Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3921-3940 of 4376 results.
Abdur Rashid (Md) and others Vs. Bainchitala Junior High School, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....s appellant in the miscellaneous appeal and the said application was allowed and as against that Revisional application was moved a Rule was obtained, Civil Revision No. 216/85 (Jessore)/ 3602/91 (Dhaka) and finally, the Rule was rule was made absolute on 2nd August, 1994. It may be mentioned du......nbsp; Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Gholam Rabbani J Md. Ruhul Amin J Abdur Rashid (Md) and others.................. Petitioners Vs. ......lam Rabbani J Md. Ruhul Amin J Abdur Rashid (Md) and others.................. Petitioners Vs. Bainchitala Junior High School ................Respondent ......dgment of the High Court Division in any respect. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 80. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Bangabir Kader Siddiqui, Bir Uttam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....lection Commission. It is the case of the petitioner that he subsequently received a FAX message informing him that the members of the inquiry committee composed of respondent Nos. 3-6 would leave Dhaka for Tangail on 28-11-1999 for holding inquiry into the matter and requested the petitioner t......, Attorney-General instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 586 of 2000. (From judgment and order dated 22-2-2000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No......nbsp; Bangabir Kader Siddiqui, Bir Uttam ………….……………. Petitioner Vs. Government Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of Law & o....... There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 64. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 158
BRAC and others Vs. Professor Mozaffar Ahmed and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... antecedent as a citizen of Bangladesh, a distinguished professor of economics, sometime president of the Economics Association of Bangladesh, Director of the Institute of Business Administration, Dhaka, a member of the Cabinet in the Government, enjoying high reputation nationally and internati......bsp; BRAC and others ……………….………Appellants ......p; BRAC and others ……………….………Appellants Vs. Professor Mozaffar Ahmed and others……Respondents ......se appeals. Accordingly, the same are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 36. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 199
Syed Abu Hossain Arshad & ors Vs. BD Sugar and Food Industries Corpn and ors, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
...., facts and circumstances all the three leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 33. ......sp; Syed Abu Hossain Arshad and others……..Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Su......; Syed Abu Hossain Arshad and others……..Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and ors ……&......, facts and circumstances all the three leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 33. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Commissioner of Taxes, Dhaka (South) Zone, Dhaka Vs. Ujala Match Factory, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....sp; Commissioner of Taxes, Dhaka (South) Zone, Dhaka..…….. Appellant Vs. ...... Sections 10(2)(X) & 16(2)(XVI) Since the respondent assessee paid the bonus to the employees as per direction of the Government under the provisions of the above Ordinance and Notification, the question of earning profit for payment of bonus, does not arise…&helli......sp; Commissioner of Taxes, Dhaka (South) Zone, Dhaka..…….. Appellant Vs. Ujala Match Factory…………………...... The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 23. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Akbar Hossain (Md) Vs. MD, Agrani Bank and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....ime but due to illness of the mother and on reaching home found her condition serious. Petitioner sent application for leave for 4 months with a request to forward the same to the General Manager, Dhaka. But the Regional Manager did not forward the same instead brought charge on 14-6-1976 asking...... Akbar Hossain (Md)…………………………. Petitioner Vs. MD, Agrani Bank and others ………………Respondents Judgment ...... Md. Fazlul Karim J Akbar Hossain (Md)…………………………. Petitioner Vs. MD, Agrani Bank and others ……………&...... In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 21. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Khairullah (Md) Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....esented—the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 852 of 1997. (From the judgment and order dated 26-6-1997 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 06 of 1991 (Dhaka), Civil Revision No. 372 of 1989 Rangpur). Judgment Mahmudul Amin Choudhury CJ.- This ......ivil) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury CJ Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J Khairullah (Md)………………….Petitioner Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another…………. Respondents. Judgment May 24, 2001. Result: The Petition is d......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury CJ Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J Khairullah (Md)………………….Petitioner Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another…………. Respondents. Judgment May 24, 2001. Result...... Court Division in exercising the discretion. There is therefore no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 13. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
AKM Ali Imam Vs. DG, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute & another, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....nt and order dated 6-1-1997 passed by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal in Miscellaneous Appeal No.5 of 1996 affirming judgment and order dated 13-1-1996 passed by the Administrative Tribunal, Dhaka in Execution Case No.3 of 1995. 2. The short fact leading to this petiti......ive Tribunals Rules, 1982, Rule 7 The execution case was dismissed on the ground that the order passed by the Tribunal was declaratory without any direction for reinstatement and as such the said order is not executable. Lawyers Invo......sp; AKM Ali Imam......................................Petitioner Vs. DG, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute & another....................There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 104
