Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3861-3880 of 4531 results.
Akhtarun Nessa and another Vs. Habibullah and ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....son in First Miscellaneous Appeal No.96 of 1974. Facts in short relevant for disposal of the appeal are like this. Respondent nos. 1 and 2 filed an application under section 96 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 hereinafter referred to as "the Act," in the Court of the Ad......R (AD) (1979) 88. ......of the learned Subordinate Judge are restored. In the facts and circumstances of the case we allow half of the costs to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 88. ......of the learned Subordinate Judge are restored. In the facts and circumstances of the case we allow half of the costs to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 88. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Bangladesh Vs. Tan Kheng Heck and others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....ases Referred To- Emperor Vs. Khawaja Nazir Ahmed, AIR 1945 Privy Council 19; Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh Vs. A.T. Mridha, (1974) 26 DLR (SC) 17; Abdul Quader Chowdhury and others Vs. The State, (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 38; State of West Bengal Vs. S.N. Basak, AIR 1963 SC 447; Emperor Vs. Khaw...... (1979) 69. ......eedings to continue in accordance with law. The accused will continue on the same bail till an order is passed by the competent Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 69. ......eedings to continue in accordance with law. The accused will continue on the same bail till an order is passed by the competent Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 69. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 95
....Order No.67 of 1972. In this view of the matter the contention of Mr. Karim fails. We find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 64.
...... 64.
......Order No.67 of 1972. In this view of the matter the contention of Mr. Karim fails. We find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 64.
......Order No.67 of 1972. In this view of the matter the contention of Mr. Karim fails. We find no merit in this petition. It is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 64.
..
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. Government of Bangladesh and other, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....istan Vs. Rowshan Bijoya Shaukai Ali Khan, (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 214; Tofazzal Hossain Vs. Province of East Pakistan, (1965) 17 DLR, 498; Mahbub Anam Vs. Government of East Pakistan, PLD 1959 Dacca 774; State of Bombay Vs. Atma Ram, AIR 1951 (SC) 157; Sibban Lal Sakena Vs. State of U.P., AIR 1954 (SC) ......t Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Abdul Latif Mirza..............Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and other..............Respondents Judgment September 2, ......stan, PLD 1959 Dacca 774; State of Bombay Vs. Atma Ram, AIR 1951 (SC) 157; Sibban Lal Sakena Vs. State of U.P., AIR 1954 (SC) 179; Ram Krishna Bhardwaj Vs. State of Delhi, AIR 1953 (SC) 318; Arbab Muhammad Hashem Khan Vs. The Crown, (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 1; Sardar Fazlul Karim Vs. Govt. of East Pakis...... already held that as the detention of the appellant is not sustainable in law on other grounds stated above I would allow this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 1. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 408
Moyezuddin and another Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)
....upreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed ABM Hossain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J Moyezuddin and another................Appellants Vs. The State................................Respondent Judgment December 7, 1977. Cases Referre......1979) 37. ...... The appeal is dismissed. The appellants are directed to surrender to their bail bonds and serve out the remainder of the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 37. ...... The appeal is dismissed. The appellants are directed to surrender to their bail bonds and serve out the remainder of the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 37. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Bangladesh Vs. Moslem Mia, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....dinary litigant. We do not find any substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. We make no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 45. ......lso Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 45. ......ed on March 16, 1970, that is, out of time by 56 days. In our opinion, the High Court was fully justified in applying the principle as laid down in the case of Central Excise, Lyallpur V. Ch. Fakir Muhammad, (1958) 10 DLR (SC) 165 to the effect that no extended period of limitation is provided f......dinary litigant. We do not find any substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. We make no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 45. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 101
....the High Court and restore that of the Income Tax authority. As there is no appearance on the other side we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 48. ......l)
Present:
Kemaluddin Hossain CJ
Fazle Munim J
Ruhul Islam J
E Rahman, Chairman, Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Chittagong & others.........Appellants
Vs.
Khan Saheb Ata Mohammad Khan...........Respondent
Judgment
February 14, 1978.
La......the High Court and restore that of the Income Tax authority. As there is no appearance on the other side we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 48. ......the High Court and restore that of the Income Tax authority. As there is no appearance on the other side we make no order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 48. ..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Enamul Huq and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Enamul Huq and another..........................................Petitioner Vs. The State...........................Respondent Judgment February 1, 2005 Lawyers I......(Criminal) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Enamul Huq and another..........................................Petitioner Vs. The State...........................Respondent Judgment February 1, 2005 ...... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Mohirruddin Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t Judge, Lalmonirhat Sadar impleading the petitioner as pre-emptee opposite party and opposite party Nos. 2-23 as other opposite parties for preemption of the case land under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act stating, inter alia, that the pre-emptor is co-sharer in the case......ion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Mohirruddin............................................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment&nb......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Jashimuddin & other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....l) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judgment Jan...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judg......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. Judgment June 20, 2005. Cas...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; Md Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J M Sahabuddin...................Petitioner vs State……………………………..Respo......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... The second condition is that the fresh evidence, if true, would have had, or would have been likely to have had, a determining influence on the Court below". 17. In the case of Messrs Muhammad Siddiq Muhammad Umar and another vs Australasia Bank Ltd reported in PLD 2966 (SC) 6...... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate........Petitioner vs State and another... .........Respondents Judgment ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....r and others 41 DLR (AD) 30; Bangladesh vs Md Azizur Rahman 46 DLR (AD) 19; Sharfat Ali vs Union of India AIR 1974 SC 1631; CB Boarding and Lodging vs Mysore AIR 1970 SC 2042; Kashabananda Bharati vs State of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461; Anwar Hossain Chowdhury vs Government of Bangladesh and ors 41 DLR......Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Farida Akhter and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....p; MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others... ............Appellants vs State…………………………….Respon......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Kashem Vs. Amirun Nahar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 2. The predecessor of the deceased pre-emptor Amirun Nahar instituted Miscellaneous Case No. 193 of 1972 before the learned Munsif (now Assistant Judge) Lakshmipur under section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act against the petitioner for preempting the case land sold in favou......ivision (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Abdul Kashem............................Petitioner Vs. Amirun Nahar and others.................Respondents Judgment March 5,...... view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 86. ...... view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 2007 (XV) BLT (AD) 86. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
State Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Read the High Court Division Judgment here. Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur R...... (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Re......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 184
Ali Akbar (Md) Vs. Shajirannessa Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Election Commission Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....last for all time to come and not to be scrapped by any means including amendment of the Constitution." 83. Thereafter, he submits that the fundamental principles of the State are required to be followed and basic rights of the citizens cannot be denied to them as ens......hul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Election Commission......................Appellant [In both the Appeals] Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others.........Respondents [In CA No. 54 of 2006]......on, as above, in the findings and observations/ directives given by the High Court Division in the impugned judgment and order. The parties will bear their respective costs. Ed. ......on, as above, in the findings and observations/ directives given by the High Court Division in the impugned judgment and order. The parties will bear their respective costs. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 159
19451943194219401938193619351932193119221915191219091908190719051904190319021900