Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3861-3880 of 4791 results.
Mariam and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....t for decision in accordance with law in the light of the observations made above. Costs will abide the result. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 247. ......t for decision in accordance with law in the light of the observations made above. Costs will abide the result. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 247. ......t for decision in accordance with law in the light of the observations made above. Costs will abide the result. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 247. ...... Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Mariam and ors……………..Appellants Vs. Bangladesh………………….Respondents Jud..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 89
Mrs. Halima Khatun Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....er the petitions have abated not cannot be in the affirmative. The petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 207. ......er the petitions have abated not cannot be in the affirmative. The petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 30 DLR (SC) (1978) 207. ...... Fazle Munim J Mrs. Halima Khatun.........Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others………....Respondents (In Civil Petition No. 171 of 1977) Mrs. Delerash Begum…………….Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh...... ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 307
Faridul Alam Vs. State and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere. The criminal petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 93; 16 BLT (AD) 51; 13 BLC (AD) 61. ......made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere. The criminal petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 93; 16 BLT (AD) 51; 13 BLC (AD) 61. ......made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere. The criminal petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 93; 16 BLT (AD) 51; 13 BLC (AD) 61. ......eme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Faridul Alam............ ..................Petitioner Vs. State and another...........................Respondents Judgment February 18, 2..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 138
Azizul Hoque Vs. State and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....ned Counsel could not point at any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ned Counsel could not point at any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ned Counsel could not point at any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ers.................Respondents Judgment February 26, 2007. Cases Referred To- Abid Hossain Babu Vs. Gazi Mojibul Hoque 4 MLR 55; Samarendra Nath Goswami vs. Helena Herlovi 5 BLT (AD) 67 = 3 BLC ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Sheikh Hasina and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ich the question is raised can be properly disposed of in some other way and Court should not give decision on any law which is not strictly necessary for the disposal of the case before it. ...... Panir vs Bangladesh reported in 44 DLR (AD) 319; Moni Begum vs RAJUK 46 DLR (AD) 154; Basheshar Nath vs Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi and Rajasthan AIR 1959 SC 149; Hefzur Rahman (Md) vs Shamsun Nahar Begum 51 DLR (AD) 172; Hussain Baksh vs Settlement Commissioner 21 DLR 456; Firm Sriniwas vs M......f violation of Article 35(1) of the Constitution does not arise………………………..(66 and 88) Cases Referred To- Kudrat-e-Elahi Panir vs Bangladesh reported in 44 DLR (AD) 319; Moni Begum vs RAJUK 46 DLR (AD) 154; Basheshar Nath vs Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi and Rajasthan AI......ich the question is raised can be properly disposed of in some other way and Court should not give decision on any law which is not strictly necessary for the disposal of the case before it. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 254
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shamsul Huda and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ections and guidelines, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division appealed against is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 108. ......ections and guidelines, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division appealed against is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 108. ......ections and guidelines, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division appealed against is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 108. ...... Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs................................Appellant Vs. Md. Shamsul Huda and others..................Respondents Judgment M..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 124
A. B. M. Shamsuddin Vs. Mahmuda Selina and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ngs and decisions as arrived at by the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......ngs and decisions as arrived at by the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......n, CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J Md. Joynul Abedin, J A. B. M. Shamsuddin................................. Petitioner. Vs. Anowara Begum being dead her heirs 1. (a) Mahmuda Selina and others. ........................ Respondents....... R. Mudassir Husain, CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J Md. Joynul Abedin, J A. B. M. Shamsuddin................................. Petitioner. Vs. Anowara Begum being dead her heirs 1. (a) Mahmuda Selina and others. .....................Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Loyal Shipping Ltd. Vs. Castrol UK Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... of Money Suit No. 21 of 1993 by the plaintiff. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 48. ...... of Money Suit No. 21 of 1993 by the plaintiff. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 48. ...... of Money Suit No. 21 of 1993 by the plaintiff. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 48. ......late Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Loyal Shipping Ltd. ........................Appellant Vs. Castrol UK Ltd. and others ...............Respondents Judgment Decembe..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Barrister Nazmul Huda and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....fe to be certified by duly constituted Medical Board, may consider the matter of granting bail in an appropriate case in an appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 256. ......fe to be certified by duly constituted Medical Board, may consider the matter of granting bail in an appropriate case in an appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 256. ......fe to be certified by duly constituted Medical Board, may consider the matter of granting bail in an appropriate case in an appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 256. ...... MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J Anti-Corruption Commission ........................Appellant (In both the cases) Vs. Barrister Mir Md. Helaluddin and another…..Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2008) ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 219
Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....gment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 49; V ADC (2008) 150. ......gment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 49; V ADC (2008) 150. ......gment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 49; V ADC (2008) 150. ......iya ………………….Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1999) Amanullah Kabir..............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1999) Vs. The State and others …………………&hell..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
State Vs. Md. Kamaluddin @ Pichi Kamal and ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Md. Abu Alam Vs. Zarina Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abu Alam ...........................Appellant Vs Zarina Begum and others..............Respondents Judgment July 5, 2006. Lawyers Invo......pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Md. Muinuddin Zulfiquer Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Mahfuzul Hoque and ors Vs. Collector of Customs, Customs House, Chittagong & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... 61. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... 61. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... 61. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Collector of Customs, Customs House, Chittagong & others................. Respondents (In all the cases). Judgment August 8, 2005. Cases Referred To- Mustafa Kamal Vs. The Commissioner of Customs, 52 DLR (AD) 1; Phassco Hardware Company Vs. The Government of Paki..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Badal Chandra Das and others Vs. Amena Khatun, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... No infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division could be pointed out for our interference. In that view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... No infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division could be pointed out for our interference. In that view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... No infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division could be pointed out for our interference. In that view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Badal Chandra Das and others .........Appellants Vs. Amena Khatun .............................Respondent Judgment April 5, 20..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Kazi Muhammad Khokon Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Sree Girish Chandra Barman Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Girish Chandra Barman………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other ……………………R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Khan Md. Firoj Kabir Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Khan Md. Firoj Kabir...................................Appellant Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others... ...................Respondents Judgment Mar..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Arif A. Shekha and others Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Arif A. Shekha and others............................Appellants Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another..................................Respondents ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) .....................Appellant Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others..........Respondents Judgment July 17, 2..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 216
23742370236823642360235923562355235123492345234423432342234123402339233323322331