Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Shafquat Haider & others Vs. M. Al-Amin and another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ......s order, however, does not restrain respondent No.1 from discharging his duties as Chairman of the company. The winding-up matter should be disposed of expeditiously. No order as to costs. Ed. ......buddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Shafquat Haider & others………………….....Appellants. Vs. M. Al-Amin and another....................... Respondents Judgment August 13, 1986. Case......others v. Exxon Insurance Consultants International Ltd. All E.R. (1981) Vol. 2 pages 495; Turton vs. Turton, 42 Ch. Division, 128; Office Clearing Services Ltd. v. Westminster Window and General Cleaners Ltd. RPC Vol. 62-63 p. 39; K.M. Multani v. Paramount Talkies, AJR 1942 Bom. 1..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 239
Sharping Matshajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M. Nurullah, Attorney-General, M.M. Huq, Deputy Attorney-General with him instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondents ......nd shall not act arbitrarily or in discriminatory manner. In these circumstances, writ jurisdiction is quite available to the lessee. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 85. ......r AIR 1973 (SC) 1121; M/s. Momin Motor Vs. Regional Transport Authority PLD 1962 108; Chairman Chittagong Pourashava Vs. Md. Amjad Khan 1980 B.S C.R. 54; M/S. Radha Krishna Agarwal Vi. State of Bihar and others AIR 1977 Patna 65; Shitla Prasad vs. M. Sadiullah and others AIR 1975 (All) 344 (F.B) Pur....... 1628. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him) instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. M. Nurullah, Attorney-General, M.M. Huq, Deputy Attorney-General with him instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—F..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Sree Monoranjan Banik & anr Vs. Sree Nitya Ranjan Karmakar & ors., 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ......ion (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim C J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sree Monoranjan Banik and another……………………………&......the Transfer of Property Act. The impugned order does not call for any interference. The petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 1987 BLD (AD) 122. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Comm Taxes, Dhaka (East Zone) Vs. M/S. Macneil & Kilburn Ltd., Adamjee Ct, Dhaka, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....urement of the agency was a trading asset and hence termination thereof had no impact on the trading capacity. In view of the above fact and circumstances, the view was taken that the Deputy Commissioner of Taxes was fully justified in treating it as revenue receipt and thereby...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ......1986. Cases Referred To- AIR 1932 (PC) 138: C.I.T Vs. K Rahman & Co. Ltd 1980 B.T.D. 242: C.I.T. vs. Vizir Sultan & Son 36.I.T.R. Goderaj Co vs. C.I.T. 37 I.T.R. 381; Karam Chand Tahapar and Bros. P. Ltd. vs. C.I.T. 80 ITR. (SC) 167 A.I.R. 1932 138 (P.C.) C.I.T Vs. K Rahman...... In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Tribunal is restored. There will be no order as to costs Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Siraj Miah & another Vs. State & another, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....hellip;…………..Respondents Judgment May 15, 1986. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellants. Syed Mudassir Hussain, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Zinnur, Advocate-on- Record.—For the Respondent No. 1......nd allow the appeal. The appellants are acquitted of the charge leveled against them. Let them be set at liberty forthwith, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed. ...... General, instructed by Zinnur, Advocate-on- Record.—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte—For the Respondent No. 2. Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 1985. (From the judgment and order dated 29th September, 1983 passed by the High Court Division, Comilla Bench in Criminal ......ellip;……..Respondents Judgment May 15, 1986. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellants. Syed Mudassir Hussain, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Zinnur, Advocate-on- Record.—For the Respondent No. 1. Ex-parte..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Sufia Khanam Chowdhury Vs. Faizun Nesa Chowdhury, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Nesa Chowdhury...........................Respondent (in both the cases) Judgment July 23, 1986. Cases Referred to- Kalu Ram AIR 1932 All. 485 (F-B); Sri Krishna Chanda ILR 55 All. 791; Daibaki Lal. (1965) 17 DLR (F-B) 119; Katia Pillai. AIR 1929 Mad 393; Petherp......irection for amendment of the plaint is set aside and that of the trial Court is restored. With this modification the appeals are dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Hazera Begum and others Vs. Roushan Ara Begum and others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......r with the judgment of Badrul Haider Chowdhury J. Order of the Court By a majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ivision (Civil) Present: F.K.M.A Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Hazera Begum and others………………………Appellants ...... it is referred to a lawful title. Similar view had been expressed much earlier by Lord Denman C.J. in Culley v. Doe Dem Taylerson. 11A & E 1008 (1840) in the following terms: "Generally speaking one tenant in common cannot maintain an ejectment against another ten..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Narendra Nath Basu Roy and another Vs. Municipal Committee, Mymensingh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ......s landlord and tenant. And there ends the matter. