Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Shah Gauhar Jamil Palash Vs. Shah Md. Mansur, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....iver therein, passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Rajshahi in MNGR (Metropolitan Non-General Register) Case No.273 of 2003 should not be quashed and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court might seem fit and proper. 2. Facts, relevant for the purpose of..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 1 Nov, 2003 | Hits: 1
Abul Kashem Khan Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....rajee petition and thereby accepting the FRT submitted by the police and discharging the accused) in Nari‑o‑Shishu Case No. 213 of 2002 should not be quashed and/or such other or further order of orders passed as to this Court might seem fit and proper. 2. On 27‑11‑2001 the petitioner as ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 27 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 157
Debendra Kumar Saha & another Vs. Uttara Bank Ltd, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ekhar refunded the money he received from the defendants as rents. They were asked to act as per law and thereafter the defendants sent Taka 3600 on 23‑5‑1980 under money order but the said money orders were refused by the plaintiff Bank. Finding no other alternative the defendants deposite..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 12 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 3
Motiar Rahman (Md.) and 18 others Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh and others
....ases it is found that most of the District Magistrates including the District Magistrates of Dhaka, Narayanganj, Manikganj, Faridpur, Barisal, Chittagong, Cox's Bazar, Pabna, Gopalganj made those orders effective for 30 (thirty) days from the date of service of the same. 2. On a reference t..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 11
Abdul Kader Rabbani and others Vs. Ebaruddin and others, 2003,32 CLC (HCD)
.... This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos.1‑13 to show cause as to why the impugned order complained of in the petition should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The case of the petitioners, in shor..Category: Civil Law | Date: 1 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 4
Mrs. Razia Satter Vs. Mr. Azizul Huq and two others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... it may not stand the scrutiny of law and if any body violates any such order would amount to contempt because such an order does not lack total jurisdiction of the Court to act upon and such kind of orders which are passed by a Court may be assailable on merits and until and unless that order is re..Category: Constitutional Law, Contempt of Court Law | Date: 30 Jun, 2003 | Hits: 13
Bangladesh Biman Corporation, represented by MD Vs. Rabia Bashri Irene and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....sion. In the afore state of the matter we find no substance in these petitions. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 132. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 30 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 164
Amir Hossain Vs. MA Malek & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....inable/ maintainable and because of fraudulently obtaining the Rule and bail and the subsequent order making the Rule absolute and remanding the case to the trial Court without surrender in court the orders are illegal, void and without jurisdiction. 7. Because the learned Judge of the Hi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 15 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 88
Sazzadul Haque Liku (Md.) and others Vs. Sarder Anwar Hossain, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....er dated 23-1-2003 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge, Kalia, Narail in Title Suit No.3 of 2003 granting temporary injunction shall not be set aside and or pass such other order or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Opposite Party No.1 as plaintiff filed Titl..Category: Civil Law, Election Law | Date: 24 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 2
Securities and Exchange Commission Vs. Abu Tyeb and 10 ors. 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... parties and applied judicial mind, the High Court Division was wrong in making the Rule absolute and transferring the cases to the Court of Metropolitan Session Judge holding that the impugned orders were passed mechanically without applying judicial mind and not in accordance with the term..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 17 Dec, 2002 | Hits: 76
Taiyaba Zaman Vs. Gias Uddin Ahmed and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....te No.1 to show cause as to why the order 12‑2‑2002 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, 6th Court, Dhaka in Title Suit No.137 of 2001 should not be set aside and such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. The short facts for disposal of the ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 6 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 198
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. MA Khair Bhuiyan, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....rt or Tribunal has inherent powers to recall order obtained by practicing fraud on it. There is no question of the Court becoming functus officio because it retains the jurisdiction to recall such orders. It inherits in a Court or Tribunal to review by recalling the orders on grounds of fraud, m..Category: Civil Law | Date: 4 Nov, 2002 | Hits: 152
Sirajul Islam (Md.) and others Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....sconding accused persons and order of attachment of property of absconding accused persons under sections 87 and 88 of the Code respectively as evident by order dated 1‑9-1997 and the subsequent orders considered the first information report, charge-sheet, statements of witnesses under section..Category: Women and Children | Date: 5 Aug, 2002 | Hits: 219
Zilaluddin (Md.) Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs & others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....unity of being heard. She has further asserted that according to the records available with her, she ascertained that the aforesaid practice and procedure are being followed since 1974 and the office orders in that respect from 1980 have been annexed as Annexures III and IV series. 12. In the c..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 29 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 2
Goutam Chandra Das alias Goutam Kumar Das Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... in this court) the appellant has continued to suffer imprisonment, it is a fit and proper case in which the High Court Division should consider the case on merit also and then pass whatever order or orders it thinks appropriate in the interest of justice," [51 DLR (AD) 18 at page 20] 26. For th..Category: Women and Children | Date: 20 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 173
Kamaluddin (Md.) & anr. Vs. Sec., Ministry of Land, Bangladesh and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... to invoke the writ jurisdiction as against the intermediate steps as a prelude to the making of that order seeking declaration as to the legality or otherwise of the intermediate or ad‑interim orders(s). In the afore state of the matter, we find no substance in this petition. Acc..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 6 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 149
Ekushey Television Ltd. and others Vs. Dr. Chowdhury Mahmood Hasan & others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....he circumstances the High Court Division called for the file of the technical committee in which the minutes or deliberations were recorded to be examined by it. The High Court Division passed two orders for the production of the file before the court but according to it (at page 140 of leave pe..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 2 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 50
State Vs. Chief Editor, Manabjamin and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)_Part One
....wo categories, namely (1) criminal contempt; consisting in words or acts obstructing or tending to obstruct the administration of justice, and (2) contempt in procedure, consisting in disobedience of orders or other process of the Court resulting in a private injury. (xi) That criminal contempt..Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 20 May, 2002 | Hits: 201
Chowdhury Mahmood Hasan and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....fulfilled, only then their proposals may be considered. We do not know actually what were noted in the relevant file where the Technical Committee recorded the minutes or deliberations. We passed two orders to produce the file but the file was not produced, even there is no explanation as to what ha..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 7
Monzur Alam (Md) Vs. State and another, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....bsp; Not Represented-Respondent No. 1 (In all the cases) Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 165-167 of 2001. (From judgements and orders dated 8-8-2001 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case Nos. 7753, ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 13 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 124