Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 401-420 of 614 results.
Sirajul Islam @ Siraj and another Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... entertain this application under section of 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and, as a result, the application is rejected summarily. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 62. ...... entertain this application under section of 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and, as a result, the application is rejected summarily. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 62. ......petitioners. 20. Lastly, we find from the certified copy of order sheet submitted by the petitioners that though the offence is triable by a Special Magistrate, the case is pending in the Paribesh Adalat. But this issue is not good enough for entertaining the application for quashment. Because it......is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 62. ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 414
Moinuddin Ahmed alias Farook Vs. Khursheda Begum and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....y No. 1. Civil Revision No. 2250 of 1999. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - This Rule is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25-3-99 passed by the learned Second Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin/ Commercial Court, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 104 of 1998 reversing the judgment and decree......1. Civil Revision No. 2250 of 1999. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - This Rule is directed against the judgment and decree dated 25-3-99 passed by the learned Second Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin/ Commercial Court, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 104 of 1998 reversing the judgment and decree dated......e in respect of one-third portion of schedule “Ka” property. The order of status quo earlier passed by this court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 354. ......t High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam J Moinuddin Ahmed alias Farook …………………………….Petitioner Vs. Khursheda Begum and others………………. Opposite-Parties Judgment June 18, 2001. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Ganesh Chandra Das Vs. Arati Acharjya, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....e opposite party Arati Acharjya to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 15-2-1995 and 22-2-1995 respectively passed by Mr. Hasan Shaheed Ferdous, learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Family Appeal No. 46 of 1994 affirming the judgment and decree passe......site party Arati Acharjya to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 15-2-1995 and 22-2-1995 respectively passed by Mr. Hasan Shaheed Ferdous, learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Family Appeal No. 46 of 1994 affirming the judgment and decree passed by M...... party Arati Acharjya to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 15-2-1995 and 22-2-1995 respectively passed by Mr. Hasan Shaheed Ferdous, learned Subordinate Judge, 3rd Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong in Family Appeal No. 46 of 1994 affirming the judgment and decree passed by Mr. M......ry action accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002)348. ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 186
Pubali Bank Ltd. Vs. Mazid and Co. and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....te Party Nos. 1-2. Civil Revision No. 1188 of 1993. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - This Rule is direct against the judgment and order dated 31-3-93 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Narayanganj in Bandhaki Case No. 93 of 1992 by which the ex parte decree passed on......ty Nos. 1-2. Civil Revision No. 1188 of 1993. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - This Rule is direct against the judgment and order dated 31-3-93 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Narayanganj in Bandhaki Case No. 93 of 1992 by which the ex parte decree passed on 16-3-......os. 1-2. Civil Revision No. 1188 of 1993. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J. - This Rule is direct against the judgment and order dated 31-3-93 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Narayanganj in Bandhaki Case No. 93 of 1992 by which the ex parte decree passed on 16-3-93 i......eme Court High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sikder Maqbul Huq J Pubali Bank Ltd……………………..Petitioner Vs. Mazid and Co. and others................ Opposite Parties Judgment December 3, 2000. Cases Ref..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Khorshed Alam (Md) Vs. Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....sion (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Marzi-ul-Huq J Khorshed Alam (Md)………………………………… Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 and others………………………Respondents Judgment November 27, ...... (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Marzi-ul-Huq J Khorshed Alam (Md)………………………………… Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 and others………………………Respondents Judgment November 27, 2001. ......pecial Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Marzi-ul-Huq J Khorshed Alam (Md)………………………………… Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 and others………………………Respondents Judgment November 27, 2001. C......Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Marzi-ul-Huq J Khorshed Alam (Md)………………………………… Petitioner Vs. Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 and others………………………Respondents Judgment November ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Mafizul Hoq Bebu (Md) Vs. Majida Begum and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....No. 3671 of 2000. Judgment Hasan Foez Siddique J. - This Rule, at the instance of the defendant-petitioner, is directed against order dated 10-8-2000 passed by the Learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 175 of 1999 rejecting the prayer for seeking expert......71 of 2000. Judgment Hasan Foez Siddique J. - This Rule, at the instance of the defendant-petitioner, is directed against order dated 10-8-2000 passed by the Learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 175 of 1999 rejecting the prayer for seeking expert’s op......f 2000. Judgment Hasan Foez Siddique J. - This Rule, at the instance of the defendant-petitioner, is directed against order dated 10-8-2000 passed by the Learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Dhaka in Title Suit No. 175 of 1999 rejecting the prayer for seeking expert’s opinio...... High Court Division(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J Hasan Foez Siddique J Mafizul Hoq Bebu (Md)……….……………… Petitioner Vs. Majida Begum and others……………..Opposite Parties Judgment December 10, 2001. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
State Vs. Moslem, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....upon condemned prisoner is maintained and Death Sentence imposed upon him is confirmed. Sentence shall be executed ill accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 116. ......upon condemned prisoner is maintained and Death Sentence imposed upon him is confirmed. Sentence shall be executed ill accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 116. ......s the nature and gravity of crime and not the criminal which are germane in awarding conviction and imposing appropriate punishment. In the matter in hand, Judge, Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Manikganj responded to the cry of justice from society, soul of unfortunate victim of crime ......………..….Condemned Prison Judgment October 30, 2002. Cases Referred To- Abdus Samad Vs. State, 16 DLR (SC) 261; Tulsi Gangota Vs. Emperor, 34 Criminal Law Journal 395; Hazer Ali Mandal and others Vs. State, 37 DLR (AD) 87; Nazir and Others Vs. State, PLD 1962 (SC) 269. Lawyer..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Banesa Bibi Vs. The Senior Vice-President and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....loan mortgaging the property described hereinabove being owner thereof as far back in December, 2002 but she failed to make repayment of installments in terms of the loan and as per section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. The bank put the said property in auction inviting bid through publicati......ortgaging the property described hereinabove being owner thereof as far back in December, 2002 but she failed to make repayment of installments in terms of the loan and as per section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. The bank put the said property in auction inviting bid through publication of ......aging the property described hereinabove being owner thereof as far back in December, 2002 but she failed to make repayment of installments in terms of the loan and as per section 12 of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. The bank put the said property in auction inviting bid through publication of noti......on (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim Md. Joynul Abedin Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman Banesa Bibi……………………….....Petitioner Vs. The Senior Vice-President and others………......Respondents Judgment April 19, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Rokanudd..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 81
M Tariqullah Sikder Vs. Sonali Bank, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....I, rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure and formal decree framed thereunder. 2. It is stated that Sonali Bank as plaintiff filed Civil Suit No. 254/2001 in the Court of Joint District Judge, and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka against M Tariqullah Sikder as defendant for realisation of loan mone......e 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure and formal decree framed thereunder. 2. It is stated that Sonali Bank as plaintiff filed Civil Suit No. 254/2001 in the Court of Joint District Judge, and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka against M Tariqullah Sikder as defendant for realisation of loan money from...... of the Code of Civil Procedure and formal decree framed thereunder. 2. It is stated that Sonali Bank as plaintiff filed Civil Suit No. 254/2001 in the Court of Joint District Judge, and Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka against M Tariqullah Sikder as defendant for realisation of loan money from him...... This FA 337 of 2003 is preferred against judgment dated 25-3-2003 by Joint District Judge, 3rd Court Dhaka rejecting plaint of TS No. 194/2002 under Order VII, rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure and formal decree framed thereunder. 2. It is stated that Sonali Bank as plaintiff filed Civil Su..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Udayan Garments (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
.... all these four Writ Petitions hence, the same are being disposed of by this single judgment. 2. In Writ Petition No. 6611 of 2004 the petitioners have challenged the appointment of Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Chittagong, namely Mr. Md. Abdur Rouf, being violative of Article 116 o......hese four Writ Petitions hence, the same are being disposed of by this single judgment. 2. In Writ Petition No. 6611 of 2004 the petitioners have challenged the appointment of Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Chittagong, namely Mr. Md. Abdur Rouf, being violative of Article 116 of the ...... four Writ Petitions hence, the same are being disposed of by this single judgment. 2. In Writ Petition No. 6611 of 2004 the petitioners have challenged the appointment of Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Chittagong, namely Mr. Md. Abdur Rouf, being violative of Article 116 of the Cons......59 DLR (2007) 615...Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 168
