Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
M/S. Zaman and Co. Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....os. 1 and 3. Ex-parte.—Respondent Nos. 2 and 4-6. Civil Appeal No. 91 of 1984. (From the judgment and order dated 14th November, 1983 passed by the High Courts Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 248 of 1983). Judgment &nb......ate Division (Civil) Present: F.K.M A. Munim J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal. J M/S. Zaman and Co. represented by its Proprietor N. Zaman…………....Appellant ......ry J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal. J M/S. Zaman and Co. represented by its Proprietor N. Zaman…………....Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors………...Respo......cation for review is dismissed for, hit non-appearance he should rush to the Court, law says within fifteen days, for its restoration. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 3. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1986. (From the judgment and order dated 23.4.1986 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka Bench in Writ Petition No. 179 of 1985.) Judgment Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. - This appe......r AIR 1973 (SC) 1121; M/s. Momin Motor Vs. Regional Transport Authority PLD 1962 108; Chairman Chittagong Pourashava Vs. Md. Amjad Khan 1980 B.S C.R. 54; M/S. Radha Krishna Agarwal Vi. State of Bihar and others AIR 1977 Patna 65; Shitla Prasad vs. M. Sadiullah and others AIR 1975 (All) 344 (F.B) Pur......vil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd.....................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………………………….......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....urt, with him instructed by Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 6 of 1985. (From the judgment and order dated 21-8-84 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Civil Revision No.3 of 1984). Judgment Shahabuddin Ahmed J.-The question raised in......ed in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J ATM Afzal J Feroza Majid and another……………….... Appellant Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation......................Respondent Result: The appeal is dismis...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A.Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Commissioner of Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone), Dhaka.................... Appellant Vs M/S. Macneil & Kilburn ......1986. Cases Referred To- AIR 1932 (PC) 138: C.I.T Vs. K Rahman & Co. Ltd 1980 B.T.D. 242: C.I.T. vs. Vizir Sultan & Son 36.I.T.R. Goderaj Co vs. C.I.T. 37 I.T.R. 381; Karam Chand Tahapar and Bros. P. Ltd. vs. C.I.T. 80 ITR. (SC) 167 A.I.R. 1932 138 (P.C.) C.I.T Vs. K Rahman...... Vs M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Court, Dhaka....................Respondent Judgment August 3, 1986. Cases Referred To- AIR 1932 (PC) 138: C.I.T Vs. K Rahman & Co. Ltd 1980 B.T.D. 242: C.I.T. vs. Vizir Sultan & Son 36.I.T.R. Goderaj Co ...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Dira Dockyard & Engineers Ltd. & ors Vs.Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & ors, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate on Record-For the Respondent Nos. 2-6. Civil Appeal No. 37 of 1985. (From the Judgment and Order dated 22-8-4 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in First Miscellaneous Appeal No. 98 of 1984.) Judgment:  ...... (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Present: Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others.... Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha &......J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Present: Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and others.... Appellants Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others…………Respondent ......in Article 33 of the Order. For the reasons stated above, we are of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Hazera Begum and others Vs. Roushan Ara Begum and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....x-Parte-For the Respondent Nos. 3-38, 41- 46 & 48—59. Civil Appeal No. 115 of 1983. (From the Judgment and decree dated 21st August 1982 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in S. A. No. 368 of 1974). Judgment: &n......ivision (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Hazera Begum and others………………………Appellants ......sp; Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Hazera Begum and others………………………Appellants Vs. Roushan Ara Begum and others……………Respondents ......r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another Vs. Municipal Committee, Mymensingh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....tructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 98 of 1984. (From the Judgment and decree dated 12th June, 1984 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in S.A. No. 402 of 1975) Judgment Badrul Haider Chowdhury J.- This appeal by special le...... (AD) 16. ...... Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another……………………………Appellants Vs. Municipal Committee, Mymensingh................................Respondents Judgment A......s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ecord —For the Appellants. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 58 of 1983. From the Judgment and Order dated 30.583 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Appeal No.3 of 1982. Judgment Fazle Munim CJ.-This appeal arises from Crimi...... allsowed. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), section 154 Criminal Trial The fundamental principle of a criminal trial is that the accused shall be presumed innocent and that he is not required to prove his innocence. The entire burden of proof of his guilt lies on ......on (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Muslimuddin & others………………………Appellants Vs. The State………………………………….Respondent Judgment Feb 20, 1986. ......