Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
State Vs. Harun Chowdhury, District Magistrate and Mostafa Kamal, SP Sylhet, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....r Contemner No. 1. Tanjib-ul-Alam, Advocate—For Contemner No. 2. Md. Humayan Kabir Bulbul, Assistant Attorney-General, Md. lqbal Kabir, Assistant Attorney-General—For the State. Contempt Rule No. 112 (R) of 2005 (Arising out of Criminal Appeal No. 572 of 1993). Judgment Md. Mo......; Shamsur Rahman Vs. Tahera Nargis, 44 DLR (AD) 237; State Vs. Abdul Karim Sarker 57 DLR 26; Abdul Karim Sarker Vs. the State, 38 DLR (AD) 188; Abdul Hoque Vs. District Judgeship, 51 DLR (AD) 15. Lawyers Involved: AM Aminuddin, Advocate—For Contemner No. 1. Tanjib-ul-Alam, Advocate—For..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 1272
MA Salam Vs. Additional District Judge & Dewlia Adalat, Chittagong and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....Aftabuddin, Advocates—For the Petitioner. M Qumrul Haque Siddique with Joy Rahman, Advocates—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 485 of 2001. Judgment Md. Muzammel Hossain J.- This Rule was issued at the instance of the petitioner calling upon the respondents to show cause as to w......n Vs. District Judge and Appellate Election Tribunal, Bhola and others, 38 DLR (AD) 172; In Colquhoun Vs. Brooks (1889) 14 App. Case 493 (496), Canada Sugar Refining Co Vs. R (1898) AC. 735 (74). Lawyers Involved: Mostafa Neaz Mahmood with Hamida Chowdhury and Aftabuddin, Advocates—For the ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Md. Lokman @ Lokman Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... leave to appeal at the instance of the petitioner is directed against the judgÂment and order dated 18-03-2009 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Revision No.1142 of 2007 discharging the Rule and affirming the order dated 21-08-2007 passed by the learned Judge, Druta Bichar Tribunal No....... 3, 2010. Cases Referred To- Bangladesh Vs. Paran Chandra Baroi, 1986 BCR (AD) 225; Taher Hossain Rushdi Vs. The State, 7 MLR (AD) 116; State Vs. Khondker Md. Moniruzzaman, 17 BLD (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Advocate, instructed by Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record-For ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Dhaka Leather Complex Ltd. Vs. Sikder Construction Ltd. and another, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....02 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and decree dated 04-04-2002 passed by the Joint District Judge, 5th Court, Dhaka in Title suit No.15 of 1999 decreeing the suit by making the award Rule of the Court. 2. The respondent as plaintiff filed Title Suit No.158 of 1999 in the Court of...... Overseas Cotton Co. Vs. S.M. Fazail and Co. PLD 1958 (WP) Karachi 27; Mohammad Shafi Vs. Mohammad Sabir, PLD 1960 Lah 591; Abdus Salam and another Vs. Osman Gani and another, BCR 1984 (AD) 346. Lawyers Involved: M. A.Samad, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-On-Record-For..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 187
Abi Abdullah (Md.) and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ul Islam with AQM Safiullah. Advocates For the Petitioners. Quamrunnesa, Assistant Attorney-General—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 3838 of 1998. Judgment Fazlur Rahman J. - This Rule under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh was issued calling......vernment of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land & others..……………………Respondents. Judgment November 29, 2005. Case Referred to- 31 DLR (AD) 195. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam with AQM Safiullah. Advocates For the Petitioners. Quamrunnes..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Abdur Razzaque Zoarder and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... the Petitioners. Md. Abdun Nur, Advocate—For the Respondents. Writ Petition No. 6436 of 2001. Judgment Syed Refaat Ahmed J.- In this Application under Article 102 of the Constitution a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Impugned Order contain...... Zoarder and others…………………………………Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………………………………Respondents. Judgment November 9, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque with Md. Oziullah, Advocates—For the Petitioners. Md. Abdun..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Abdul Mannaf (Md.) Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali Akand & others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....gned judgment and order dated 1 -2-2003 passed by the Joint District Judge, 3rd Court, Mymensingh, the pre-emptee (Md. Abdul Mannaf) has preferred this revisional application and obtained the present Rule. 7. The opposite party No. 1 (pre-emptor has contested the Rule by filing a counter affidavi......