Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 3981-4000 of 6261 results.
Abdul Baten (Md.) Vs. Chairman, NBR & others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....torney General with Nahid Mahtab, Deputy Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition Nos. 5458, 5459 with Writ Petition No. 5872 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- In the above Rules Nisi, a declaration that levy and collection of advance VAT at the rate of 1.5% ad-valorem pur......iftah Uddin Choudhury J Abdul Baten (Md.)……………………………….Petitioner Vs. Chairman, NBR & others……………………Respondents Judgment August 15, 2007. Lawyers involved: Mahmudul Islam with Mizanul Haque Chowdhury and Md Hasan Rajib Prodhan, Advocat..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Uzzal alias Elias Hossain Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....statement not made in oral evidence in the proceedings, if the evidence of that person would have been admissible as evidence in that matter and the relevant person is dead. Similarly, in the USA the Rules of Evidence have been formulated in such a way that hearsay evidence of "spontaneous or excite......ases Referred To- Dr. Jainand vs. Rex, AIR (36) 1949 Allahabad 291; SM Qamruzzaman vs. State 33 DLR 156; Balaka Singh vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1975 (SC) 1962; Ghulam vs. State, 1983 PCrLJ 196. Lawyers involved: Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney-General with Md. Jamil Akkter Elahi, Assistant At..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Fida-ul-Huq Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
.... AKM Salahuddin Khan, Assistant Attorney-General with Rubaiyat Hossain, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 2826 of 2003. Judgment Mir Hashmat Ali J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why Memo No. 115 (AP)/DA/2003 (Angs......………..Respondents Judgment June 7, 2007. Cases Referred To- Sekander Ali Mia vs. Chairman, BIWTA 40 DLR (AD) 262, Shamsunnahar Salam vs. Mohammad Wahidur Rahman 51 DLR (AD) 232 . Lawyers involved: Md. Shakhawat Hossain, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AKM Salahuddin Khan, A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Superintendent Engineer, PWD & another Vs. A Mahiuddin and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....ersing the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge. 10. Being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree, the defendants-respondents came before this court and obtained the present Rule. 11. Mr. Zafor Ali, the learned Assistant Attorney-General for the petitioners, submits that....... Tajul Islam 49 DLR (AD) 177; Mallikpur Fishermen's Cooperative Society vs. Secretary, Ministry of Land 1995 BLD (AD) 243 = 48 DLR(AD) 88; Baber Ali Pramanik vs. Mosar Ali Pramanik 45 DLR(AD)120. Lawyers involved: Md. Jafor Ali, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Petitioners. M. Khaled A..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Jinnat Ali (Md) Vs. Md. Abu Bakkar Siddique and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....DLR 353; Md. Azizul Bari Vs. Md. Ismail and another, 19 DLR 184. Lawyers Involved: None appears for the Parties. Civil Revision No. 156 of 1996. Judgment Md. Abdur Razzaque J.- This Rule at the instance of the pre‑emptor petitioner is directed against the impugned judgment and or......tafa and others Vs. Kazem Ali Khan @ Kazal Khan and others, 50 DLR 544; Shafiq Mia and others Vs. Hafizuddin Ahmed and others, 11 DLR 353; Md. Azizul Bari Vs. Md. Ismail and another, 19 DLR 184. Lawyers Involved: None appears for the Parties. Civil Revision No. 156 of 1996. Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Mohsina Rahman alias Jaya Vs. Abdul Majid and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....n, Advocate — For the Petitioner. MA Samad with Bazlul Kasir and MGH Ruhullah, Advocates — For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 2609 of 1999. Judgment NK Chakravartty J.- This Rule at the instance of the defendant/petitioner was issued calling upon the opposite parties to sho......ravartty J Mohsina Rahman alias Jaya………………………….Petitioner Vs. Abdul Majid and others…………….………………..Opposite Party Judgment June 24, 2001. Lawyers Involved: Bakhtiar Hossain, Advocate — For the Petitioner. MA Samad with Bazlul Kas..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
....
39. In view of above discussion, we are of the view that this revisional application has merit. The plaintiffs-opposite parties-petitioners are entitled to get relief.