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:39 DLR (AD) 16. ...... (AD) 16. ......is stopped from denying the title of his landlord. Now to examine the contention of Mr. Pal that the land originally belonged to a rent-receiver and that the acquisition of rent receiving interest by General Notification dated 14th April 1956 it became the property of the Government. The General Not..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Nur Muhammad & others Vs. Moulvi Moinuddin Ahmed & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ......r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ......ich a Court barred to try. The Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) Or. VII, r 11 Public Purpose Natural Justice Section 14A of the (Emergency) Requisition of Property Act has, in clear and unmistakable terms put an express embargo on entertainment of any suit or application against an......r Chowdhury, J. Order of the Court By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD) 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Muslimuddin & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ......nts is set aside and all of them are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 311. ...... allsowed. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), section 154 Criminal Trial The fundamental principle of a criminal trial is that the accused shall be presumed innocent and that he is not required to prove his innocence. The entire burden of proof of his guilt lies on ......Information Report within the meaning of section 154 of the Crl.P.C. and all subsequent information fall within the purview of section-161 of the Crl. P.C. No such "information” was recorded in the General Diary, but the Daroga appeared on the scene suo motu after mid-day and recorded the ejahar a..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 56
Ghyasuddin Ahmed Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... of the learned Company Judge are modified accordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ...... of the learned Company Judge are modified accordingly. The appeal is allowed is part. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 296 ......……………...Appellant Vs. Q.N. Faruque & others........................................Respondents Judgment March 24, 1986. The Companies Act, 1913 (VII of 1913), sections 79(3) and 76(3) Having regard to the powers conferred under sections 76 (d) and 79 (d), the Court ......cca Jute Miils Ltd., PLD 1968 Dae 610. Mrs. A. Ananthalakshmi Ammal vs. Tijjin's Barytes, Asbestos and Paints Limited, AIR 1952 Mad 60 at para 3; The Indian Spinning Mills Ltd. vs. His Excellency Lt. General Madan Sharnsher Jang Bahadur Rana, AIR 1953 Cal 355 at para 21; Bal. Krishna Maheshwari Vs. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Maqsood Alam Vs. Bangladesh, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....1955, authorised the Military Estate Officers as specified in the Schedule of the said Notification, to sign and verify the plaint or written statement in a suit by or against the Government. The Deputy Commissioner has, therefore, no competence to do it. In respect of the Ministry of Def...... result, the appeal is allowed. The impugned orders of the High Court Division and the trial Court are set aside. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 290 ...... Augusr 3, 1986. The Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908), Order XXVII, rr. 1 & 2 The Government by a Notification dated 14th December, 1955, authorised certain officers to sign and verify the plaint or written statement. The Government by a Notification dated 14th ......awyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate (M. A. Wahab Miah, Advocate with him) instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. A.W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 5. Ex-parte—..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 108
A. B. M. Tofayel Ahmed Vs. Sheikh Aminuddin & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... from prosecution. In this case there was no such application from the Public Prosecutor but the 'Magistrate allowed the withdrawal on perusal of the order of the Government forwarded through the Deputy Commissioner. This is clearly illegal; the Magistrate must act according to his judicial di......rnment's order as to Withdrawal did not show any reason for withdrawal. We find nothing to interfere. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 282 ......file an application for withdrawn of a case from the prosecution. In this case the Magistrate having passed the order of withdrawal without any application from the Public Prosecutor is an illegality and such order has rightly been reversed. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate instru......rnment's order as to Withdrawal did not show any reason for withdrawal. We find nothing to interfere. Both the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 282 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Waliul Bari Chowdhury Vs. District Magistrate, Kushtia arid others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....the "District Magistrate" used in sections 12,23 and 24 of the Printing Presses and Publications (Declaration and Registration) Act, 1973 did not include Additional District Magistrate/Additional Deputy Commissioner, He further submitted that under the provisions of section 19 of the General C......cluding Printing Press be released at once and the publication of weekly 'Ispat' be allowed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 256..............Appellant Vs. District Magistrate, Kushtia arid others…………………....Respondents Judgment January 27, 1986. Result: The Appeal is allowed. The Printing Presses and Publication (Declaration and Registration) Act, 1973 (XXIII of 1973) Declaration in resp......the Act. By virtue of the definition an Additional District Magistrate is also included in the term District Magistrate. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), section 10 The General Clauses Act, 1897 (X of 1897), section 19 Words used in sub-section (2) of section 10..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 226
