Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Abdur Rashid Salam Vs. Md. Moniruzzaman, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....o granted earlier by this court is also vacated. Send down the lower court records at once if already received by the office of this Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 298. ...... Azizul Hassan and another Vs. Malik Ghulam Muhammad, 1971 SCMR 123; Shankar Rao and others Vs. Raghunath Rao, AIR 1926(Nag) 75(1); Forman Ali Dewan and another Vs. Munsur Ali and ors, 13 DLR 836. Lawyers Involved: ASM Md. Ramzan Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Sk Md. Morshed, Advocate...... obtained the Rule challenging the impugned judgment and decree dated 22-4-2004 passed in Title Suit No. 353/2003 by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Second Court, Dhaka rejecting the plaint under Order VII, rule 11 of the Code on the application filed by the defendant-opposite party applicant. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 90
Amin Uddin (Md.) Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
.... matter having great social importance giving top most priority. LC records along with copy are sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 294, 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 433. ......……………………………………………….Petitioner Vs. State……………………………………………………………….Respondent. Judgment April 26, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Anisul Hoque, Advocate—For the Petitioner. ABM Waliur Rahman Khan, Dep...... matter having great social importance giving top most priority. LC records along with copy are sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 294, 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 433. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Nabisco Biscuit and Bread Factory Ltd. Vs. Baby Food Products Ltd. and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ected to take necessary steps in accordance with law to effect rectification of the Register of Trade Marks in the light of this Judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 287. ...... Co. Ltd, 48 DLR 376; Sunil Kumar Das Vs. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha & another, 57 DLR 93; The Andhra Perfumery Works Family Concerns Vs. Karkula Suryanarayaniah and others, AIR 1969 Madras 126. Lawyers Involved: M Hashmat Ullah Sheikh, Advocate-For the Petitioner. Abdul Malek with Rokanu......1 and has become an established trade mark for biscuits and confectionery, etc. After the emergence of Bangladesh the mark was registered under The Trade Marks (Invalidation and Summary Registration) Order, 1973 (PO No. 19 of 1973). The Petitioner claim that it has been using that said mark for its ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 386
Motleb Mondal Vs. State & others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....57/2000 in accordance with law and in the manner as directed in the cited decision as reported in 18 DLR SC 474. Copy is sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 282. ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦...Accused-Opposite Parties. Judgment August 29, 2005. Cases Referred to: 18 DLR (SC) 474; 6 BLC 17; Nur Elahi Vs. State and others, 8 DLR (SC) 474. Lawyers Involved: Md. Shamsul Huda, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Md. Abdur Rouf, Deputy Atto......Sonar Uddin of police case SC 57/2000 as per charge-sheet to be examined in the trial of complaint case SC 28/2000 who appear to be admittedly accused Nos. 1, 3, 7 and 5 in complaint case SC 28/2001. Order as to stay of the further proceeding of both above cases be recalled. Both the cases do procee..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Sonali Bank Limited and Others Vs. Prime Global Limited and Others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....from the date of receipt of this order in accorÂdance with law. Ed. This Order is also Reported in: 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 99, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 49, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 151, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 119. ...... Sonali Bank Limited and Others…………………………….. Petitioners Vs. Prime Global Limited and Others…………………………… Respondents Order February 22, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate......mmel Hossain J SK Sinha J Sonali Bank Limited and Others…………………………….. Petitioners Vs. Prime Global Limited and Others…………………………… Respondents Order February 22, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by C..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Sonali Bank Limited and others Vs. M/s. Fair Chemicals (Pvt) Ltd. and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....imposed upon the petitioner for payment to the plaintiff respondents. With these observations and directions this petition is disposed of. This Order is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 52. ......Limited and others ... ………………………………….Petitioners Vs. M/s. Fair Chemicals (Pvt) Ltd. and others ………………………Respondents Order February 10, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul-Haque, Senior Advocate (with Md. Azizul Huq, Advocate), instructed b......J SK Sinha J Sonali Bank Limited and others ... ………………………………….Petitioners Vs. M/s. Fair Chemicals (Pvt) Ltd. and others ………………………Respondents Order February 10, 2011. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul-Haque, Senior Advocate (with Md. Aziz..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Kabir Ahmed Sawdagar Vs. Md. Syed Saifuddin Jaheed and others, 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....aside and the original suit being Miscellaneous Appeal No. 76 of 1992 be restored to its original file and number. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 277, 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 388. ......heed and others…………………………Opposite Parties. Judgment March 7, 2006. Case Referred to- Seth Shivrottam G Mohatta Vs. Messrs Mohammadi Steamship Co. Ltd, 17 DLR 487. Lawyers Involved: Sk Zulfiqur Bulbul Chowdhury, Advocate—For the petitioner HN Nondy, Advoca......affirming the judgment and order No. 111 dated 18-1-1998; passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, First Court, Sadar, Chittagong in Miscellaneous Case no 230 of 1994 rejecting the application under Order IX, rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The opposite party No.1 Syed Saifuddin Moham..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 115