In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to cost and the impugned judgment and order dated 29-3-20......on Ltd. and another ………….Petitioners
Vs.
Malika Hasina Jahan (Lili) and others……………………………..Opposite Parties
Judgment
January 29, 2007.
Lawyers involved:
Md. Ozair Farooq with Sk. Md. Murshed and Md. Zaman, Advocates—For the Pe..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Abdul Aziz Master (Md) and others Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....t Attorney-General—For the State-Opposite Party. Mir Mahfuzur Rahman, Advocate—For the Applicant. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 5519 of 2003. Judgment Sharifuddin Chaklader J.- This Rule calls for a simple question to answer, whether the learned Sessions Judge under law is empowere......Master (Md) and others ……………….Accused Petitioners Vs. State………………………………………………………………..Opposite Party Judgment April 5, 2005. Lawyers involved: Habibul Islam Bhuiyan, Senior Advocate with Md. Aminul Haque Helal, Advocate—..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Iqbal Hossain Mollah Vs. Director, Plant Protection Wing and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....itioner. Zaman Akhter, Deputy Attorney-General with Md. Sabed Ali, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 5700 of 2000. Judgment Md. Muzammel Hossain J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned omission shall not......lah………………………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Director, Plant Protection Wing and others……………………Respondents Judgment January 4, 2006. Lawyers involved: Imtiaz Mahmood, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Zaman Akhter, Deputy Attorney..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 219
Nirode Baran Barua Vs. Mrinal Kanti Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....Petitioner. Khondker Mahbub Hossain with Afroza Nazneen, Advocates—For the Opposite Parties. Miscellaneous Case No. 5183 of 2004. Judgment Sharifuddin Chaklader J.- This Rule involved a question as to whether a Magistrate can take cognisance of an offence on final repor......rua…………………………………….Accused-Petitioner Vs. Mrinal Kanti Das and others………………………Opposite Parties Judgment March 15, 2006. Lawyers involved: AKM Faiz with HS Deb Barman, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Khondke..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Major Monjur Quader(Retd.) Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....oner. Shamim Khaled Ahmed, Advocate—For Respondent No. 1. Abdullah Al Mamun, Advocate—For Respondent Nos. 3& 4. Writ Petition No. 3931 of 2001. Judgment Tariq-ul-Hakim J.- This Rule Nisi has been issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned CIB Repo......o- M/s MM Ispahani vs. Sonali Bank and others, 37 DLR (AD) 1; IFIC Bank and others vs. Beximco Limited and others, 57 DLR 154; Md. Mahbubul Alam vs. Bangladesh Bank and another, 1 LG (2004) 343 Lawyer involved: Rafique-ul Huq, Senior Advocate, with Md. Zafar-ullah Chowdhury and Ahsanul Kari..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 125
....dvocates—For the Petitioner.
Md. Shafiqul Islam Siddique for Md. Raushan Ali, Advocate—For Respondent No. 4.
Writ Petition No. 908 of 2003.
Judgment
Tariq-ul-Hakim J.- Rule Nisi under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh was issued ca......resent:
Syed M Hossain J
Tariq-ul-Hakim J
Masudur Rahman......................................................................Petitioner
Vs.
Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice & parliamentary Affairs & ors.....Respondents
Judgment
October 27..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
....ate—For the Petitioner.
Humayun Kabir Bulbul, Deputy Attorney-General-For the Opposite Parties- State.
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 3353 of 2006.
Judgment
Nazmun Ara Sultana J.- This Rule was issued on an application under section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure calling upon......ity………………………………………..Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others………………..Opposite-Parties
Judgment
May 23, 2006.
Lawyers involved:
Seema Zahur, Advocate—For the Petitioner.
Humayun Kabir Bulbul, Deputy Att..
