Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Serajul Islam Bhuiyan (Md) Vs. Bangladesh Water Development Board & others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....6. Writ Petition No. 7377 of 2002. Judgment Md. Nizamul Huq J.- Upon an application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh filed by the petitioner, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order contain......on the basis of order dated 9‑11‑2002 and that the authority for the greater interest of work stayed the transfer order which cannot be questioned. It was further stated that the authority is not absolutely bound by the Rules 1997 because the Rules are Administrative instructions laying down gen..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Ekushey Television Ltd. and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....involved all the writ petitions are disposed of by this single judgment. 2. Writ Petition No. 4196 of 2003 has been filed by Ekushey Television Limited represented by its Chairman Mr. Abdus Salam. Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned memo dated 7‑6â€......to ETV Ltd should not be declared to have been entered into and granted unlawfully and without lawful authority and to be of no legal effect. Subsequently, after hearing the parties the Rule was made absolute on 27‑3‑2002. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid Judgment and order dated 27‑3‑2002, ..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 230
Salauddin Jamil Vs. Amjad Ali Khan and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....on Limited, 55 DLR 578. Lawyers Involved: AB Siddique-For the Petitioner Mohiuddin Ahmed-For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 230 of 2001. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- The Rule was obtained by defendant No. 1 upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the ...... with cost. Order of stay granted at the time of issue of file Rule on 19‑1‑2001 is hereby recalled and vacated. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 87. ..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 161
Arif Iftekhar Ali and others Vs. Sekandar Ali Hawlader, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....id J Hasan Foez Siddique J Arif Iftekhar Ali and others.............Petitioners Vs. Sekandar Ali Hawlader..................Opposite Party Judgment April 15, 2002. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Maulana Abdul Motin and others vs. Shah Alam Bhuiya...... Foez Siddique J Arif Iftekhar Ali and others.............Petitioners Vs. Sekandar Ali Hawlader..................Opposite Party Judgment April 15, 2002. Result: The Rule is made absolute. Cases Referred to- Maulana Abdul Motin and others vs. Shah Alam Bhuiyan and others ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Akhteruzzaman Chowdhury Vs. Hamidul Huq, MD, UCBL and another, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... Petitioner Dr. Kamal Hossain with Rokanuddin Mahmood, Senior Advocates‑For Contemner‑Opposite. Parties. Contempt Petition No. 3 of 2003. Judgment Syed Amirul Islam J.- This contempt Rule was issued calling upon the contemner opposite parties to show cause as to why they shall not b......nor they have any statutory power under the Articles of Association of the company to do so. Dr. Hossain submitted that it was not within the power of any of the contemner opposite parties and it was absolutely within the power of Chairman designate to issue any notice for calling the AGM for those ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 158
Standard Bank Ltd. Vs. Tripos Engineering & Trading Company (GD) and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ed Trading Corporation SA vs. Allied Arab Bank Ltd, (1985) 2 Lloyd's Law Report 554 at page 556. Lawyers Involved: Ajmalul Hossain, QC with Iftekhar Ahmed, Advocates-For the Petitioner (In both Rule). M Moniruzzaman Khan with Mokunda Chandra Debnath, Advocates‑For the opposite Party No. 8......is directed to make the payment under the letters of credit in question to the Premier Bank without any further delay. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 55...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Noor Mohammad Vs. Md. Noor Hossain & another, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... Involved: AS Md. Ramzan Khan, Advocate-For the Petitioner. Dr. Kazi Aktar Hamid, Advocate-For Opposite Party No. 2. Civil Revision No. 2517 of 2001. Judgment Bijan Kumar Das J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 8...... Court, therefore, allowed the addition of party without applying its mind and without assigning any reason whatsoever which has caused serious miscarriage of justice. In the result this Rule is made absolute. The impugned order dated 8‑2‑2000 and 10-2‑2000 passed by the learned Assistant Judg..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 171
Uttara Bank Limited Vs. Syed Abidur Reza and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....oint which survives for determination in the suit". 8. It was further submitted that the High Court Division fell in error in holding that the impugned termination order issued on 19.09.1981 under Rule 18(b) of the Bank's Staff Service Rules of 1965 being a dead service rule and dead law, the ter......n error in holding that the impugned termination order issued on 19.09.1981 under Rule 18(b) of the Bank's Staff Service Rules of 1965 being a dead service rule and dead law, the termination order is absolutely a nullity and without jurisdiction, in view of the fact that the petitioner bank on the d..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Quazi Faruque Ahmed Vs. M. A. Wadud and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....g on 9th June, 2009 are illegal, void and collusive, and for permanent injunction. 3. After the institution of the suit, the petitioner filed an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of Code of Civil Procedure restraining the respondents from disturbing him in his peac...... Sinha J. - This petition for leave to appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 11th August, 2009 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2323 of 2009 making the rule absolute in part. 2. Facts relevant for the disposal of this petition are that the petitioner ins..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A.B.M. Siddique Mia, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....istrative Tribunal could have declared that the respondent is 'still in active service' is not clear to us? Both the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and the Administrative Tribunal failed to notice Rule 34 of the Civil Service Rules, Part-1 which provides "unless Government in view of special circ......ore, merit in this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 15 MLR (AD) (2010) 460, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 6, IX ADC (2012) 201. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 229