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦. Petitioner Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali Akand & others ……………………………………...Opposite Parties. Judgment July 25, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Not represented — the Petitioner. Md. Abdul Haque, Advocate—For the Oppo..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Alimuddin and others Vs. Abdul Kabir and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... Md. Omar Ali Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Shah Md. Zahurul Haque, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 4300 of 2002. Judgment Nozrul Islam Chowdhury J. - This Rule at the instance of the plaintiffs as petitioners, was issued under section 115(1) of the Code o........Petitioner Vs. Abdul Kabir and others………………………………….Opposite Parties. Judgment June 29, 2003. Cases Referred to- 13 DLR 871; 1985 BLD 61; 1985 BLD 61. Lawyers Involved: Md. Omar Ali Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Shah Md. Zahurul Haque, A..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Executive Engineer, Sylhet Public Works Department Vs. Md. Asob Ali, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....tant Attorney-General—For the Petitioner. AKM Mainuddin with Nurul Huda Ansary, Advocate—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 300 of 2005. Judgment Faisal Mahmud Faizee J.- This Rule, upon an application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, was directed against the...... Md. Asob Ali……………………………………………………………………………….Opposite Party. Judgment August 17, 2005. Case Referred to- 2 MLR (AD) 109. Lawyers Involved: Md. Azizul Haque, with Md. Jafor Ali. Assistant Attorney-General and Md. Iqbal ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 209
Shomurunessa and others Vs. Md. Musa Miah and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Opposite Parties. Judgment December 4, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Not represented— the Petitioners. Md. Ibrahim Mollah, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Rule No. 510(Con) of 2001. Judgment Salma Masud Chowdhury J. - This Rule was issued calling up...... Shomurunessa and others………………………………..Petitioners Vs. Md. Musa Miah and others ………………………………Opposite Parties. Judgment December 4, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Not represented— the Petitioners. Md. Ibrahim Mollah, Advocate—For the O..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Golap Vs. Md. Abdul Hakim & others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....e legal heirs of the deceased defendant is concerned should not be set aside or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 2. Before the issuance of the Rule delay of 29 days was condoned. The plaintiff-opposite party filed the suit for declaration of t......……….Petitioner Vs. Md. Abdul Hakim & others…………….Opposite Parties. Judgment October 23, 2002. Case Referred to- Abdul Aziz Vs. Abani Mohan, 30 DLR (SC) 221. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hoque, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Not represented— the Opposite ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Tahera Begum and others Vs. Mizanur Rahman (Md.) and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....dvocate—For the Petitioners Mojibur Rahman, Advocate—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 5242 of 2002. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - Defendant Nos. 1 to 4 and 6 obtained the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against an ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦..Opposite Parties. Judgment March 16, 2004. Case Referred to- Amimdlah Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abdul Hafiz and others, 1981 BCR (AD) 131 = 33 DLR (AD) 282. Lawyers Involved: Joynal Abedin, Advocate—For the Petitioners Mojibur Rahman, Advocate—For..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72
Rafique Ullah (Md) Vs. Badsha Alam and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....”For the Petitioner. Md. Khalilur Rahman Bhuiyan with Mohammad Mofazzal Hossain, Advocates—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 5491 of 2002. Judgment Sheikh Abdul Awal J.- This Rule is directed against the judgment and order dated 27 6-2002 passed by the learned Additional Dis.......Petitioner Vs. Badsha Alam and others..................................Opposite Parties. Judgment August 30, 2005. Case Referred to- Abdul Wahab Vs. Samad Ali, 33 DLR (AD) 113. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abul Kalam Chowdhury, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md. Khalilur Rahman..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Badel Alam Howlader Vs. Falu Dewan and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....7-9-97 respectively passed in Other Class Suit No. 31 of 1995 by the Senior Assistant Judge, Haluaghat Court, Mymensingh, the defendant-respondent-petitioner moved this Court and obtained the instant Rule. 2. Facts necessary for disposal of the Rule, briefly stated, are as under the plaintiff-app......Plaintiff-Appellant-Opposite-Parties. Judgment February 11, 2004. Cases Referred to- 1 MLR 54; 46 DLR 34; 49 DLR 428; Md. Yusuf Ali Vs. Chancellor of Rajshahi University, 1998 BLD 1. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Hoque, Advocate — For the Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner. Idris..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
