Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4361-4380 of 8015 results.
Zafela Begum and others Vs. Atikulla and others, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
..... Cases Referred To- Jainal Abedin Vs. Mizanur Rahman and other, 44 DLR (AD) 162; Krishna Kishori Chaodhrani Vs. Kishori Lal Ray, 14 I.A. 71(P.C.). Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Mahmudul I......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: ABM Khairul Haque CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Zafela Begum and others………………………Appellants Vs. Atikulla and others …………………………………Respondents Judgment January......l is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLC (AD) (2011) 46, 31 BLD(AD) (2011) 111, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 133, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 216, VIII ADC (2011) 907. ......11) 111, 8 LG (AD) (2011) 133, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 216, VIII ADC (2011) 907. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 127
....erma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1985 SC 167; (1984) 4 SCC 251; Md. Mojibur Rahman Mia Vs. Jamini Mosahar and others, 7 DLR 82.
Lawyers Involved:
Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan with SRM Lutfor Rahman, Advocates‑For the Petitioners.
Shamsuddin Babul with Kanai Lal Saha, Advocates‑For the Respon......
...... of the review petitioners the same is set aside on review.
In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 289.
...... of the review petitioners the same is set aside on review.
In the result, the Rule is made absolute without any order as to costs.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 289.
..
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 119
Agrani Bank Vs. MA Kahhar, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....nnath, AIR 1924 All 551; Nathu Sing Vs. Girwar Sing, AIR 1929 All 657; Puliyath Govinda Nayar Vs. Parekalattil Achutan Nair, AIR 1940 Mad 678. Lawyers Involved: Abul Hasnat with M Maniruzzaman, Advocate-For the Appellant. Not represented- the Respondent. Appeal from Original Decree No....... High Court Division (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam J AHM Shamsuddin Chowdhury J Agrani Bank …………………………………….…Appellant Vs. MA Kahhar …………………………respondent Judgment March 27, 2002. Cases R...... in view of above nothing would justify us to allow this appeal. We do, therefore dismiss this appeal without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 285.  ...... in view of above nothing would justify us to allow this appeal. We do, therefore dismiss this appeal without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 285.  ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 215
Alam Kabiraj and others Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....Referred to- State Vs. Sarowaruddin, 5 BLC 451; State Vs. Md. Ali Kibria @ Shahjahan, 43 DLR 512; Nil Raton Biswas Vs. State, 3 BLC 35. Lawyers Involved: Rafiqur Rahman with Serajur Rahman, Advocates- Âfor the Appellants. ABM Waliur Rahman Khan with Shamima Ara Dora, Assistant Attorne......3. ...... Sarder and Bashir Sarder @ Bashar accordingly, directed to be set at liberty if not connected with any other case. Record be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 273. ...... Sarder and Bashir Sarder @ Bashar accordingly, directed to be set at liberty if not connected with any other case. Record be sent down. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 273. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Sirajul Islam (Md.) Vs. Wahidul Haque, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....ry J Sirajul Islam (Md.)..……….………….Petitioner Vs. Wahidul Haque…………………….Respondents Judgment March 16, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate‑For the Petitioner. M Saleemullah, Advocate‑For the Respondent. Review Petiton No......Supreme Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Hamidul Haque J Salma Masud Chowdhury J Sirajul Islam (Md.)..……….………….Petitioner Vs. Wahidul Haque…………………….Respondents Judgment March 16, 2003. Lawyers ......ion is allowed. The punishment awarded on the petitioner by the order dated 27‑1‑2003 in Contempt Petition No. 70 of 2002 is remitted. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 272. ......ion is allowed. The punishment awarded on the petitioner by the order dated 27‑1‑2003 in Contempt Petition No. 70 of 2002 is remitted. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 272. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 118
Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Vs. Md. Abdul Hoque, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
........................Opposite party Judgment December 1, 2002. Case Referred To- Hridoy Mohan Sanyal Vs. Khagendra Nath Sanyal and others, 34 CWN 213. Lawyers Involved: Shaheed Alam, Advocate‑For the Petitioner. Not represented ‑ the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 1396...... High Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Gour Gopal Saha J Sk Rezowan Ali J Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation...........................Petition Vs. Md. Abdul Hoque ...........................Opposite party Judgment December 1, 2002. ...... of the Money Execution Case No. 88 of 1996. Communicate the order to the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Jessore at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 270....... of the Money Execution Case No. 88 of 1996. Communicate the order to the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Jessore at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 270...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Hossain Khan (Md.) and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....Province of East Pakistan, 14 DLR 486; Province of East Pakistan Vs. Kalu Mia, 13 DLR 528; Province of East Pakistan Vs. Sharafatullah, 19 DLR 237. Lawyers Involved: MA Samad with MGH Ruhullah, Advocates‑ For the Appellants. Mahbubey Alam with Md. Harun-or-Rashid, Advocates-For Respondent......264. ......Rule No. 250(FM) of 2001 is also made absolute. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 264. ......Rule No. 250(FM) of 2001 is also made absolute. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 264. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 95
