Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 381-400 of 1504 results.
The State Vs. Abdul Awal, 1983, 12 CLC (HCD)
....gment be forwarded to the learned Magistrate where he is posted now. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 288. ......gment be forwarded to the learned Magistrate where he is posted now. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 288. ......gment be forwarded to the learned Magistrate where he is posted now. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 288. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 13 Feb, 1983 | Hits: 1
....without any order as to costs. Judgments and decrees of the Courts below are set aside and Title Suit No. 76 of 1958 is decreed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 157.
......without any order as to costs. Judgments and decrees of the Courts below are set aside and Title Suit No. 76 of 1958 is decreed.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 157.
......Fazle Munim CJ. - This appeal arises from the judgment dated 11th December, 1979 passed by the High Court Division in Second Appeal No. 27 of 1966.
2. The appellant which was formerly Dhamai Tea Company Limited instituted Title Suit No. 76 of 1958 in the 2nd Court of Munsif, at Moulvi Baza..
Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Aug, 1982 | Hits: 3
....dinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca are hereby affirmed for the reasons stated above.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 282.
......dinate Judge, 3rd Court, Dacca are hereby affirmed for the reasons stated above.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 282.
......s Vs. Aghore Kumar Ganguli and other, AIR 1914 Privy Council page 27; N. Qamar Jahan Begum Vs. Ch. Bansi Dhar, AIR 1942 Oudh 231; Muralidhar Kulthia Vs. Sm. Tara Daye, AIR 1953 Calcutta 349; Kharadah Company Ltd. Vs. Raymon & Co. (India) Private Ltd., AIR 1962 (SC) 1810; Waverly Jute Mills Co. L..
Category: Arbitration Law, Corporate Law, Property Law | Date: 15 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 2
M/s Saleh Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. TSS PACIFIC ABETO and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ......ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ......ertified copy of the plaint is to be kept in the record. The Bank guarantee in this suit is extended upto 15th July, 1982. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 35 DLR (AD) (1983) 188. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 9 Jun, 1982 | Hits: 400
....Advocates of the parties and by Mr. Rafiq-ul Huq who appeared as amicus Curiae.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 345; 3 BLD (HCD) (1983)149
......Advocates of the parties and by Mr. Rafiq-ul Huq who appeared as amicus Curiae.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 345; 3 BLD (HCD) (1983)149
......lamandiar Private limited. AIR 1960 Bombay 136: Mazda, Daddy, S. & others Vs. Irani K.R. 78 CWN 872; Sri Gulabrai Kalidas Naik and others Vs. Shri Laxmidas Lalubhai Patel of Baroda and others, 48 Company cases, 438; 7 PLR (Dacca series) 159.
Lawyers Involved:
Amirul Islam with&nbs..
Category: Company Law | Date: 28 May, 1982 | Hits: 3
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... 97,075/- only. The plaintiffs claim for interest at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ......t David (Bangladesh) Ltd…………………………………………..Plaintiff Vs. M/S Brestern Shipping Company Ltd. & others…………………Defendants Jud..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
.... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... at the rate of Tk. 20% is rejected as it has not been substantiated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 362, 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 3. ...... (Admiralty Jurisdiction) Present: M.H. Rahman J Albert David (Bangladesh) Ltd.…………..…..................Plaintiff Vs. M/S Brostern Shipping Company Ltd. & Others…….. Defendant Judgment April 29, 1982 Result:..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 29 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 7
....ordered that the suit be decreed for a sum of Tk. 10, 27,502/- only against defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and 3 with costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 356
......ordered that the suit be decreed for a sum of Tk. 10, 27,502/- only against defendant Nos. 1 and 2 and 3 with costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 356
......ernment, certain necessary and consequential changes were made by the legislative authority, but on scrutiny it appears that these amendments were effected only to keep the corporate existence of the Company intact. It is true that the Government assumed some overriding powers as the sole shareholde..
Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law, Corporate Law | Date: 12 Apr, 1982 | Hits: 5
Neerala Tea Estate & another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board & ors, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......the case, we direct that the contesting respondent No.2 do pay cost to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 7. ......unt of money previously for development of the inaccessible area and they transferred all their rights in the property to petitioner no.1, against shares allotted to them as consideration in the Company. As per terms of the lease the petitioner no.1 paid the rent fixed for the first year amount..Category: Constitutional Law, Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Neerala Tea Estate Ltd. And Another Vs. Bangladesh Tea Board and Others, 1982, 11 CLC (HCD)
....nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ......nces of the ease, we direct that the contesting respondent No. 2 do pay colt to the petitioners which we assess at Tk. 2000/00. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 161. ......th costs. A.T M. Afzal J. -The Rule under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh is at the instance of Neerala Tea Estate Limited, a private Limited Company, and one of its Directors, Mr. Hamidul Huq Chowdhury, petitioners No. 1 and 2 respectively a..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Jan, 1982 | Hits: 2
Syed Abdul Aziz Vs.Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... observation this rule is discharged. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 54. ...... observation this rule is discharged. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 54. ......on and inter alia stated that the alleged shortage of oil was caused not due to misappropriation by him but it was the result of the discrepancy in the measurement taken by Flow Metre of the Oil Company and the Calliberation Chart provided with the Oil Barge No.1 by Narayanganj Dockyard. T..Category: Administrative Law, Constitutional Law | Date: 18 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 2
Bazlur Rahman Bhuiyan Vs. Bangladesh Shipping Corporation, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....time stipulated in the contract the suit shall be dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 443;34 DLR (AD) (1982) 42. ......time stipulated in the contract the suit shall be dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 443;34 DLR (AD) (1982) 42. ......led before the court. A new fact was brought to the notice of the court that the entire consideration money amounting to Tk. 1, 14, 25,000/00 had been accepted by the Corporation form Madina Shipping Company. by way of bank guarantee. The court, however, by Order No. 52 dated 13-5-81 dismissed the r..Category: Company Law, Contract Law, Procedural Law | Date: 12 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 0
Saad Ahmed Vs. The State, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
..../-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 15 days more. Let the records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 75. ....../-, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 15 days more. Let the records be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (HCD) (1983) 75. ......in reports that on 6-11-71 a fight took place between 30 of his Razakars and 35 Muktibahini forces between 10 A.M. to 4 P.M. at village Beel Baruichara in police station Kumarkhali in which a Razakar Company Commander named Kutubuddin was killed. Razakars arrested two Muktibahini forces but they wer..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 3 Nov, 1981 | Hits: 1
Md. Ismail & others Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
....he operation of the impugned order of requisition is stayed till 21st October, 1981 from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 4, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 407 ......he operation of the impugned order of requisition is stayed till 21st October, 1981 from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 4, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 407 ......he operation of the impugned order of requisition is stayed till 21st October, 1981 from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 4, 1 BLD (HCD) (1981) 407 ..Category: Property Law | Date: 19 Aug, 1981 | Hits: 2
..... In the facts and circumstances there will be no cost of these Rules.
Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.—I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 55
....... In the facts and circumstances there will be no cost of these Rules.
Abdul Wadud Chowdhury J.—I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 55
......reme Court
High Court Division
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Present:
Abdul Wadud Choudhury J
Sultan Hossain Khan J
Managing Partner, Messrs, Bank Line Navigation Company.............Petitioner
Vs.
Chairman, Second Labour Court, Dacca & another..
Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: 13 Aug, 1981 | Hits: 2
....1.7.80 was done without lawful authority.
The Rule is accordingly made absolute without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 34
......Suri and others, AIR 1956 Cal 456; Management Board Vs. Shaha Golam Nabi and others (27 DLR (AD) 156); Mritun Joy Paul Vs. Province of East Pakistan (PLD 1963 Dac 754); Sind Industrial Trading Estate Ltd. Vs. First Assistant Judge, Hyderabad, W.P. (PLD 1960 Kar 826); Sabir Ahmed ......
Cases Referred to-
Dacca, National Medical Institute Vs. Prov. of East Pakistan (1958) 10 DLR 343 and District Magistrate, Lahore Vs. Syed Raja Kasim (1961) 13 DLR (SC) 66; Standard Vaccum Oil Company Vs. The Trustees for the Port of Chittagong (PLD 1961 Dacca 278(289)); The Tariq Transp..
Category: Constitutional Law, Procedural Law | Date: 23 Jul, 1981 | Hits: 1
Bengal Water Ways Ltd & Another
....rds I concur with the judgment delivered by my learned brother Masud J. and dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 435 ......rds I concur with the judgment delivered by my learned brother Masud J. and dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 435 ......……………..Respondent Judgment July 8, 1981 Result: Appeal dismissed Companies Act (VII of 1913), Section 162. Winding up of Private Company It is well settled principle that a private limited company can, if circumstances so pe..Category: Corporate Law | Date: 8 Jul, 1981 | Hits: 0
Nazera Begum Vs. Motahar Ali Miah being dead, his heirs, Faruk Mia & others, 1981, 10 CLC (HDC)
....ourts below are hereby affirmed. As no one appears on behalf of the respondent, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 49 ......ourts below are hereby affirmed. As no one appears on behalf of the respondent, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 49 ......ourts below are hereby affirmed. As no one appears on behalf of the respondent, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 49 ..Category: Contract Law | Date: 30 Jun, 1981 | Hits: 2
Pubali Bank Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation and another, 1981, 10 CLC (HCD)
.... the case parties are made to bear their own casts in this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 104, 2 BLD (HCD) (1982) 17. ......ion between the purchaser and the supplier. The bank cannot raise this plea. The question as to what part has not been performed is not also relevant……..(7) Cases Referred To- Trading Corporation of Bangladesh Vs. Makhan hall & Co. & others. C.A. 80 of 1978 (Unreporte...... the case parties are made to bear their own casts in this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (HCD) (1982) 104, 2 BLD (HCD) (1982) 17. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: 30 Jun, 1981 | Hits: 2
Kanak Chandra Das & Others Vs. Basiruddin Khan & Another, 1981, 9 CLC (AD)
....irected that the second appeal be disposed of by the High Court Division on merits. The respondent shall pay costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 421 ......irected that the second appeal be disposed of by the High Court Division on merits. The respondent shall pay costs of this appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1 BLD (AD) (1981) 421 ...... of 1962), Section 62 Banking Companies Ordinance - Winding up order made— A matter pending before the High Court Division or Appellate Division on appeal cannot be transferred to the Company Judge. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khandker, Sr. Advocate, with B.K. Das, Advocate..Category: Banking Law, Corporate Law | Date: 25 Jun, 1981 | Hits: 0
93726821936970999227933292289226933392299341965193469222954995409650954692319654