Shah Newaz (Md.) and others Vs. Shah Wali and another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... the Petitioners. Md. Abdus Salam Khan with Aminul Islam Mondal, Advocates—For the Substituted Opposite-Party No. 1. Civil Revision No. 2031 of 1992. Judgment Md. Abdus Salam J. - This Rule under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure arose out of the impugned judgment and decree ......end down the original case records at once with a copy of this judgment to the learned District Judge, Dhaka for necessary action accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002)375...Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 187
Khadem Ali (Md) Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... Lawyers Involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate-For the Petitioner. Not represented— the Opposite Party. Criminal Revision No. 112 of 2000. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the delay of 916 days in fil......nvolved in the case is found to be due to circumstances beyond his control, 1 find it just and expedient in interest of justice to condone the delay of in question. In the result, the Rule is made absolute and the delay 916 days in filing the revisional application is condoned. Ed. This Cas..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Nurul Islam Manzoor Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....cate M Faruque, Deputy Attorney-General with Anisul Haque Md. Mostafa, Assistant Attorney-General—For the State. Criminal Revision No. 557 of 1999. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J. - By this Rule, the opposite party was called upon to show cause as to why statement of the witnesses recorded...... are returned to one of the learned Advocates of the petitioners. Communicate the order to the Metropolitan Session Judge, Dhaka. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 276. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Nur Hossain (Md) Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....AD) 11. Lawyers Involved: AKM Faiz, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Shaheed Ahmed Advocate—For Respondent No.1. Writ Petition No. 2277 of 1996. Judgment Md. Abdul Matin J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why they should not perform the fun......stances of the case we find no substance in this writ petition and accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 275. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Bangladesh Marine Fisheries Association Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Mushfiqur Rahman Khan, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No.1158 of 1996. Judgment Md. Fazlul Karim J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order Gazette date...... impugned order also not impose any legal obligation for employment any trained legal personnels therein and no fine by way of penalties can also follow for thereof. In the result the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000)..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Dhaka Leather Company Ltd. Vs. Sikder Construction Ltd. and another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... Lawyers Involved: MA Samad, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Enayetur Rahim, Advocate—For Opposite Party No. 1. Civil Revision No. 3643 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - This Rule was obtained by defendant No. 1 against an order dated 18-6-2000 of the Fifth Court of Subordin......result, the Rule is discharged. No costs. Order of stay granted at the time of issue of the Rule is hereby recalled and vacated. Communicate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 357...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Moinuddin Ahmed alias Farook Vs. Khursheda Begum and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....vocate—For the Petitioner. ASM Wahidul Momen Chowdhury with Fedaushi Shorab, Advocates—For Opposite-Party No. 1. Civil Revision No. 2250 of 1999. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - This Rule is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25-3-99 passed by the learned Second Subordin......chedule property exceeds 1/3rd portion of the properties left by late Alimuddin. 7. Heard the learned Advocates. In the plaint the plaintiff, amongst others, prayed for declaration that she is the absolute owner of the property described in schedule Ka of the plaint by virtue of the deed dated 25..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Abdul Mannan (Md) Vs. Swaraj Roy and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....wyers Involved: Md. Ismail, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Harendra Nath Nondy, Advocate—For Opposite party No. 1. Civil Revision No. 2467 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by the plaintiff upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code ......is affirmed. No order as to costs. The order of stay granted at the time of issue of the Rule is hereby re-called and vacated, Communicate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 352. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Khulna Newsprint Mills Limited Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....alilur Rahman with Syed Afsar Jahan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Azizul Hoque, Advocate—For Respondent No. 2. Writ Petition No. 535 of 1994. Judgment Kazi A T Manowaruddin J. - This Rule under Article 102 of the Constitution of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh was issued calling ......ision we cannot but hold that the Labour Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the said IRO case of the respondent No.2 or to pass the impugned judgment and order. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. The impugned judgment and order passed by that Labour Court is set aside without any order..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Amir Hossain Bhuiya (Md) Vs. Harisul Haq Bhuiya and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....er. Shaheed Alam with Mahbubey Alam, Muhammad Safar Ali and Mozammel Hossain, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 2046 of 1998. Judgment Md. Iftikhar Rasool J. - This Rule is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31-5-1998 passed by the Additional District J......ve facts and circumstances, I am constrained to hold that the lower appellate Court was not at all legally justified to dismiss the whole suit of the petitioner. 13. In the result the Rule is made absolute in part without any order as to costs. The impugned judgment and decree dated 31-5-98 passe..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 99