Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Amjad Molla Vs. Syeduzzaman Molla and others, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....re on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds to serve their sentence. Ed. This case is also reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 17 ......re on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds to serve their sentence. Ed. This case is also reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 17 ......4) 17 ...... Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Shahabuddin Ahmed J. Amjad Molla................................Appellant Vs. Syeduzzaman Molla and others …………… Respondents ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Momtazuddin and another Vs. Yakub Ali, 1993, 22 CLC (AD)
....1 Madras 412 (PC) & Sunderabai Vs. Collector 43 Bom 376 (PC). Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Dr. Kamal Hossain Senior Advocate (Khad......f limitation will remain open for decision at the hearing of the appeal and the respondent is free to take all legitimate objections. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 13. ......f limitation will remain open for decision at the hearing of the appeal and the respondent is free to take all legitimate objections. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 13. ......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Momtazuddin and another………….Defendant-Appellants Vs. Yakub Ali .......................Plaintiff-Respondent Judgment May 27, 1993 Resul..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Bangladesh Bank and others Vs. Mohammad Abdul Mannan, 1994, 23 CLC (AD)
....571 and MK Agarwal Vs. Gurgaon Gramin Bank, AIR 1988 (SC) 286. Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court (MA Wahab Miah, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Abdur Rab Chowdhury, Advoca......unal is set aside and that of the Administrative Tribunal is restored. Parties are to bear their respective costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 1. ......unal is set aside and that of the Administrative Tribunal is restored. Parties are to bear their respective costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 46 DLR (AD) (1994) 1. ......hmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Bangladesh Bank and others ....... Appellants Vs. Mohammad Abdul Mannan............ Respondent (In Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1992)..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 149
Sharif Nurul Ambia Vs. Dhaka City Corporation represented by its Mayor and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ......this order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 5 are directed to stop construction of the multi-storied building and to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ......this order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 5 are directed to stop construction of the multi-storied building and to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ......this order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 5 are directed to stop construction of the multi-storied building and to demolish the structure, if any, already constructed. Ed. ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 293
Sheikh Farid (Md) & others Vs. Abdul Wadud Sikder and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......is lack of evidence to show that he possessed the land denying title of Karuna Moyee Dasi or her sons to their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......is lack of evidence to show that he possessed the land denying title of Karuna Moyee Dasi or her sons to their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sheikh Farid (Md) & others. ............. Appellants Vs. Abdul Wadud Sikder and others...................Respondents Judgment M..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Serajul Islam & others Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....late Division (Civil) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J SJR Mudassir Husain J Serajul Islam & others ...................Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another.................Respondents Judgment Apri......tly affirmed the decision of the lower appellate Court as the final court of fact. In such view of the matter, this petition merits no consideration Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......tly affirmed the decision of the lower appellate Court as the final court of fact. In such view of the matter, this petition merits no consideration Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J SJR Mudassir Husain J Serajul Islam & others ...................Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another.................Respondents Judgment..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Anwar Hossain Vs. Mainul Hosein & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of Bihar vs. Rai Bahadur Hurdut Roy Moti Lal Jute Mills and another AIR 1960 SC 378; Madhu Limaye vs. The Superintendent. Tihar Jail, Delhi and others AIR 1975 SC 1505; M Saleem Ullah Advocate vs. Md. Abdur Rouf, Chief Election Commissioner and others 1 BLC 229; Md. Abdur Rashid Khan vs. Governm...... question. All the appeals are therefore, allowed. There is no order as to costs. The connected civil petition is disposed of in the light of the Judgment in the appeals. Ed. ...... question. All the appeals are therefore, allowed. There is no order as to costs. The connected civil petition is disposed of in the light of the Judgment in the appeals. Ed. ......vil) Present : Md Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Anwar Hossain………………….Appellant Vs. Mainul Hosein & others... ......Respondents Judgment May 2, 2005. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Bangladesh Bank Vs. Rana Awan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t be sent to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Works and also to the Solicitor. Ed. ...... the official(s) who was/were responsible for the default. Let a copy of the judgment be sent to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Works and also to the Solicitor. Ed. ...... the official(s) who was/were responsible for the default. Let a copy of the judgment be sent to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Works and also to the Solicitor. Ed. ...... the official(s) who was/were responsible for the default. Let a copy of the judgment be sent to the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Works and also to the Solicitor. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Harendra Nath Mahali Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....o merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ...... reconveyance at all stages. 18. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ...... reconveyance at all stages. 18. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ......resent: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Harendra Nath Mahali…………………………… Appellant Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others...............Respondents Judgment Ma..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Afia Begum and others Vs. Abdul Baset Mia & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ....... In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ....... In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......sent: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Afia Begum and others…………………………….Appellants Vs. Abdul Baset Mia & others... .........................Respondents Judgment..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Nur Amin and others Vs. Abdul Quddus and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Nur Amin and others..............Appellants Vs. Abdul Quddus and others... .............Respondents Judgment March 23..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Monowara Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....awyers Involved: AKM Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mvi Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent No. 1. Not represented—Respo......ed Unnecessarily which we disapprove. 14. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any substance in this petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......ed Unnecessarily which we disapprove. 14. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any substance in this petition. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ...... Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS)...........................Petitioner Vs. Monowara Begum and others.......................................Respondents Jud..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Jainul Abedin Jamal Vs. Qais Huda and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....fere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......e notice dated 11-7-2001. 10. In the circumstances, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......e notice dated 11-7-2001. 10. In the circumstances, we find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Both the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jainul Abedin Jamal....................Petitioner Vs. Qais Huda and others....................Respondents Judgment December 15..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; Ed. ......im earlier. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the witness ………..(21) Cases Referred to- Abdus Samad and others vs. Md Shorab Ali and others 1981 BLD (AD) 77 = 33 DLR (AD) 113; Jalaluddin Fakir vs. Shajahan All Molla and others 1984 BLD (AD) 27; Shahidur Rahman Molla vs. Abdul Halim Molla 1983 BLD 89 = 35 DL......ourt Appellate Division (Civil) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others.................Appellants Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others..................Respondents Judgment Nove..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ssed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul K Chowdhury J Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others..................Appellants Vs. State............................Respondent Judgment December 7, 2004..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Agrani Bank. Vs. Ansarul Hoque and ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ...... Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs and the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank........................Appellant Vs. Ansarul Hoque and ors................Respondents Judgment April 17, ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dhaka Vs. Election Commission, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....servations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ......Senior Member of the Bar and also as an Officer of this Court and we sound word of caution to him for the future. With the aforesaid observations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ......Senior Member of the Bar and also as an Officer of this Court and we sound word of caution to him for the future. With the aforesaid observations, the Rule is disposed of. Ed. ...... Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Supreme Court of Bangladesh, Appellate Division, Dhaka.........................Petitioner Vs. Election Commission represented by the Chairman (Chief Election Commissioner) and..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha Vs. Abdul Jakir and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gladesh 50 DLR (AD) 11. Lawyers Involved: AKM Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record— Fo......, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ......, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha......................Appellant Vs. Abdul Jakir and others........................Respondents Judgment..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Agrani Bank and other Vs. Essential Garments Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......petition. 23. In the background of our discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......petition. 23. In the background of our discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......late Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank and other........................Appellants Vs. Essential Garments Ltd. and others...............Respondents Judgment ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Abdul Mannan Vs. Tayeb Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......rit. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......rit. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdul Mannan……………………….Appellant Vs. Tayeb Ali and others........................Respondents Judgment March..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66