Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Ala Meah, being dead his heirs are Syed Ali & ors. Vs. Ali Ahmed, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
....azlul Karim, Advocate - For the respondent. Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 331 of 1968. Judgment Bimalendu Bikash Roy Chowdhury J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 17.2.67 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Chittagong in other Appeal No. 175......e sold out the property to defendant No. 2 who is now in possession thereof. Defendant No.2 supported the case of defendant No. 1 and claimed himself to be a bona fide purchaser for value without any notice of the alleged benami transaction. 4. The learned Munsif having decreed the suit with cost......Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Chittagong in other Appeal No. 175 of 1966 reversing those dated 31.3.66 passed by the learned Munsif, North Raozan in Other Suit No. 150 of 1962. 2. The suit was one for declaration that the kabala dated 12th August, 1948 standing in favour of defendant No. 1 was a ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Abdul Khalek Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1986, 15 CLC (HCD)
.... Abdus Sattar Howlader - For the appellant. Fakhrul Islam, Assistant Attorney General - For the Respondent. Second Appeal No. 855 of 1966 Appeal preferred against the Judgement and decree dated 18.2.1965 and 27.2.65 passed by Additional District Judge 3rd Court Barisal in Title Appeal No......d was not final and concluded one and the kabuliyat executed was not accepted or approved by the appropriate authority. It was also contended that the suit was not maintainable, bad for want of valid notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the suit was barred under Section 42 of t......l in title Appeal No. 89 of 1964 reversing those of dated 21.1.64 passed by the learned subordinate judge, 1st Court, Barisal in Title Suit No.7 of 1963. 2. The plaintiff appellant instituted the aforesaid suit for declaration of title in 5 acres of land described in schedule "A" to the plaint an..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Iftekhar Ahmed Majumder Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
.... prayer to remand them to custody till the receipt of the detention order. Thereafter the District Magistrate, Comilla, namely, the opposite party No. 3 Put the detenu under detention by his order dated 26.1.87 for a period of 30 days. On the same date the grounds of detention were served upon th...... copy of this order be communicated to the District Magistrate, Comilla and Superintendent of Comilla Jail. Syed Fazle Ahmed J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (1988) 18....... a cultivator and an honest and innocent person living on cultivation. On 24.1.87 the Kotwali Police arrested the detenu along with 9 others under section 54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and was forwarded to the court of Magistrate with a prayer to remand them to custody till the receipt of the..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Chowdhury Saifuddin Ahmed Vs. Shamsuddin & Ors., 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....nan with Zakir Ahmed - for the respondents. Appeal from Original Order No. 171 of 1984. Judgment Mustafa kamal J. - This first miscellaneous appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.4.84 passed by Mr. Ali Ashraf Khan Lodi, Subordinate Judge, 1st Court, Dhaka in Miscellaneo......eal is dismissed, but in the facts and circumstances of the case we make no order as to costs. Mohammad Ismail Uddin Sarker J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (1988) 10. ......t August 17, 1987. Result: The appeal is dismissed. Case Referred to- Firm Kaura Mal Vs. Firm Mathra Dass, AIR 1959 (Punjab) 646. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed - for the appellant. Fakir Abdul Mannan with Zakir Ahmed - for the respondents. Appeal from Orig..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 101
KDH Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Pubali Bank and Ors., 1987, 16 CLC (HCD)
....dvocates - For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 87 of 1985. Judgment Mustafa Kamal J. - This Rule obtained under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is directed against an order dated 9.4.84 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka accepting the written stateme......frain from interfering in the matter. In the result, the rule is discharged, but without any order as to costs. AKM SADEQ J. - I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (1988) 1. ...... by the learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka accepting the written statement filed by the defendant-opposite parties in Money Suit No. 126 of 1982. 2. The petitioner as plaintiff filed the aforesaid suit on 16.4.82 for recovery of TK. 1,50,00,000/- being the market value of the plaintiffs ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Habib Bank Limited Vs. UAE Bangladesh Investment Company Limited and another, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....5 of 1996. Judgment Mahmudul Amin Choudhury J.- This appeal is directed against judgment and decree passed by Artha Rin Adalat No. 2. Dhaka in Money Suit No. 34 of 1992. The Adalat by judgment dated 29-8-1996 decreed the suit for a sum of Taka 14, 05, 75,934.28 paisa with interest. 2. The ......ransfer of the amount but that was not done. It was explained by defendant No.3 that the amount does not belong to defendant No.1 rather it belongs to their client. Defendant No.1 also brought to the notice of defendant No.3 of the decision given by Bangladesh Bank in the matter. It is the case of p......ul Amin Choudhury J.- This appeal is directed against judgment and decree passed by Artha Rin Adalat No. 2. Dhaka in Money Suit No. 34 of 1992. The Adalat by judgment dated 29-8-1996 decreed the suit for a sum of Taka 14, 05, 75,934.28 paisa with interest. 2. The short fact leading to this appeal..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 136