AHM Khurshed Ali & others Vs. Md. Hashem Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....th Ahsamd Karim. Advocates—For the Petitioners. Shafique Ahmed with Omar Ali Khan, Advocates—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No. 1701 of 2005. Judgment Md. Awlad Ali J.- This Rule issued under section 115(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 14-5-2005 pa......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦Opposite Parties. Judgment February 8, 2006. Cases Referred to- Mohammad Eshaque Vs. Ruhul Amin and others, 34 DLR 342, Abdus Salam Vs. Bangladesh, 33 DLR 141. Lawyers Involved: Rufique-ul-Huq with Ahsamd Karim. Advocates—For the Petitioners. Shafique ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Afil Jute Mills (Pvt) Ltd. and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ir, Advocate—For Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Qamrun Nessa Ratna, Assistant Attorney-General—For Respondent No. 1. Writ Petition No. 2977 of 1998. Judgment Md. Joynul Abedin J.- Initially Rule Nisi was issued under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ca......of Finance and others……… Respondents. Judgment January 26, 2006. Cases Referred to- State of MP Vs. GC, Mandawar AIR 1954 SC 493; SA Sabur Vs. Returning Officer 41 DLR (AD) 41. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque with Shahin Ahmed. Advocate — For the Petitioner. Shamim Kh..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 125
Ali Akbar (Md.) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....Zahir with Subrata Chowdhury, Advocates —For Respondent No. 5. Writ Petition No. 1259 of 2005. Judgment Syed Mahmud Hossain J.- In this application under Article 102 of the Constitution, a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned memo (Annexur......……………………………………………………..Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others……………………………Respondents. Judgment August 13, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Baset Majumder, Advocate—For the Petitioner. M Zahir with Subrata Ch..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Ziaul Hoque Chowdhury (Md.) Vs. State and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ate—For the Petitioner. Md. Mujibur Rahman, Advocate—For Opposite Party No. 2. Criminal Revision No. 907 of 2003. Judgment SK Sinha J.- Informant Md. Ziaul Huq Chowdhury obtained this Rule against the order dated 7-6-03 of the Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Chittagong in Sessi......lam and another Vs. State, 36 DLR (AD) 58; Shamsun Nahar alias Maina Vs. State, 1984 BLD (AD) 206; Abdur Rahman Vs. State, 29 DLR (SC) 256; Bangladesh Vs. Yakub Sardar and others, 40 DLR (AD) 246. Lawyers Involved: Raquibul Haque Miah, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md. Mujibur Rahman, Advo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 49
HRC Shipping Ltd. Vs. MV X-Press Manaslu, MV X-Press Resolve & others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....ntrol of the party declaring the force majeure." Clause 23 of the Agreement under the heading "Clause Paramount" provides that the Agreementshall have effect subject to the provisions of theHague Rules as amended by the Brussels Protocoldated 23-2-1968 (Visibly amendment). 15. The original Ha......se events which involved no human agency and which it was not realistically possible for a human to guard against.……………………..(17) Cases Referred to- The Maritime Trader, Lloyds Law Reports (1981) Vol. 2. page 153; Messrs Sun Line Agencies Ltd Vs. MV Psiloritis and others, 1984..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 314
Government of Bangladesh represented by the DC, Comilla Vs. Md. Eakub and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....mouth Boat Construction Ltd, [1951] 2 All England Reports 278 and that of the Supreme Court of India in Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 2414. 13. He also read the Rules of Business and submitted that under said Rules administration of industrial units was assigne......ruction Ltd, [1951] 2 All England Reports 278; Delhi Cloth and General Mills Ltd Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 2414; Howell Vs. Falmouth Boat Construction Ltd. [1950] 1 All England Reports 542. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Advocate—For the Appellant. (In First Appeal No. 425 of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 159