S. M. Iqbal Hossain Vs. Managing Director, I F I C Bank Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....itioner Vs. Managing Director, International Finance Investment and Commerce (IFIC) Bank Ltd. Head Office, Bangladesh Shilpa Bank Bhaban, 17-18 Floors, 8, RAJUK Avenue, Motijheel, Dhaka-1000 and others................................. Respondents. Judgment ......ent: M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Iqbal Hossain................. Petitioner Vs. Managing Director, International Finance Investment and Commerce (IFIC) Bank Ltd. Head Office, Bangladesh Shilpa Bank Bhaban, 17-18 Floors, 8, RAJUK Av......e Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Iqbal Hossain................. Petitioner Vs. Managing Director, International Finance Investment and Commerce (IFIC) Bank Ltd. Head......that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Md. Marfat Ali Miah Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ge, Iswarganj, Mymensingh. The suit was filed seeking declaration that the order dated January 25, 1989 passed in Second Certificate Appeal No.88 of 1984 by the Additional Divisional Commissioner, Dhaka Division, order dated August 22, 1989 passed in Certificate Review Case No. 16 of 1989 by the...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Marfat Ali Miah being dead his legal heir: Firoj Ahammad Bhulu.....Appellant Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others....................................... Respondents Judgment ......e Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Marfat Ali Miah being dead his legal heir: Firoj Ahammad Bhulu.....Appellant Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others....................................... Respond....... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
M/S. Noor Crokaries and another Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ame. 2. The facts, leading to this petition, are that the respondent No. 1 as plaintiff instituted the aforesaid title suit in the 4th Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka and the same was transferred to the Subordinate Judge and Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2 as......vision (Civil) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karirn J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahamed J M/S. Noor Crokaries and another................................ Petitioners Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Lt......hury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karirn J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahamed J M/S. Noor Crokaries and another................................ Petitioners Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd. and others…….................. Respondents ......ourt Division has rightly passed the impugned order and no interference is called for. In the aforesaid, premises, we find no merit in this petition and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other.................................Appellants. Vs. Abdur Rahman and others...........sion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other.................................Appellants. Vs. Abdur Rahman and others.................. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and other.................................Appellants. Vs. Abdur Rahman and others...........................................Respondents. Judgment ......itration Appellate Tribunal. In view of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost to be paid by the appellant No. 1. Ed...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 58
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Government of Bangladesh and others................................Petitioners Vs Md. Shahjahan Gazi.................cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....him for the purpose of further enquiry. 2. The respondent as the petitioner instituted Administrative Tribunal Case No. 282 of 999 on 15.2.1999 before the Administrative Tribunal, 3. Dhaka stating, inter alia, that the respondent joined the service on 6.3.70 as a Social Welfare Org...... ...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh and others .....................Appellants Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque...............................................Respondent Judgm......azlul Haque...............................................Respondent Judgment 22 March 2005 Cases Referred To- Zane Alam Khan vs. Abdul Hamid Chowdhury, 3 BLC (AD) 55; A.B.M. Abdul Baqi vs. Government of Bangladesh, 4 BLC (AD) 213. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... constitutionality of section 4(2) and (3) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain 1990 (Act IV of 1990) and appointment of Mr.Md Amirul Islam, Subordinate Judge as a Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Dhaka by the Government and also challenging the continuation of Title Suit No. 258 of 2000 filed b......mmad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 Case Referred To- ......uhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and Rural Development Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others………......Respondents. Judgment March 23, 2006. ......uhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and Rural Development Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others………...........ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and R......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....an Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka & others .............Respondents Judgment 30 March 2006 Lawyers In...... Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka & others .............Respondents ......ision (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Habibur Rahman Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....High Court Division in First Appeal No. 211 of 1996 allowing the same. The appeal was filed, against the order dated November 5, 1995 of the 5th Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Dhaka in Title Suit No. 135 of 1995 allowing the application filed by the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 he......nt: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Habibur Rahman.........................Appellant. Vs. M/S. Uttara Bank Ltd., represented by its Managing Director and others….…… Respondents Judgment July 31, 2005. Result: The appeal is dismiss......(AD) 59. ......our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 BLC (AD) 59. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......usain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Shafique Ahmed........................................ Petitioner Vs Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others………...............Respondents Judgme......area in question and his appointing authority is authorized under the law to curtail the area or jurisdiction in view of the decision of this Division reported in the case of Kazi Md. Aminul Islam Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Law 16 BLD (AD)110 and in the case of Moulvi Md. Khourshid Alam Vs. Bang......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....as issued upon a revisional application, filed by the plaintiffs against the judgment and decree dated 10-11-1997 passed in Title Appeal No, 187 of 1994 by the learned Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court, Dhaka, who affirmed the judgment and decree dated 10-5-1994 passed by the learned Senior Assistant...... ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain J Al-haj Mohammad Seraj-ud-Dowla and others.................................Petitioners. Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of works...................................................Respo......ommitted any error or illegality and no case for interference by this Division has been made out, we find no merit in the petition for leave to appeal. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
13401333133113281324132313201317131413131310130413011299129612941293129212901289