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Ghyasuddin Ahmed Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ocate with him instructed by Ahmed Nurur Reza, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 17 of 1986. (From the Judgment & Order dated 20.11.85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Matter No. 13 of 1986.) Judgment: Fazle Muim CJ.-This appeal arises from, Matter No.......……………...Appellant Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others........................................Respondents Judgment March 24, 1986. The Companies Act, 1913 (VII of 1913), sections 79(3) and 76(3) Having regard to the powers conferred under sections 76 (d) and 79 (d), the Court ...... F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Ghyasuddin Ahmed ……………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others........................................Respondents Judgment March...... of the learned Company Judge are modified accordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Maqsood Alam Vs. Bangladesh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ah man J A. T. M. Afzal J Maqsood Alam………………………………………….Appellant Vs. The People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Military Estate Officer, Dhaka Cantonment, Ministry of Defense & others………………………Respondent Judgmen...... Augusr 3, 1986. The Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908), Order XXVII, rr. 1 & 2 The Government by a Notification dated 14th December, 1955, authorised certain officers to sign and verify the plaint or written statement. The Government by a Notification dated 14th ......resent: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rah man J A. T. M. Afzal J Maqsood Alam………………………………………….Appellant Vs. The People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Military Estate Officer, Dhaka Ca...... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 108
A. B. M. Tofayel Ahmed Vs. Sheikh Aminuddin & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....rd—For the Respondents (In both the cases). Criminal Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 52 & 53 of 1985. (From the judgment and order dated 28-5-85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Revision No. 106 & 107 of 1984, respectively.) Judgment: Shahabuddin Ahmed ......file an application for withdrawn of a case from the prosecution. In this case the Magistrate having passed the order of withdrawal without any application from the Public Prosecutor is an illegality and such order has rightly been reversed. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate instru......riminal) Present: F K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M H. Rah man J A. B. M. Tofayel Ahmed...........................Petitioner (In both the cases) Vs. Sheikh Aminuddin & others………….. Respondent (In both the cases) Judgment May 8......rnment's order as to Withdrawal did not show any reason for withdrawal. We find nothing to interfere. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 282 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Md. Shajahan Vs. Md. Sadeq & another , 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....s own motion or on the requests of any candidate......(13) Cases Referred to- Mofazzal Hossain Vs. Election Commissioner, (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51; Nurul Islam V. Munsif, Election Tribunal 28 DLR (Dhaka) 375. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate w...... Recounting of the ballot papers by a Tribunal long after the election should ordinarily be resorted to simply on mere asking by an interested party. Ballot papers have special sanctify of their own and their secrecy should not be infringed by reopening the sealed packet unless the recounting beco......rt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Md. Shajahan……………………………………..Appellant Vs. Md. Sadeq & another …………………………….....Respondents Judgment Mar......sing the Tribunal's order and dismissing the election-petition. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 275. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 140
Abdul Hadi Bepari Vs. Safaruddin Mondal and others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....n-Record— for Respondent Nos. 1—3. Ex-parte- Respondents No. 4—32. Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1984. (From the judgment and order dated 30 October, 1983 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, to Civil Revision No. 242 of 1983.) Judgment: Shahabuddin Ahmed J.- This appeal by a p...... Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J A. T. M. Afzal J Abdul Hadi Bepari ................................Appellant Vs. Safaruddin Mondal and others.........Respondents Judgment March 12, 1986. The Code Civil Procure, 1908 (V of ......llate Division (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J A. T. M. Afzal J Abdul Hadi Bepari ................................Appellant Vs. Safaruddin Mondal and others.........Respondents Judgment March 12, 1986. The Code C......ot find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without, however, any order as to costs. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 265..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Waliul Bari Chowdhury Vs. District Magistrate, Kushtia arid others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ttorney-General, instructed by B. Hussain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents. Civil Appeal No. 61 of 1985. (From the Judgment and Order dated 22 5 85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in Writ Petition No. 113 of 1985.) Judgment Fazle Munim CJ.-This appeal arises from .............Appellant Vs. District Magistrate, Kushtia arid others…………………....Respondents Judgment January 27, 1986. Result: The Appeal is allowed. The Printing Presses and Publication (Declaration and Registration) Act, 1973 (XXIII of 1973) Declaration in resp......ivision (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhuri J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Waliul Bari Chowdhury...........................Appellant Vs. District Magistrate, Kushtia arid others…………………....Respondents Judgment J......cluding Printing Press be released at once and the publication of weekly 'Ispat' be allowed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 256...Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 226
