Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Ali Asgar Khan Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....reme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Ali Asgar Khan, Registrar, Supreme Court of Bangladesh & others....Appellants. Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam being dead his heirs; Mos......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Ali Asgar Khan, Registrar, Supreme Court of Bangladesh & others....Appellants. Vs. Md. Anwarul Islam being dead his heirs; Most. Afroza Begum& others...............Resp...... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... suit from the trial court and transferring the same to its own file for trial and disposal and this requires interference by us. The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... and as such we do not find any substance in this petition. More so the petition appears to have not been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......yed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdul Mannan Akanda…………………….....Petitioner Vs. Md. Lutfar Rahman and others……….........Respondents Judgement......t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t been filed fulfilling the requirement of Rule 4 of order XXVI (Part-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. The civil review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Kamrul Hasan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....enty thousand). Ed. ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ......into consideration the basic fact that appointment of the respondent was cancelled in public interest. Accordingly the appeal is allowed with cost of Tk.30.000/- (twenty thousand). Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d. ......being dead his heirs Mrs Rosey Firoz and others……... ........Respondents Judgement February 10, 2004. Case Referred to- Central London Property Trust Ltd Vs. High Trees House Ltd, 1974 QB 130. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additio...... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Moksed Ali Mondal Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....greement. The plaintiff surrendered his possession of 'Ka' schedule properties situated in India infavour of Ghose brothers who also gave possession of 'Kha' schedule properties to the plaintiff in Bangladesh in pursuance of the contract. But when the plaintiff came to this country on query he le......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Moksed Ali Mondal being dead his heirs Md. Abdul Mannan and others...Appellants. Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others…………..........Respondents. ......gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 12 BLD (AD) 247; Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 20 BLD (AD) 278; Sreemati Pushpa Rani Das and another Vs. A.K.M. Habibur Rahman a......ip;…….....Appellant Vs M.M. Nurussafa and others .........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 12 BLD (AD) 247; Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 20......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer Bangladesh Railway Vs. A.P.M. Basher, Advocate & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ere is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ellip;………………………………………..Appellant Versus Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondent......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
......Appellant Vs Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others…………….........Respondents Judgement June 27, 2004. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Railway Vs. M/s. Sinaf Racht Chartering and Ship Broking Corporation, 5 BLD (AD) 115. ......Vs Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others…………….........Respondents Judgement June 27, 2004. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Railway Vs. M/s. Sinaf Racht Chartering and Ship Broking Corporation, 5 BLD (AD) 115. Lawyers Involv......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: ......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh………....Appellant Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others............Respondents Judgement June 21, 2005. Case Referr......gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 156
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ns made in the judgment. As against that order dated 26.1.2003 accused petitioner filed Criminal Revision No. 546 of 2003 before a Division Bench of the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and their lordships by judgment and order dated 17.6.2003 rejected the said criminal rev......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Robert Pinaru Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....out of that 14 decimals were acquired by C & B Department and thereupon he remained owner and possessor of 27 decimals of land. It was further averred that during the war of liberation he left Bangladesh and in his absence structures including dwelling house in the land in suit were destroye...... (2004) 421. ......he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ......he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
State Vs. Khandker Zillul Bari and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 1998 has been preferred by the State represented by the Solicitor to the Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh against the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division on 9th April, 1996in Cr......, 77. ......gainst them. In default, the District Magistrate concerned shall take step for effecting their arrest to undergo the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 77. ......gainst them. In default, the District Magistrate concerned shall take step for effecting their arrest to undergo the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 77. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-op......m J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, and others.....Petitioners. Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder...................................Respondent Judgment ......ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ......ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Md. Faruque Reza and another Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Hossain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Faruque Reza and another..............Petitioners. Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others.................Respondents. Judgment M......is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation And Others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....zlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq……………………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation and Others………..Respondent Judgment ...... Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq……………………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation and Others………..Respondent Ju...... The appeal is allowed with the aforesaid direction to the Respondents. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 21. ...... The appeal is allowed with the aforesaid direction to the Respondents. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 21. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Abdus Salam Mollah Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....trial Court and affirmed by the High Court Division. The appellant be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 14. ......trial Court and affirmed by the High Court Division. The appellant be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 14. ......trial Court and affirmed by the High Court Division. The appellant be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 14. ......trial Court and affirmed by the High Court Division. The appellant be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 14. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Shahanaz Begum Vs. Md. Kutubuddin and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Nur Mohammad Vs. Badruddoza Chowdhury and anr., 1990, 19 CLC (AD)
.... rule was issued on the respondent No.1 to show cause under what authority he claimed to hold the office of the Chairman since he has defaulted in paying the loan of Taka 10,000/- taken by him from Bangladesh Krishi Bank, Satkhira Branch. Thus he became a defaulter within the meaning of section ...... Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Nur Mohammad............................………………………………………Appellant Vs. Badruddoza Chowdhury and another.....................................Respondents Judgmen......erefore, this appeal is allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside without any order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 116 ......erefore, this appeal is allowed and the judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside without any order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 42 DLR (AD) (1990) 116 ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 124