Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4241-4260 of 5263 results.
Ashraf and others Vs. Md. Zahangir Alam & others , 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ve the appeals are allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 66; V ADC (2008) 189; 14 MLR (AD) (2009) 86. ...... (AD) (2009) 86. ......ve the appeals are allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 66; V ADC (2008) 189; 14 MLR (AD) (2009) 86. ......ve the appeals are allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 66; V ADC (2008) 189; 14 MLR (AD) (2009) 86. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 88
Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Barrister Nazmul Huda and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....n Criminal Appeal No. 6 of 2008) Judgment March 6, 2008. Cases Referred to- ADM, Jabalper vs. Sukla, AIR 1976 (SC) 1207, Harabayashi vs. United States (1943), Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh vs. Syed Sanwar Ali 27 DLR (AD) 16; 1991 BLD (AD) 96 = 43 DLR (AD) 119, 1994 BLD (AD) 184......am J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J Anti-Corruption Commission ........................Appellant (In both the cases) Vs. Barrister Mir Md. Helaluddin and another…..Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2008) Barrister Nazmul Huda and another...... MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J Anti-Corruption Commission ........................Appellant (In both the cases) Vs. Barrister Mir Md. Helaluddin and another…..Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2008) ......fe to be certified by duly constituted Medical Board, may consider the matter of granting bail in an appropriate case in an appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 256. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 219
Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....al Code and other penal laws of the country…………….(44) Cases Referred To- Khondaker Modarresh Elahi Vs. The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 21 BLD 352; Bharat Kumar K. Palicha and another Vs. State of Kerala and others, AIR 199......hellip;………….Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1999) Amanullah Kabir..............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1999) Vs. The State and others …………………………&he......iya ………………….Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1999) Amanullah Kabir..............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1999) Vs. The State and others …………………&hell......gment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 49; V ADC (2008) 150. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
State Vs. Md. Kamaluddin @ Pichi Kamal and ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Mudassir Husain CJ M.A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J The State, Represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Comilla......Appellant Vs Md. Kamaluddin @ Pichi Kamal and ors. .............Respondents Judgment January 10, 2005. Lawyers Involve......or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Md. Muinuddin Zulfiquer Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Muinuddin Zulfiquer ............................................Petitioner Vs Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka a.......................................Petitioner Vs Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others.... Respondents Judgment November 29, 2006. Lawyers Involved: ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Mahfuzul Hoque and ors Vs. Collector of Customs, Customs House, Chittagong & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e imposition of supplementary duty has the force of law having been made under valid legislation. On such specified types of goods imported/exported mentioned in the from and out of Bangladesh, section 25(7) in one of such law authorizing the Government to fix tariff value on...... M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mahfuzul Hoque, Golam Mostafa, Abul Kalam, Abdul Matin, Md. Shahid, Ujjal Chowdhury, A. Rahman, M/s. Hasan and Company, M/s. Asgar Oil Mills Ltd. M/s. F. Rahman Oil Mills Ltd., M/s. Universal Trading, Rahi......Collector of Customs, Customs House, Chittagong & others................. Respondents (In all the cases). Judgment August 8, 2005. Cases Referred To- Mustafa Kamal Vs. The Commissioner of Customs, 52 DLR (AD) 1; Phassco Hardware Company Vs. The Government of Paki...... 61. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Kazi Muhammad Khokon Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ellip;…………….Petitioner Vs Deputy Secretary (Registration) Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Secretariat, Dhaka and others ........Respondents Judgment November 30, 2......;…………………………………….Petitioner Vs Deputy Secretary (Registration) Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Secretariat, Dhaka an...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Humayun Kabir Khan Vs. Md. Nurul Haque & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......aiz Siddiqui, Advocate instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent Nos. 2-18. Civil Appeal No. 61 of 2002. (From the judgment and order dated 25.05.1998 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1233 of 1996.) ......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Commissioner of Customs and others Vs. Mohammad Ali, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Abedin J Commissioner of Customs and others......Appellants Vs. Mohammad Ali................Respondent Judgment April 19, 2007. Cases Referred To- Bangladesh Vs. Mizanur Rahman, 52 DLR (AD) 149. Lawyers Involved: MA Azim Khair, Deput...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Commissioner of Customs and others......Appellants Vs. Mohammad Ali................Respondent Judgment...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Commissioner of Customs and others......Appellants Vs. Mohammad Ali................Respondent Judgment April 19, 2007. C......s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Khan Md. Firoj Kabir Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ...... Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Khan Md. Firoj Kabir...................................Appellant Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others... ...................Respondents Judgment March 12, 2006. Cases R......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Khan Md. Firoj Kabir...................................Appellant Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others... ...................Respondents Judgment Mar......nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Arif A. Shekha and others Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....d another..................................Respondents Judgment June 4, 2007. Result: The appeals are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Messrs Helal Jute Press Limited Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 27 DLR 551; Government of Bangladesh Vs. Mirza Shahab Ispahani, 40 DLR (AD) 116; Governm......sion Judgment in Review Petition Here. Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Arif A. Shekha and others............................Appellants Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and a......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Arif A. Shekha and others............................Appellants Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another..................................Respondents ......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) .....................Appellant Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others..........Respondents Judgment July 17, 2006. Cases Referred To- ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Shahid Hossain Khan (Md) .....................Appellant Vs. Abdul Bashed Lashkar and others..........Respondents Judgment July 17, 2...... decree of permanent injunction. 15. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 216
