Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Ganesh Chandra Das Vs. Arati Acharjya, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....te—For the Defendant Petitioner. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate—For the Plaintiff-Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 1899 of 1995. Judgment Md. Abdus Salam J. - In this civil Revision a Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Arati Acharjya to show cause as to why the impugned ......d down the original records at once with a copy of this judgment to the learned District Judge, Chittagong for necessary action accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002)348. ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 186
Mirza Abdul Bari Beg and Others Vs. Zahidannessa and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....s Involved: Md. Mozibur Rahman, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Shahidul Islam, Advocate—For Opposite Party No. 1-7. Civil Revision No. 78 of 2001. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. -This Rule was obtained by judgment-debtors upon making an application under section 115 of the Code of Ci......d. The executing Court is directed to proceed with the execution by issuing again the writ for delivery of possession to the decree-holders. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002)344. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Pubali Bank Ltd. Vs. Mazid and Co. and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....A Tariq, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Rokanuddin Mahmud with Murad Reza, Advocates—For Opposite Party Nos. 1-2. Civil Revision No. 1188 of 1993. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - This Rule is direct against the judgment and order dated 31-3-93 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge,......say that the High Court has no jurisdiction to set aside the same on the ground that no revision lies against an interlocutory order passed by the Artha Rin Adalat. In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to cost and the impugned order dated 31-3-93 passed by the Artha Rin A..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 93
State Vs. Rashid Ahmed & others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....hittagong and the Deputy Commissioner, Chittagong for their information and necessary action. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 333. ......hat all the prosecution witnesses uniformly and consistently stated in their evidence that the occurrence took place near the bamboo clump in front of the house of the accused persons and there being absolutely no discrepancy in their evidence regarding the place of the occurrence, the learned Addit..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Delwar Hossain Khan Vs. Alhaj Rustum Ali & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....Md.Taj Mohammad, Advocates — For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 2612 of 2001 with Civil Revision No. 2617 of 2001. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - This order will dispose both the Rules, which arise out of the following facts and circumstances: 2. On 8-11-1994 opposite party N......lled and vacated. The executing Court is directed to take steps for expeditious restoration of possession to the claimants. Communicate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 328. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Rice Mill Owners Association Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others , 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....nod Kumar Agarwal, Advocate—For the Petitioner. KS Salahuddin Ahmed for M. Ziaul Hasan, Advocate—For Respondents No. 5. Writ Petition No. 2612 of 2000. Judgment SAN Mominur Rahman J.- Rule was issued calling upon the respondent Nos. 1-3 to show cause as to why the impugned Memo No. B......e in favour of respondent No. 5 cannot be said to be bona fide or in accordance with the provisions of law and there is violation of principle of natural justice. 10. Accordingly, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs. The registration given and the licence granted in favour ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 162
Abdul Muhit and others Vs. Social Investment Bank Limited (SIBL) and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....s of SIBL dated 9-5-2001 the petitioners separately filed Writ Petition No. 1889 of 2001, Writ Petition No. 1873 of 2001 Writ Petition No. 1872 of 2001 and Writ Petition No. 1871 of 2001 and obtained Rules and orders staying the operation of Bangladesh Bank letters dated 8-5-2001 but no stay was giv......the petitioner is the Civil Court and not this Court. In view of the above, these applications are rejected without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 306...Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 208
Kajemuddin Miah (Md) Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ith SAM Mahbub Elahi, Advocates—For the Petitioner. M Iman Ali, Deputy Attorney-General-For the Respondent. Writ Petition No. 2702 of 1996. Judgment Mainur Reza Chowdhury J. - By this Rule Nisi the respondents were called upon to show cause as to why the impugned order as contained i...... a competent authority or Court under any law for the time being in force and also all lands, so lost by diluvion under the said sub-section, which may re-appear on or after the said date, shall vest absolutely in the Government free from all encumbrances shall be at its disposal. (1) Notwithstan..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 167
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 482
Shan Hosiery Vs. Bangladesh Jatiya Shamabaya Shilpa Samity Ltd and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... with MB Taz Mohammad, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Probir Halder, Advocate—For Opposite Party Nos.1, 2 & 5. Civil Revision No. 3748 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - This Rule was obtained by the plaintiff against the order of Subordinate Judge, Second Court at Dhaka dat......ssumption of facts which are not borne out by the plaint, and also not sanctioned by law and such order has no doubt resulted in serious miscarriage of justice. 18. In the result, the Rule is made absolute with costs. The cost is assessed at Taka 10,000 and the defendant Nos. 1, 2 and 5 are direc..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Sazeda Khatun Vs. Asad Ali and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....amida Chowdhury, Advocates — For the Petitioner. Surajit Bhattacharya, Advocate—For Opposite Party Nos. 1 & 2. Civil Revision No. 3023 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by the pre-emptee (purchaser) by making a revision application under section 115 o...... this Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. Order of stay granted at the time of issue of the Rule is re-called and vacated. Communicate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 285...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Shaikh (Md) Obaidullah Raihan Vs. Sayed Shahidul Haque Jamal and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....rooqui, Advocate — For the Petitioner. Ajmalul Hossain, QC with Iftekhar Ahmad, Advocates — For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 6200 of 2001. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause under what authority respondent No.1 has ......tion of disqualification and for the reason mentioned earlier, the Rule is liable to be struck out. In the result, the Rule is struck out. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 280...Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Ramesh Chandra Chowdhury @ Das Vs. Naresh Chandra Das @ Chowdhury, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....nvolved: Bikash Paul, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md. Mansurul Haque Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 636 of 1996. Judgment Bijan Kumar Das J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 16-......te of receipt of this order. Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge Narshingdi at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 227...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Tofazzal Hossain (Md) and others Vs. Momtaz Begum & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....an, Md Tamizuddin, Fazlul Yaque Khan Fakir Rahen Hossain with Mostafa Zaman Islam, Advocates—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.1546 of 1999. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- In this Rule, the judgment and order dated 15-4-99 passed by the Second Court of Subordinate Judge, Manikgan......est by the judgment and order dated 30-1-97. Against the aforesaid judgment and order the petitioners preferred Civil Revision No.1272 of 1998. This Court by the judgment dated 18-11-98 made the Rule absolute and sent back the appeal on remand to the learned Subordinate Judge, Manikganj for a fresh ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Abul Hossain Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....d in accordance with law after treating the naraji petition as a petition of complaint. As such, an order can be passed on the basis of the present application, we do not find any reason to issue any Rule. The order of the learned Sessions Judge dated 1-2-2000 is set aside to the extent of the porti......nce with law regarding that petition. Communicate the order to the Magistrate concerned. The application is accordingly disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 222...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Shah Alam (Md.) Vs. Abul Kalam and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....s Involved: SK Afzalur Rahman, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Shamim Khaled Ahmed —For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 621 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- The above Rule was obtained by the preemptors upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code......sdiction. We do not need to enter into the findings on service of summons or possession arrived at in such proceedings, which were uncalled for and are quashed. 21. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs. The impugned judgment and order dated 28-11-99 are hereby set aside...Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Protima Sen and others Vs. Chitra Rani Dey and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....rotima Sen and others…………………………...Petitioners Vs. Chitra Rani Dey and another…………………...Opposite Parties Judgment August 24, 1999. Result: The Rule is made absolute without any order as to cost. Section 4 of the Partition Act was enacted t......d others…………………………...Petitioners Vs. Chitra Rani Dey and another…………………...Opposite Parties Judgment August 24, 1999. Result: The Rule is made absolute without any order as to cost. Section 4 of the Partition Act was enacted to afford a sp..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42