A Rouf and others Vs. State and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....pondents Judgment October 25, 1999. Cases Referred To- Yusuf A Hassan Vs. Kh Rezaul Firdous, 48 DLR (AD) 53; 35 DLR 120; 36 DLR (AD) 58; 35 DLR 103. Lawyers Involved: Sheikh A Awal, Advocate—For the Petitioner. M A Rouf Assistant Attorney-General—For the State. Criminal ......t High Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Ali Asgar Khan J A Rouf and others………………………………..Petitioner Vs. State and another ……………………………….Respondents Judgment October 25,......order of the Sessions Judge that the Magistrate shall dispose of case in accordance with law is upheld. Accordingly this Rule is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 395.......order of the Sessions Judge that the Magistrate shall dispose of case in accordance with law is upheld. Accordingly this Rule is disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 395...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Nabiran Bibi Vs. Md. Panna Miah and others, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....biran Bibi…………………………………….Appellant Vs. Md. Panna Miah and others ………………Respondents Judgment May 12, 1998. Lawyers Involved: Ashfaqul Islam, Advocate — For the Appellant. Not represented — the Respondents. Criminal Appeal No. 22 o......eme Court High Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Nurul Islam J Md. Hassan Ameen J Nabiran Bibi…………………………………….Appellant Vs. Md. Panna Miah and others ………………Respondents Judgment May 12, 1998. Law......learned District Magistrate, Manikganj with a copy of Judgment for disposal of the case by a competent Magistrate for disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 394. ......learned District Magistrate, Manikganj with a copy of Judgment for disposal of the case by a competent Magistrate for disposal of the case. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 394. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
Mazharul Huq Quraishi and others Vs. Hari Chandrs Hrishi and another, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....i and another…………….Opposite Parties Judgment May 25, 2000. Case Referred To- Fateh Haider and another Vs. Emperor, AIR 1930 Lahore page 407. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Advocate—For the Petitioners. Md Khurshid Alam Khan, Advocate—For the Opposite Party No. 1. ......eme Court High Court Division (Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Hamidul Haque J Md. Abdul Quddus J Mazharul Huq Quraishi and others……………..Petitioner Vs. Hari Chandrs Hrishi and another…………….Opposite Parties Judgment May 25, 2000. ...... to conclude the trial as early as possible preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the judgment. Copy be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 392. ...... to conclude the trial as early as possible preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the judgment. Copy be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 392. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mati Lal Karmakar and Another Vs. Kalandar Talukder and another, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....er…………………..Petitioners Vs. Kalandar Talukder and another…………………..Opposite Parties Judgment October 21, 1998. Lawyers Involved: SS Halder with SS Sarker Advocates—For the Petitioners. AB Roy Chowdhury, Advocate—For Opposite Party No.1. Civil R......ted in: 52 DLR (2000) 390.......eason to interfere with the judgments and decree of the Courts below. In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 390.......hatian No.43 belonged to Indo Mohon and Monindra Bhusson Saha. Nanda Rani Paul and Nata Kudar Pal became the owners of the suit land along with other land and SA record was prepared accordingly. Naba Kumar was survived by two sons, Radha Shayam and Radha Krishna Pal who owned and possessed share of ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Amirul Islam (Md.) and others Vs. Thana Nirbahi Officer and others, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....Md.) and others ………………….Petitioners Vs. Thana Nirbahi Officer and others ………………Respondents Judgment April 5, 2000. Lawyers Involved: Md. Eunus Ali Akond, Advocate—For the Petitioner. Dr. Kazi Reazul Hoque, Assistant Attorney General—For the Respon......me Court High Court Division (Special Original Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Mozammel Hoque J Md. Abdur Rashid J Amirul Islam (Md.) and others ………………….Petitioners Vs. Thana Nirbahi Officer and others ………………Respondents Judgment April 5, 2000......his order within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The office is directed to communicate this order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 388. ......his order within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The office is directed to communicate this order at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 388. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Omar Ali Sheikh Vs. Shamsul Alam Mridha and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
......................Petitioner Vs. Shamsul Alam Mridha and others..............Opposite Parties Judgment December 10, 2002. Lawyers Involved: Shawkat Ali Khan with MM Huq Siddique, Advocate -For the Petitioner. Muhammad Samsul Hoque, Advocate‑For the Opposite Parties. Civi......: 55 DLR (2003) 257. ...... the Rule is discharged without any order as to cost. The order of stay granted at the time of the issuance of the Rule is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 257. ...... the Rule is discharged without any order as to cost. The order of stay granted at the time of the issuance of the Rule is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 257. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Talebuddin (Taleb) and another Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....er.................Petitioners Vs. The State………………………………………………….....Respondent Order February 24, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Saiful Huq, Advocate instructed by Syed Mahbubar Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represen......preme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim CJ Bijan Kumar Das J ABM Khairul Haque J Talebuddin (Taleb) and another.................Petitioners Vs. The State………………………………………………….....Respondent Order ......ks is disÂpensed with as prayed for. The order of stay granted earlier by this Court shall continue till disposal of the Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 89 & 447. ......e till disposal of the Court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 89 & 447. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
