Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 381-400 of 614 results.
Monju Mia and others Vs. Shiraj Mia and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....irs of defendant No.1 obtained the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order dated 13‑7‑1999 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat (In-charge) at Sylhet in Title Suit No. 46 of 1998, which rejected a prayer for an ...... defendant No.1 obtained the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order dated 13‑7‑1999 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat (In-charge) at Sylhet in Title Suit No. 46 of 1998, which rejected a prayer for an expert......endant No.1 obtained the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order dated 13‑7‑1999 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat (In-charge) at Sylhet in Title Suit No. 46 of 1998, which rejected a prayer for an expert opi....... This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 264. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Salahuddin Talukder (Md) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....r, Appraiser and others so far relates to the petitioner is hereby declared to have been passed without any lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 161. ...... Azizul Haque Sikder and others Vs. Collector of Customs, Chittagong and others 49 DLR (AD) 172; Mujibur Rahman Vs. Government of Bangladesh 44 DLR (AD) 111; Junnur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha 51 DLR (AD) 166, Delwar Hussain Miah Vs. Bangladesh 52 DLR (AD) 120; Azizul Haque Sikde......r, Appraiser and others so far relates to the petitioner is hereby declared to have been passed without any lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 161. ........Petitioner Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh.................Respondent Judgment April 16, 2002. Cases Referred to- Azizul Haque Sikder and others Vs. Collector of Customs, Chittagong and others 49 DLR (AD) 172; Mujibur Rahman Vs. Gover..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Nasim Anwar Hossain Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....faulting borrower. The High Court Division, after exhaustive hearing and on examination of the relevant sections/articles respectively in the Bank Companies Act, 1991; Bangladesh Bank Order, 1972 and Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, held: “ 22. ... The petitioner’s name, even if he is indebted to ......ng borrower. The High Court Division, after exhaustive hearing and on examination of the relevant sections/articles respectively in the Bank Companies Act, 1991; Bangladesh Bank Order, 1972 and Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, held: “ 22. ... The petitioner’s name, even if he is indebted to one of......orrower. The High Court Division, after exhaustive hearing and on examination of the relevant sections/articles respectively in the Bank Companies Act, 1991; Bangladesh Bank Order, 1972 and Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, held: “ 22. ... The petitioner’s name, even if he is indebted to one of the......Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Md. Ruhul Quddus J Nasim Anwar Hossain…………..... Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others…………..... Respondents Judgment December 7, 2010. Cases Referred to- M..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 167
Md. Arif Gaffar Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....d in: ...... ...... ...... High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Md. Ruhul Quddus J Md. Arif Gaffar…………..... Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna and others..... Respondents Judgment December 2, 2010. Cases Referred to- Provat Kumar ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 169
Abu Mohammad Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh & another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....foregoing reasons, we see there is no merit in this Rule. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 352. ......ecific provision under heading Treatment of Liabilities and in clause 5.1 it was stipulated that the long term liabilities due to financing institutions like Bangladesh Shilpa Bank, Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha, Krishi Bank or any other Commercial Banks and the Financing institutions shall be assu......foregoing reasons, we see there is no merit in this Rule. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 352. ......rnment of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh & another……………Respondents Judgment November 30, 1999. Cases Referred To- Managing Director, Dhaka WASA Vs. Superior Builders and Engineers Ltd. 51 DLR (AD) 56; Associate Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. Vs. Wednesbury Corporati..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 95
Fatema Begum Vs. The Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ted in: ......: ......upreme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Md. Ruhul Quddus J Fatema Begum…………….....Petitioner Vs. The Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj and others………….... Respondents Result: The Rule is made absolute. ......h Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Md. Ruhul Quddus J Fatema Begum…………….....Petitioner Vs. The Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj and others………….... Respondents Result: The Rule is made absolute. Judgment Novem..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 183
