Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Bangladesh Vs. M/s. Zeenath Textile Mills Limited and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....all the lands within the country is amenable under section 22 of the Act for the purpose of collection of rent……………………..(8 & 9) In view of the express provisions of section 22 even Government cannot, by an order or agreement, exempt any land from assessment or payment of rent. The...... Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 189 ......late Division (Civil) Present: F. K. M. A. Munim CJ Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A. T. M. Afzal J Bangladesh……………………………………………Appellant Vs. M/s. Zeenath Textile Mills Limited and others..............Respondents Judgment June 2...... power. 14. The appeal is allowed and the judgments of the Courts below are set aside. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 189 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Nur Ahmed Majumder Vs. Nur Ahmed Majumder & others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
.... suit properly and they sold their taluki interest by kabla Ext. B(1) to Pitambar, that the vendors of defendant No. 1 had accordingly inherited taluki right from PiÂtambar which was acquired by the Government under the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act since 1956 and consequently defendant No. 1 c......hatun & others..................Appellants Vs. Nur Ahmed Majumder & others..................Respondents Judgment July 1, 1987. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972. Articles 103(3) & 104. The lower appellate court and the learned Judge of the Hi......resent: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M. H. Rahman J A. T. M Afzal J. Nur Ahmed Majumder, beÂing dead his heirs: Hafiza Khatun & others..................Appellants Vs. Nur Ahmed Majumder & others..................Respondents Judgment July 1, 1987. Res......operly reversed…….(13) Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khondker, Senior Advocate, (AJ Mahammad Ali, Advocate with him) instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellants. Md. Nurul Haq, Advocate-on-Record - For the Respondents No. 1 and 2. Ex Parte- Respondent Nos. 3-..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Moulana Mokhter AhÂmed Vs. Mohammadul Mokhter Usmani & others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
.............................Appellant Vs. Mohammadul Mokhter Usmani & others.........................Respondents Judgment March 17, 1987. Result: The appeal is dismissed. The Local Government (Union Parishad) Ordinance, 1983 (51 of 1983). Counting was done in presence of the par......that the decision in the case turned on two marginal votes only. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 165 ......ion (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin AhÂmed J M.H.RahÂman J A.T.M. Afzal J Moulana Mokhter AhÂmed...........................................Appellant Vs. Mohammadul Mokhter Usmani & others.........................Respondents Judgment March ......that the decision in the case turned on two marginal votes only. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 165 ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Afzal & others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M Afzal J Bangladesh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural DevelÂopment and Co-operatives, Govt. of Bangladesh............................Ap......is Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 154. ...... M.H. Rahman J A.T.M Afzal J Bangladesh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural DevelÂopment and Co-operatives, Govt. of Bangladesh............................Appellant. Vs. Md. Afzal & others..............................Respondents Judgment August 31, 198......ahman J A.T.M Afzal J Bangladesh, through the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural DevelÂopment and Co-operatives, Govt. of Bangladesh............................Appellant. Vs. Md. Afzal & others..............................Respondents Judgment August 31, 1987. T..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 118
Karatala Lakshmi Bihar Vs. Hriday Ranjan Chowdhury & others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....s no controversy and no body had alleged anything to the contrary. The point rests there. The appeal is therefore, dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 137 ..................................Appellant Vs. Hriday Ranjan Chowdhury & ors...................Respondent Judgment November 11, 1987. Leave was granted to consider whether the Buddhists in Bangladesh are governed by the Hindu Law in matters of succession. The plaintiff and the defe......dÂhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J Karatala Lakshmi Bihar reÂpresented by Dharmadarshi Bikshu being dead Sreemat Amrita Nanda Mahathero…..............................Appellant Vs. Hriday Ranjan Chowdhury & ors...................Respondent Judgment November 11, 1987.......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦(7) Cases Referred to- 32 DLR 187, Mondodari vs. Kshitendra S.A. No. 2256 of 1931. Lawyers Involved: S. R. Pal, Senior Advocate, (Ranadhir Sen, AdvoÂcate with him) instructed by Md. Shamsul Huq Siddique, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Appellant. Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Government of BanglaÂdesh Vs. Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....s Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 116. ...... Government of BanglaÂdesh.................Appellant Vs. Mirza Shahab Ispahani.... ...................Respondent Judgment July 27, 1987. Result: The appeal is dismissed. The Bangladesh Abandoned Property (Control, Management and Disposal) Order, 1972 (President's Order No. ......reme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin AhÂmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Government of BanglaÂdesh.................Appellant Vs. Mirza Shahab Ispahani.... ...................Respondent Judgment July 27, 1987. Resu......1889) 14 App. Case 631 (636). Lawyers Involved: A.W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, inÂstructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate (Md. Fazlul Huq, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respon..Category: Immigration and Citizenship Law | Date: | Hits: 214
