Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 441-460 of 3679 results.
Oriental Bank Ltd. Vs. Rina Alam and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....Rin Adalat Suit. DW, 1 Mr. Azfar Ahmed, an officer of the Bank and tadbirkar, has deposed in that suit that the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 was not a surety and that defendant No. 4 did not keep the land in question as security for the loan but the instant case was a suit for the declaration, int......e High Court Division. This petition is accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (AD) (2005) 51. ......July 5, 2004. Result: The petition is dismissed. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Section 11 The matter in issue was not at all in controversy in the previous suit and that the same was not litigated upon or any decision arrived at by the Artha Rin Adalat and, as such,......ion is dismissed. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Section 11 The matter in issue was not at all in controversy in the previous suit and that the same was not litigated upon or any decision arrived at by the Artha Rin Adalat and, as such, the issue that has been decided on ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 5 Jul, 2004 | Hits: 171
Rajshahi Development Authority Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ullah reported in 42 DLR (AD) 91 the relevant passage is quoted as under: "It was said in the case that though notice for acquisition under section 5(a) was served in 1962 the land was six years when the value of the land increased to a great extent. Government did not explai......f this case only. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......82, Section 47 Application of the provision of the Ordinance when the property was acquired under the Act- Section 47 of Ordinance No. II of 1982 provides that all pending matters under the Act No. 13 of 1948 i.e. the Emergency Requisition of Property Act......ision (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Rajshahi Development Authority……...........Appellant Vs. Sultan Ahmed, Advocate and others.........Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 29 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 232
Abdul Mumin alias Tanu Miah Vs. Mahfujur Rahman and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....t, 1949 seeking pre-emption in respect of the sale by 5 different kabalas dated 5.9.1988. The claim of pre-emption was made on the assertion that by inheritance the pre-emptor is the co-sharer of the land of lot Nos. 2183 and 2184 of khatian No. 450. 2. The pre-emptor claimed to have inherited the ......ost. Ed. This Case is alsoReported in: 1 ADC (2004) 515.......f 1998) Judgment June 28, 2004. Cases Referred to- S.M. Basiruddin Vs. Zahurul Islam Chowdhury, 35 DLR (AD), 230; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan Vs. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury, being dead his heirs Amena Khatun, 35 DLR (AD) 338. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed b......ahurul Islam Chowdhury, 35 DLR (AD), 230; Md. Khairullah Bhuiyan Vs. Haji Nurul Alam Chowdhury, being dead his heirs Amena Khatun, 35 DLR (AD) 338. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant(In all the appe..Category: Property Law | Date: 28 Jun, 2004 | Hits: 43
Govt. of BD rep. by DC Vs. Anwara Huq & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
...........Respondents Judgment May 25, 2004. The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (I of 1894), Sections 3(a), 23 & 24 In assessing compensation for acquired land compensation is to be assessed not only for land simplicitar but also for benefits arising out......wara Huq and ors .........................Respondents Judgment May 25, 2004. The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (I of 1894), Sections 3(a), 23 & 24 In assessing compensation for acquired land compensation is to be assessed not only for land simplicit......41 and thereupon deducting the amount of Taka 3,69,786.22 already received by the respondents on protest made the final order for payment of Taka 33,53,878.19. 2. Facts, in short, are that respondents' property measuring 5,4250 acres with structures, orchard, tank, etc. were acquire...... Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Government of Bangladesh, represented by Deputy Commissioner…….Appellant Vs. Anwara Huq and ors .........................Respondents Judgment May 25, 2004. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 May, 2004 | Hits: 121
Sultan Miah (Md) Vs. Kazi Abu Siddique and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....di for permanent injunction on the averments, inter alia, that after the death of the CS recorded owner Meher Ali and his sons Kamaruddin, Janab Ali and Chand Miah got one third each of the suit land on amicable partition. It is further stated that the plaintiff became the owner of the suit lan......refore, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......r dated 7‑8‑2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4619 of 1997 making the Rule absolute. 2. The facts, leading to this petition, are that the leave‑petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.37 of 1994 in the Court of Seni......nts Judgment May 8, 2004. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908) Section 115 The High Court Division committed no error of law in confirming judgement and decree of the trial court at the same time setting aside the ..Category: Civil Law | Date: 8 May, 2004 | Hits: 825
