Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Afzalul Haque (Md.) and others Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....landlord petitioners. Send down the lower Court's record with a copy of the Judgment and order to the Court concerned. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 13 BLC (HCD) (2008) 185. ......roperty Act. The defendant further stated in his written statement that the security money is still lying with the plaintiffs which has now become Taka 40,000 to 50,000 after the addition of the interest and which was not adjusted from the rent and the defendant regularly sent the rent by money..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 4 May, 2005 | Hits: 25
Category: Property Law | Date: 3 May, 2005 | Hits: 3
M Moinul Khan Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ection (1 Kha) of section 27 of the aforesaid Ain, 2000. Communicate a copy of the judgment and the order expeditiously to the Court below. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 253. ......20 as amended by Act No. 30 of 2003 provides that for safe custody of a woman or child, while passing an order, the Tribunal would receive and consider his/her opinion keeping in view the welfare and interest of the woman or child concerned. Section 25 of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 p..Category: Women and Children | Date: 3 May, 2005 | Hits: 98
Anowar Hossain (Md.) and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ejected without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 512. ......oner failed to furnish the required information to RAJUK, as to the approval of the plan of the building constructed at holding Nos.105 and 106 BCC Road. It has been contended that the applicants are interested parties, inasmuch as their easement rights as to air and light are being affected because..Category: Civil Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2005 | Hits: 4
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ali Akbar Ansari, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....stances, we find no substance in the submissions of learned Additional Attorney General. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 841. ......avour of the respondent after disposal of the writ petitions, review petitions and civil petitions for leave to appeal. The same is the position of tenants/lessees in the disputed properties as their interest is derived from the Government and the general observation of the High Court Division in th..Category: Property Law | Date: 9 Apr, 2005 | Hits: 93
Ismail Hussain Posshari & anr Vs. District Land Acquisition Officer, Bogra & ors., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....eing barred by limitation. In view of the opinion expressed hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Whether period of limitation for filing an arbitration case can be extended.- When the compensation assessment was made and notice thereof was served appellants were not the interested persons, as such, arbitration case filed by them after the expiry of the period of limita..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 64
Bangladesh rep. by Sec., Ministry of Works Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the argument advanced by Mr. B Hossain and accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is affirmed. Ed. ......ingly, the property has been rightly declared as abandoned property. The trial Court held that the plaintiff did not file the suit as the holder of power of attorney to establish the right, title and interest of the grantor of the power of attorney and hence the suit is not maintainable, that it is ..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 101
Category: Constitutional Law, Contempt of Court Law | Date: 21 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 7
Anil Chandra Paul Vs. Commissioner of Taxes, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....raised herein are required to be answered at this moment. With the above observations this reference application is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 756. ......4,75,536 (Taka one crore thirty-four lac seventy-five thousand five hundred and thirty-six) and thereupon Taka 5,05,532 (Taka five lac five thousand five hundred and thirty-two) was charged as simple interest and accordingly, demand a total sum of Taka 1,39,81,058 (Taka one crore thirty-nine lac eig..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: 19 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 4
Star Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Chairman Labour Court, Khulna and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......ioner company simply terminated from service under section 19(1) of the said Act with all monetary termination benefits as admissible thereunder without assigning any reason or blame or stigma in the interest of the enterprise, which plays a very important role in the national economy, without consi..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 12 Mar, 2005 | Hits: 110
M/s. Shanker Kumar Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh and 6 others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....e date of receipt of the copy of this judgment. 17. In the result, this Rule is made absolute but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 27 BLD (HCD) (2007) 185. ......s such, the petitioner's contention in respect of project No.26 for Tk. 10,00,000/- is not correct and denied. It is further stated in the affidavit-in-opposition that the petitioner cannot claim any interest over the fund allotted for the financial year 2002-2003 since by the Memo No.8.6.2002 the r..Category: Civil Law | Date: 23 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 31
Category: Company Law | Date: 22 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 364
Siraj Miah Vs. Mohammad Miah and others, 2005, CLC (HCD)
....t No.91 of 1977 renumbered as Title Suit No.52 of 1986 is hereby upheld. Send down the Lower Courts records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 356. ......of title, stating, inter alia, that the defendant No.1 sold out 60 decimals of land to him on 25‑12‑1972 under a registered suf kabala in which the plaintiff had enjoyment of his right, title and interest. The defendant No.3 gave him possession in Plot No.1701 for 50 decimals and another 10 deci..Category: Property Law | Date: 7 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 2
Chairman, Sherpur Paurashava Vs. Md. Jahangir Hossain Chowdhury, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....-retainable khas land of the original landlord, we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......I am of the view that it is not at all necessary to search as to whether the Government has any title in the suit land or not and the papers relating to the settlement of Tazammel Huq, predecessor-in-interest of the defendants petitioners were forged or not." 8. No issue was su..Category: Property Law | Date: 1 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 118
Mustaque Hossain (Md). Vs. Md. Shajahan Miah and another, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... attributed for acceptance of the salami to render the tenant non‑ejectable in accordance with law. The petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 105. ...... of salami makes a monthly tenant non-ejectable? The widespread and longstanding practice of voluntary payment of salami in the commercial world did not make the tenant a non-ejectable one and no interest other than tenancy right recognised by law could be created on payment of salami so as to p..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 1 Feb, 2005 | Hits: 120
SMAH Ltd SMAH Ltd Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....time of issuance of this Rule is hereby recalled and vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 267. ......ease and restoration of possession of the land to the original owner, the same was included in the list of enemy property in the Tejgaon Police Station VP Case No.566 of 1969 at the behest of certain interested quarters. For proper utilization and management including power to sell off the land, Mrs..Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 7
Lal Miah (Hajee) Vs. Nurul Amin and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....est money of Taka 15,000 paid to the defendant No. 1. The other part of the ordering portion of the judgment of the High Court Division is maintained. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......nest money out of the total consideration money, that defendant No. 2 purchased the land in suit from the defendant No. 1 for valuable consideration money and thereby has acquired right, title and interest in the land so purchased, that plaintiffs failed to prove their case. 6..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 5 Jan, 2005 | Hits: 147
Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....e directions herein above given. Let a copy of this judgment and order be supplied to the learned Deputy Attorney General for compliance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 BLD (HCD) (2005) 83. ......, submitted that since the respondents did not appear before this Court to answer the Rule, the allegations made against them in the writ petition cannot be resisted. He further submitted that in the interest of the health of the people of Bangladesh and for supply of iodine in proportionate ratio i..Category: Health Law | Date: 14 Dec, 2004 | Hits: 239
Biseruddin Sarder (Md) and others Vs. Md. Tofazzal Hossain Biswas and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e view that the High Court Division acted illegally in interfering with the findings and decision of the Court of appeal. The appeal is, therefore, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......t facts are that the suit land originally belonged to Saku Sarder and Hossain Sarder in equal shares and the. CS record was accordingly prepared and finally published. On the death of Saku Sarder his interest devolved upon his, son and daughters and the interest of Hossain Sarder devolved upon his t..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Dec, 2004 | Hits: 21
Fokrul Alam Chowdhury Vs. State & another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... connection with the Rule stands vacated. Send a copy of the judgment to the Senior Special Judge, Cox's Bazar, immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 727. ...... power and thereby violated the specific instructions given to him by the Head Office of the Bank. The amount of the aforesaid non-recovered loan was raised to Taka 63, 27,968.72 after calculation of interest. It is alleged that accused petitioner has sanctioned those unauthorised loans for personal..Category: Banking Law, Criminal Law | Date: 12 Dec, 2004 | Hits: 1