SDS Dairy Limited Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....esh and others ……………….... Respondents Judgment January 6, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Code of Civil Porcedure, 1908 (V of 1908); Order XXI rule 83 The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 ( VIII of 2003); Chapter VI Scope of applicability of the Civil Proced......d others ……………….... Respondents Judgment January 6, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Code of Civil Porcedure, 1908 (V of 1908); Order XXI rule 83 The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 ( VIII of 2003); Chapter VI Scope of applicability of the Civil Procedure Co......hers ……………….... Respondents Judgment January 6, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Code of Civil Porcedure, 1908 (V of 1908); Order XXI rule 83 The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 ( VIII of 2003); Chapter VI Scope of applicability of the Civil Procedure Code i......Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Nazmun Ara Sultana J Md. Ruhul Quddus J SDS Dairy Limited………………….... Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………….... Respondents Judgment January 6, 2011. Result: The Ru..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Badal Kumar Paul Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... not wanted in any other case. Send down the records. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the Directorate of Narcotics for guidance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 218....... not wanted in any other case. Send down the records. Let a copy of this judgment be sent to the Directorate of Narcotics for guidance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 218.......e on record it did not appear to us that the seizure list witnesses were telling the truth in the trial. After close scrutiny, we could not find any reason to take any view different from that of the Adalat that the prosecution successfully proved the seizure of 250 bottles of Phensidyl and 72 piece......iminal Appeal No. 31 of 2001. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This appeal was presented by the sole appellant Badal Kumar Paul under section 410 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against judgment and order dated 13‑11‑2000 passed by the Sessions Judge at Jessore in session case No. 39 of 199..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 90
MA Qasem Vs. Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
.... High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Surendra Kumar Sinha J MA Qasem…………………………….Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others…………………Respondents Judgment November 22, 1999. Cas......Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Surendra Kumar Sinha J MA Qasem…………………………….Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others…………………Respondents Judgment November 22, 1999. Cases Ref......t Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Surendra Kumar Sinha J MA Qasem…………………………….Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others…………………Respondents Judgment November 22, 1999. Cases Referre......ion (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Surendra Kumar Sinha J MA Qasem…………………………….Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and others…………………Respondents Judgment November 22, 1999. Cases Referred To- ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 90
....uently transferred to the Court of 3rd Joint District Judge, Chittagong and was re-numbered as 83 of 2003. The Bank also instituted Mortgaged Suit No.92 of 2003 which was subsequently re-numberless Artha Rin Suit No.43 of 2003 against the writ petitioner for realization of outstanding loan amounti...... transferred to the Court of 3rd Joint District Judge, Chittagong and was re-numbered as 83 of 2003. The Bank also instituted Mortgaged Suit No.92 of 2003 which was subsequently re-numberless Artha Rin Suit No.43 of 2003 against the writ petitioner for realization of outstanding loan amounting to ...... the above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 995....... Abdul Matin J
ABM Khairul Haque J
Md. Muzammel Hossain J
Surendra Kumar Sinha J
M/S. Hamida Oil Mills, Proprietor Bhaiya Oil Mills Ltd…….....Petitioner
Vs.
The Agrani Bank Ltd. and others.……………………………........Respondents
Judgment
March 15, 2010.
La..
Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 191
....ul Matin J
ABM Khairul Haque J
Md. Muzammel Hossain J
Surendra Kumar Sinha J
M/s. Aimon Electrical Industries, Proprietor, Md. Delowar Hossain and another.....Petitioners
Vs.
Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court at Dhaka and others …........Respondents
Judgment
February 14,......in J
ABM Khairul Haque J
Md. Muzammel Hossain J
Surendra Kumar Sinha J
M/s. Aimon Electrical Industries, Proprietor, Md. Delowar Hossain and another.....Petitioners
Vs.
Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court at Dhaka and others …........Respondents
Judgment
February 14, 2010.......
ABM Khairul Haque J
Md. Muzammel Hossain J
Surendra Kumar Sinha J
M/s. Aimon Electrical Industries, Proprietor, Md. Delowar Hossain and another.....Petitioners
Vs.
Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court at Dhaka and others …........Respondents
Judgment
February 14, 2010.
......esent:
Mohammad Fazlul Karim CJ
Md. Abdul Matin J
ABM Khairul Haque J
Md. Muzammel Hossain J
Surendra Kumar Sinha J
M/s. Aimon Electrical Industries, Proprietor, Md. Delowar Hossain and another.....Petitioners
Vs.
Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court at Dhaka and others …....