Sunder Ali being dead his heirs A. Hannan & ors. Vs. Md. Serajul I. Sarker & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....e plaint of the aforementioned Title Suit. 2. Predecessor of the present appellant No. 14 and another filed the aforesaid title suit seeking declaration of title In respect of the land described in the schedule attached to the plaint. 3. In due course the defendants ......ts Judgment April 27, 2004. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order VII rule 11 Cause of action is bundle of facts and for the ascertainment of the cause of action Court is required to read the plaint in its entirety…&h......earance and filed written statement. Later on, defendants filed an application under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking rejection of the plaint stating, inter alia, that the subject matter of the suit is an open water body and the people of the locality are enjoyin......spondents Judgment April 27, 2004. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Order VII rule 11 Cause of action is bundle of facts and for the ascertainment of the cause of action Court is required to read the plaint in its entirety&he..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 102
Rokeya Begum Vs. Md. Nurul Absar and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....agong, in Miscellaneous Case No.314 of 1988 allowing the same, respectively. 2. Pre-emption was sought under Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act in respect of 38 1/2 decimals of land in each of the Miscellaneous cases. The land sought to be pre-empted was transferred by two kab......Absar and others………….................Respondents (In C.A.No.84 of 1999) Md. Nurul Alam and others……………...............Respondents (In C.A.No.85 of 1999) Judgment April 25, 2004 Cases Referred To- Jadav Chandra Mali Vs. Abdul Khaleque and others, 27 DLR (AD) 114; Md. Jabed Ali ......of land in each of the Miscellaneous cases. The land sought to be pre-empted was transferred by two kabalas dated June 25, 1988 3. The land originally belonged to Khan Bahadur Aman Ali and the R.S. Khatian No. 791/1 was prepared in his name. The pre-emptor by different kabalas of the years 1981 and......(AD) 338; Abdur Rabban Vs. Aminul Hoque Sowdagar and another, 43 DLR (AD) 19; Ahmed Hossain and others Vs. Basharat Ali and others, 32 DLR (AD) 54. Lawyers Involved: Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate instructed by A. S. M Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants (In both the ..Category: Property Law | Date: 25 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 42
Bangladesh Bank and ors. Vs. Zafar Ahmed Chowdhury and another, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... above of the High Court Division not being sustainable in law is hereby set aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... aside. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ......d another .........Respondents Judgment April 24, 2004. Result: The petition is disposed of with observations. The Constitution of Bangladesh, 1972, Article 102 (i) The rule that the Court will not entertain, a writ petition when the appropriate remedy is yet available is no......n a writ petition when alternative remedy of appeal is not equally efficacious and effective but not when such remedy is avoided of…..(7) (ii) It is the principle of law that an ad interim order could be passed only in aid of or ancillary to main relief that may be available upon final de..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 24 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 175
Abdul Jabbar Vs. Md. Lokman Hossian, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....opposite party herein. 8. In the present case admittedly the defendant occupied the suit premises as tenant under the plaintiff and thereafter he was paying rent to the plaintiff admitting him as land lord, which was also confirmed by his rent case No. 43 of 1993. Thereafter he has created a n......ccordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nt and decree dated October 25, 2000 of the Court of Senior Assistant Judge and the S.C.C. Judge, Sadar, Kushtia, passed in S.C.C. Suit No. 7 of 1993 dismissing the same. 2. Facts, in short, are that predecessor of the Respondents filed aforementioned S.C.C. Suit seeking eviction of the petiti......Abdul Latif and others. ...........................Respondents. Judgment 21 April 2004 Lawyers Involved: Herendra Nath Nandi, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioner Nurul Amin, Advocate, instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-r..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 21 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 69
