Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 421-440 of 735 results.
Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha (BSRS) Vs. Aziz Pipes Limited, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....ll realization of the decreetal amount if it is not paid within a period of 90 days from date. The parties are to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ......Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ......ll realization of the decreetal amount if it is not paid within a period of 90 days from date. The parties are to bear their own costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 221. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 126
Sultan Mia (Md.) Vs. Hazi Md. Yusuf, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....te Party. Civil Revision No. 3254 of 2000. Judgment SK Sinha J.- Petitioner is the decree-holder who obtained this Rule against the order dated 11-6-2000 of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.31 of 1997 directing him to make over posses......ty. Civil Revision No. 3254 of 2000. Judgment SK Sinha J.- Petitioner is the decree-holder who obtained this Rule against the order dated 11-6-2000 of the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka in Title Execution Case No.31 of 1997 directing him to make over possession o......e of the matter expeditiously preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the order. Send down the lower Court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 555. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Abdur Razzaque Mollah Vs. Md. Qayum Mollah & others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....lding Finance Corporation defendant No.3 against loan of Taka 2,00,000 for construction of residential house in the suit land and the said defendant No.3 having obtained decree for the said amount in Artha Rin Suit No.5 of 1991 against the defendant No.1, the instant suit for specific performance fo......Finance Corporation defendant No.3 against loan of Taka 2,00,000 for construction of residential house in the suit land and the said defendant No.3 having obtained decree for the said amount in Artha Rin Suit No.5 of 1991 against the defendant No.1, the instant suit for specific performance for the ......s of the case, we direct the parties to bear their respective costs all through. Send down the lower Court’s Record immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 535. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Sabed Ali Howlader and Others Vs. Abdul Barek and other, 1998, 27 CLC (HCD)
....M Ruhul Amin J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1 and 10 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated l2-4-94 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal in Title Appeal No.70 of 1992 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judg......l Amin J. - This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1 and 10 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated l2-4-94 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal in Title Appeal No.70 of 1992 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment a...... suit in accordance with law. The trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible preferably within 3 months. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 51 DLR (1999) 204...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Bengal Bricks Industries Ltd. Vs. Al-haj Md. Ishaque Chowdhury and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....the appeal is allowed with cost. Impugned judgment and decree are hereby set aside. The suit is dismissed. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 62. ......the appeal is allowed with cost. Impugned judgment and decree are hereby set aside. The suit is dismissed. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 62. ......the appeal is allowed with cost. Impugned judgment and decree are hereby set aside. The suit is dismissed. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 58 DLR (2006) 62. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Anindra Bhusan Ghose Vs. Bangladesh Government, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....l. For the reasons and discussions made above, I find no merits in this appeal. In the result the appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 493.......l. For the reasons and discussions made above, I find no merits in this appeal. In the result the appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 493.......l. For the reasons and discussions made above, I find no merits in this appeal. In the result the appeal is dismissed. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 493...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Parul Bala @ Parul Rani Shah Mondol Vs. Suruj Miah and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....)68 is disposed of accordingly, the judgments and decrees of, the Courts below are set aside. The suit is decreed in full. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 481.......)68 is disposed of accordingly, the judgments and decrees of, the Courts below are set aside. The suit is decreed in full. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 481.......)68 is disposed of accordingly, the judgments and decrees of, the Courts below are set aside. The suit is decreed in full. No costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 53 DLR (HCD) (2001) 481...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 83
Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Vs. Md. Abdul Hoque, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ction 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure a Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 4‑2‑2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and Sub Judge, Jessore in Money Execution Case No. 88 of 1996 should not be set asi......115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure a Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 4‑2‑2002 passed by the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat and Sub Judge, Jessore in Money Execution Case No. 88 of 1996 should not be set aside and...... of the Money Execution Case No. 88 of 1996. Communicate the order to the learned Joint District Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Jessore at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (2003) 270...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 91
Mazharul Huq Quraishi and others Vs. Hari Chandrs Hrishi and another, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
.... to conclude the trial as early as possible preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the judgment. Copy be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 392. ...... to conclude the trial as early as possible preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the judgment. Copy be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 392. ...... to conclude the trial as early as possible preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the judgment. Copy be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (2000) 392. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Razia Sultana Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....annot now exercise its powers under Article 8 of the Order. In the result, this Rule is made absolute but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 366. ......annot now exercise its powers under Article 8 of the Order. In the result, this Rule is made absolute but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 366. ......annot now exercise its powers under Article 8 of the Order. In the result, this Rule is made absolute but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 366. ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 194
Ali Akbar (Md) and others Vs. Sakina Begum and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....iscellaneous Appeal No. 28 of 2002. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This appeal was presented by defendant Nos. 1 to 4 against an order dated 15-1‑2002 of Joint District Judge (in-Charge) and Artha Rin Adalat No.2 in Dhaka in Title Suit No. 95 of 1997, appointing a receiver of the suit prope......aneous Appeal No. 28 of 2002. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This appeal was presented by defendant Nos. 1 to 4 against an order dated 15-1‑2002 of Joint District Judge (in-Charge) and Artha Rin Adalat No.2 in Dhaka in Title Suit No. 95 of 1997, appointing a receiver of the suit property. ......der of stay is recalled. Learned Joint District Judge is directed to proceed with the Suit, expeditiously, Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 303. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 69
....ant No.7 are declared to be illegal, collusive, without jurisdiction, mala fide and of no legal effect.
