Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4201-4220 of 4708 results.
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Ramananda Sarker, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... wronged. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 35. ...... Kazi Ebadul Hoque J Government of Bangladesh………..Petitioner Vs. Ramananda Sarker……….Respondent Judgme...... wronged. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 35. ...... wronged. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 35. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Commissioner of Taxes, Dhaka (South) Zone, Dhaka Vs. Ujala Match Factory, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 23. ...... Sections 10(2)(X) & 16(2)(XVI) Since the respondent assessee paid the bonus to the employees as per direction of the Government under the provisions of the above Ordinance and Notification, the question of earning profit for payment of bonus, does not arise…&helli...... The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 23. ...... The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 23. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Akbar Hossain (Md) Vs. MD, Agrani Bank and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 21. ...... Akbar Hossain (Md)…………………………. Petitioner Vs. MD, Agrani Bank and others ………………Respondents Judgment ...... In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 21. ...... In view of the above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 21. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Khairullah (Md) Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
.... Court Division in exercising the discretion. There is therefore no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 13. ......ivil) Present: Mahmudul Amin Choudhury CJ Mainur Reza Chowdhury J Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Fazlul Karim J Khairullah (Md)………………….Petitioner Vs. ADC (Revenue) and another…………. Respondents. Judgment May 24, 2001. Result: The Petition is d...... Court Division in exercising the discretion. There is therefore no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 13. ...... Court Division in exercising the discretion. There is therefore no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 13. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 121
AKM Ali Imam Vs. DG, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute & another, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ......ive Tribunals Rules, 1982, Rule 7 The execution case was dismissed on the ground that the order passed by the Tribunal was declaratory without any direction for reinstatement and as such the said order is not executable. Lawyers Invo......There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ......There is no merit in this petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 5. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 104
S. M. Iqbal Hossain Vs. Managing Director, I F I C Bank Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......ent: M. M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J S. M. Iqbal Hossain................. Petitioner Vs. Managing Director, International Finance Investment and Commerce (IFIC) Bank Ltd. Head Office, Bangladesh Shilpa Bank Bhaban, 17-18 Floors, 8, RAJUK Av......that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division took a correct view in the matter and as such the impugned judgment does not call for our interference. The petition is, therefore, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 78
Md. Marfat Ali Miah Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
..... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Marfat Ali Miah being dead his legal heir: Firoj Ahammad Bhulu.....Appellant Vs. Sree Jagadish Chandra Sheel and others....................................... Respondents Judgment ....... The Other Class Suit No. 82 of 1991 is restored to its file and number. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit expeditiously. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......ayer for rejection of the plaint on the ground that the suit was not maintainable arid that barred by section 42 of the Specific Relief Act and that the suit was also barred under section 37 of the Public Demands Recovery Act (PDR Act) as well as under sections 48 and 49 of the PDR Act. The lear..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Shahjahan Gazi, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....s possession on obtaining renewal of the licence and the gun was never used in any unlawful activities and there is no allegation that the gun was used in the above case; that one Salim Chowdhury, Chairman of the Union Parishad being enemical to the petitioner falsely implicated him in the above...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Government of Bangladesh and others................................Petitioners Vs Md. Shahjahan Gazi.................cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......cided the case and there is no legal infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment of the High Court Division to warrant our interference. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Haque, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......stance in the appeal in order to interfere with the impugned judgment and order of High Court Division. 24. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Md. Anarul Islam and others Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....iness. 9. Similar view has been taken in the case Md. Yameen and another Vs. K.A. Bashar and others reported in 6 BLD (1986) AD 305 and the issue was as to whether the Managing Director and Chairman of a company, the trustees of the fund of the company could be prosecuted for misappropriat......t Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Anarul Islam and others................. Appellant Vs. The State and another……………………...........he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......he company may proceed against the accused-appellants for the allegations in the petition of complaint in the appropriate forum and in accordance with law. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 50
A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited Vs. Janata Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......mmad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J A. R. A. Jute Mills Limited….......Petitioner Vs. Janata Bank and others........ Respondents Judgment 5 January, 2006 Case Referred To- ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......t the High Court Division correctly decided the matter and as such it does not call for our interference. 24. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 121
....s dismissed.