Kazi Rashed Akhter Shahid (Prince) Vs. Rokshana Choudhury (Sanda), 2006, 35 CLC (HCD)
....of stay granted at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby recalled and vacated. Send down the LCR at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 271, 26 BLD (HCD) (2006) 613. ......……………..Opposite Party. Judgment February 27, 2006. Cases Referred to- Serajul Islam Vs. Helana Begum, and others, 48 DLR 48; Shafiqul Islam and others Vs. State, 46 DLR 700. Lawyers Involved: HM Borhan, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Abul Quashem, Advocate—For the O...... suit was fixed for ex parte hearing on 20-4-1999. Later on the learned trial Court decreed the suit ex parte on 2-6-1999. 6. The defendant-petitioner filed Miscellaneous Case No. 57 of 1999 under Order XLVII, rules 1 and 2 on 8-6-1999. The Miscellaneous case was allowed on 7-7-1999 and the case ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 184
State Vs. Harun Chowdhury, District Magistrate and Mostafa Kamal, SP Sylhet, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....tafa Kamal, Superintendent of Police, Sylhet are exonerated from the charge of contempt of Court and they are warned to be careful in future. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 267.......; Shamsur Rahman Vs. Tahera Nargis, 44 DLR (AD) 237; State Vs. Abdul Karim Sarker 57 DLR 26; Abdul Karim Sarker Vs. the State, 38 DLR (AD) 188; Abdul Hoque Vs. District Judgeship, 51 DLR (AD) 15. Lawyers Involved: AM Aminuddin, Advocate—For Contemner No. 1. Tanjib-ul-Alam, Advocate—For......tafa Kamal, Superintendent of Police, Sylhet are exonerated from the charge of contempt of Court and they are warned to be careful in future. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 267...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 1272
MA Salam Vs. Additional District Judge & Dewlia Adalat, Chittagong and another, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....nal District Judge and Bankruptcy Court, Chittagong in Bankruptcy Case No. 6 of 2000 is declared to have been passed with lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 258. ......n Vs. District Judge and Appellate Election Tribunal, Bhola and others, 38 DLR (AD) 172; In Colquhoun Vs. Brooks (1889) 14 App. Case 493 (496), Canada Sugar Refining Co Vs. R (1898) AC. 735 (74). Lawyers Involved: Mostafa Neaz Mahmood with Hamida Chowdhury and Aftabuddin, Advocates—For the ...... of section 27 of the Act. Section 28 provides for dismissal of the plaint, whereas Rule 11 of the Bankruptcy Rules provides for rejection of the plaint, which is somewhat similar to the provision of Order VII, rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). 23. It appears that the defendant-petiti..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 131
Md. Lokman @ Lokman Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....Rule requiring no interÂference by this Court. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 156, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 81, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 60. ...... 3, 2010. Cases Referred To- Bangladesh Vs. Paran Chandra Baroi, 1986 BCR (AD) 225; Taher Hossain Rushdi Vs. The State, 7 MLR (AD) 116; State Vs. Khondker Md. Moniruzzaman, 17 BLD (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Advocate, instructed by Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record-For ......Rule requiring no interÂference by this Court. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. This Case is also Reported in: 63 DLR (AD) (2011) 156, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 81, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 60. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Dhaka Leather Complex Ltd. Vs. Sikder Construction Ltd. and another, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ost. The impugned judgment and order dated 18-08-2003 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 255 of 2002 is hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 8 LG (AD) (2011) 75....... Overseas Cotton Co. Vs. S.M. Fazail and Co. PLD 1958 (WP) Karachi 27; Mohammad Shafi Vs. Mohammad Sabir, PLD 1960 Lah 591; Abdus Salam and another Vs. Osman Gani and another, BCR 1984 (AD) 346. Lawyers Involved: M. A.Samad, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-On-Record-For......ost. The impugned judgment and order dated 18-08-2003 passed by the High Court Division in First Appeal No. 255 of 2002 is hereby affirmed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 8 LG (AD) (2011) 75...Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 187
Abi Abdullah (Md.) and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
