Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4081-4100 of 4531 results.
Promode Ranjan Saha and others Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and another, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....Dacca, being Title suit No, 12 of 1958 for declaration that the acquisition of the Hat at Shakherchar by the Government under Notification dated 2.4.56 issued under section 3(1) of the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act was illegal and void and for injunction. The suit was dismis......m J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Promode Ranjan Saha and others………………………... Appellants. Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and another..........................Respondent Judgment ...... President's Order No. 90 of 1972 and accordingly, the appeal and the suit have abated. The appeal is accordingly dismissed it having abated but without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... President's Order No. 90 of 1972 and accordingly, the appeal and the suit have abated. The appeal is accordingly dismissed it having abated but without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Abdul Quddus Vs. Sec., Cabinet Secretariat. Establishment Div., Govt. of BD & ors, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....in the negative. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order is declared to be of no lawful authority. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Abdul Quddus ……………………….Appellant Vs. Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat. Establishment Division, Govt. of Bangladesh and others........in the negative. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order is declared to be of no lawful authority. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......in the negative. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order is declared to be of no lawful authority. However, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 94
Khabiruddin and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....t. 3. The Government's case is that the suit land is a fishery, locally known as Magura beel fishery and it was recorded in the khatian of the Deputy Commissioner under section 20(3) of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act as a non‑retainable khas land and that the Government has b...... (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Khabiruddin and others ..................................................Appellants. Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others...........................Respondents Judgme......rlier been an order of remand to the trial Court and the appellants had an opportunity to produce all their papers in support of their case. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......rlier been an order of remand to the trial Court and the appellants had an opportunity to produce all their papers in support of their case. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Alhaj Md. Serajuddowlah Vs. The State, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....ision (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Alhaj Md. Serajuddowlah……........Accused-Appeallant Vs. The State………………......................Respondent Judgmen...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Alhaj Md. Serajuddowlah……........Accused-Appeallant Vs. The State………………......................Responden......etitioner summarily. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed and the impugned proceeding pending in the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka is quashed. Ed. ......etitioner summarily. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed and the impugned proceeding pending in the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka is quashed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
ABM Quabil Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....nce of the petitioner that impelled him to file this petition. We find no substance in this petition and it is, accordingly, dismissed. Stay granted by this Court earlier is vacated. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J ABM Quabil Ahmed .........................................Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Planning, Gover......nce of the petitioner that impelled him to file this petition. We find no substance in this petition and it is, accordingly, dismissed. Stay granted by this Court earlier is vacated. Ed. ......nce of the petitioner that impelled him to file this petition. We find no substance in this petition and it is, accordingly, dismissed. Stay granted by this Court earlier is vacated. Ed. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 128
Mst. Qaiser Khatoon and 12 others Vs. Mvi. Abdul Khaliq and others, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....€”Respondent No. 1(iv). Ex-parte—Respondent No. 1(ii) & 2(i) Civil Appeal No. 52 of 1966. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicatures, Bahawalpur State at Baghdad-ul-Jadid, dated the 9th April, 1949 in Civil Appeal No. 2 of 1947.) Judgmen...... Hamoodur Rahman CJ Sajjad Ahmed Jan J Waheeduddin Ahmed J Mst. Qaiser Khatoon and 12 others.....................................................Appellants Vs. Mvi. Abdul Khaliq and others..........................................................R......not contrary to justice, equity or good conscience and has not been by this or anyother enactment altered or aboliÂshed, and has not been declared to be void by any competent authority; (b) the Muhammadan Law, in cases where the parties are Muhammadans, and the Hindu Law, in cases where the ......ing his report a final decree for possession will have to be drawn up. Since success is divided each party will bear his own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 104. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Lutfar Rahman Vs. State, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 102 ......ase is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 102 ...... Criminal Appeal No. 19-D of 1970. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of East Pakistan, Dacca, dated the 2nd June, 1969 in Criminal Appeal No. 198 of 1967.) Judgment Muhammad Abdullah Jabir, J.— This apÂpeal by special leave arises out of a judgment of a Single J......tion and sentence passed against the appellant under section 420 of the Penal Code are set aside and he is discharged of the bail bond. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 102 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Wadud and ors., 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....s remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law. In the circumstances of the case there will be no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 90. ......C) (1973) 90. ......s remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law. In the circumstances of the case there will be no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 90. ......s remanded to the trial Court for disposal in accordance with law. In the circumstances of the case there will be no order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 90. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 103