Executive Engineer, LGED, Rangpur Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... no claim to compensation, in any case. 30. Mr. Shafique Ahmed submitted that the learned Arbitrator is empowered to give compensation or damages for breach of the contract under law of the land even when the contract is silent. Submission may sound appealing but is devoid of any substance...... Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 656. ......account of compensation and interest for cancelling the work order and blacklisting the company. The application was registered as Title Suit No.134 of 1997. 3. In the application, it is stated that on 6‑2-1995 the plaintiff submitted a tender quoting Taka 85, 98,775.50 for construction .......Appellant Vs. A Latif & Company Ltd...................................Respondent Judgment April 11, 2004. Result: The Appeal is allowed. Appointment of Arbitrator by the Court Section 20(4) empowers the Court to make an order of reference to the arbitrato..Category: Arbitration Law | Date: 11 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 3
Agrani Bank, rep. by the Chairman, BoD, & ors. Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... 14. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......aker Badrudduza ......................Respondent Judgment April 6, 2004. Service Matter Punishment- In modifying the order of dismissal in the manner as stated in the judgment of AAT upon importing the concept of proportionality which has no applica...... 2. The respondent tiled the aforesaid AT Case challenging legality of his dismissal and prayed for reinstatement with all financial benefits. 3. Facts of the case, in short, are that, the respondent while serving in the Chak Bazar Branch of the appellant No. 1 (Agrani Bank) ha...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M M Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Agrani Bank, represented by the Chairman, Board of Directors, and others .....Appellants Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza ......................Respon..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 6 Apr, 2004 | Hits: 130
Aftab A (Capt Retired) Vs. SM Kutubuddin being dead his heirs: Nuzhat Banu & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ce. 2. Plaintiff‑appellant and another (respondent No. 2) filed the Other Class Suit No. 70 of 1992/Other Suit No. 86 of 1988 seeking a decree for specific performance of contract for sale of land against the predecessor of the respondent Nos. 1 (a) to 1 (c) on the basis of the 'bainapatra'......n 73 The High Court Division is competent enough to compare signature of the defendant in the bianapatra with available authenticated signature of the defendant. Therefore The High Court Division was in error in sending the case back on remand for the same purpose to the trial court. Lawyers......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Aftab Ali (Captain Retired)......................Appellant Vs. SM Kutubuddin being dead his heirs: Nuzhat Banu and others………Respondents Judgment March 20, 2004. The Code of Civil Proced......ct, 1872 (I of 1872) Section 73 The High Court Division is competent enough to compare signature of the defendant in the bianapatra with available authenticated signature of the defendant. Therefore The High Court Division was in error in sending the case back on remand for the same purpose to ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 20 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 106
Akram Hossain (Md.) Vs. Sahera Khatun and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....osite party Nos.1 and 2. None of the sisters entered into any contract for sale of the suit holding to the plaintiff. Rather, all three sisters entered into an agreement with him for sale of the suit land at a consideration of Taka 36,00,000 and upon receipt of Taka 9,00,000 on 8‑12‑2002 they de......onths from the date of receipt of this order. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 317. ......Court Division (Civil Revisional Jurisdiction) Present: Md. Abdur Rashid J S Rahman Miah J Akram Hossain (Md.)................................Petitioner Vs. Sahera Khatun and others.........................Respondents Judgment March 8, 2004. Result: ...............................Petitioner Vs. Sahera Khatun and others.........................Respondents Judgment March 8, 2004. Result: The Rule is discharged. Whether or not the oral contract as claimed by the plaintiff is genuine and enforceable in law Addition..Category: Contract Law | Date: 8 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 5
Ataur Rahman (Md.) another Vs. Edruc Limited, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....PSL RM Ramanathan Chettiar Vs. OR MP RM Ramanathan Chettiar, 1968 SC 1047 at 1049; Sahadeo Sukul and others Vs. Seikh Shawkat Hossain, 12 CWN 145 at 146; Re Welsh Brick Industries Ltd., 1946 2 All England Law Reports, page 197; Ram Lal Vs. Central Bank of India, AIR 1961 Punj. 340 at 344, 349; Varji......................Petitioners Vs. Edruc Limited ..........................................Respondent Judgment March 3, 2004. Result: The applications are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Amin Scales Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987 BLD (AD) 259 = 39 DLR (AD) 2......and another Vs. Md. Yakub, 1987 BLD (AD) 259 = 39 DLR (AD) 201; Haridas Vs. Baroda Kishore, 27 Cal 38; Fardous Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 3 BLC (AD) 213; Bancharam Majumdar Vs. Adyanath Bhattacharja, ILR 36 Cal, 936; Capt BS Demograry Vs. VIF Airways Ltd., 1999 Company Cases 291; In re ...... In the result, the applications are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 337. ..Category: Company Law | Date: 3 Mar, 2004 | Hits: 8