.... petitioners are concerned. In the result, the Rule is made absolute so far as it relates to the petitioners without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 250. ......vernment of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land & others..……………………Respondents. Judgment November 29, 2005. Case Referred to- 31 DLR (AD) 195. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam with AQM Safiullah. Advocates For the Petitioners. Quamrunnes......t interfered with their right of ownership which has been restored by the Act, 1994 would be taken away. It is also submitted that the respondents have misconstrued both the provisions of President's Order No. 135 of 1972 and the Act of 1994 which amended section 86 of the State Acquisition and Tena..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Abdur Razzaque Zoarder and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....n light of the above, this Court finds substance in this Rule. In the result, the Rule is made absolute. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 245. ...... Zoarder and others…………………………………Petitioners Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others………………………………Respondents. Judgment November 9, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque with Md. Oziullah, Advocates—For the Petitioners. Md. Abdun....... 6436 of 2001. Judgment Syed Refaat Ahmed J.- In this Application under Article 102 of the Constitution a Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Impugned Order contained in Memo No. 225-Paubo-Kop/B-lKa/Sha-l/B-2/2001 (Part- 4) dated 5-9-2001 (Annexure-D)..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Abdul Mannaf (Md.) Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali Akand & others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....th the impugned judgment and order. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Send down the LC Records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 242. ......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦. Petitioner Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali Akand & others ……………………………………...Opposite Parties. Judgment July 25, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Not represented — the Petitioner. Md. Abdul Haque, Advocate—For the Oppo......th the impugned judgment and order. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Send down the LC Records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 242. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Alimuddin and others Vs. Abdul Kabir and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
.... with the appeal in accordance of law. Send down a copy of this judgment to the learned Joint District Judge, Kishoreganj for compliance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 240.........Petitioner Vs. Abdul Kabir and others………………………………….Opposite Parties. Judgment June 29, 2003. Cases Referred to- 13 DLR 871; 1985 BLD 61; 1985 BLD 61. Lawyers Involved: Md. Omar Ali Khan, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Shah Md. Zahurul Haque, A......he pendency of the other Class Appeal No. 372 of 1993 before the Joint District Judge, Kishoreganj, the plaintiff-petitioners filed an application on 24-6-2002 seeking amendment of their plaint under Order VI, rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure as per Annexure-'B'. 6. The said application dat..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 93
Executive Engineer, Sylhet Public Works Department Vs. Md. Asob Ali, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....o costs. The order of stay passed at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby vacated. Send down the records of the Courts below at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 236. ...... Md. Asob Ali……………………………………………………………………………….Opposite Party. Judgment August 17, 2005. Case Referred to- 2 MLR (AD) 109. Lawyers Involved: Md. Azizul Haque, with Md. Jafor Ali. Assistant Attorney-General and Md. Iqbal ......o costs. The order of stay passed at the time of issuance of the Rule is hereby vacated. Send down the records of the Courts below at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 236. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 209
Shomurunessa and others Vs. Md. Musa Miah and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ce on the part of the petitioner. I do not find any substance in the Rule. In the result, the Rule is discharged without order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 228. ...... Shomurunessa and others………………………………..Petitioners Vs. Md. Musa Miah and others ………………………………Opposite Parties. Judgment December 4, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Not represented— the Petitioners. Md. Ibrahim Mollah, Advocate—For the O......ce on the part of the petitioner. I do not find any substance in the Rule. In the result, the Rule is discharged without order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 228. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 96
Golap Vs. Md. Abdul Hakim & others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....al Court is directed to proceed with the suit and the suit as against the deceased defendant No. 3 Rasullah alias Abdur Rashid stands abated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 227.......……….Petitioner Vs. Md. Abdul Hakim & others…………….Opposite Parties. Judgment October 23, 2002. Case Referred to- Abdul Aziz Vs. Abani Mohan, 30 DLR (SC) 221. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Hoque, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Not represented— the Opposite ......as defendant in the suit within 90 days from the date of the death of defendant No. 3 and prayed for passing an order for abatement. Subsequently, on 27-4-98 the plaintiffs filed an application under Order I, rule 10 and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of the plaint and to s..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Tahera Begum and others Vs. Mizanur Rahman (Md.) and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... in Title Suit No. 12 of 2002 staying all further proceedings of Title Execution Case No. 1 of 2002 is hereby set aside. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 224.......€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦â€¦..Opposite Parties. Judgment March 16, 2004. Case Referred to- Amimdlah Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abdul Hafiz and others, 1981 BCR (AD) 131 = 33 DLR (AD) 282. Lawyers Involved: Joynal Abedin, Advocate—For the Petitioners Mojibur Rahman, Advocate—For....... As such, the final decree became nullity and the executing case was liable to be dismissed. 5. On or about 27-6-2002 said opposite party No.1 also made an application under section 151 read with Order XXI and rule 26 of the Code in his suit for stay of all further proceedings of said Title Exec..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72