Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4061-4080 of 4969 results.
Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....al Code and other penal laws of the country…………….(44) Cases Referred To- Khondaker Modarresh Elahi Vs. The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 21 BLD 352; Bharat Kumar K. Palicha and another Vs. State of Kerala and others, AIR 199......iya ………………….Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1999) Amanullah Kabir..............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1999) Vs. The State and others …………………&hell......gment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 49; V ADC (2008) 150. ......gment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 49; V ADC (2008) 150. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Md. Abu Alam Vs. Zarina Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Md. Muinuddin Zulfiquer Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Muinuddin Zulfiquer ............................................Petitioner Vs Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka a......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Mahfuzul Hoque and ors Vs. Collector of Customs, Customs House, Chittagong & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e imposition of supplementary duty has the force of law having been made under valid legislation. On such specified types of goods imported/exported mentioned in the from and out of Bangladesh, section 25(7) in one of such law authorizing the Government to fix tariff value on......Collector of Customs, Customs House, Chittagong & others................. Respondents (In all the cases). Judgment August 8, 2005. Cases Referred To- Mustafa Kamal Vs. The Commissioner of Customs, 52 DLR (AD) 1; Phassco Hardware Company Vs. The Government of Paki...... 61. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... 61. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Kazi Muhammad Khokon Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ellip;…………….Petitioner Vs Deputy Secretary (Registration) Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Secretariat, Dhaka and others ........Respondents Judgment November 30, 2...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Commissioner of Customs and others Vs. Mohammad Ali, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Abedin J Commissioner of Customs and others......Appellants Vs. Mohammad Ali................Respondent Judgment April 19, 2007. Cases Referred To- Bangladesh Vs. Mizanur Rahman, 52 DLR (AD) 149. Lawyers Involved: MA Azim Khair, Deput...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Commissioner of Customs and others......Appellants Vs. Mohammad Ali................Respondent Judgment April 19, 2007. C......s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Arif A. Shekha and others Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....d another..................................Respondents Judgment June 4, 2007. Result: The appeals are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Messrs Helal Jute Press Limited Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 27 DLR 551; Government of Bangladesh Vs. Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 40 DLR (AD) 116; Governm......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Arif A. Shekha and others............................Appellants Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another..................................Respondents ......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Bangladesh...........................................Appellant Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak an......nt: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Bangladesh...........................................Appellant Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others..................Respondents Judgment February......17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Upendra Chandra Rishi and ors. Vs. Sufia Begum and ors., 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.....12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. ......(Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Upendra Chandra Rishi and others.………………...…………..Appellants Vs. Sufia Begum and others...........………………….………........Respondents Judg.......12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. .......12.80 passed in Title Suit No. 789 of 1980 is set aside and the said suit is restored to its file and number. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 285; 1990 BLD (AD) 194. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Managing Director, WASA Vs. Md. Ali and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....A Greet and other, AIR 1933 PC 89; Collipara Sriramulu Vs. Aswatla Harayal, AIR 1968 SC 1208; Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India, AIR 1979 SC 1628; SMS Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 39 DLR (AD) 85; Anjumane Ahmadiya, Sargodha Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Sargod...... ......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 100
Rabia Bhuiyan, MP Vs. Ministry of LGRD & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ases Referre to: Virendar Gaur vs. State of Haryana (1995)2 SCC 577; Vineet Narain vs Union of India, AIR 1998 SC 889; MC Mehta vs Union of India, 1999 (6) SCC 12; Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque vs Bangladesh, 55 DLR 613. Lawyers Involved: Dr Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instruct...... MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rabia Bhuiyan, MP…………………………………..Appellant. Vs. Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development & others... ..................Res......ing steps taken to implement the Arsenic Policy, 2004 and the Plan. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed within directions as set out above. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ing steps taken to implement the Arsenic Policy, 2004 and the Plan. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed within directions as set out above. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 255