Khulna Newsprint Mills Ltd. Vs. Khulna Newsprint Employees Union, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
.... directing the reinstatement of Nurul Gani, is set aside. In the circumstances of the case, the parties are left to bear own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 85. ......5. ......eal No. 101-D of 1968. On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of East Pakistan, Dacca, dated the 17th January, 1968 in Appeal from Original Order No. 60 of 1964.) Judgment Muhammad Abdullah Jabir J.— This appeal by special leave was filed by Khulna News Print Mills Limi...... directing the reinstatement of Nurul Gani, is set aside. In the circumstances of the case, the parties are left to bear own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 85. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Karachi Stock ExchanÂge Vs. Kurban Ali M. MerÂchant and others, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
.... the present case, created by rule 3(iv) of Forward Contracts Rules of the Exchange, viz. that it amounts to a 'floating security'. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 82. ......diction (Civil) Present: A. R. Cornelius CJ M. Yaqub Ali J Abdus Sattar J Karachi Stock ExchanÂge.......................................................................Appellant Vs. 1. Kurban Ali M. MerÂchant. 2. Purviz Merwanji Dalal........................... Respondent ...... the present case, created by rule 3(iv) of Forward Contracts Rules of the Exchange, viz. that it amounts to a 'floating security'. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 82. ...... the present case, created by rule 3(iv) of Forward Contracts Rules of the Exchange, viz. that it amounts to a 'floating security'. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 82. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Sirajul Islam Vs. State, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
.... ......1973) 73. ......ourt and acquit the appellant. M. R. Khan, J.—I agree. Sajjad Ahmed Jan, J.—I agree. Wahiduddin Ahmed J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 CLC (SC) (1973) 73. ......ourt and acquit the appellant. M. R. Khan, J.—I agree. Sajjad Ahmed Jan, J.—I agree. Wahiduddin Ahmed J.—I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 CLC (SC) (1973) 73. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 142
Mohammad Sharif, s/o Barkhurdar Vs. Mohammad Ashraf, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....nt: Muhammad Yaqub Ali J Sajjad AhÂmed Jan J Salahuddin Ahmad J Mohammad Sharif, s/o Barkhurdar...........................Petitioner Vs. 1. Mohammad Ashraf son of Sad Ali, 2. The State......Respondents Judgement February 18, 1971. High Court not to m...... Appellate Jurisdiction (Criminal) Present: Muhammad Yaqub Ali J Sajjad AhÂmed Jan J Salahuddin Ahmad J Mohammad Sharif, s/o Barkhurdar...........................Petitioner Vs. 1. Mohammad Ashraf son of Sad Ali, 2. The State......Respondents Judgement February 18,......eath or transportation for life, his bail may be canÂcelled. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 71. ...... to the Court of Sessions Judge for trial on charges punishable with death or transportation for life, his bail may be canÂcelled. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 71. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Asif Ali, s/o Ahmed Ali Vs. State, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....nal) Present: Hamoodur Rahman CJ Sajjad Ahmed Jan J M. R. Khan J Wahiduddin Ahmed J Asif Ali, s/o Ahmed Ali................Appellant Vs. The State....................Respondent Judgment October 30, 1970. ......n (Criminal) Present: Hamoodur Rahman CJ Sajjad Ahmed Jan J M. R. Khan J Wahiduddin Ahmed J Asif Ali, s/o Ahmed Ali................Appellant Vs. The State....................Respondent Judgment October 30, 1970. ......n the same fashion. To my mind, the question involved in the appeal was a simple one, namely, whether the appellant was corÂrectly recognised by the victim, Arif Mirza, and his brother-in-law. P. W. Muhammad Abid, as the culprit who had thrown acid the former. In addition, there was the evidence of......ult. For the reasons stated above, I do not think that the matter calls for our interference. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 68. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Sri Monmotha Nath Kuri Vs. Mvi Mohammad Mokhlesur Rahman and others, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
.... raise the same in the execution proceedings. As the question of law raised is one of first impression we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 49. ......b Ali J Sajjad Ahmad Jan J Abdus Sattar J M. R. Khan J Sri Monmotha Nath Kuri ...............................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 38-D of 1965.) Vs. 1. Mvi Mohammad Mokhlesur Rahman. 2. Begum Fatima Khatun.......Respondents. ...... raise the same in the execution proceedings. As the question of law raised is one of first impression we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 49. ...... raise the same in the execution proceedings. As the question of law raised is one of first impression we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 49. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 124