Md. Shahjahan Sheikh and others Vs. Sessions Judge, Pirojpur and others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....of the exercise of revisional power by the Sessions Judge under section 439 A. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 246 ......of the exercise of revisional power by the Sessions Judge under section 439 A. In the result, therefore, the appeals are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 246 ......so Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 246 ......both the appeals) Judgment February 19, 1985. Cases Referred to- PLD 1967 S C. 317, 19DLRS.C. 439 Rajpati Vs. Bashan AIR 1981 (S.C.) 18 Botany vs. Noni Desai AIR 1968 (S.C.) 1444 Attorney General Vs Sillen (1864) 10 H.L.C. 704 Molik Manzoor Elahi vs. Lala Bishamber Das, 16 DLR (SC) 246. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mohitullah Pk. @ Mohitullah & others Vs. The State, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... under. Thus both the grounds upon which leave was granted are found to be without any merit. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 240 ...... under. Thus both the grounds upon which leave was granted are found to be without any merit. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 240 ...... The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898), section 271. Trial does not commence with the commitment of the case. It commences only after the accused is brought before the Court to stand his trial. Till the trial commences within the meaning of section 271 of the Code of Criminal Pr...... Lawyers Involved: Syed Istiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate with Mahmudul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on Record—For the Appellants. A. W Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 1985. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 45
Abdul Mannaf Khan and others Vs. Bangladesh & another, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
....hich the 'plaintiffs are found to be entitled under law and equity; That the decree be passed declaring that the order of forfeiture dated 30.10.72 / 4.11.72 passed by Mr. A F. Khan the then Joint Deputy Commissioner Tangail in Case No.1 (XIII) S.D.O 71(7)/3 (XIII) J.D.C. is illegal, void, inoper......Justice. Order of the Court By the majority decisions the appeals are dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 201. ......DLR (AD) (1986) 201. ....... C. Supreme Court. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Kazi Shahabuddin Ahmed, Advocate-on- Record —For the Appellants (In both cases). K.A. Bakr. Attorney-General, (A.W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General with him) instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 202
Abdul Karim Sarker Vs. The State and another, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....istrate and the Munsif is only holding 2nd class power. As such he is subordinate to him and he should leave the station after intimating the contemner. In the Memo he has not only asked the Deputy Commissioner, Rangpur to note the absence of the Munsif Magistrate without intimation to th......ismissed. The order of conviction passed by the High Court Division is upheld but the order of sentence is modified no payment of fine. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 188 ......llate Division (Criminal) Present: F.K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J M. H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Abdul Karim Sarker .............Appellant Vs. The State and another …………Respondent Judgment February 9, 1986. Contempt of Court “......kwal vs. State of U.P., AIR 1984 SC 1374. Lawyers Involved: S R. Pal, Senior Advocate instructed by Kazi Ebadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. A.W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by A. W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
AKM Ruhul Amin Vs. District Judge and Appellate Election Tribunal, Bhola & others, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
.... Civil Appeal No. 54 of 1985 is allowed. Civil petition No. 140 of 1985 is disposed of. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 172. ...... Civil Appeal No. 54 of 1985 is allowed. Civil petition No. 140 of 1985 is disposed of. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 172. ......unim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J AKM Ruhul Amin.................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 51 of 1985 with Civil Petition No. 140 of 1985) Vs. District Judge and Appellate Election Tribunal, Bhola and others ...Respondents Abul Kalam Azad ……………...... dismissed and Civil Appeal No. 54 of 1985 is allowed. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 102 The Local Government (Union Parishad) Ordinance, 1983 (LI of 1983) Section 29(4) The General Clauses Act, 1896, “District Judge” Interpretation of Statutes District Judge..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 154
Ismail Ullah, being dead his heirs Bazidullah & ors Vs. Sukumar Chandra Das & ors, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....d as defendant No. 49 in the partition suit. In the result, therefore, this appeals as allowed. There will be do order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 125 ......d as defendant No. 49 in the partition suit. In the result, therefore, this appeals as allowed. There will be do order as to costs. Ed. This Caes is also Reported in: 38 DLR (AD) (1986) 125 ......te Division (Civil) Present: F K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Ismail Ullah, being dead his heirs Bazidullah and others……….Appellants Vs. Sukumar Chandra Das and others………………………......hat there is a mistake in the decree of 1853, occasioned by an accidental omission and that mistake ought to have been corrected as a matter of course." Retort was taken to the provision of General Order of 1843 which provides that any clerical mistake in a decree or any error arising from..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48