The State Vs. Madhu Mirdha, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....er of the High Court Division is set aside and it is directed that the trial be held according to the amended provision of Criminal P.C. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 99 ......of the petitioner it is contended that extension of time in this case is not applicable and the instant case was not pending on 8.8.83 when the Ordinance No. XXXVII of 1983 was published in the Bangladesh Gazette. It is furÂther contended that sub-section (4) of section 339 C is applicable ......) (1988) 99 ......ng the case to be not pending be set-aside……………(3 & 4) Lawyers Involved: A.W. Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, inÂstructed by B.Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.-For the Appellant. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 1985. From..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
M/s Binning & Co.(Bangladesh) Ltd. Vs. M/s Nasirabad Properties Ltd., 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....hief Justice. Order of the Court. By the majority decision, the appeal is dismissed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 89 ......88) 89 ......l) Present: F K.M.A. Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J M/s Binning & Co.(Bangladesh) Ltd………………….Appellant Vs. M/s Nasirabad Properties Ltd…………………………..Respondent Judgment Februa......tion to waive such default, amount to waiver so as to entitle him to the protection against the consequence of default, that is, eviction…………(13) Cases Referred to- Ramjan Ali Mistry V. Md. Hedayetullh,(1979) 31 DLR 183 AD Profulla Kumar Chakraborty V. Anil Proshad Chowdhury, (1981) 33..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Bangladesh and others Vs. Dhaka Lodge Welfare Society, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....ciety. 4. There is a two storied building having 3 rooms in each floor and the entire property including the building was under the possession of the plaintiff's society. Trouble started when the Government was given the permissive uses of the premises and since the title of the plaintiff was in......This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 86 ......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H.Rahman J A.T.M.Afzal J Bangladesh and others ..................Appellants (In both appeals) Vs. Dhaka Lodge Welfare Society...........Respondent (In both appeals) Judgment June 22nd ......hese evidence as additional evidence which will enable the plaintiff to give challenge 10 the claim. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 86 ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Md. Shamsuddin alias Lambu and ors Vs. The State and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
.... told to anybody. No G.D. entry was filed in this case nor was any salish called for. Not even a petition of complaint was filed in Court against the accused appellants. Between 1973-1975 there was a Government in the Country and then in August, 1975 a change was effected in the structures of the St......in Ahmed, JJ; I concur with the judgment of Shahabuddin Ahmed, J. Order of the Court By majority decision the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 69 ......ppellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Md. Shamsuddin alias Lambu and ors………………Appellants Vs. The State and others ..................................Respondents Judgment July 5th 1...... Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 69 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Amirul Islam Vs. Sec, Min. of Land Administration & Land Reforms, Bangladesh, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....ury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H.Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Amirul Islam......................................Appellants Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration & Land Reforms, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & ors………………….Respondents. Judgmen......man J A.T.M. Afzal J Amirul Islam......................................Appellants Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration & Land Reforms, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh & ors………………….Respondents. Judgment August 25th 1987. The General ......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H.Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Amirul Islam......................................Appellants Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Land Administration & Land Reforms, Government of the People's Rep......¦â€¦..(14 & 15) Cases Referred to- Shahbaz vs. Crown P.L.D. 1956 (F.C.) 46, Lt. Col. G. L. Bhattacharya V. The State and 2 others P.L.D. 1964 (SC) 503, Himayatullah Farukhi P.L.D. 1969 (SC) 407, Md. Shoib vs. Govt. of Bangladesh 27 DLR 315, Md. Hemayetullah in 21 DLR (SC) 236 = PLD 1969 (SC) 40..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 49
Sr. Manager, M/s. Dosta Tex Mills Ltd., Ranirhat, Feni & ors Vs. Sudhansu B Nath, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....ondent is a worker and that he is not an employee of the Corporation whose Service Rules are not applicable to his case, the suit is not maintainable. Cases Referred to- Jogesh Chandra Datta v. Government of Bangladesh. 30 DLR 219, New Dhaka Industries Ltd.Vs. Quamrul Huda and others, 31 DLR(A......rker and that he is not an employee of the Corporation whose Service Rules are not applicable to his case, the suit is not maintainable. Cases Referred to- Jogesh Chandra Datta v. Government of Bangladesh. 30 DLR 219, New Dhaka Industries Ltd.Vs. Quamrul Huda and others, 31 DLR(AD) 234 and Mot......) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Senior Manager, M/s. Dosta Textile Mills Ltd., Ranirhat, Feni and others. .......Appellants Vs. Sudhansu Bikash Nath ...............................Respondent Judgement Aug. 3 1987. ...... and the lower appellate court arc set aside and that of the trial court is restored, though on different grounds. