Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4221-4240 of 4744 results.
Nurunnessa and ors Vs. Babr Ali Bepari and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the poÂwer of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the poÂwer of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......w, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Involved: M.G. Rabbani, Advocate, instructed by B.C.Panday, Advocate-on-Record.—For the ApÂpellants. S.M. Huq, Advocate-on-Rccord.—For the Respondents 3-7 and 9-11. K.A. Bakr, Attorney-General, instructed by B.Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.—Under Rule 1, Order XLV S.C. (A.D.) Rules, 1..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 128
Khadomul Islam Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....for disposal in accordance with law. Let the operation of the order dated 12th July. 1979 be stayed till the disposal of the matter in the High Court Division There will no order as to costs. Ed. ......for disposal in accordance with law. Let the operation of the order dated 12th July. 1979 be stayed till the disposal of the matter in the High Court Division There will no order as to costs. Ed. ......sion (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Khadomul Islam Chowdhury…………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………………………..Respondents Judgment July 21, 1980. Lawyers ......dgment July 21, 1980. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Advocate instructed by Md. Shafiqur Rahman, Advocate-on- Record—For the Appellant. Abdus Sobhan, Additional Attorney General, with Matiur Rahman, Assistant Attorney General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 160
Shamuj Ali and other Vs. Kamalarma Bibi and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......n: ......the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Ful Chand Das and others Vs. Mohammad Hammad and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....arted living there. Defendant No. 1 Ganesh Chandra Chakraborty residing in the Dacca city appeared in their village and gave out to the villagers that he was a representative from the office of the Deputy High Commissioner of India in Dacca and told them that there was apprehension of fresh riot ......ent of the High Court Division is maintained. Consequently, this appeal stands dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 68. ......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: FKMA Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Ful Chand Das and others......................Appellants Vs. Mohammad Hammad and others&......he amendatory statute is wholly void, the statute sought to be amended is not affected but remains in force. The paragraph reads as under: "24. Effect of Invalid Amendments, Generally.— Of course, if the amendatory statute is wholly void, the statute sought to ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Abdul Alim and others Vs. A. K. Abdul Hoque and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....Act. In this view, the appeal is allowed but in the facts of case we make no order as to costs. The decrees of courts below are set aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ......Act. In this view, the appeal is allowed but in the facts of case we make no order as to costs. The decrees of courts below are set aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Ruhul Islam J K. M. Subhan J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Abdul Alim and others……………………………&h......Act. In this view, the appeal is allowed but in the facts of case we make no order as to costs. The decrees of courts below are set aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Govt. of BanglaÂdesh Vs. Md. Arshad Ali, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ip;…………………………......... Respondent Judgment February 25, 1982. Lawyers Involved: A Wadud Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, B. Hossain, Assistant Attorney General, instructed by Abdul Wadud Mia......e sustained. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......e Appellants. Rafiq-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate instructed by Serajuddin Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record,—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 118 of 1981. From the judgment and order dated April 30, 1981 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 760 of 1980.......ip;……………………......... Respondent Judgment February 25, 1982. Lawyers Involved: A Wadud Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, B. Hossain, Assistant Attorney General, instructed by Abdul Wadud Mian, Advocate-on-R..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 171
M/s. Everett OriÂent Lines Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Ctg Zone, Ctg, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....esult, therefore, both the appeals are allowed. The judgement of the High Court Division is set aside and the orders of the Tribunal are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......esult, therefore, both the appeals are allowed. The judgement of the High Court Division is set aside and the orders of the Tribunal are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate -instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondent. Civil Appeal Nos. 129 of 1980 and 130 of 1980. On appeal from the judgment and order dated 23-6-1980 pa......esult, therefore, both the appeals are allowed. The judgement of the High Court Division is set aside and the orders of the Tribunal are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Mofizur Rahman Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... 73 of 1981) Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate instructed by A. B. Majumder, Advocate-on-Record—For the ResponÂdent(In Civil Appeal No. 74 of 1981). KA, Bakr, Attorney-General, with A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B, Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondents (In Civ...... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦... Appellant Vs. Burhanuddin Ahmed………………………….. Respondent (In Civil Appeal No. 124 of 1981) Judgment March 10, 1982. Result: Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. Cases Referred To- Dr. Nurul Islam Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh (1......pellant (In Civil Appeal No. 73 of 1981) Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate instructed by A. B. Majumder, Advocate-on-Record—For the ResponÂdent(In Civil Appeal No. 74 of 1981). KA, Bakr, Attorney-General, with A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B, Hossain, Advocate-on-Record.â€..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