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Md. Ali Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ireen Mahbub, Deputy Attorney-General—For the State-Respondent. Criminal Revision No. 1104 of 2004. Judgment Md. Abdul Quddus J.- Rule was issued at the instance of convict appellant petitioner Md. Ali under section 439 of the C......l Islam Chowdhury vs. State 1999 BLD (ad) 18; Asimon Begum vs. State 1999 BLD (AD) 119 = 51 DLR (AD) 18; 51 DLR 83; Ashraf Miah vs. Bangladesh 27 DLR (AD) 106; A Hafiz Sarder vs State 28 DLR 253 . Lawyers involved: Md. Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Ireen Mahbub, Deputy ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 30
New Zealand Milk Brands Ltd. Vs. Unilac Sanowara (BD) Ltd. & ors., 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....the Trade Marks Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") for rectification of the Register of Trade Marks by removal of registered trademark No. 62724 in Class 29 from the Register. 2. Rule was issued calling upon the respondent-opposite parties to show cause as to why the Register of...... 157; Pakistan Soap Factory, Chittagong vs. Chittagong Soap Factory, 22 DLR (SC) 400; Surya Brothers vs. Messrs Dada Soap Factory Ltd., PLD 1971 Karachi 189, Ford vs. Forster (1872) 7 CH 611 . Lawyers involved: Dr. M. Zahir, Advocate with Md. Moazzem Hussain, Ziaul Hasan and KS Salahud..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 187
Salina Begum Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....……………………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others……………………………Opposite Parties Judgment June 19, 2006. Result: The Rule is discharged without any order as to the costs. The concurrent findings of fact should not......94, Khurshed and others vs. Noorjahan Bewa and others, 1995 BLD (AD) 82, Raja Sreenath Roy and others vs. Moharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahai Deo, Indian Cases Volume No. 82 Privy Council at page 879. Lawyers involved: Mushfiquddin Bakhtiar with Jabunnessa Mushfique, Advocates—For the Petitioner..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Samiran Haider and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ith Karuna Moy Chakma, Deputy Attorney-General—For Respondent No. 1 (In all the Writ Petitions). Petition Nos. 1006, 2045-2056, 2357-2360 of 2002. Judgment Tariqul-ul-Hakim J.- Rules Nisi were issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned Notificatio......of India AIR 1987 SC 386; JB Chopra vs. Union of India AIR 1987 SC 357; SP Sampalh Kumar vs. Union of India has been overruled by the case of Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India AIR 1997 SC 1125. Lawyers involved: Amirul Islam with Dr. S Shirin Chowdhury Advocates —For the Petitioners (..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Barrister Md. Rafiqul Islam Mia Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... Mia (in person) Advocates—For the Petitioner. Karunamoy Chakma, Deputy Attorney-General— For Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Writ Petition No. 2028 of 2001. Judgment Tariq-ul-Hakim J.- This Rule Nisi has been issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the order of sanction......desh and others……..Respondents Judgment October 18, 2006. Cases Referred To- Syed Mustafizur Rahman vs. State 53 DLR 125; Abdul Hakim vs. State, , Alfazuddin vs. State 45 DLR 325. Lawyers involved: Rokanuddin with Md. Rafiqul Islam Mia (in person) Advocates—For the Petitione..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 140
Mahbub-ur-Rahman Chowdhury Vs. DG, Bureau of Anti-Corruption and others , 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....uty Attorney-General with AKM Salahuddin Khan and Rubaiyat Hossain, Assistant Attorneys-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 2401 of 1998. Judgment SAK Md. Dabirush-Shan J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order under Memo N...... Cases Referred To- Md. Habibur Rahman vs. State reported in 2006 BLD (AD) 59= 58 DLR (AD) 12; Begum Tahmina vs. Bangladesh 52 DLR 503 and Mustafizur Rahman vs. DG, Anti-Corruption 2 BLC 605. Lawyers involved: AKM Faiz with HS Deb Brahman, Advocates—For the Petitioner. Zaman Akhter B..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 150
Ratan Sarder and others Vs. Bishai Bepari and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ad Fazlul Karim J. – The appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated the 17th day of March, 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2308 of 1993 making the Rule absolute setting aside the judgment and decree dated 10.05.1993 passed by the Subordinate Judge...... Bishai Bepari and others………..........Respondents Judgment August 3, 2009. Cases Referred To- 45 DLR 15; Md. Matlabur Rahman and others Vs. Madan Meah Chowdhury 33 DLR (AD) 286. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Amin, Advocate instructed by Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Recor..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
40674065405740554053405240514050404840474046404540444043404140404038403740364034