Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4061-4080 of 4762 results.
Amin Scales Limited and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....structed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants (In both the appeals). Mainul Hosein, Advocate (Md. Joynal Abedin, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent (In both the appeals). Civil Appea......her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ......ed J M. H. Rahman J A.T. M. Afzal J. Amin Scales Limited and another……………………..Appellants (In both the appeals) Vs. Md. Yakub………………………&hellip......her proceeding to meet the ends of justice. We do not find any ground to interfere with either of these two orders. The appeals are dismissed without however any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Nausher Ali Sarder & others Vs. The State, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....nt Judgment March 16, 1987. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent, Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1986 ...... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ......y;dhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H Rahman J A .T. M. Afzal J Nausher Ali Sarder & others………………….Appellants Vs. The State………………………&hellip...... are sentenced to transportation for life instead of death. 12. In the result, the appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death is commuted to transportation for life. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
....cate, Nurul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate with him instructed by
Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant.
A. Y.
Salehuzzaman, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record —For the Respondent No. 1.
A. W.
Bhuiyan, Additional Attor......
order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution
Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment.
No order as to cost.
Ed.
......todian, Vested and
Non-Resident Property, Chittagong and others .............................Respondents
Judgment
September 24, 1986
Cases
Referred to-
Rahima Aktar Vs. Asim Kumar Bose
1985 BLD (AD) 155; Watson v. Winch, 1 K. B. (1916) 688; Surtees v. Ellison
(18......
order of the Executing Court is set aside and it is directed that the Execution
Case No. 4 of 1967 be proceeded with and disposed of in the light of this judgment.
No order as to cost.
Ed.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
The State Vs. Fazal and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ts Judgment March 12, 1987. Cases Referred to- AIR 1917 PC 25; Siraj Din v. Kala, 16 DLR, SC 95; A.I.R 1917 P.C. 25; 16 D.L.R (SC) 94. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate Sharifuddin Chakl......nesses are P.W.1 Miazan, P.W. 2 Saburannessa and P.W. 5 Abdul Latif who are brother, wife and son respectively of deceased Khijir. They have deposed as eyewitnesses of the occurrence. P.W.3 Ishaque Shaikh, sister’s husband of deceased Bhola is another eye-witness. P.W. 6 Mohir Uddin is uncl...... Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J The State……………………………....Appellant Vs. Fazal and others………………....Respondents J......rt Division as would call for interference by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Order of the Court By the majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Bangladesh Biman Corporation Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
........Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. Cases Referred to- Nava Kumar vs. Radhashyam. AIR 1931 (PC) 229; United Provinces Vs. Atiqa Begum, AIR 1984 PC 16. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. R......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ......sion (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Bangladesh Biman Corporation..........Appellant Vs. Syed Aftab Ali and others……………….......Respondent Judgment May 14 1986. ......h that of the Chief Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the impugned decree is set aside and the suit is dismissed. The appeal is allowed. No order as to cost’s. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 97
State Vs. Lalu Miah and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
..... 1125; Kauda Paduyachi vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 1972 S.C. 66(69); Bhuboni Sahu vs. The King AIR 1949 P.C. 257 (259); H.S. Rathod vs. State of Gujrat AIR 1979 S.C. 1232. Lawyers Involved: B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.- For the Appellant. Habib Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab H......sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J State..........................Appellant. Vs. Lalu Miah and another………………..Respondents. Judgment September 8, 1986. R......sed Kabir and Lalu who are on bail are directed to surrender to their bail bonds at once and serve their sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 117; 1987 BLD (AD) 212. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Ayub Vs. Bangladesh, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... Khaleque Bains vs. Government of Bangladesh, Civil Appeal No. 21 of 1986. Lawyers Involved: T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Mahbub Miah, Advocate with him, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Rafiqul-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, Moksud...... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Md. Ayub…………………………..……….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works & others……....... appeal is, therefore, allowed in part and the impugned order of the High Court Division adding respondent No. 7 as a party is set aside. There will, however, be no order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Shafquat Haider & others Vs. M. Al-Amin and another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ramount Talkies, AJR 1942 Bom. 119. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Res......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ...... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Shafquat Haider & others………………….....Appellants. Vs. M. Al-Amin and another....................... Respondents Judgment August......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M. Nurullah, Attorney-General, M.M. Huq, Deputy Attorney-General with him instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents Nos. 1 and 2. T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M.R.......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......vil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd.....................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh & others…………………………………………………………….......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Feroza Majid and another Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....awyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, Mahbubey Alam, Advocate, Supreme Court with him, instructed by Sajjadul Huq, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate, A. B. M. Khairul Huq Advocate, Supreme Court, with him instructed by Md. N...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J ATM Afzal J Feroza Majid and another……………….... Appellant Vs. Jiban Biman Corporation......................Respondent Result: The appeal is dismis...... the appellants. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) (1987) 78. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
....hy;trial Development Bank. (1966) 18 DLR (SC) 354; PLD
1966 SC 1938.
Lawyers Involved:
Syed
Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed
by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants.
A KM.
Nazrul lslam, Advocate instructe......in Article 33 of the Order.
For the reasons stated above, we are
of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will,
however, be no order as to costs.
Ed.