Chaudhury Muhammad Khan Vs. Sanaullah and others, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....n (Criminal) Present: Muhammad Yaqub Ali, J., Sajjad Ahmad Jan, J., Salahuddin Ahmad, J, Chaudhury Muhammad Khan.........................Appellant. vs. 1. Sanaullah, 2. The State........................... Respondents Judgment February 15, 1971. The Constitution o......Asghar. It could not, therefore, be said that a new circumstance was made to appear which justified the passÂing of a contradictory order". 15. We fail to see why the rule laid down in Farid Vs. Ghulam Hussain and others which must have been brought to the notice of the learned Judge was no......e respondent No. 1. He shall surrender to his bail bond forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 45 ......the order dated 31st July, 1970, of the High Court granting bail to the respondent No. 1. He shall surrender to his bail bond forthwith. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 45 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Commissioner, Khairpur Division, Khairpur and another Vs. Ali Sher Sarki, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....nishment after final adjudication and, therefore, the High Court should be deemed to have the inherent power to pass such an order in an appropriate case. 5. Leave to appeal was granted to the State to consider whether the power to suspend or modify an order pending the hearing of an appeal c...... Present: Hamoodur RahÂman CJ MuÂhammad Yaqub Ali J Sajjad Ahmad Jan J Commissioner, Khairpur Division, Khairpur and another..........................Appellants Vs. Ali Sher Sarki..............................Respondent Judgment September 2......CRLJ Report 492. Lawyer Involved: Kazi Akhtar Ahmad, Advocate-General—For the Appellants. Respondent—Ex-parte. Civil Appeal No. K-6 of 1969. Judgement Muhammad Yaqub Ali J.—The question raised in this appeal by special leave of the Court is whether ...... In the result, the appeal is dismissed but as the respondent has not put in appearance there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 41. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Tripura Modern Bank Ltd. Pakis. Zone, Chittagong Vs. Khan Bahadur Khalilur Rahman, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....ere not substituted his name was struck off. DeÂfendant No. 1 did not deny the transaction. His defence mainly was that the suit was not maintainable in view of sections 69 and 70 of the East Bengal State Acquisition and TenÂancy Act as he was a rent-receiver. Defendant No. 2 admitted that he had ......llate Jurisdiction (Civil) Present: Hamoodur RahÂman CJ Abdus Sattar J M. R. Khan J Tripura Modern Bank Ltd. Pakistan Zone, Chittagong................................ Appellant Vs. Khan Bahadur Khalilur Rahman being dead repreÂsented by his heir Sultamed and ors.................i vs. Jagabandhu Chakravarti and others AIR 1929 Cal. 392; Sital Chandra Majhi vs. Parbati Charan Chakravarti AIR 1922 Cal. 32. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hussain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Muhammad Nurul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Ahmed Sobhan, Senior Advocate, instru......ment and decree of the High Court are set aside and these of the trial Court restoÂred. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 34. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 230
Nazir Ahmad, Divisional Engineer, Telephones (Gulberg) Lahore Vs. Pakistan, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....e the impugned order was passed, and that he should be allowed all the benefits consequent thereon. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 28 ......e the impugned order was passed, and that he should be allowed all the benefits consequent thereon. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 28 ......ing, viz., the 19th of February, 1944, the appelÂlant was a "departmental outside candidate'', having joined the department as a First DiviÂsion Clerk much earlier on the 23rd of October, 1943. Mr. Muhammad Ismail Bhatti, the learÂned counsel for the department, has contendÂed that the term "app......e the impugned order was passed, and that he should be allowed all the benefits consequent thereon. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 28 ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 103
The Advocate-GeneÂral, Govt. of East Pak, Dacca Vs. Benoy Bhusan Majumdar & ors, 1973, 2 CLC (AD)
....dents of village Kumarkhali, P.S. Nazirpur in the district of Bakerganj. 3. The prosecution case was that the resÂpondents applied to the Government of India and to settle down at Calcutta in the State of West Bengal. A Migration Certificate being Ext. 1 was issued to them by the Attache (MiÂgr......te Jurisdiction (Criminal) Present: Hamoodur Rahman CJ Abdus Sattar J M. R. Khan J The Advocate-GeneÂral, Govt. of East Pakistan, Dacca.............................. Appellant Vs. Benoy Bhusan Majumdar and others................................................. Respondents......ground that they were not 'foreigners' within the meaning of section 2(a) of the Foreigners Act. We, accordingly, dismiss the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 9. ......ground that they were not 'foreigners' within the meaning of section 2(a) of the Foreigners Act. We, accordingly, dismiss the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 25 DLR (SC) (1973) 9. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Popular Biscuit Ltd Vs. Biximco Bremer Export Contor Brand, Repprecht Gmbh & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... Respondents Judgment June 28, 2005. Cases Referred to- Food Corporation of India and another vs. Yadav Engineer and Contractor, (1982) 2 Supreme Court Cases 25. State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Janaki Saran, AIR 1973 SC 2071. Muhammad Idris and others vs. Tobarak H......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Popular Biscuit Limited...........................................Appellant Vs. Biximco Bremer Export Contor Brand, Repprecht Gmbh and others.................. Respon...... Cases Referred to- Food Corporation of India and another vs. Yadav Engineer and Contractor, (1982) 2 Supreme Court Cases 25. State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Janaki Saran, AIR 1973 SC 2071. Muhammad Idris and others vs. Tobarak Hossain, 17 DLR 209, New Bengal Shipping Company vs. E...... Court Division in staying the suit can not be sustained. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 743. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 94
14861485147714761467142414231421142014191417141514141412141114101409140814051373