Abdul Halim Mollah @ Monohar Mollah & anr Vs. Member, App Tribunal Dacca & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....LR S.C. 258. Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. Basel Majumder, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Md. Moksudur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Respondents. ......nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......resent: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ F. K. M. A. Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Abdul Halim Mollah alias Monohar Mollah and another……………………Appellant &nbs...... Lawyers Involved: Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. Basel Majumder, Advocate on Record—For the Appellants. Md. Moksudur Rahman, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate on Record—For the Respondents. Crimi..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Misfor Ali and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....gladesh Water Development Board and they were removed from service on the charge of misconduct and breach of discipline. It was alleged that the respondents entered into the office of the Deputy Director of Accounts and manhandled M. Abdullah, Deputy Director of Accounts on 9 9.74.......ges, the appeal must succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......emaluddin Hossain CJ F. K, M. A Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power and Water Resources ……………… Appellants Vs. M......p;…………………………Respondents Judgment March 18, 1982. Lawyers Involved: Matiur Rahman, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record, —For the Appellants. Moinul Hos..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 92
....ange the basis of gross profit as calculated by the assessee and raise it to a higher perÂcentage.
The trading accounts of the respective assessee was rejected on valid grounds and action of the Deputy CommiÂssioner of Taxes for taking recourse to section 13 and making estimate for finding out......dgment and order by the High Court Division are set aside. The appeals are allowed without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 298; 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 48.
......ns 13, 66(1)
In case of assessee does not maintain accounts in accordance with method of accounting regularly, the assessing officer has been given the power to reject the accounts of the assessee and take recourse to the proviso to section 13. In such a case, the assessing officer is competent t......dgment and order by the High Court Division are set aside. The appeals are allowed without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD)(1982) 298; 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 48.
..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ip;…..Respondent Judgment March 4, 1982. Case Referred To- M.A. Hai vs. Trading Corporation (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 46. Lawyers Involved: A.W Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. ......ourt Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed with the modification that; the punishment is altered to compulsory retirement. No order as to costs. Ed. ......n Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Works and Rural Development and another ……………………&h......pondent Judgment March 4, 1982. Case Referred To- M.A. Hai vs. Trading Corporation (1980) 32 DLR (AD) 46. Lawyers Involved: A.W Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Syed Ishtia..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chowdhury Ramzan Ali and another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ed without any order as to costs. The orders of the Court below are set aside, the proceedings of claims of the appellant before the Company Judge will proceed according to law. Ed. ......ed without any order as to costs. The orders of the Court below are set aside, the proceedings of claims of the appellant before the Company Judge will proceed according to law. Ed. ......ent: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Commissioner of Income Tax...........................Appellant Vs. Chowdhury Ramzan Ali and another…………......Respondents Judgment Aug 14, 1978. ......ed without any order as to costs. The orders of the Court below are set aside, the proceedings of claims of the appellant before the Company Judge will proceed according to law. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Hajee Khabiruddin Ahmed Vs. Md. Salam Kabir, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ter the lapse of a reasonable time. For the reason stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial court restored. Ed. ......ter the lapse of a reasonable time. For the reason stated above, the appeal is allowed with costs. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the trial court restored. Ed. ...... instructed by Santiranjan Karmaker, Advocate-on-Record.— For the Appellant. Syed Sakhawat Ali, Advocate-on-Record. — For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 139 of 1981. From the judgment and Decree dated June 25, 1981 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 122 of 1976. ...... of the High Court Division. Apart from such presumption of service of notice which arises from the posting of letter containÂing it, our attention was drawn to the proviÂsions of section 27 of the General Clauses Act which read as follows: Where any Act of Parliament or ReÂgulation made a..