Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) and another Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....a copy of this judgment be communicated at once. Sheikh Abdul Awal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 194; 15 MLR (HCD) (2010) 145; 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 194. ......a copy of this judgment be communicated at once. Sheikh Abdul Awal J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 194; 15 MLR (HCD) (2010) 145; 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 194. ......tion-Shibalaya, District-Manikganj detained in the condemned cell of Dhaka Central Jail on conviction in Nario-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Case No.75 of 1999 by Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Manikganj purportedly under section 6(2) of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan (Bishesh Bidhan) Ain,...... MLR (HCD) (2010) 145; 30 BLD (HCD) (2010) 194. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Ershad Ali Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....n of the District Magistrate, Chandpur. The learned tribunal will however be at liberty to cancel bail if there is any misuse of the same. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 544.......June 4, 2000. Cases Referred To- Ocean Industries Ltd. Vs. Industrial Development Bank 18 DLR (SC) 354 and PLD 1966 (SC) 938; Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others, 39 DLR (AD) 59. Lawyers Involved: Umme Kulsum Rekha, Advocate—For......n of the District Magistrate, Chandpur. The learned tribunal will however be at liberty to cancel bail if there is any misuse of the same. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 544.......Ali…..………….Appellants Vs. State……………Respondent Judgment June 4, 2000. Cases Referred To- Ocean Industries Ltd. Vs. Industrial Development Bank 18 DLR (SC) 354 and PLD 1966 (SC) 938; Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangsth..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Habib Bank Ltd. Vs. Eastern Bank Limited and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....before the trial Court and the trial Court accepted the same. Now the question arises as to whether Bank Guarantee can be furnished before filing this appeal within the meaning of Section 7(2) (A) of Artha Rin Adalat Act. It requires interpretation of the aforesaid provision of law which has got, in...... the trial Court and the trial Court accepted the same. Now the question arises as to whether Bank Guarantee can be furnished before filing this appeal within the meaning of Section 7(2) (A) of Artha Rin Adalat Act. It requires interpretation of the aforesaid provision of law which has got, in our o...... trial Court and the trial Court accepted the same. Now the question arises as to whether Bank Guarantee can be furnished before filing this appeal within the meaning of Section 7(2) (A) of Artha Rin Adalat Act. It requires interpretation of the aforesaid provision of law which has got, in our opini......537...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Asaduzzaman (Md.) Vs. Md. Salamatullah & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....quashed. In the result, both the Rules are made absolute. The proceedings of CR Case No.555 of 1996 and CR Case No.65 of 1996 are quashed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 530.......quashed. In the result, both the Rules are made absolute. The proceedings of CR Case No.555 of 1996 and CR Case No.65 of 1996 are quashed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 530.......Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- By these two Rules, opposite parties were directed to show cause as to why the proceedings of CR Case No.555 of 1996 and CR Case No.65 of 1996 pending in the Nalishi Adalat ‘Ka’ Anchal, Satkhira should not be quashed. 2. As the facts and question of law invol......laneous Case No.767 of 1997 with 145 of 1997. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J.- By these two Rules, opposite parties were directed to show cause as to why the proceedings of CR Case No.555 of 1996 and CR Case No.65 of 1996 pending in the Nalishi Adalat ‘Ka’ Anchal, Satkhira should not be quas..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Agrani Bank Vs. W Rahman Jute Mills Ltd. and ors., 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....ury J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1, 20 (ka) to 20 (cha), 27 (ka) to 27 (Gha) and 31 to show cause why order date 7-10-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, and Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka in Money Execution Case No. 44 of 1997 should not be set aside. 2. T...... - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1, 20 (ka) to 20 (cha), 27 (ka) to 27 (Gha) and 31 to show cause why order date 7-10-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, and Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka in Money Execution Case No. 44 of 1997 should not be set aside. 2. The sho......his Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1, 20 (ka) to 20 (cha), 27 (ka) to 27 (Gha) and 31 to show cause why order date 7-10-97 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, and Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka in Money Execution Case No. 44 of 1997 should not be set aside. 