Ed.
......n of Tikapara Ghoramara Rajshahi...................Petitioner
Vs.
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance Internal Resources Division and others................Respondents
Judgment
January 23, 2006.
Result:
The petition ......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
......ayment of VAT which the petitioner avoided to pay is an appealable order in our view, the High Court Division rightly refused to issue the Rule.
6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Ed.
..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Md. Ashaduzzaman Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3179 of 2005 summarily rejecting the writ petition. 2. The writ petitioner filed the Writ Petition challenging the holding of office of Chairman, Jhalakati Pourashava by Respondent No.4 on the grounds, inter alia, that at the time of f......uhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Ashaduzzaman................ Petitioner. Vs. Bangladesh, representedby the Secretary, Ministry of local Government, Engineering and Rural Development Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others………...........pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......pal amount he borrowed from the Bank. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, we find no merit in the leave petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Saifur Rahman Emam Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... petition was filed for a direction upon the respondent No. 5 of the writ petition to treat the nomination paper of the petitioner as valid allowing him to contest the bye election for the post of Chairman of Kalikapur Union Parishad, District-Patuakhali scheduled to be held on 05.04.2006. The n...... Arnirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Saifur Rahman Emam................. Petitioner Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka & others .............Respondents ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. 8. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 119
Md. Shafique Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......usain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Shafique Ahmed........................................ Petitioner Vs Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others………...............Respondents Judgme......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......-IV) of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules, 1988. 4. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration and accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 106
Com. of In. Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Shahabuddin Ahmed J Commissioner of Income Tax, Dacca Zone, Dacca ……………………..Appellant. Vs. M/S. Badridas Full-chand, Saidpur, Rangpur... ………………………&he......eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......eal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is hereby set aside and the answer of the question under section 66 (1) must be in the negative. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 76
S.M. Quddus & ors Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Ctg. & anr, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J S.M. Quddus & ors. ............Petitioners (in C.P. Nos. 58/80, 59/78, 60 of 1980). Vs Chairman, Labour Court, Ctg. & anr…………………&helli...... the petitions). Not represented—Respondent No. 1 (in all the petitions.) Civil Petition for special leave to appeal Nos. 58 to 60 of 1980. (On appeal from the judgment and order dated 6-6-79 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 993, 994 and 995 of ...... provides, in our opinion, sufficient justification for granting termination benefits instead of reinstatement. In that view of the matter, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ...... provides, in our opinion, sufficient justification for granting termination benefits instead of reinstatement. In that view of the matter, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others Vs. Gani Ahmed and others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J KM Subhan J Siddique Ahmed Chowdhury & others….....………Appellants Vs. Gani Ahmed and others …………………………..Respondents Judgment. July 18, 1979. The Moha......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ......is is a question of fact and hardly arises in this appeal by special leave. For the foregoing reason, we dismiss the appeal with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 33 DLR (AD) 1. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdus Subhan &. others, 1979, 8 CLC (AD)
....n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......so Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......n of P.O. 16 of 1972 is illegal and as such the provision of M.L.R. VII 1977 has no application. The petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255.......is Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 255...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors Vs. State and another, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ......llate Division (Criminal) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain, C J. Ruhul Islam, J., Badrul Haider Chowdhury, J. Abdul Jabbar Khan @ Jabbar Khan & ors ……..Appellants. Vs. State and another.......................................... Respondents Judgment January 24, 1980. ......oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ......oned in the original complaint petition and sent up for trial by the police and he will be guided by the principles enunciated above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 32 DLR (AD) (1980) 247 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
13301324132313201317131413131301129912971296129512941293129012871278127712761275