......J
Badrul Haider Chowdhury
J
Shahabuddin Ahmed J
M.H. Rahman J
A.T.M. Afzal J
Present:
Dira Dockyard and Engineers Ltd. and
others.... Appellants
Vs.
Bangladesh
Shilpa Rin Sangstha & others…………Respondent
......in Article 33 of the Order.
For the reasons stated above, we are
of the view that the appeal must fail. It is accordingly dismissed but there will,
however, be no order as to costs.
Ed.
..
Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ts fencing and started beating him by fists and blows. When P.W.1 raised alarm the accused persons threatened and compelled him to keep quiet and tit at the southeast corner of the hut. The accused Hossain took away one steel trunk containing Caries, petty-coats, blouses etc. Tk 550/- in cash an......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ......d J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Siraj Miah & another………………………………Appellants Vs. State & another……………………&helli......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Chunnu Mia Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....ridhar Suar AIR 1976 (SC) 1860; Srimath D. P. Desikar AIR 1936 (P.C.) 183; Atyam Veerraju AIR 1966 (SC) 629. Lawyers Involved: Sheikh Afzalur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Ranadhir Sen, Advocate, instructed by Syed S......rgument was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settlement. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......nim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Chunnu Mia………………………Appellant Vs. Monindra Lal Roy & others……Respondents Judgment June 29, ......rgument was advanced before the High Court Division with regard to the merit of the settlement. We find no substance in this appeal and, accordingly, it is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... Case Referred To- Safdar Ali Vs. Crown, 5 DLR (FC) 107. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record —For the Appellants. B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 58 of 1983. From the Ju......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ......on (Criminal) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Muslimuddin & others………………………Appellants Vs. The State………………………………….Respondent Judgment Feb 20, 1986. ......he evidence and circumstances appeared to be more probable than the prosecution case. 39. Of the 9 prosecution witnesses, P.W.1 is the Informant, Majeda Khatun, wife of the deceased Idris; P.W.3 Miriara Khatun is the step-daughter of P.W.1; P.Ws. 4 and 5, Muslimuddin and Abdul Mannan, are next-..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Waliullah Munshi Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....mad Ali, Advocate with him instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record. — For the appellant. T. H. Khan, Senior Advocate, M. A. Wahhab Mia, Advocate with him instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on- Record— For respondent No. 1. EX-parte- Respondent Nos. 2-5. Civil App......1979 of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A.Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J Waliullah Munshi…………………………... Appellant Vs. Lodu Mia Patwary & others………………..Respondent Judgment January 19, 1986.......1979 of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Lakshmipur will now proceed in accordance with law. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 308 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mrs. Amena Hoque Vs. Rajab Ali & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ion 339C Cr.P.C. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed by Serajur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Habibur Rahman Khan, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent Nos. 1-15. A.W. Mollik, Advocate-on-Record—Fo......Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ......ivision (Criminal) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Mrs. Amena Hoque……………………………………Appellant Vs. Rajab Ali & others……………………………….……Respondents Judgment Apri......Sessions Judge are hereby set aside. The proceeding of S.T. Case No. 232 of 1983 will commence from the stage where it was on 22.12.83. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 303 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Ghyasuddin Ahmed Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... in Matter No. 13 of 1986.) Judgment: Fazle Muim CJ.-This appeal arises from, Matter No. 13 of 1985 and was decided by the Company Judge of the High Court Division, Dhaka (Mr. Justice Sultan Hossain Khan) on 20th November 1985. 2. On 17th April 1985 respondents filled an application unde...... of the learned Company Judge are modified accordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ...... F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Ghyasuddin Ahmed ……………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others........................................Respondents Judgment March...... of the learned Company Judge are modified accordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Maqsood Alam Vs. Bangladesh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....han, Senior Advocate (M. A. Wahab Miah, Advocate with him) instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. A.W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5. Ex-parte—for Respondent Nos. 3 and ...... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ......resent: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rah man J A. T. M. Afzal J Maqsood Alam………………………………………….Appellant Vs. The People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Military Estate Officer, Dhaka Ca...... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 108
A. B. M. Tofayel Ahmed Vs. Sheikh Aminuddin & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....yers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners (In both the case). M. A. Wahhab Miah, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents (In both the cases). Criminal Petitions for Spe......rnment's order as to Withdrawal did not show any reason for withdrawal. We find nothing to interfere. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 282 ......riminal) Present: F K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M H. Rah man J A. B. M. Tofayel Ahmed...........................Petitioner (In both the cases) Vs. Sheikh Aminuddin & others………….. Respondent (In both the cases) Judgment May 8......rnment's order as to Withdrawal did not show any reason for withdrawal. We find nothing to interfere. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 282 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Md. Shajahan Vs. Md. Sadeq & another , 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....ecounting had been made to the Presiding Officer who is alone empowered to recount on the spot either on his own motion or on the requests of any candidate......(13) Cases Referred to- Mofazzal Hossain Vs. Election Commissioner, (1976) 28 DLR (AD) 51; Nurul Islam V. Munsif, Election Tribunal 2......sing the Tribunal's order and dismissing the election-petition. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 275. ......rt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Md. Shajahan……………………………………..Appellant Vs. Md. Sadeq & another …………………………….....Respondents Judgment Mar......sing the Tribunal's order and dismissing the election-petition. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 275. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 140
16521651165016491648164716461645164316421638163716351631163016291628162716251624