2. The short f...... 51 DLR (1999) 235. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Manager, Bangladseh Krishi Bank and others Vs. Al-Haj Md. Nurul Islam & another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... letter etc, and against mortgagee deed subsequently registered in favour of the Bank but in gross violation of those conditions the company did not pay the instalments and compelled the Bank to file Artha Rin Adalat Case No.1 of 1991 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Munshiganj for the decree of T......r etc, and against mortgagee deed subsequently registered in favour of the Bank but in gross violation of those conditions the company did not pay the instalments and compelled the Bank to file Artha Rin Adalat Case No.1 of 1991 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Munshiganj for the decree of Taka 1,......c, and against mortgagee deed subsequently registered in favour of the Bank but in gross violation of those conditions the company did not pay the instalments and compelled the Bank to file Artha Rin Adalat Case No.1 of 1991 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Munshiganj for the decree of Taka 1,71,6...... also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 434. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Aziz Pipes Limited, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ll realization of the decreetal amount if it is not paid within a period of 90 days from date. The parties are to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ......Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ......ll realization of the decreetal amount if it is not paid within a period of 90 days from date. The parties are to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ...... Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS)...........Respondent (In Civil Appeal No. 151 of 2001) Judgment August 11, 2003. Result: The Civil Appeal No. 95 of 2001 is dismissed and Civil Appeal No. 151 of 2001 is allowed in part. Lawyers Involved: A. K. M. Nazrul Islam,..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 126
State Vs. Moyezuddin Sikder and Others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....rected to take steps for disposal of the application in the light of our findings as above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 82; 28 BLD (AD) (2008) 138; V ADC (2008) 796. ......rected to take steps for disposal of the application in the light of our findings as above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 82; 28 BLD (AD) (2008) 138; V ADC (2008) 796. ...... Vs. Moyezuddin Sikder and Others…………Respondent Judgment April 23, 2008. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Emergency Power Rules, 2007, Rule 19(gha) The expression Adalat or Tribunal in rule 19(gha) refer to all Courts including the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. Th......J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J The State……………………………………………Appellant Vs. Moyezuddin Sikder and Others…………Respondent Judgment April 23, 2008. Result: The appeal is allow..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Sultan Mia (Md.) Vs. Hazi Md. Yusuf, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....te Party. Civil Revision No. 3254 of 2000. Judgment SK Sinha J.- Petitioner is the decree-holder who obtained this Rule against the order dated 11-6-2000 of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.31 of 1997 directing him to make over posses......ty. Civil Revision No. 3254 of 2000. Judgment SK Sinha J.- Petitioner is the decree-holder who obtained this Rule against the order dated 11-6-2000 of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.31 of 1997 directing him to make over possession o...... Civil Revision No. 3254 of 2000. Judgment SK Sinha J.- Petitioner is the decree-holder who obtained this Rule against the order dated 11-6-2000 of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.31 of 1997 directing him to make over possession of sc......uf ………………Opposite Party. Judgment August 16, 2001. Lawyers Involved: KS Salahuddin Ahmed, Advocate—For the Petitioner. M Enayetur Rahman with Shahidul Islam, Md. Alamgir and Jail Gazi, Advocates—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 3254 of 2000. Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Abdur Razzaque Mollah Vs. Md. Qayum Mollah & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....lding Finance Corporation defendant No.3 against loan of Taka 2,00,000 for construction of residential house in the suit land and the said defendant No.3 having obtained decree for the said amount in Artha Rin Suit No.5 of 1991 against the defendant No.1, the instant suit for specific performance fo......Finance Corporation defendant No.3 against loan of Taka 2,00,000 for construction of residential house in the suit land and the said defendant No.3 having obtained decree for the said amount in Artha Rin Suit No.5 of 1991 against the defendant No.1, the instant suit for specific performance for the ......n against loan case No.Bag-8 of 1985 for loan of Taka 2,00,000.00 for constructing house on the suit land within the knowledge of the plaintiff and the Mortgagee having obtained a decree in Artha Rin Adalat Suit No.5 of 1991 in the Court of Sub-Judge cum Artha Rin Adalat, Bagerhat the instant suit f......