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Abdul Jalil Miah and another Vs. Siddiqur Rahman, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....set aside. 2. That on 25-2-81 the petitioners as plaintiffs filed Title Suit No.276 of 1981 in the First Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka (which transferred to 4th Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat re-numbered as Title Suit No.244 of 1992) for declaration of title and recovery of ......ide. 2. That on 25-2-81 the petitioners as plaintiffs filed Title Suit No.276 of 1981 in the First Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka (which transferred to 4th Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat re-numbered as Title Suit No.244 of 1992) for declaration of title and recovery of khas p...... 2. That on 25-2-81 the petitioners as plaintiffs filed Title Suit No.276 of 1981 in the First Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka (which transferred to 4th Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat re-numbered as Title Suit No.244 of 1992) for declaration of title and recovery of khas posse......is Case is also Reported in: 29 BLD (HCD) (2009) 735. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
....ench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 6254 of 2008 (Analogously heard with Writ Petition No. 7346 of 2007 and disposed of by a common judgment) disposing of the writ petition directing Artha Rin Adalat No.3 Dhaka to dispose of Money Execution Case No.51 of 1992 filed by the decree-hol......f the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 6254 of 2008 (Analogously heard with Writ Petition No. 7346 of 2007 and disposed of by a common judgment) disposing of the writ petition directing Artha Rin Adalat No.3 Dhaka to dispose of Money Execution Case No.51 of 1992 filed by the decree-holder af......e High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 6254 of 2008 (Analogously heard with Writ Petition No. 7346 of 2007 and disposed of by a common judgment) disposing of the writ petition directing Artha Rin Adalat No.3 Dhaka to dispose of Money Execution Case No.51 of 1992 filed by the decree-holder after ...... VII ADC (2010) 819...
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Rahmatullah (Md.) and others Vs. Sabana Islam and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....btained by uncles and aunts of the minor upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment and order dated 29-3-2001 passed by Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.2 at Dhaka in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 287 of 1993 affirming those of the Assist......d by uncles and aunts of the minor upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment and order dated 29-3-2001 passed by Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.2 at Dhaka in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 287 of 1993 affirming those of the Assistant Ju...... uncles and aunts of the minor upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment and order dated 29-3-2001 passed by Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.2 at Dhaka in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 287 of 1993 affirming those of the Assistant Judge,...... Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 519. ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 179
Madinullah Miah Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan & another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....In the light of my above discussion I am inclined to allow this application. The Rule is, therefore, made absolute. The judgment and order dated 24-5-2001, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Noakhali, in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 59 of 2000 and the judgment and order dated ...... light of my above discussion I am inclined to allow this application. The Rule is, therefore, made absolute. The judgment and order dated 24-5-2001, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Noakhali, in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 59 of 2000 and the judgment and order dated 30-6-1......ht of my above discussion I am inclined to allow this application. The Rule is, therefore, made absolute. The judgment and order dated 24-5-2001, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Noakhali, in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 59 of 2000 and the judgment and order dated 30-6-1999,......l Mannan & another…………………………….Respondents Judgment November 28, 2001. Cases Referred- Promotha Nath Mazumdar vs. Nagendra Nath Mazumdar 33 CWN 1211; Abdus Samad and others vs. Md. Sohrab and others, 1981 BLD (AD) 77. Lawyers Involved: M Enayetur Rahim, A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Syed Ahmed Chowdhury Vs. Abdur Rashid Mridha, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... interference. In view of the discussion made above we find that this Rule merits no consideration. The Rule is, therefore, discharged. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 498. ...... interference. In view of the discussion made above we find that this Rule merits no consideration. The Rule is, therefore, discharged. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 498. ......nal Jurisdiction) Present: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nizamul Huq J Syed Ahmed Chowdhury………………. Petitioner Vs. Abdur Rashid Mridha, Retired Process Server, 2nd Munsif Adalat and 15 ors…….. Opposite Parties Judgment April 24, 2002. Lawyers Involved: ......isdiction) Present: Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Nizamul Huq J Syed Ahmed Chowdhury………………. Petitioner Vs. Abdur Rashid Mridha, Retired Process Server, 2nd Munsif Adalat and 15 ors…….. Opposite Parties Judgment April 24, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Md. Mo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 29
