Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Nurunnessa and ors Vs. Babr Ali Bepari and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the power of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......edule lands of the plaint. The parties will have opportunity to prove the power of attorney in the manner indicated above and in accordance with law, we, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. ......f attorney executed in India and authenticated by a Magistrate in India and not authenticated by any authorised officer of Diplomatic Mission of the then Pakistan in Calcutta is a valid document in Bangladesh which could be acted upon. Facts in short are, that the plaintiff Haji Abdul Karim migrat..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 128
Abdus Samad & ors Vs. Md. Sohrab Ali and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ge cannot be sustained, therefore, the appeal is allowed with costs and the Judgment of the High Court set aside. Judgment and order of the lower Appellate Court are restored. Ed. ......ge cannot be sustained, therefore, the appeal is allowed with costs and the Judgment of the High Court set aside. Judgment and order of the lower Appellate Court are restored. Ed. ......some of the co-sharers by inheritance. On a revisional application filed by the pre-emptor-respondent under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Bangladesh set aside the judgment of the lower Appellate Court holding that the preemption cas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
Khadomul Islam Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
.... to the file on setting aside the judgment already pronounced and signed. 2. Facts for disposal of the appeal are that the appellant filed a writ petition under Article 102 of the Constitution for declaration that the notice dated July 21,1976 issued by Respondent, Special Additional Land Acquisi......for disposal in accordance with law. Let the operation of the order dated 12th July. 1979 be stayed till the disposal of the matter in the High Court Division There will no order as to costs. Ed. ......ellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Khadomul Islam Chowdhury…………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and others ……………………………..Respondents Judgment July 21, 1980. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 160
Shamuj Ali and other Vs. Kamalarma Bibi and others, 1980, 9 CLC (AD)
....ues on "the date of the final decree of the appellate court." 2. Facts of the case are rather simple. The respondent-plaintiffs filed Title Suit No. 68 of 1956 against the appellant-defendant for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the suit land. The suit was decreed by the Munsif......the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......the appellate court if appeal is preferred from the decree of reversal of the first appellate court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Ful Chand Das and others Vs. Mohammad Hammad and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....nal. It further provides that no court shall entertain any suit for the Specific Performance of Contract relating to the transfer of immovable property of a member of minority community or for the declaration of title or enforcement of mortgage-security in relation to such property, except ......ent of the High Court Division is maintained. Consequently, this appeal stands dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 3 BLD (AD) 1983, 68. ......sion in the Chittaranjan Sutar's case even if it stood after the disposal of the appeal before the Pakistan Supreme Court is not binding upon this Appellate Division of Bangladesh Supreme Court and this Division may examine the question. There is no dispute that this ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Abdul Alim and others Vs. A. K. Abdul Hoque and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....2. In the facts of this case whether it could be said that the second executions petition was within time. 2. The facts giving rise to these questions are that there was a suit for declaration of an easement right over the passing of water through a drain between the respondents ......Act. In this view, the appeal is allowed but in the facts of case we make no order as to costs. The decrees of courts below are set aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ......Act. In this view, the appeal is allowed but in the facts of case we make no order as to costs. The decrees of courts below are set aside and the execution petition dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 54
Govt. of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Arshad Ali, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....aimed as a matter of right and as such there being no cause of action for seeking remedy by filing the writ petition, the learned Judge by an erroneous decision made the impugned declaration in favour of the respondent. 6. It appears from the judgment of the High Court D......e sustained. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ight which can be enforced by a writ petition. 2. Respondent Mohammad Arshad Ali caused detection and recovery of 1514 tolas of gold and 3271 tolas of silver in the course of smuggling from Bangladesh to India in Satkhira, Khulna. The respondent handed over the articles to the Sub-Divisio..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 171
M/s. Everett Orient Lines Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Ctg Zone, Ctg, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....esult, therefore, both the appeals are allowed. The judgement of the High Court Division is set aside and the orders of the Tribunal are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......esult, therefore, both the appeals are allowed. The judgement of the High Court Division is set aside and the orders of the Tribunal are restored. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......bsp; Badrul Haider Chowdhury J.—These are two certificated appeals under section 66 (a) (2) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee-appellant is a Company incorporated outside Bangladesh but carries on business in Bangladesh through local Agents. It is Shipping Company and i..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 114
Mofizur Rahman Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ...... disposed of in these terms, without any cost. In the result, Civil Appeal Nos. 73 and 124 of 1981 are dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 321. ......ent: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Mofizur Rahman Khan…………………...Appellant Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh…………………... Respondent (In Civil Appeal No. 73 of 198) And Govt. of Ba..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