Angels Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd. and another Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....e Constitution upon the respective respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order of "Transformation" of TS 195/2000 vide order No. 14 date 1-10-2003, previously filed under the provisions of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 into new case in pursuance of the provisions of section 60(3) of Artha Ri......titution upon the respective respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order of "Transformation" of TS 195/2000 vide order No. 14 date 1-10-2003, previously filed under the provisions of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 into new case in pursuance of the provisions of section 60(3) of Artha Rin Adal......tion upon the respective respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order of "Transformation" of TS 195/2000 vide order No. 14 date 1-10-2003, previously filed under the provisions of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 1990 into new case in pursuance of the provisions of section 60(3) of Artha Rin Adalat A......eported in: 59 DLR (2007) 601. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 104
Oriental Bank Ltd. Vs. Sitara Siddiq, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
.... suit came at the stage of pre-emptory hearing and deposition of the opposite party as plaintiff of Title Suit No. 209 of 2002 was recorded in part. In the meantime, petitioner bank on 6-3-2004 filed Artha Rin Suit No. 34 of 2004 in the Artha Rin Adalat, 4th Court Dhaka, against Messrs Pan Asia Carr......came at the stage of pre-emptory hearing and deposition of the opposite party as plaintiff of Title Suit No. 209 of 2002 was recorded in part. In the meantime, petitioner bank on 6-3-2004 filed Artha Rin Suit No. 34 of 2004 in the Artha Rin Adalat, 4th Court Dhaka, against Messrs Pan Asia Carrier, S......and deposition of the opposite party as plaintiff of Title Suit No. 209 of 2002 was recorded in part. In the meantime, petitioner bank on 6-3-2004 filed Artha Rin Suit No. 34 of 2004 in the Artha Rin Adalat, 4th Court Dhaka, against Messrs Pan Asia Carrier, SA Panama and some other foreign companies........Plaintiff-Opposite-Party Judgment August 15, 2007. Cases Referred To- PP Gupta vs. East Asiatic Co. AIR 1960 (Allahabad), 184; Mahangu Prasad Sah vs. Pravag Sah, iAIR 1972 (Gauhati), 40 and Smt. Naufati vs. Mehma Singh, AIR 1972 (Punjab & Haryana), 421. Lawyers involved: Sayy..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Mazid and Co. and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....Party Nos. 1-2. Civil Revision No. 1188 of 1993. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 31-3-93 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Narayanganj in Bandhaki Case No.93 of 1992 by which the ex parte decree passed on ......Nos. 1-2. Civil Revision No. 1188 of 1993. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 31-3-93 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Narayanganj in Bandhaki Case No.93 of 1992 by which the ex parte decree passed on 16-3-9...... 1-2. Civil Revision No. 1188 of 1993. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 31-3-93 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Narayanganj in Bandhaki Case No.93 of 1992 by which the ex parte decree passed on 16-3-93 in......rt Division (Civil Revisional jurisdiction) Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sikder Maqbul Huq J Pubali Bank Limited…………………………………….Petitioner Vs. Mazid and Co. and others…………………………..Opposite Parties Judgment December 3, 2000. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Mahmudur Rahman and another Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....m the borrower company only to defraud the creditors. It has been further stated that the respondent No. 2 Janata Bank filed Money Suit No. 4 of 1990 in the court of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, 3rd Court, Chittagong on 30-5-1990 for recovery of Taka 2,0539,182.78 against the ......borrower company only to defraud the creditors. It has been further stated that the respondent No. 2 Janata Bank filed Money Suit No. 4 of 1990 in the court of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, 3rd Court, Chittagong on 30-5-1990 for recovery of Taka 2,0539,182.78 against the defend......ower company only to defraud the creditors. It has been further stated that the respondent No. 2 Janata Bank filed Money Suit No. 4 of 1990 in the court of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, 3rd Court, Chittagong on 30-5-1990 for recovery of Taka 2,0539,182.78 against the defendants......in: 59 DLR (2007) 540; 13 MLR (HCD) (2008) 353. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Shamshad Asif Vs. Additional District Judge and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....he applications under section 26 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1997 without considering that after passing of decrees against the petitioner and other guarantor mortgagor in the concerned Suits filed by the Artha Rin Adalat and execution proceedings against the same being pending bankruptcy proceeding for ......lications under section 26 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1997 without considering that after passing of decrees against the petitioner and other guarantor mortgagor in the concerned Suits filed by the Artha Rin Adalat and execution proceedings against the same being pending bankruptcy proceeding for realis......tions under section 26 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1997 without considering that after passing of decrees against the petitioner and other guarantor mortgagor in the concerned Suits filed by the Artha Rin Adalat and execution proceedings against the same being pending bankruptcy proceeding for realisatio......ion (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Shamshad Asif……………………………Petitioner Vs. Additional District Judge and others……….Respondents Judgment June 16, 1999. Lawyers Involved: SB Bhandary, ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Azizur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha and ors., 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ul Islam, Advocate‑ For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 3541 of 1999. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule is directed against order No. 35 dated 28‑6‑1999 passed by the 2nd Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka in Miscellaneous Case No. 36 of 1993 transferring the aforesaid case to the ......ision (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Gour Gopal Saha J Md. Abdus Salam J Azizur Rahman…………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha and ors…………………………...Opposite Parties Judgment October 21, 20......Advocate‑ For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 3541 of 1999. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- This Rule is directed against order No. 35 dated 28‑6‑1999 passed by the 2nd Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka in Miscellaneous Case No. 36 of 1993 transferring the aforesaid case to the Court of t......vil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Gour Gopal Saha J Md. Abdus Salam J Azizur Rahman…………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha and ors…………………………...Opposite Parties Judgment October 21, 2002. Case R..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Uzzal alias Elias Hossain Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....in and to be paid to the informant Abdul Mannan, the father of the victim, as compensation. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 505.......in and to be paid to the informant Abdul Mannan, the father of the victim, as compensation. Send down the lower Court records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 505....... Death Reference No. 47 of 2002. Judgment Md. Imman Ali J.- This Reference under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure made by the learned Judge, Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Rajshahi, is placed for confirmation of the sentence of death imposed upon convict Md. Far......……. Condemned Prisoner-Appellant Vs. State…………………………………………………………. Respondent Judgment November 28, 2006. Cases Referred To- Dr. Jainand vs. Rex, AIR (36) 1949 Allahabad 291; SM Qamruzzaman vs. State 33 DLR 156; Balaka Singh vs. Stat..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Taju and others Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
.... The accused appellant Taju, son of Sona Miah, is discharged from his bail bond. Send down the lower Court records expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 499. ...... The accused appellant Taju, son of Sona Miah, is discharged from his bail bond. Send down the lower Court records expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 499. ......3) Hanifa and (4) Monir is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 30-11-2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Bishesh Adalat, Narsingdi in Nari-o-Shishu Case No. 52 of 2001 convicting the appellants under section 7/9(3...... This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 499. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Tuta Pramanik (Md) Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....is set at liberty forthwith, if he is not wanted in connection with any other case. Send down the lower Court records expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 492.......is set at liberty forthwith, if he is not wanted in connection with any other case. Send down the lower Court records expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (2007) 492.......e get benefit of doubt. 25. In the result, Criminal Appeal No. 3194 of 2004 is allowed. The impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 9-8-2004 passed by the Special Tribunal Adalat No. 3, Bogra is hereby set aside. The accused-appellant Md. Tula Pramanik is set at li......vs State 9 MLR 429; Mushfiqul Islam vs. State 52 DLR 593; Tariqul Islam vs State 2001 BLD 140 = 6 BLC 134; Abdur Razzaque 51 DLR 83; Kamruzzaman vs. Babul Sikder 47 DLR 416; Babul vs. State 5 MLR 377 and 1988 BLD 106 . Lawyers involved: Md. Abul Hossain Azadi, Advocate—For the Appellant. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mohsina Rahman alias Jaya Vs. Abdul Majid and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....d Court of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka and the plaintiffs opposite parties filed an application under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure which was transferred to the court of Sub-Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3 and was renumbered as Title Suit No.5 of 1999 and on hearing the said applicat......t of Subordinate Judge, Dhaka and the plaintiffs opposite parties filed an application under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure which was transferred to the court of Sub-Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3 and was renumbered as Title Suit No.5 of 1999 and on hearing the said application th...... Subordinate Judge, Dhaka and the plaintiffs opposite parties filed an application under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure which was transferred to the court of Sub-Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.3 and was renumbered as Title Suit No.5 of 1999 and on hearing the said application the le......t Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Haque J NK Chakravartty J Mohsina Rahman alias Jaya………………………….Petitioner Vs. Abdul Majid and others…………….………………..Opposite Party Judgment June 24, 2001. Lawy..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
42324211420642044171416641564130411041004098409040854081407540714065406440624052