Md. Shahjahan Sheikh and others Vs. Sessions Judge, Pirojpur and others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... appeals). Not Represented—For Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4-14 & 17 (in both the appeals). Criminal Appeal Nos. 48 and 49 of 1985. From the order dated 5.8.85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka Bench in Writ Petitions No. 253 of 1985 and from the order dated 10.7.85 passed by the High Co......so Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 246 ......ate Division (Criminal) Present: F. K.M.A Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Md. Shahjahan Sheikh and others……………..Appellants (In both the appeals) Vs. Sessions Judge, Pirojpur and others……………….Respondents (In both the appeals) Ju......of the exercise of revisional power by the Sessions Judge under section 439 A. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 246 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Abdul Mannaf Khan and others Vs. Bangladesh & another, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent (In Civil Appeal No. 164 of 1983). Civil Appeal Nos. 63 & 164 of 1983. From the Judgment and Order dated 27.6.83 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Civil Revision Nos. 103 & 153 of 1983. Judgment Fazle Munim CJ.-These appeals ari......DLR (AD) (1986) 201. ......Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J TM Masud J Syed Md. Mohsen Ali J Abdul Mannaf Khan and others……..Appellants (In both cases). Vs. Bangladesh & another…………………………Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 163 of......Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decisions the appeals are dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 201. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 202
AKM Ruhul Amin Vs. District Judge and Appellate Election Tribunal, Bhola & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....il Appeal No. 54 of 1985). Civil Appeal No. 51-54 of 1985 with Civil Petition No. 140 of 1985 (From the Judgment and Orders dated 16.5.85. 21.5.85, 25.4.85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka and Rangpur in Writ Petition Nos. 1, 13, 109 of 1985 and Civil Revision No. 105 of 1985 respe......unim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J AKM Ruhul Amin.................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 51 of 1985 with Civil Petition No. 140 of 1985) Vs. District Judge and Appellate Election Tribunal, Bhola and others ...Respondents Abul Kalam Azad ……………...... Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J AKM Ruhul Amin.................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 51 of 1985 with Civil Petition No. 140 of 1985) Vs. District Judge and Appellate Election Tribunal, Bhola and others ...Respondents Abul Kalam...... Civil Appeal No. 54 of 1985 is allowed. Civil petition No. 140 of 1985 is disposed of. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 172. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Md. Abu Baker Siddique Vs. S.M.A Bakar & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....r the Appellant. Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record —Nos. the Respondent Nos. 1-4. Civil Appeal No. 78 of 1985 (From the Judgment and Order dated 29.5.85 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, in F.M.A No. 184 of 1984.) Judgment: Fazle Munim CJ.-This appeal arises from F.M A. No......D 1954 Lah 704, Ali Akbar Vs. Most. Kaniz Maryam, (1956) 8 DLR Lah 43, Most. Sultana Begum Vs. Muhammad Shafi, (19,65) 17 DLR Kar 119 Mst. Munawar Jan Vs. Master Muhammad Afsar Khan, PLD 1962 Lah 142 and Rahimullah Chowdhury Vs. Mrs. Sayeda Helali Begum, (1968) 20 DLR 1 SC. Lawyers Involved: ...... 106 ......d be appointed as his guardian. For the reasons staged above, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 106 ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Abani Kanta Chakraborty & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....For the Respondent Nos. 2—4. Ex-parte-For the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6. Civil Appeal No. 166 of 1983. (From the judgment and order dated 13th April, 1983 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka, Beach in Civil Revision No. 1226 of 1982.) Judgment: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. - This...... Abani Kanta Chakraborty & others........Respondents Judgment February 5, 1986 The State Acquisition & Tenancy Act (XXVIII OF 1951) Section- 3(4) (e) The Plaintiff got licence from the landlord for cultivation of jute in the disputed land since 1940, the land being in his possession, f......hahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Mymensingh…… …………………………………Appellant Vs. Abani Kanta Chakraborty & others........Respondents Judgment February 5, 1986 The St......s unfounded. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 93 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Alauddin alias Alauddin Sarker others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka & another …………………………….....Appellants vs. Md. Alauddin alias Al......gment May 30, 1985. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 102 & 135 The Co-operative Societies Rules; Rule 37 Words & Phrases The land mortgage bank is a “co-operative society”, a voluntary association of people, having a separ......ple of natural justice was duly applied with the respondent even though civil service rules were not applicable to him. The Appeal is allowed…..(17 & 18) Case Referred to- Dr. Nurul Islam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 33 DLR (AD) 371; B S I Corporation Vs. Mahbub Hossain, 29 DLR (AD) 41;......rder of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge and the trial court is restored. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 81. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 124