Ataur Rahman Khan Vs. Md. Nasim and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... is the newspaper cutting of the daily English The Independent and Annexure-A(2) is the newspaper cutting of the daily Bengali newspaper ‘The Ittefaq’. 30. The daily English newspaper the Star dated 7-9-1999 contained the statements of Mr. Nasim in the following manner: “Home Minister Mo......application not on any political motivation, but as a citizen of this country and as a Member of the Supreme Court Bar Association. He feels that it is his duty to bring the alleged statements to the notice of the High Court Division for taking appropriate legal action as Mr. Moudud Ahmed thinks tha......or the Government. Contempt Petition Case No. 57 of 1999. Judgment Md. Mozammel Hoque J. - This is an under Article 108 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh praying for drawing up a proceeding for committing contempt of Court against Mr. Mohammad Nasim, a Member of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) Vs. Bangladesh and Others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....im J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the detenu Md. Zaved now being detained in Dhaka Central jail, Dhaka vide Memo No. Miscellaneous Case No. 1586 of 1998 dated 22-12-98 (Annexure-B to the petition) issued under the signature of respondent No.2 should not...... Court on 22-2-99 were made for the purpose of the Rule and are strongly denied by the respondents. After the filing of the writ petition the Commissioner, Dhaka Metropolitan Police gave a show cause notice on 3-2-99 to the respondent No.4 regarding the allegations under Police Officers (Special Pro......tained in Dhaka Central jail, Dhaka vide Memo No. Miscellaneous Case No. 1586 of 1998 dated 22-12-98 (Annexure-B to the petition) issued under the signature of respondent No.2 should not be brought before this Court so that it may satisfy itself that the detenu is not being held in custody without a..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....e prisoners and other 155 ‘under trial’ prisoners held in Dhaka Central Jail for periods over 360 days and to submit the report of the result of the review to this court within 4(four) weeks from date and furnish a list of such ‘under trial’ prisoners in the Dhaka Central Jail and other Jail......is judgment be communicated (1) to the Office of the Attorney-General and (2) the Secretary, Prime Minister’s Office for necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005), 11.......n the respondents to show cause as to why they should not be directed to conduct an immediate review of the cases of the prisoners and other 155 ‘under trial’ prisoners held in Dhaka Central Jail for periods over 360 days and to submit the report of the result of the review to this court within ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Sudhangshu Shekhar Haldar Vs. Moulana Delwar Hossain Saydee and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....rojpur-1, took place on the day of the general election to Parliament on 12-6-1996 and in the said election both appellant Sudhangshu Shekhar Haldar and the respondent took part along with other candidates Respondent No.1 having been declared appellant Mr. Sudhangshu Shekhar Haldar filed an election......ion only. Mr. Abdur Razzaque, learned Advocate, prays for adjournment of ten days for hearing of the appeals. The prayer is allowed. Ed. This case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (200) 58. ...... Respondents. FMA No. 144 of 1997. Judgment Md. Abdul Karim J. - This application on behalf of respondent No.1 Moulana Delwar Hossain Saydee in First Miscellaneous Appeal No.144 of 1997 is for an order dismissing the appeal on the preliminary point of maintainability. 2. The facts of t..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Satya Narayan Poddar Vs. State, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....heque number was incorrectly typed and, as such, the complainant met the accused petitioner and then the accused petitioner asked the complainant to deposit the cheque afresh on 30-7-2000 but on that date also the cheque was dishonored when it was presented for encashment. Then the plaintiff served ......n the instant case, a cheque was issued by the accused petitioner in favour of the complainant opposite party. The cheque was presented for encashment on 11-7-2000 but it was dishonored. Then a legal notice was served on 17-7-2000 which was received on 20-7-2000 but the accused petitioner gave no re......No.299 of 2000/167 of 2000 now pending in the Court of Magistrate, 1St Class, Narayanganj should not be quashed. 2. In this Rule only question raised is whether filing of a petition of complaint before the cause of action arose can be a ground for quashing the proceeding. In the instant case, a c..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Bashir Ahmed and others Vs. Ayub Ali Mollah, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
.... Chowdhury J. - This Rule at the instance of the plaintiff-petitioner arises out of an application under section 25 of the Small Causes Court Act, 1887 and is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26-11-1996 passed by the 4th Court of Assistant Judge and SCC Judge, Dhaka in SCC Suit No. 03 ...... that the defendant is defaulter in respect of payment of rent who stopped payment of rent from December, 1992 and the plaintiff was also in bona fide requirement of the suit premises and, as such, a notice under section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act has been served upon the defendant terminat......d decree dated 26-11-1996 passed by the 4th Court of Assistant Judge and SCC Judge, Dhaka in SCC Suit No. 03 of 1994 dismissing the suit. 2. Petitioner as plaintiff instituted the suit in question for ejectment of the defendant-opposite party, a monthly tenant, stating, inter alia, that the suit ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 148