State Vs. Md. Abdul Kuddus and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....of 2009) Arju ................Respondent (In Criminal Petition No. 44 of 2009) Judgment October 6, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Attorney General, instructÂed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. (In all the cases) Khondaker Mahbub Hossain, Senior Advoca...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: ABM Khairul Haque CJ Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J The State………………..........Petitioner (In all the cases) Vs. Md. Abdul Kuddus and others………....Respondents (In Criminal Petition No. 42 of 2009) ......ecretary, Ministry of Home Affairs Government of Bangladesh for taking legal actions in the light of the judgment. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 73, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 156. ......s Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 73, 16 MLR (AD) (2011) 156. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Habibur Rahman Mollah (Ex-Member of Parliament, Dhaka-4) Vs. State, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... Dhaka-4)….…….Petitioner Vs. The State, repreÂsented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka………….Respondent Order January 25, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Rafique-ul Huq, Senior Advocate and Ajmalul Hossain, Q.C. Senior Advocate instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Re......minal) Present: MM Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Habibur Rahman Mollah (Ex-Member of Parliament, Dhaka-4)….…….Petitioner Vs. The State, repreÂsented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka………….Respondent Order ......larged on bail to the satisfacÂtion of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka on furnishing bail bond for a periÂod of (6) six months. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 63. ......larged on bail to the satisfacÂtion of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka on furnishing bail bond for a periÂod of (6) six months. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 63. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 120
Md. Zahidul Islam Vs. Md. Kamal Hossain and another, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....Islam..............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Kamal Hossain and another .........Respondents Judgment November 16, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Munsorul Haque Chowdhury, Senior Advocate, instructed by Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the petitioner. Not repres......(Criminal) Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Aziz J BK Das J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Md. Zahidul Islam..............................Petitioner Vs. Md. Kamal Hossain and another .........Respondents Judgment November 16, 2009. Law...... absolute. The above submission merit consideraÂtion. Leave is granted. Preparation of paper book is dispensed with as prayed for. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 60....... also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 60...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Rakib and others Vs. State, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....€¦â€¦.................Petitioners Vs. The State………………............................Respondent Judgment January 12, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbub Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not repreÂsent......late Division (Criminal) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Rakib and others……………….................Petitioners Vs. The State………………............................Respondent Judgment January 12,......e above, we find no subÂstance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 57. ......e above, we find no subÂstance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the petitioners. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 57. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 38
State Vs. A.K.M. Rafiqul Islam, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
........Petitioner Vs. A.K.M. Rafiqul Islam ………….......Respondent Order February 4, 2010. Lawyers Involved: Md. Salim, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by Mrs. Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Anisul Huq, Advocate instructed by Md. Abu Siddique, Advoc......n (Criminal) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Abdul Matin J Bijan Kumar Das J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J The State...........................Petitioner Vs. A.K.M. Rafiqul Islam ………….......Respondent Order February 4, 2010. Lawyers ......aper books is disÂpensed with as prayed for. The order of stay granted earlier by this Court shall continue till disposal of the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 55.......osal of the appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 55...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Kazi Md. Ruhul Amin Vs. Abdur Rahman Chowdhury and another, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....l Amin……………………….....Petitioner Vs. Abdur Rahman Chowdhury and another……….....Respondents Judgment January 13, 2009. Lawyers Involved: Bivash Chandra Biswas, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No.......e Division (Criminal) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Kazi Md. Ruhul Amin……………………….....Petitioner Vs. Abdur Rahman Chowdhury and another……….....Respondents Judgment January 13, 2009....... we find no subÂstance in the submissions of the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 53....... we find no subÂstance in the submissions of the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VIII ADC (2011) 53...Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 44
46014600459945984596459545934591459045894588458745854584458345824581458045794578