Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3761-3780 of 4452 results.
Enamul Huq and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Enamul Huq and another..........................................Petitioner Vs. The State...........................Respondent Judgment February 1, 2005 Lawyers I......(Criminal) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Enamul Huq and another..........................................Petitioner Vs. The State...........................Respondent Judgment February 1, 2005 ...... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Mohirruddin Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t Judge, Lalmonirhat Sadar impleading the petitioner as pre-emptee opposite party and opposite party Nos. 2-23 as other opposite parties for preemption of the case land under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act stating, inter alia, that the pre-emptor is co-sharer in the case......ion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Mohirruddin............................................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment&nb......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Jashimuddin & other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judgment Jan...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judg......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. Judgment June 20, 2005. Cas...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; Md Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J M Sahabuddin...................Petitioner vs State……………………………..Respo......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate........Petitioner vs State and another... .........Respondents Judgment ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......ahangir, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record— For Respondent No.1. Abdus Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record —For R......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....r and others 41 DLR (AD) 30; Bangladesh vs Md Azizur Rahman 46 DLR (AD) 19; Sharfat Ali vs Union of India AIR 1974 SC 1631; CB Boarding and Lodging vs Mysore AIR 1970 SC 2042; Kashabananda Bharati vs State of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461; Anwar Hossain Chowdhury vs Government of Bangladesh and ors 41 DLR......Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Farida Akhter and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents......s 44 DLR (AD) 109; Smt. Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narayan AIR 1975 SC 2275; Jibendra Kishora vs Province of East Pakistan, 9 DLR (SC) 21; Jalan Trading Company vs Mill Mazdoar Sabha AIR 1967 SC 69; Sheikh Abdus Sattar vs Returning Officer and others 41 DLR (AD) 30; Bangladesh vs Md Azizur Rahman 46 DLR (......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others... ............Appellants vs State…………………………….Respon......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Kashem Vs. Amirun Nahar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 2. The predecessor of the deceased pre-emptor Amirun Nahar instituted Miscellaneous Case No. 193 of 1972 before the learned Munsif (now Assistant Judge) Lakshmipur under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act against the petitioner for preempting the case land sold in favou......ivision (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Kashem............................Petitioner Vs. Amirun Nahar and others.................Respondents Judgment March 5,...... view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 86. ...... view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 86. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
State Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Read the High Court Division Judgment here. Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur R...... (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Re......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 184
Ali Akbar (Md) Vs. Shajirannessa Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Election Commission Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....last for all time to come and not to be scrapped by any means including amendment of the Constitution." 83. Thereafter, he submits that the fundamental principles of the State are required to be followed and basic rights of the citizens cannot be denied to them as ens......hul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Election Commission......................Appellant [In both the Appeals] Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others.........Respondents [In CA No. 54 of 2006]......on, as above, in the findings and observations/ directives given by the High Court Division in the impugned judgment and order. The parties will bear their respective costs. Ed. ......on, as above, in the findings and observations/ directives given by the High Court Division in the impugned judgment and order. The parties will bear their respective costs. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Aynul Sheikh and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Aynul Sheikh and others........Petitioners vs State.................................Respondents Judgement July 19, 2005. La......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
AKM Shamsuddin alias Kalam Doctor and other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J AKM Shamsuddin alias Kalam Doctor and other......Petitioners vs State.................................Respondent Judgment June 22nd, 2005. Lawy......ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ......ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ......ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Paper Converting & Packaging Ltd. Vs. Govt. of the People’s Repub of BD and ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... been accrued to the plaintiff-petitioner in respect of the same for any declaration or any permanent injunction as sought for in the instant suit. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......esent: KM Hasan CJ Md Fazlul Karim J Md Tafazzul Islam J Paper Converting & Packaging Ltd.................. Petitioner Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others.......Respondents ......reinafter the referred to as "Company") and the Companies had its registered office at 99 Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka. Initially, the Company had three share-holders viz. Abdul Aziz, Abdus Sattar Abdus Salam and Marium Sattar, the 2 (two) sons and wife of Abdus Sattar. In November...... been accrued to the plaintiff-petitioner in respect of the same for any declaration or any permanent injunction as sought for in the instant suit. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Anwar Hossain Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
.... Tamijuddin Khan; 7 DLR (FC); 9 DLR (SC) 177, 178; 18 DLR (SC) 69; 32 DLR (AD) 233 Bangladesh vs. Hazi Abdul Gani; 17 DLR (SC) 384 Shamsuddin vs. Capt.Gauhar 1 Ayub; 35 DLR 362 Md. Mustafa Mandal Vs. State; 41 DLR 395 Nurul Huda vs. Baharuddin; 26 DLR (SC) 17; 34 DLR (AD) 110 Al Sayar Nav vs. Delia ...... (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Anwar Hossain Chowdhury.................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1988) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry o...... Cases Referred To- 34 DLR 225; 37 DLR 7; 20 DLR (SC) 322; 7 DLR 552 Eklas vs. Crown; 17 DLR (SC) 74 National Bank of Pakistan vs. Ataul Hoque; 25 DLR 236, 344 A. T. Mridha's case; 38 DLR (AD) 38 Abdus Sattar vs. Stole; 7 DLR (FC) 291 Federation of Pak vs. Tamijuddin Khan; 7 DLR (FC); 9 DLR (SC)......Petition No. 3 of 1989 is disposed of in terms of this Order. 6. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1989) BLD (Special Issue) 1, 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 165. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 1934
Mizazul Islam @ Dablu Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....reme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M H Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mizazul Islam @ Dablu.......Appellant Vs. The State......................... Respondents Judgment January 22, 1989. Result: The appe......here Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M H Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mizazul Islam @ Dablu.......Appellant Vs. The State......................... Respondents Judgment January 22, 1989. Result: ...... High Court Division is set aside. Conviction and sentence of accused Mizazul Islam @ Dablu is set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 157...... High Court Division is set aside. Conviction and sentence of accused Mizazul Islam @ Dablu is set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 157..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Abul Kashem and others Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....ellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Abul Kashem and others............. Appellants Vs. The State……………………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1989 The Pe......urt Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Abul Kashem and others............. Appellants Vs. The State……………………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 198......nce is set aside. They are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 152......nce is set aside. They are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 152..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Mohammad Musa Vs. Kabir Ahmed & anothers, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
...., instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record, — For the Appellant. B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney-General instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record — For Respondent No. 2 (State). M.A. Wahhab Miah, Advocate, instructed by Md. Altab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record — For R......ourt Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Mohammad Musa..........................Appellant. Vs. Kabir Ahmed & anothers.................Respondents Judgment January 25, 1989. The P......lly proved. It was accepted by all the three Courts below. We find no reason to interfere in the matter. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 151 ......lly proved. It was accepted by all the three Courts below. We find no reason to interfere in the matter. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 151 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
19321931192219151912190919081907190519041903190219001898189718961895189418921891