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Rokeya Khatun Vs. Alijan @ Alijan Bepari and ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ......he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ...... J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Rokeya Khatun………………………….... Appellant. Vs Alijan @ Alijan Bepari and ors………...Respondents Judgment November 10, 1981. Cas......he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Khondker Moshtaque Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ed, Senior Advocates with Nizamuddin Haider, Advocate, instructed by Shahabuddin Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In both the appeals). K.A. Bakr, Attorney-General, with A W Bhuiyan Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent (In both t......w Court and the order of Government on review are set aside, The orders of convicÂtion passed on the appellant ate hereby quashed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 222. ......LD 1973 (SC) 49; Federation of Pakistan Vs. Saeed Ahmed PLD (SC) 151; Jamil Huq Vs. Bangladesh (1982) 34 DLR(AD) 125; A Rouf Vs. Abdul Hamid Khan (1965 17 DLR (SC) 515. Lawyers Involved: MH Khandker and Khandker Mahbub uddin Ahmed, Senior Advocates with Nizamuddin Haider, Advocate, instructe...... Khandker Mahbub uddin Ahmed, Senior Advocates with Nizamuddin Haider, Advocate, instructed by Shahabuddin Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (In both the appeals). K.A. Bakr, Attorney-General, with A W Bhuiyan Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B. Hossain Advocate-on-Record—For..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 287
Bangladesh Vs. Hon'ble Judge, Prize Court, HCD, Supreme Court Building, Dacca, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....me Court Building, Dacca …………….. Respondents Judgment Feb. 23, 1982. Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General with A. W. Bhuiyan Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by M R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. ......e learned Attorney-General are found unacceptable, not because it lack reasons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ......ent : F.K.M.A. Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Bangladesh………………......High Court Division, Supreme Court Building, Dacca …………….. Respondents Judgment Feb. 23, 1982. Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General with A. W. Bhuiyan Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by M R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record&mda..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 116
Abdul Hamid Vs. Abdul Jabbar , 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....o this modification the appeal is allowed, the order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge is restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......o this modification the appeal is allowed, the order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge is restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......h;For the Appellant. Shaukat Ali Khan, Advocate, instructed by A. Baset Majumder, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 111 of 1981 (From the judgment and order dated 7.7.1981 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1034 of 1980). ......o this modification the appeal is allowed, the order of the High Court Division is set aside and that of the Subordinate Judge is restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Bangladesh & others Vs. A. K. M. Zahangir Hossain, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....R 1977 SC 2155; Durga Shanker Mehta Vs. Raghuraj Singh, AIR 1954 SC 520; Royal Aquarium Vs. Parkinson 1892 (1) CB 436 (466). Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General, with A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants (In Civil ...... member of the said 'disciplined force' if he has been illegally dismissed, removed, discharged, reduced in rank or comÂpulsorily retired. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 173. ......iplined force, he is debarred from invoking the writ jurisdiction unless it is coram non judice or mala fide. Cases Referred To- High Commissioner for India vs. I. M. Lall, AIR 1948 PC 121; Khandker Ehteshamuddin Ahmed Vs. State (1981) 33 DLR (AD) 154; Harinagar Sugar Mills Vs. Shyam Sundar,......, Shillong Vs. WA Sangma, AIR 1977 SC 2155; Durga Shanker Mehta Vs. Raghuraj Singh, AIR 1954 SC 520; Royal Aquarium Vs. Parkinson 1892 (1) CB 436 (466). Lawyers Involved: K. A. Bakr, Attorney-General, with A.W. Bhuiyan, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record—F..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
General Manager Jamuna Oil ComÂpany Ltd. Vs. Golap Rahman & another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....dinance shows that the Court itself either cannot compel the attendance of such member or extract his advice. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......dinance shows that the Court itself either cannot compel the attendance of such member or extract his advice. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Appellant. Rokanuddin Mahmood Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Respondent No. 1. Civil Appeal No. 141 of 1980. (From the judgment and order dated July 18, 1980 passed by the High Court Division in Writ petition No. 672 of 1978). ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ F.K.M.A. Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J General Manager Jamuna Oil Company Ltd........................Appellant Vs. Gola..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 97
15461544154315421541153915381536153515341533153115291528152715231520151915181517