Abdul Halim Mollah @ Monohar Mollah & anr Vs. Member, App Tribunal Dacca & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......nion is that such appeal cannot be entertained. I would, therefore, allow the appeal. Order of the Court By the majority judgment the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ...... 1979. 2. Facts necessary for disposal of the appeal are that the appellants filed the above noted writ petition before the High Court Division under Article 102 of the Constitution of Bangladesh calling in question the legality of the order of conviction passed by the Appellate Tri..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 40
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Misfor Ali and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ges, the appeal must succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......ges, the appeal must succeed. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The judgment of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed. We make no order as to costs. Ed. ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ F. K, M. A Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power and Water Resources ……&hel..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Matiur Rahman, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed with the modification that; the punishment is altered to compulsory retirement. No order as to costs. Ed. ......ourt Division is set aside and the Writ Petition is dismissed with the modification that; the punishment is altered to compulsory retirement. No order as to costs. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Kemaluddin Hossain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Works and Rural Development and an..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Rajan Miah Vs. Abdur Rashid and another, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....;This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court Division in Second Appeal No. 467 of 1972. 2. Plaintiff is the appellant. He filed a suit for declaration of his title and for recovery of khas possession. The suit was decreed by the trial Cou...... of the trial court judgment by the appellate Court below was justified and the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ...... of the trial court judgment by the appellate Court below was justified and the plaintiff is not entitled to any relief. In the result, therefore, this appeal is dismissed with cost. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Rokeya Khatun Vs. Alijan @ Alijan Bepari and ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
.... reverts back to her heirs, namely, respondent No. 2 Mahtabuddin and the appellant Rokeya Khatoon according to their respective shares. Mahtabuddin cannot get the benefit of the result of the declaration. Transfer of the property in favour of respondent No.1 to the extent of his share stand......he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ......he modification that the suit is decreed in part in favour of the appellant to the extent of the 1/3 rd share in the suit property. Respondent No. 1 is to pay cost of the appeal. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Khondker Moshtaque Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....ion taken under the Martial Law Regulation is challenged on the ground of want of Jurisdiction or mala fide, the Superior Court in exercise of its writ Jurisdiction is competent to make the necessary declaration. I do not consider it necessary to discuss this question at length." In that case al......w Court and the order of Government on review are set aside, The orders of conviction passed on the appellant ate hereby quashed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) (1982) 222. ......sain CJ Fazle Munim J Ruhul Islam J Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J Khondker Moshtaque Ahmed………………………. Appellant (In both the appeals). Vs. Bangladesh through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs……….. Respondent (In both the appeal..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 287
Bangladesh Vs. Hon'ble Judge, Prize Court, HCD, Supreme Court Building, Dacca, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....e learned Attorney-General are found unacceptable, not because it lack reasons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ......e learned Attorney-General are found unacceptable, not because it lack reasons but such reason has no support in law. The appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs. Ed. ...... ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 116
Bangladesh & others Vs. A. K. M. Zahangir Hossain, 1981, 10 CLC (AD)
....ted by both sides. Some of these decisions may be discussed. 24. Bharat Bank case relates to an industrial dispute, and the decision of the Industrial tribunal under certain matters, required a declaration by the Government, and so the question arose whether it was a tribunal under Article 136...... member of the said 'disciplined force' if he has been illegally dismissed, removed, discharged, reduced in rank or compulsorily retired. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 34 DLR (AD) 173. ......34 DLR (AD) 173. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 188
Bangladesh Vs. Winifred Rubi & ors., 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....oning again series of litigations cropped up between the parties, some of which are still pending. At one time the Respondent No.4 filed Title Suit No. 700 of 1975 in the First Court of Munsif for declaration that he is the sole proprietor of the Little Flower School and he was entitled to close...... 7. In the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed. And the Judgement of the High Court Division are set aside and the writ petition is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost. Ed. ...... Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 65
Md. Habibur Rahman & ors. Vs. Hasen Ali Mondal and others, 1982, 11 CLC (AD)
....cant from that date. 5. Respondent No. 1 moved the High Court Division under Article 102 of the Constitution challenging the legality of his removal from office and succeeded in getting the declaration sought for by him. The impugned notification is as follows:— &ldquo......atal so as to nullify the notification issued on February 4, 1980. The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ......atal so as to nullify the notification issued on February 4, 1980. The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court Division is set aside and the Writ Petition dismissed. No costs. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 100