Md. Nurul Islam Vs. Artho Rin Adalat and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....he circumstances, we find no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. As such, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII ADC (2010) 642....... (Civil) Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam CJ Md. Abdul Matin J ABM Khairul Haque J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Nurul Islam…...............................Petitioner Vs. Artho Rin Adalat and others......................Respondents Judgment January 6, 2010. Lawyers In......(Civil) Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam CJ Md. Abdul Matin J ABM Khairul Haque J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Nurul Islam…...............................Petitioner Vs. Artho Rin Adalat and others......................Respondents Judgment January 6, 2010. Lawyers Involv...... Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam CJ Md. Abdul Matin J ABM Khairul Haque J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Nurul Islam…...............................Petitioner Vs. Artho Rin Adalat and others......................Respondents Judgment January 6, 2010. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Pubali Bank Ltd. Vs. Md. Mamunur Rahman and Another, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... Advocate—For the Respondent No.1. First Appeal No. 73 of 1992. Judgment ABM Khairul Haque J. - This appeal arises on the judgment dated 27-2-1992 and decrees 1-3-1992 passed by the Judge, Artha Rin Court Kishoregonj, in Artha Rin Case No. 27 of 1990, in allowing set off against the plain......ate—For the Respondent No.1. First Appeal No. 73 of 1992. Judgment ABM Khairul Haque J. - This appeal arises on the judgment dated 27-2-1992 and decrees 1-3-1992 passed by the Judge, Artha Rin Court Kishoregonj, in Artha Rin Case No. 27 of 1990, in allowing set off against the plaintiff. ......als of the godown for the relevant period, as such, according to his written statements, as supported by him in his deposition, comes to Taka 17,71,100 against claim of the bank. 11. The Artha Rin Adalat Ordinance came into effect on 31-7-1989 establishing special Courts for adjudication of the r...... High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: ABM Khairul Haque J KM Khaled J Pubali Bank Ltd………….……………….. Appellant Vs. Md. Mamunur Rahman and Another………. Respondents Judgment December 9, 2001. Case Referred To- Sulta..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Uttara Bank Ltd. Vs. Ali and Co. and another, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... appeal No. 304 of 1997 at the instance of the Uttara Bank Limited Bangabandhu Avenue Branch, Dhaka in directed against the judgment and decree dated 28‑7‑1997 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat in Title Suit No. 182 of 1984. Further, the Appeal No. 148 of 1999 is also against ......l No. 304 of 1997 at the instance of the Uttara Bank Limited Bangabandhu Avenue Branch, Dhaka in directed against the judgment and decree dated 28‑7‑1997 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat in Title Suit No. 182 of 1984. Further, the Appeal No. 148 of 1999 is also against the sa....... 304 of 1997 at the instance of the Uttara Bank Limited Bangabandhu Avenue Branch, Dhaka in directed against the judgment and decree dated 28‑7‑1997 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat in Title Suit No. 182 of 1984. Further, the Appeal No. 148 of 1999 is also against the same s......(2003) 156...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 101
Nurujjaman and others (Md) Vs. Md. Sajjad Ali and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....17‑1‑90 executed by the defendant Nos. 9 to 13 in favour of the defendant Nos. 1 to 4 were inoperative, void and of no legal effect. The suit was on transfer to the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat at Sylhet renumbered as Title Suit No. 62 of 1995. 3. Then, opposite party No. 1......‑90 executed by the defendant Nos. 9 to 13 in favour of the defendant Nos. 1 to 4 were inoperative, void and of no legal effect. The suit was on transfer to the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat at Sylhet renumbered as Title Suit No. 62 of 1995. 3. Then, opposite party No. 1 as pl......0 executed by the defendant Nos. 9 to 13 in favour of the defendant Nos. 1 to 4 were inoperative, void and of no legal effect. The suit was on transfer to the Court of Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat at Sylhet renumbered as Title Suit No. 62 of 1995. 3. Then, opposite party No. 1 as plaint....... This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 149...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 65
45394515448844874472444944424438443443834374435843204317431543104284427642544244