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Bangladesh...........................................Appellant Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak an......Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Bangladesh...........................................Appellant Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others..................Respondents Judgment February 7, 2007. Lawyers In......nt: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Bangladesh...........................................Appellant Vs. Md. Abdur Razzak and others..................Respondents Judgment February......17. In view of the discussion made above, we do not find any grounds to interfere with the impugned judgement and order. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 117
Managing Director, WASA Vs. Md. Ali and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....A Greet and other, AIR 1933 PC 89; Collipara Sriramulu Vs. Aswatla Harayal, AIR 1968 SC 1208; Ramana Dayaram Shetty Vs. International Airport Authority of India, AIR 1979 SC 1628; SMS Samity Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 39 DLR (AD) 85; Anjumane Ahmadiya, Sargodha Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Sargod...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Managing Director, WASA.............................Appellant Vs. Md. Ali and others………………………………………………Respondents Judgment July 1...... ......ent and order of the High Court Division cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 59 DLR (AD) (2007) 185. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 100
Rabia Bhuiyan, MP Vs. Ministry of LGRD & others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ases Referre to: Virendar Gaur vs. State of Haryana (1995)2 SCC 577; Vineet Narain vs Union of India, AIR 1998 SC 889; MC Mehta vs Union of India, 1999 (6) SCC 12; Dr. Mohiuddin Farooque vs Bangladesh, 55 DLR 613. Lawyers Involved: Dr Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instruct......zul Islam J Rabia Bhuiyan, MP…………………………………..Appellant. Vs. Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development & others... ..................Respondents Judgment August 27, 2...... MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rabia Bhuiyan, MP…………………………………..Appellant. Vs. Ministry of Local Government and Rural Development & others... ..................Res......ing steps taken to implement the Arsenic Policy, 2004 and the Plan. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed within directions as set out above. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Environmental Law | Date: | Hits: 255
Rowshan Ara Begum Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, BD, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rowshan Ara Begum…………………………..Petitioner Vs Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, Government of Bangladesh and others......Respondents Judgment: December 12, 2006. Case Referred To- M......te Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Rowshan Ara Begum…………………………..Petitioner Vs Secretary, Ministry of Works and Urban Development, Government of Bangladesh and others......Respondents Judgment: Decembe......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ......in question since said property is an abandoned property. The ground contending which review of our judgment is sought merits no consideration. Accordingly the review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Muinuddin Zulfiquer (Md) Vs. Government of the Republic of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cation by the Administrative Tribunal, relief sought as against the said matter was not available to the writ-petitioner in writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. This Division while dismissing the petition for leave to appeal observed "In the b......or Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioner. Not represented—The Respondents Civil Review Petition No. 47 of 2005 (From the Judgment and Order dated December 4, 2004 passed by the Appellate Division in Civil Petition for Leave to A......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e of the judgment for review. 8. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 76
Ali Hussain Faraji & others Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......min CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Ali Hussain Faraji & others......................Petitioner Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another.......Respondent Judgment August 15, 2007. Lawyers Involved: ......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Ali Hussain Faraji & others......................Petitioner Vs. Abdul Ali Pradhania @ Abul and another.......Respondent Judgment August 1......The learned Counsel could not point out any illegality or infirmity in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Meghna PET Industries Ltd and others Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....roup of Industries. The writ-petitioners and two others namely Mr. MF Kamal and Mr. Md. Zakaria were the directors of Meghna PET Industries Ltd. Meghna PET Industries Ltd. obtained loan from Saudi Bangladesh Industrial and Agricultural Investment Company Ltd (SABINCO), a public limited company t......ion No. 477 of 2005). Abdur Razzaq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Zahirul Islam, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. (In Civil Petition No. 478 of 2005). Rafique-ul-Huq and Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Reco...... Meghna PET Industries Ltd..........Petitioner (In Civil Petition No. 477 of 2005) Prime Edible Oil Ltd. & another........Petitioners (In Civil Petition No. 478 of 2005) Vs. Md. Mostafa Kamal & others........Respondents (In both the cases) Judgm......faulter borrowers. Accordingly, the application for dismissing the civil petition for leave to appeal Nos. 477-478 of 2005 is allowed. Both the civil petitions are dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 108
Collector of Customs, Chittagong & anr Vs. M.M Shafullah and ors., 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....he language of S. 167(9B) of the Act. For these reasons this appeal fails and it is dismissed, but having regard to the circumstance of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ......hmud Hossain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhaitacharya J Collector of Customs, Chittagong & anr……………Appellants Vs. M.M Shafullah and ors………….…Respondents Judgment June 29, 1977. ......bsp; Syed A. B. Nahmud Hossain CJ Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhaitacharya J Collector of Customs, Chittagong & anr……………Appellants Vs. M.M Shafullah and ors………….…Respondents Judgment......he language of S. 167(9B) of the Act. For these reasons this appeal fails and it is dismissed, but having regard to the circumstance of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
23522351234923452343234223402338233623332332233123302324232323182317231223112310