Send down the LCR at once.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 269.
......ant No.7 are declared to be illegal, collusive, without jurisdiction, mala fide and of no legal effect.
Send down the LCR at once.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 269.
......ant No.7 are declared to be illegal, collusive, without jurisdiction, mala fide and of no legal effect.
Send down the LCR at once.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 269.
..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Monju Mia and others Vs. Shiraj Mia and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....irs of defendant No.1 obtained the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order dated 13‑7‑1999 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat (In-charge) at Sylhet in Title Suit No. 46 of 1998, which rejected a prayer for an ...... defendant No.1 obtained the Rule upon making a revision application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against an order dated 13‑7‑1999 passed by the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat (In-charge) at Sylhet in Title Suit No. 46 of 1998, which rejected a prayer for an expert......e of the Rule on 10‑11‑1999 is hereby recalled and vacated. The learned Subordinate Judge is directed. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 264. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Salahuddin Talukder (Md) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....r, Appraiser and others so far relates to the petitioner is hereby declared to have been passed without any lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 161. ...... Azizul Haque Sikder and others Vs. Collector of Customs, Chittagong and others 49 DLR (AD) 172; Mujibur Rahman Vs. Government of Bangladesh 44 DLR (AD) 111; Junnur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha 51 DLR (AD) 166, Delwar Hussain Miah Vs. Bangladesh 52 DLR (AD) 120; Azizul Haque Sikde......r, Appraiser and others so far relates to the petitioner is hereby declared to have been passed without any lawful authority. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (HCD) (2004) 161. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Md. Nasirullah & other Vs. Md. Ziauddin Khan & others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 19. ......on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 19. ......on record arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 19. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Nasim Anwar Hossain Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....faulting borrower. The High Court Division, after exhaustive hearing and on examination of the relevant sections/articles respectively in the Bank Companies Act, 1991; Bangladesh Bank Order, 1972 and Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, held: “ 22. ... The petitioner’s name, even if he is indebted to ......ng borrower. The High Court Division, after exhaustive hearing and on examination of the relevant sections/articles respectively in the Bank Companies Act, 1991; Bangladesh Bank Order, 1972 and Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, held: “ 22. ... The petitioner’s name, even if he is indebted to one of......dent from annexe-B to the writ petition) is hereby declared to have been done without lawful authority and is of no legal effect. Nazmun Ara Sultana, J.- I agree. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 167
Md. Arif Gaffar Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....d in: ...... ......reby cancelled. The office is directed to communicate the copy of this judgment at once to the concerned executing Court. Nazmun Ara Sultana, J.- I agree. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 169
Abu Mohammad Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh & another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....foregoing reasons, we see there is no merit in this Rule. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 352. ......ecific provision under heading Treatment of Liabilities and in clause 5.1 it was stipulated that the long term liabilities due to financing institutions like Bangladesh Shilpa Bank, Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha, Krishi Bank or any other Commercial Banks and the Financing institutions shall be assu......foregoing reasons, we see there is no merit in this Rule. Accordingly, the Rule is discharged. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 352. ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 95
Fatema Begum Vs. The Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj and others, 2010, 39 CLC (HCD)
....ted in: ......: ...... copies there for. The office is directed to send a copy of this judgment to the Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj at once. Nazmun Ara Sultana J.- I agree. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 183
SDS Dairy Limited Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2011, 40 CLC (HCD)
....esh and others ……………….... Respondents Judgment January 6, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Code of Civil Porcedure, 1908 (V of 1908); Order XXI rule 83 The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 ( VIII of 2003); Chapter VI Scope of applicability of the Civil Proced......d others ……………….... Respondents Judgment January 6, 2011. Result: The Rule is made absolute. The Code of Civil Porcedure, 1908 (V of 1908); Order XXI rule 83 The Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 ( VIII of 2003); Chapter VI Scope of applicability of the Civil Procedure Co......e with law. The office is directed to communicate the judgment at once to the concerned executing Court. Nazmun Ara Sultana J.- I agree. This Case is also Reported in:20 BLT (HCD) (2012) 15. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 95
46784664466046504642462746254595458945614550454045394515449644884487447244494442