………Appellant Vs. Md. Qayum Mollah & others……...Opposite Parties. Judgment August 14, 2001. Cases Referred To- 43 DLR (AD) 78; 43 DLR (AD) 125; AIR 1975 All 341; Ram Chand Appellant Vs. Rain Swamp Respondent AIR 1952 Allahabad 654; Jalaluddin Mia Vs. Md. Yunus 1982 BC..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Sabed Ali Howlader and Others Vs. Abdul Barek and other, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....M Ruhul Amin J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1 and 10 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated l2-4-94 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal in Title Appeal No.70 of 1992 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judg......l Amin J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1 and 10 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated l2-4-94 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal in Title Appeal No.70 of 1992 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment a......in J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1 and 10 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated l2-4-94 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal in Title Appeal No.70 of 1992 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and d...... possible preferably within 3 months. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 204...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Sohail Thakur and others Vs. State, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....rar is directed to send copy of this judgment to the Sessions Judges for their future guidance and compliance with the directions made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 199.......rar is directed to send copy of this judgment to the Sessions Judges for their future guidance and compliance with the directions made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 199.......forth shall see that as soon as the record of the case is received from the Court of the Magistrate in a case triable by the Court of Sessions including the special Judge, Special Tribunal of Bishesh Adalat and the accused is either produced or appears then the prayer for bail of the accused, if any......ons made above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 199...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Osena Begum alias Babuler Ma and another Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....r case. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the learned Additional Sessions Judge for his guidance. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 299. ......r case. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the learned Additional Sessions Judge for his guidance. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 299. ......000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Reference was made under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 2 and Nari‑O‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman Adalat at Brahmanbaria by its judgment and order dated 12Â-10‑2000 passed in Nari‑O‑Shisu Nir......so Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 299. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Vs. Md. Abdul Hoque, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ction 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure a Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 4‑2‑2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and Sub Judge, Jessore in Money Execution Case No. 88 of 1996 should not be set asi......115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure a Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 4‑2‑2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and Sub Judge, Jessore in Money Execution Case No. 88 of 1996 should not be set aside and......1) of the Code of Civil Procedure a Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 4‑2‑2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and Sub Judge, Jessore in Money Execution Case No. 88 of 1996 should not be set aside and/or ..........................Petition Vs. Md. Abdul Hoque ...........................Opposite party Judgment December 1, 2002. Case Referred To- Hridoy Mohan Sanyal Vs. Khagendra Nath Sanyal and others, 34 CWN 213. Lawyers Involved: Shaheed Alam, Advocate‑For the Petitioner. Not ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
State Vs. Billal Hossain Gazi, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....ourt and the trial Court shall be at liberty to decide the case independently on the basis of the evidence to be available with the record. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 355. ......ourt and the trial Court shall be at liberty to decide the case independently on the basis of the evidence to be available with the record. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 355. ......eneral-For the State. Md. Abdul Haque, Advocate-State Defence Lawyer for the Respondent. Death Reference No. 33 of 2001. Judgment SK Sinha J.- The Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Chandpur sentenced the condemned prisoner Billal Hossain Gazi to death by judgment and order...... Vs. Billal Hossain Gazi ……………..Respondent Judgment April 13, 2004. Lawyers involved: Nikilesh Dutto, Deputy, Attorney-General with Md. Baset, Assistant Attorney-General and Fara Mahmuda Assistant Attorney-General-For the State. Md. Abdul Haque, Advocate-State Defenc..