Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Akhtarun Nessa and another Vs. Habibullah and ors, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....of the learned Subordinate Judge are restored. In the facts and circumstances of the case we allow half of the costs to the appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 88. ......(1962) 14 DLR 847; 17 DLR 618; 19 DLR 659; 21 DLR 647; 22 DLR 64; 26 DLR 93; 21 DLR (AD) 5; 38 CWN 288; 38 CWN 654; 43 CWN 200. Lawyers Involved: M. H. Khondker, Senior Advocate with Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate, Instructed by A. Backkar, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellants. Ahmad Subha..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Md. Golam Rabbani and another Vs. Hon’ble Judges of the High Court Division & anr, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
.... Since Government has been made a party on its prayer for adding it in the proceeding its name as Respondent shall continue on record. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 87. ......p; another….…….Respondents Judgment November 22, 1978. Lawyers Involved: M.G. Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by D.C. Panday, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellants. Maksudur Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For Respondent No.2...Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 84
Controller of the Customs and ors Vs. Shamsur Rahman, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....he appeal is allowed and the order appealed against is set aside. We direct the writ to be recalled. We make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 60. ......me Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazl Munim J Ruhul Islam J Controller of the Customs and ors…………..Appellants Vs. Shamsur Rahman……………Respondent Judgment February 22, 1978. Lawyers Involved: Sultan..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Abdul Latif Mirza Vs. Government of Bangladesh and other, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
.... already held that as the detention of the appellant is not sustainable in law on other grounds stated above I would allow this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 1. ...... subsequently decided by the said Court, but no decision on the question was given as the orders of detention impugned in the said case had been made before the said Amendment. Mr. Justice Hamoodur Rahman (as he then was) in delivering the judgment in the said case, inferred the power of the High ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 408
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Enamul Huq and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......iction and sentence passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Patuakhali in Sessions Case No.23 of 1985. 2. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 20.12.1984 at about 12.00 noon. P.W.2 Maksudur Rahman and deceased Shahjahan @ Shanu were talking with ach other to the east of the tube well in t..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Matiur Rahman Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Sree Hare Krishna Das Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ring the review petition filed by the petitioner, rejected the same. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 146. ......neous. 6. Before we part with the discussion, it will be pertinent to mention in this connection that before the petitioner was dismissed from service an enquiry was held by Mr. Latifur Rahman the then justice, Supreme Court of Bangladesh, High Court Division on the allegation as brou..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Md. Firozul Islam and others Vs. Md. Helalul Islam and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, having no leg to stand the leave petition is without any substance. 7. The leave petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. ......001 discharging the Rule. 2. The facts leading to the leave petition are that the predecessor of the respondents as plaintiff instituted Other Class Suit No. 151 of 1995 against one Fazlur Rahman predecessor in interest of the petitioners as defendant praying for declaration that the dee..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......down in Mahomed Golab's case considered to be the correct proposition of law regarding the scope of the suit seeking setting aside of the ex parte decree on the ground of fraud. In the case of Azizur Rahman Vs. Sudhangshu Kumar Mitra and another reported in 4 DLR, 636 scope of the suit filed seeking..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......ision (Civil) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....erred To- Abdul Kader Chowdhury and others vs State 28 DLR (AD) 38. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate,(AKM Zahirul Hoque, Advocate with him) instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. MA Rouf, Deputy Attorney-General, in......……..Respondent Judgment May 11, 2005. Case Referred To- Abdul Kader Chowdhury and others vs State 28 DLR (AD) 38. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate,(AKM Zahirul Hoque, Advocate with him) instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......id decision of the Government of awarding the respondent a scholarship to enable him to do his PhD and thereafter to be absorbed in the Government service had disappeared. The late President Ziaur Rahman having been apprised of this mischief ordered an investigation into the matter. Consequ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Tahedul Islam (Md) and others Vs. Md. Mojibar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... in interfering with the judgment of the appellate Court and thereupon restoring the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Md Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Tahedul Islam (Md) and others..........................Appellants vs Md. Mojibar Rahman and others.........................Respondents Judgment November 22, 2005. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ner. Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record— For Respondent No.1. Abdus Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record —For Respondent No. 2. Criminal Petition for...... Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record— For Respondent No.1. Abdus Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record —For Respondent No. 2. Criminal Petition for Leave to..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ahi Panir vs Bangladesh 44 DLR (AD) 319 and Deepchand vs State of Uttar Pradesh (AIR 1959 SC 664). Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate (Sigma Huda, Advocate with him), instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners (In Civil Petition Nos. 707 & 708 of 2......ra vs Province of East Pakistan, 9 DLR (SC) 21; Jalan Trading Company vs Mill Mazdoar Sabha AIR 1967 SC 69; Sheikh Abdus Sattar vs Returning Officer and others 41 DLR (AD) 30; Bangladesh vs Md Azizur Rahman 46 DLR (AD) 19; Sharfat Ali vs Union of India AIR 1974 SC 1631; CB Boarding and Lodging vs My..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
State Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ...... Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Result: The ap..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 184
Ashequr Rahman (Md) Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... that proceeding against him was not concluded within 180 days as per Regulation 43(8) of the Regulations. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......er as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Paper Converting & Packaging Ltd. Vs. Govt. of the People’s Repub of BD and ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... been accrued to the plaintiff-petitioner in respect of the same for any declaration or any permanent injunction as sought for in the instant suit. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......hibit (B) which is a photocopy of an affidavit has not been collaborated by any witnesses. Further, the DW No. 2. Mr MS Shamsudoha in his cross admitted that the attesting Notary Public Mr Habibur Rahman told him, DW No. 2, that the Notary Public has got no duplicate i.e. of Exhibit (B), the dec..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93