Rowshan Ara Begum Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, BD, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rowshan Ara Begum…………………………..Petitioner Vs Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, Government of Bangladesh and others......Respondents Judgment: December 12, 2006. Case Referred To- M......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Muinuddin Zulfiquer (Md) Vs. Government of the Republic of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cation by the Administrative Tribunal, relief sought as against the said matter was not available to the writ-petitioner in writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. This Division while dismissing the petition for leave to appeal observed "In the b......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Meghna PET Industries Ltd and others Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....roup of Industries. The writ-petitioners and two others namely Mr. MF Kamal and Mr. Md. Zakaria were the directors of Meghna PET Industries Ltd. Meghna PET Industries Ltd. obtained loan from Saudi Bangladesh Industrial and Agricultural Investment Company Ltd (SABINCO), a public limited company t...... Meghna PET Industries Ltd..........Petitioner (In Civil Petition No. 477 of 2005) Prime Edible Oil Ltd. & another........Petitioners (In Civil Petition No. 478 of 2005) Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others........Respondents (In both the cases) Judgm......faulter borrowers. Accordingly, the application for dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal Nos. 477-478 of 2005 is allowed. Both the civil petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......faulter borrowers. Accordingly, the application for dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal Nos. 477-478 of 2005 is allowed. Both the civil petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Ambia Khatun and anr Vs. Syed Altaf Hossain and another, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....enancy Act also enacted legislation for the control of the rent of the premises let out on monthly basis. The East Pakistan Premises Rent Control Ordinance 1963 which has been continued in force in Bangladesh with necessary charges is the present law for regulating the relationship of landlord an...... Present Syed ABM Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Ambia Khatun and anr.........Petitioner Vs. Syed Altaf Hossain and another…………..Respondent ...... of the Rent Control Ordinance, does not come within the mischief of either of the said provisions. We do not find any merit in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ...... of the Rent Control Ordinance, does not come within the mischief of either of the said provisions. We do not find any merit in this petition which is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Niamat Ali Sheikh and others Vs. Begum Enayetur Noor and others, 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
....me. We, therefore, find no ground for interference with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 250 ...... (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Niamat Ali Sheikh and others.....…………………………..………….....Appellants Vs. Begum Enayetur Noor and others.....................................Respondents Judgment ......me. We, therefore, find no ground for interference with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 250 ......me. We, therefore, find no ground for interference with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 250 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Shaikh Abdul Quader Vs. Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....ent A.B. M. Hussain C.J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Shaikh Abdul Quader…………Petitioner Vs. Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation & ors ……..……&hellip...... (Civil) Present A.B. M. Hussain C.J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Shaikh Abdul Quader…………Petitioner Vs. Chairman, Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation & ors ……..&h...... petition to decide whether the said view of the learned Judges of the High Court was correct. We do not find anything to interfere with the order. The petition is dismissed.. Ed. ...... petition to decide whether the said view of the learned Judges of the High Court was correct. We do not find anything to interfere with the order. The petition is dismissed.. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shahabuddin and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....rdingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh........................Petitioner Vs. Md. Shahabuddin and others.................Respondents Judgment June 18, 2006. Lawy......d Advocate-on-Record failed to point out any error in the judgment of the High Court Division of the kind calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......d Advocate-on-Record failed to point out any error in the judgment of the High Court Division of the kind calling for interference by this Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 156
Dr. Abdur Rahman and others Vs. Bangladesh, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Dr. Abdur Rahman and others………….. Appellants Vs. Bangladesh……………..Respondents Judgment June 27, 1977......esent Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Dr. Abdur Rahman and others………….. Appellants Vs. Bangladesh……………..Respondents Judgment Ju......rightly exercised their revisional jurisdiction in setting aside the order of the learned Subordinate Judge. The result therefore is that the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......rightly exercised their revisional jurisdiction in setting aside the order of the learned Subordinate Judge. The result therefore is that the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Solicitor represented by State, Govt of of Bangladesh Vs. Anisuzzaman Chy & or, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Solicitor represented by the State, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh…… …Petitioner Vs Anisuzzaman Chowdhury and other&hell...... High Court Division do not suffer from any illegality for our interference. Accordingly, we find no cogent ground for granting leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... High Court Division do not suffer from any illegality for our interference. Accordingly, we find no cogent ground for granting leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... High Court Division do not suffer from any illegality for our interference. Accordingly, we find no cogent ground for granting leave. This petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
23492344234323422340233623322330232723242323231823172311230923072305230323002295