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 45 ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Jamal and others Vs. The State, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... to the south-east. On being asked as to where they were being taken, the miscreants replied that they were going to Musa Sarkar who was at Saiyed's house. After passing through an area, which is now Government Research Centre, they arrived at a vast place. There some of the miscreants said that the......entence is set aside and the appellants are acquitted of the charges. They be set at liberty forthwith if not wanted in any other case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 38. ...... (1988) 38. ...... Musa Sarkar was alleged to be the prime mover, the main man among the accused. He hails from Char Kajla which is to the adjacent west of Char Khojapur wherefrom the main man of the complainant party Md. Sohrab (P.W.1) hails. Musa Sarkar, admittedly an influential person, has houses at two other pla..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Rahima Akhter and others Vs. Asim Kumar Bose and others, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....ch as he stepped into the shoes of the owner itself with the power of transfer available to him on and from 2.1.65 which was conferred by amendment. In Ordinance No. 93 of 1976 power was given to the Government to dispose of the property and nothing was left for making the settlement that such prope..............................Appellants Vs. Asim Kumar Bose and others ........................................Respondents Judgment April 10, 1984. Result: The appeal is allowed. The Bangladesh (Vesting of Property and Assets) Order, 1972 (P.O. No.29 of 1972), article 2 (1). The ......Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Syed Md. Mohsen Ali J Rahima Akhter and others..............................................Appellants Vs. Asim Kumar Bose and others ........................................Respondents Judgment ...... Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 23. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Md. Mostafa Hossain Vs. Sikder Md. Faruque and another, 1988, 17 CLC (AD)
....iction will entertain the petition and examine the question on merit. Mere delay in raising the question is not a ground for denying this extraordinary remedy……………….(12) (ii) The Local Government (Upazilla Parishad and Upazilla Administration) Ordinance, 1982 (LIX of 1982), Section 6 ......n ............................Appellant Vs. Sikder Md. Faruque and another........... Respondents Judgment June 29, 1987. Result: The appeal is dismissed. (i) The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 102 There is no room to entertain any doubt as to the maintainability o...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Md. Mostafa Hossain ............................Appellant Vs. Sikder Md. Faruque and another........... Respondents Judgment June 29, 1987. Result......ported in: 40 DLR (AD) (1988) 10, BLD 1988 (AD) 170. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 132
Abani Mohan Saha Vs. Asst. Custodian (S. D. O) Vested Property, Chandpur & ors, 1986, 15 CLC (AD)
....H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismisÂsed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ......o prove his assertion that at the time of the execution of the deed of gift Surendra's sons, the executants, were residing in an enemy country. In this regard reliance is placed on Abul Khair Mia vs. Bangladesh and others 32 DLR (AD) 29. 37. In that case the dispute turned on the question whethe......sion (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim CJ Badrul Haider ChowÂdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Abani Mohan Saha………………………………Appellant Vs. Assistant Custodian (S. D. O) Vested Property, Chandpur and others ………… Respondents ......H Rahman J. Order of the Court By a majority decision the appeal is dismisÂsed. There will, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 39 DLR (AD)(1987) 223. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Sudhir Chandra Sil & another Vs. Harimohan Das & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
.... the following four faults there: (i) that the appellate Court's finding that the suit was bad for defect of parties was misconceived as no objection was taken in this regard and, furthermore, the Government was impleaded as a defendant under President Order No. 142 of 1972; (ii) that the infere......The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ......handra Sil & anr…………………………………………………….Appellants Vs. Harimohan Das & ors……………………&h......The impugned judgment and decree are set aside and those of the lower Appellate Court affirmed. There will, however, be no order as to cost. The application for substitution is rejected. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 50
Sonali Bank, Local Office, Dhaka Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid & others, 1987, 16 CLC (AD)
....on 35A does not come into conflict with the limitation provided in the schedule as to the maximum ad valorem fees which may be determined under the schedule. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......appeal Schedules of 1960, 1969 and 1981 will be refer red to in this judgment. Schedule I of 1969 was brought in by East Pakistan Ordinance No. I of 1969 and the Schedule 1 of 1981 was brought in by (Bangladesh) Finance Act—Act XI of 1981. It may be noted here that though rates of fees as specifie......late Division (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider ChowÂdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Sonali Bank, Local Office, Dhaka ………………….Appellant Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid & others.……………………………………Respondents Jud......Appellant. Miah Abdul Gafur, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. S.S. Halder, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ranesh Chandra Maitra, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 2. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 3. Ex-parte-For the Respondent Nos. 4â..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 124