Jebun Nessa Zaman and Others Vs. Hosne Ara Lili, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....sion No. 3630 of 1998. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by defendants upon making an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment and decree dated 14-07-98 passed by Assistant Judge, 5th Court at Dhaka in Title Suit No.127 of 1997 decreeing ......e plaintiff left the bill of Taka 30,000 of WASA, Taka 46,000 on account of Gas unpaid. Bill of Taka 10,000 on account of electricity also remained unpaid. The plaintiff left the premises without any notice or intimation to the landlord. In the circumstances, the suit for recovery of possession of t......n application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment and decree dated 14-07-98 passed by Assistant Judge, 5th Court at Dhaka in Title Suit No.127 of 1997 decreeing the suit for possession. 2. Opposite party as plaintiff instituted the suit under section 9 of the Specifi..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Amzad Hossain Vs. State and another, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ucted by Syed M Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 2. Not Represented—Respondent No. 1. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.159 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 3-3-2009 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.5373 of 2009). ......e of the Metropolitan Additional Sessions Judge for disposal shall remain unaffected. Accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 62 DLR (AD) (2010) 288. ......n-Record- For the Petitioner. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate, instructed by Syed M Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 2. Not Represented—Respondent No. 1. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No.159 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 3-3-2009 passed by the Hig..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
BLAST Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....Gudaraghat section 15 Ward No. (old) 4 (New 95) PS Kafrul, District Dhaka, without due process of law should not be declared illegal and without lawful authority being contrary to right to life as mandated by Article 32 of the Constitution. 2. Short facts leading to this Rule are that the petitio......he Ministry of Land and North South Property Development Limited (NSPDL) but the said scheme/project was subsequently stopped. One land grabber is trying to grab this land. They have already hanged a notice board titled Chandpur Shomity (Abul Kashem and others) and they are threatening the people to......slam, Advocate-For Respondent No. 12. Writ Petition No. 5915 of 2005 Judgment SM Ziaul Karim J.- This Rule Nisi was issued, calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why threatening for eviction of the petitioner Nos. 2-5 and thousand other slum dwellers from their peaceful possess..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 171
State Vs. Chief Editor, Manabjamin and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)_Part Two
.... India and another, (1988) 3 SCC 255, the following statements were made: The working of the judges are cocktail based on Western Common Laws and American techniques, as such unproductive and outdated according to socio-economic conditions of the country . ........................ 182. Thi....... 175. Before we dispose of the case of Justice Naimuddin Ahmed, it is pertinent to mention that during the course of argument the learned Attorney General submitted that since only a show cause notice has been issued to him and if we are not satisfied with his reply and intend to proceed aga......e did, she did independently of her husband as printer and publisher of 'Manabjamin'. It is now well settled that Editor, Printer and Publisher of a newspaper must accept the fullest responsibility for everything that is published in the newspaper. So, she is also equally guilty of contempt of C..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 130
National Sports Council Vs. A Latif and Company, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....Revision No. 785 of 1999. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by the employer by making a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order dated 19-11-1998 passed by Subordinate Judge 5th Court, Dhaka in Arbitration Miscellaneous Case No. ......fered loss to the tune of more than one crore. He addressed several letters to the employer requesting for arbitration as per terms of Clause 50 of the contract. Getting no response, he then served a notice dated 08-02-1998 under section 8(1) of the Act upon the employer requesting them for appointm......de of Civil Procedure against an order dated 19-11-1998 passed by Subordinate Judge 5th Court, Dhaka in Arbitration Miscellaneous Case No. 16 of 1998 by which an arbitrator was appointed by the Court for each of the parties. 2. Opposite party, the contractor, made an application under section 8(2..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 186
Resource International Vs. MV Sargodha and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....er of rice and other goods. The defendants Nos.1-3 are the carriers of various goods including rice. Their local agent is defendant No.4, Karnaphuli Shipping Corporation. By the bill of lading No. 47 dated 30-3-95, issued by ‘MV Sargodha’ the defendant Nos.1-3 contracted to carry 296.910 tons of......endant No.1 discharged their contractual obligations by delivering goods to the plaintiff at Chittagong Port against the original bill of lading. The plaintiff took the containers without serving any notice to the carrier for the survey of the ship within the stipulated period from its discharge whi......h with SK Siddique, Md. Al Amin Sarker Advocates—For the Defendants. Admiralty Suit No. 11 of 1995. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- The plaintiff has brought the suit claiming Taka 25,22,897.91 for damages and late delivery of cargo. Initially, the plaintiff laid the claim for Taka 45,00,962.0..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 214
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Narayan Chandra Saha and another Vs. Jatindra Chandra Saha and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....tioners. M Shamsul Alam, Advocate—For the Opposite Party Nos. 1-2. Civil Revision No. 2252 of 1998. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - This Rule was obtained by the plaintiff against order dated 14-05-98 passed by the Subordinate Judge, First Court, Brahmanbaria in Title Appeal No. 21 of ......forma defendants No. 6 and 7 in suit. 2. The suit being Title Suit No.22 of 1982 was instituted in the court of 2nd Munsif at Brahmanbaria by the petitioner as plaintiff for a declaration that the notice dated 06-02-82 issued by the vested property authorities asking him to surrender the possessi...... against order dated 14-05-98 passed by the Subordinate Judge, First Court, Brahmanbaria in Title Appeal No. 21 of 1985. By the impugned order the Appellate Court accepted the written statement filed for the first time in the appeal by the opposite parties No.1 and 2 who were originally impleaded as..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 66