Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Shafiqul Huq (Md.) Vs. Mina Begum, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... Lawyers Involved: Md. Shofiqul Islam, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Sasti Sarkar, Advocate—For Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 3612 of 2001. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - This Rule was obtained by the defendant upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code ......ted. The learned Assistant Additional Judge is directed to proceed expeditiously with the family suit in accordance with law. Communicate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 481...Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 185
Sherajul Huq Mullick Vs. Bangladesh, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....lam Afzal and Md. Assaduzzaman, Advocates — For the Respondent No. 30. M.K. Rahman, Advocate—For the Respondent No. 31. Writ Petition No. 308 of 1988. Judgment Mustafa Kamal J.- This Rule Nisi obtained under Article 102 of the Constitution calls upon the respondents to show cause ...... informed the Returning Officer about the same during the poll period itself and therefore the subsequent declaration of result vide Annexure 6 to the affidavit-in-opposition of respondent No. 30 has absolutely no value. 10. We also find from Annexure 2 to the affidavit-in-opposition of respond..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Shahabuddin Vs. Janata Bank, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....ned judge appears to have been silent as to the punitive nature or otherwise of the termination order but has held that the relationship between the parties are governed by the Master and Servant Rule. He has also raised a new question of delegation of authority by the competent authority to the......he result, the Rules issued in Civil Revision No. 71 of 1987 and Civil Revision No. 73 of 1987 are discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 94...Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Nur Ahmed Vs. Moktar Ahmed & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....bdul Momen Chowdhury, Advocate — For the Petitioner. Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 276 of 1984. Judgment AM Mahmudur Rahman J.- This Rule arises out of an order of the learned Munsif, Cox's Bazar dismissing the Miscellaneous Case No.......azar in Miscellaneous case No. 342 of 1980 of the said Court. The petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Tk. 250/- to the pre-emptor-opposite party by way of costs. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 84...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Abdul Mukit Chowdhury Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner & others, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....B.K. Das, Mirza Hussain Haider, Advocates—For the Petitioner. S.R. Paul with S.K. Sinha, Advocates— For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 23 of 1988 Judgment Qazi Shafiuddin J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause why the respondent Nos. 1-4 shall not b......nt any such direction. In the result, the Rule is discharged without costs. The order of stay granted earlier by this Court stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 57...Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Warish Miah Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1988, 17 CLC (HCD)
....ddin, Advocates—For the Petitioner. S.R. Paul with S.K. Sinha and Mohammad Hossain, Advocates — For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 14 of 1988 Judgment Qazi Shafiuddin J. - This Rule calls upon the respondent Nos. 1-5 to show cause why the election of the Chairman of No. 4 Uppe......es of the present case. In the result, the Rule is discharged without costs. The order of slay granted earlier by this Court stands vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (1989) 51..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Md. Jahangir Alam Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....Khairul Haque J. - This is a petition for leave to appeal in respect of the judgment and order dated 17.11.2009, passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3161 of 2009, discharging the Rule as infructuas. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the petitioner is the proprietor......e infructuas since the period of work-order expired by efflux of time on 22.06.2009. In that view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 649...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Abdul Khaleque Vs. Md. Nazim Uddin and another, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... District Judge, Dhaka in Civil Revision No.18 of 2004 and then the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2172 of 2004. Subsequently the defendant petitioner moved another petition under Order 6, Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure for acceptance of further and better statement. The learned ......ner is permitted to add additional grounds. The order of stay granted earlier by this court shall continue till disposal of the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 647...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Sonali Bank Vs. Meghna Vegetable Oil Industries Ltd. & ors., 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....preferred against judgment and decree dated 11.03.2007 passed by learned Joint District Judge, 5th Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.176 of 2006 rejecting the plaint on an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The facts, in short, are that th......wing the defendant Nos.1 and 2 to file a written statement advised. We find no substance in this petition which is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 644...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 81
Md. Nurul Islam Vs. Artho Rin Adalat and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... an ex-parte decree in the Mortgage Suit No. 4 of 2001 in the Court of Artho Rin Adalat, Gazipur, against the petitioner. In respect of the said ex-parte decree, the defendant-petitioner obtained a Rule in Writ Petition No. 3083 of 2002, on 03.08.2002, praying for setting aside the ex-parte order ......he circumstances, we find no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. As such, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 642...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Pubali Bank Ltd. Vs. Md. Mamunur Rahman and Another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....without any order as to cost. The counter-claim of the defendant No.1 is dismissed as not maintainable. Send down the records forthwith. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 458.......without any order as to cost. The counter-claim of the defendant No.1 is dismissed as not maintainable. Send down the records forthwith. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 458...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Shahjahan Faraji and another Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....al trial at Barisal so as to justify the transfer of the case from Barisal to another District. We therefore, find no substance in the revision case, which fails accordingly. 8. In the result, the Rule is discharged. Since charge-sheet has already been submitted in the case, an early trial is fou......he date of receipt of the order. Communicate the order to the learned Magistrate, Barisal at once for his information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002)457...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Ali Sikder (Md.) Vs. Government of Bangladesh & Others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....hahabuddin Ahmed with Ferdausi Shahab, Advocates—For Respondent No. 3. MR Hasan, Advocate—For Respondent Nos. 4. Writ Petition No. 628 of 2000. Judgment Kazi AT Monowaruddin J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned letter dated 21-6-......a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of Constitution. His prayer for certificate is refused as we do find the case to be so. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002)453...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 22
Moniruzzaman (Md.) Vs. ANM Didar-e-Alam and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....dvocate—For Opposite Party No. 1. ABM Waliur Rahman Khan, Assistant Attorney- General—For the State. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3846 of 2001. Judgment Md. Shamsul Huda J. - This Rule was directed on an application under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure calling upo...... time of issuance of the Rule staying further proceeding of the case is recalled. Send down a copy of the order to the court below immediately. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002)445...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Shishir Kanti Pal and others Vs. Nur Muhammad and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....—For the Petitioners. KZ Alam with Shariful Islam Khan and AHM Mashfiqur Rahman, Advocates—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 110 of 1994. Judgment MA Wahhab Miah J. - This Rule was obtained by the heirs of deceased defendant Nos. 7, 8 and other defendants against the Judg...... impugned Judgment and decree calling for interference by the Court. In the result, this Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 440...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Tajul Islam Vs. Gobinda Prashad Das and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....iminal Revision No.578 of 2000 arises out of the same proceeding in Special Case No. 213 of 1999, pending before the Divisional Special Judge, Chittagong Division, Chittagong and therefore, these two Rules are taken up together for hearing and this judgment will govern both the Rules. 2. The shor......t the same to the District Anti-Corruption Officer, Cox’s Bazar for inquiry and report against which accused No.1 Tarani Mohan Ghosh preferred Criminal Revision being No. 754 of 1995 which was made absolute with a direction to the Special Judge, Cox’s Bazar to proceed with the case as provided u..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 158
Sarwar Garments Ltd. Vs. Chairman, National Board of Revenue and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... to release any imported goods of the petitioner Company without prior “no objection” from the office of the respondent No. 2, against which the petitioner company moved this Court and obtained a Rule on 1st July,2001 in Writ Petition No. 2718 of 2001 and the impugned order was stayed and the re......ishing the continuing Bank Guarantee to the extent of 75% of the Customs duty and other charges. Thus it appears that in Writ Petition No. 2718 of 2001 it would be just and proper if the Rule is made absolute in part so far it relates to the impugned order dated 19-6-2001 as evidenced by Annexure ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 63