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Masud Mia (Md.) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Masud Mia be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Send down the lower Court's records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 352. ...... Md. Masud Mia be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in connection with any other case. Send down the lower Court's records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 352. ...... Criminal Appeal No. 1371 of 1999. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 3‑6‑1999 passed by the Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Gaibandha in Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Case No. 51 of 1998 convicting accused-appellant Md....... Masud Mia (Md.) ……………………Appellant Vs. State ………………………………………Respondent Judgment December 7, 2003. Case Referred To- Md. Abdul Khaleque and others Vs. State, 12 DLR (SC) 165. Lawyers involved: AFM Mesbahuddin with Khandaker Diliru..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Harun‑or‑Rashid Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....f the prayer for bail of accused-appellant Harun be accordingly upheld. Copy be sent at once for information and guidance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 318. ......f the prayer for bail of accused-appellant Harun be accordingly upheld. Copy be sent at once for information and guidance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 318. ......heet was submitted against accused Harun as sole accused under sections 7/9(1) of the Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000. 3. Subsequently, record was sent to Nari‑oÂ-Shishu Tribunal Adalat, Rajshahi wherein it was registered as Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Case No. 639 of 2002. ......ddin to the effect when his daughter Shewly Khatun, aged 14 years, went to bamboo bush to make the goat drink water when accused Harun came, took her to a nearby sugarcane field by pressing her mouth and raped her against her will. Upon such information above PS case was started under section 9(1) o..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Ali Akbar (Md) and others Vs. Sakina Begum and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....iscellaneous Appeal No. 28 of 2002. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This appeal was presented by defendant Nos. 1 to 4 against an order dated 15Â-1‑2002 of Joint District Judge (in-Charge) and Artha Rin Adalat No.2 in Dhaka in Title Suit No. 95 of 1997, appointing a receiver of the suit prope......aneous Appeal No. 28 of 2002. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This appeal was presented by defendant Nos. 1 to 4 against an order dated 15Â-1‑2002 of Joint District Judge (in-Charge) and Artha Rin Adalat No.2 in Dhaka in Title Suit No. 95 of 1997, appointing a receiver of the suit property. ......us Appeal No. 28 of 2002. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This appeal was presented by defendant Nos. 1 to 4 against an order dated 15Â-1‑2002 of Joint District Judge (in-Charge) and Artha Rin Adalat No.2 in Dhaka in Title Suit No. 95 of 1997, appointing a receiver of the suit property. 2....... This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 303. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Shibu Pada Acharjee Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....neral of Police, Police Head Quarter, Dhaka IV. Superintendent of Police, Comilla. Lower Court's Record be sent down immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 285.......neral of Police, Police Head Quarter, Dhaka IV. Superintendent of Police, Comilla. Lower Court's Record be sent down immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 285.......‘Informant. 44. In Asiman Begum Vs. State, represented by Deputy Commissioner, 51 DLR (AD) 18 the accused‑appellant along with 6 others was put on trial before Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan Bishesh Adalat, Patuakhali to answer a charge under section 10 (1) of the Nari‑o‑Shishu Nirjatan (Bishes......R (AD) 18; State Vs. Abul Kalam, 5 BLC 230; Kellehar Vs. The Crown (1974) 131 CLR 534; Krishan Lal Vs. State of Haryana, AIR 1980 SC 1252; State of HP Vs. Raghubir Singh (1993) 2 SCC 622; Nurul Islam and others Vs. State, 43 DLR (AD) 6 and Masum and others Vs. State, 49 DLR 349. Lawyers Involved:..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Shahid Malongi (Md) and another Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....lined to grant bail to the appellant. In the result the appeal is dismissed. The order of the court below is upheld. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004)279. ......lined to grant bail to the appellant. In the result the appeal is dismissed. The order of the court below is upheld. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004)279. ......Criminal Appeal No. 4298 of 2003. Judgment Khademul Islam Chowdhury J.- This appeal is directed against order dated 13‑9‑2003 passed by the Nari‑o‑Shishu NiKiatan Daman Bishesh Adalat rejecting the application for bail of the accused appellant in Nirjatan‑o‑Shishu Case No.......004)279. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43