Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others................. Petitioners. Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment &nb...... Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdus Samad @ AKM Abdus Samad and others................. Petitioners. Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment ...... with the finding of fact. The petition is dismissed. The order of conviction and sentence is maintained with the modification that it is under section 148 of the Penal Code. Ed. ...... with the finding of fact. The petition is dismissed. The order of conviction and sentence is maintained with the modification that it is under section 148 of the Penal Code. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Abul Khair Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....n (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abul Khair...............Petitioner. Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. Lawyers Involved:......ellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abul Khair...............Petitioner. Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. La......elay will merit such commutation. We find no compelling extenuating circumstance in this case and therefore find no ground whatsoever to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......elay will merit such commutation. We find no compelling extenuating circumstance in this case and therefore find no ground whatsoever to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney‑General instructed by Zinnur Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 2 (State). Criminal Appeal No. 21 of 1990. (From the Judgment and Order dated 24 Octob......esent: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Hamid Mollah................... Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and another…………………... Accuse......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Chairman, Kushtia Cooperative Industrial Union Ltd Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....rim & ors Vs. Boota and others 8 DLR (WP Lahore 1965) 15. There are many others decisions Viz., Hoshiar Singh Vs. Gurbachan Singh, AIR 1962 SC 1089 (1093‑94), Bunna Prasad and others Vs. State of UP AIR 1968 SC 1348, to which we need not refer further. 11. There may be circumstan......Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Chairman, Kushtia Co‑operative Industrial Union Ltd .............Petitioner Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others...............Respondents Judgment June 10th, 199...... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ...... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
State Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
..... Ed. ...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J The State, represented by the Solicitor, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......... ......Appellant Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 118
BD Chemical Industries Corporation & another Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works & ors, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....in respect of any goods or description of goods which is identical with a trade mark belonging to different proprietor and (either already on the register or already registered in any (Acceding State or a non‑Acceding State) to which section 82A for the time being applies) in respect o...... Rahman J Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and another………………………………. Appellants Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works and others ..........Respondents (In CA 100/1990) ......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Shamsuddin Ahmed, Advocate Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....as enrolled as an Advocate of the then High Court at Dhaka in 1966 under the East Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1965‑Act 3 of 1965. Bangladesh was declared an Independent State with effect from the 26th day of March 1971 by the Proclamation of Independence issued on 10t......; Vs. People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and ...... Advocate of the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh High Court from 3.8.72 and of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ...... Advocate of the Appellate Division of the Bangladesh High Court from 3.8.72 and of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court from 16.12.72. The Appeal is allowed. No cost. Ed. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 92
Muhammad Muslim Ali Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... found that further inquiry was held in accordance with the Rules. There is thus no substance in this petition which is dismissed after condoning the delay in filing the same. Ed. ......; Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Establishment and others&helli...... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Muhammad Muslim Ali………………………Petitione...... found that further inquiry was held in accordance with the Rules. There is thus no substance in this petition which is dismissed after condoning the delay in filing the same. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 123
Shaikh Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shaikh Shahidul Islam……………....……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. Lawyers ...... Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shaikh Shahidul Islam……………....……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
State Vs. Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....preme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J State, represented by the Solicitor to the Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ............ should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal Latifur Rahman J Siddique Munshi ...................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. Cases Refer......iminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal Latifur Rahman J Siddique Munshi ...................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. ......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Sec, Min of Food, Food Div., Govt. of Bangladesh, Dhaka & others Vs. M/s. MF Ltd, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J Latifur Rahman J Secretary, Ministry of Food, Food Division, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka and others .......... Appellants. Vs. M/s. MF Limited, a Private company limited by shares........................Respondent ......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ......w that the lessee knew that the properties were liable to the octroi. 11. In the result, we find no substance in this appeal which is therefore dismissed. No order as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Chanjury Talukder and another Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Chanjury Talukder and another .................................Appellants. Vs. Chingneshay Magni and others…………………………………….Respondents ......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ......ding on the plaintiff. For all the above reasons we do not find any merit in this appeal which is dismissed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 12 BLD (1992) (AD) 253. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
Madar Chandra Basu Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Madar Chandra Basu................Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17th, 1992. ......ddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Madar Chandra Basu................Appellant Vs. The State .............Respondent. Judgment February 17t......ircumstances of the case, the appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of the trial. Ed. ......ircumstances of the case, the appeal is allowed. Let the appellant be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner concerned till commencement of the trial. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Jogendra Nath alias Govinda Sarker ..........Plaintiff‑Appellant. Vs. Amulya Chandra Sarker and others ..........Defendant‑Respondents. ......others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ......others. The prayer for separate saham by defendants 7, 9 and 11 was refused as the suit was dismissed. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Hussain Mohammad Ershad Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hussain Mohammad Ershad...............Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1992 Lawyers Involved: ......ent here. Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Hussain Mohammad Ershad...............Petitioner Vs. The State ………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 1992 Lawyers In......From the Judgment and Order dated 21.1.1992 passed by the High Court Division, Dhaka in Criminal Revision No. 120 of 1992). Judgment ATM Afzal J.- The former President of Bangladesh, Hussain Muhammad Ershad, the accused petitioner, is facing trial on a charge of corruption in Special Case......smissed. Stay granted by this Court on 26.1.92 is vacated. No observation in the interlocutory proceedings binds the trial Court on the merit of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 88
SA Sultan Vs. The State and another, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....e Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J SA Sultan ............................Accused‑Appellant Vs. The State and another................Respondents Judgment November 20, 1991. Result: The app......39. ......case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ......case has been made out and we do not think it fit and proper to quash the proceeding at this stage. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) (1992) 139. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Afsaruddin Ahmed Vs. Banque Indosuez, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....pliedly considered the case being one of exceptional circumstances as the documents which ought to have been filed with the plaint as per rule 14 of the said Order were not filed. From the Concise Statement filed by the plaintiff‑respondent we find that on 14.9.88 another suit being Title ......d.......................................Defendant‑Appellant Vs. Banque Indosuez having Its Local Office at 47, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka .............of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereby correctly held that this rule is directory and not mandatory. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......of the Code of Civil Procedure and thereby correctly held that this rule is directory and not mandatory. In the result, this appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Mujibur Rahman (Md) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....Commissioner for India Vs. IM W, AIR 1948 PC 121; Pakistan Vs. Mrs. AV Issacs 22 DLR (SC) 371; United Provinces Vs. Atiqua Begum AIR 1941 FC 16; JB Chopra Vs. Union of India AIR 1987 SC 357 (Para 2); State of Bihar Vs. Kameshwar Singh, AIR 1952(SC) 252; Chandra Mohan Vs. State of UP, AIR 1966 (SC) 1...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Mujibur Rahman (Md)……………………………………. Appellant Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others……….. Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 35 of 1987) ...... the Supreme Court which exercises the judicial power of the State. I concur again with the decision of my learned brother, MH Rahman J. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 111. ...... the Supreme Court which exercises the judicial power of the State. I concur again with the decision of my learned brother, MH Rahman J. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 111. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 203