Jalil Brothers and ors. Vs. Humayun Majid and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....al Area, Dhaka occupied by the appellants and respondents Nos. 3‑17 stating, inter alia, that former Government of East Pakistan by a registered deed of lease dated 6‑10‑65 granted lease of the land situated at Holding No. 21, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka to Enam Elahi and Brothers, a fami......he decision of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......him the vacant possession of the ground floor of the building situated at Holding No. 21, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka occupied by the appellants and respondents Nos. 3‑17 stating, inter alia, that former Government of East Pakistan by a registered deed of lease dated 6‑10‑65 granted lease......ut any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 18 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 133
State Vs. Anjuara Khatun, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....econd Court, Jessore in Sessions Case No.182 of 1999. 7. Prosecution to bring home culpability of Anjuara Khatun put on witness box fourteen (14) witnesses. 8. Defence adopted was that over land dispute some other, persons killed Tipu Sultan. Innocence and false implication had been, also,......; February 17, 2004. Result: Death Reference No.43 of 2001 stands rejected. Criminal Appeal No.3459 of 2001 and Jail Appeal No.3887 of 2001 are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Abdul Bahar alias Abul Bashar and others Vs. State, 1995 BLD 84; Nazir and ot......Court Division (Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Present: AK Badrul Huq J Md. Abu Tariq J State.............................................Petitioner Vs. Anjuara Khatun................................Condemned Prisoner Judgment ......a Vs. Krishnamurti Laxmipati Naidu, AIR 1981 SC 617=1981 CriLJ 9; Surajdeo Oza and others Vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1979 SC 1505 = 1979 CriLJ 1122. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rouf, Deputy Attorney-General with Md. Ibrahim Khalil, Assistant Attorney-General‑ For the State-Respondent (In al..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 17 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 7
Abdus Sattar (Md) and ors. Vs. Lalon Mazar Sharif & Seba Sadan Committee & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....er as plaintiff instituted Title suit No. 3 of 1985 in the Court of Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge), Kushtia against the opposite party Nos. 1-3 for declaration of title to the suit land stating, inter alia, that the suit land appertaining to CS Khatian No. 174 belonged to Bholai S......s... Respondents Judgment February 11, 2004. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908), Section 107(B) Remand cannot be allowed as a matter of course to fill up the lacuna of the case of any party…..(6) Order X......d restoring the judgment and decree dated M‑2‑1990 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge (now Joint District Judge) Kushtia in Title Suit No. 3 of 1985. 2. Short facts are that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title suit No. 3 of 1985 in the Court of Subordinate Judg......of 1908), Section 107(B) Remand cannot be allowed as a matter of course to fill up the lacuna of the case of any party…..(6) Order XXVI, rule 12. Report of the Advocate Commissioner itself without examining the commissioner is not an evidence but ..Category: Property Law | Date: 11 Feb, 2004 | Hits: 127
State Vs. Nazrul Islam @ Nazrul, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
.... a copy of his judgment for future reference. Send down the lower court records. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 289. ......azrul Islam @ Nazrul……………Condemned Prisoner Judgment January 20, 2004. Result: The Death Reference is rejected the Jail Appeal is allowed. Cases Referred to- Shamsul Haque alias Shamsul and others Vs. State, 38 DLR (AD) 75; Dahyabhai C......sions Case No.84 of 1998. Condemned Prisoner, pursuant there of preferred the above appeal. These matters are disposed of by this judgment. 2. Prosecution case, in short, as narrated by Sakhina Khatun (P.W.1) is as follows: 3. Deceased Shalema is her niece and wife of the condemned-prisone......hai Thakur Vs. State of Gujarat, AIR 1964 SC 1563; Bhikari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 1; Fayasena Vs. Reginam, (1970) 1 All ER 219. Lawyers Involved: Nikhilesh Dutta, Deputy Attorney-General, with Mohammed Abdul Baset, Assistant Attorney-General and Fara Mahmuda, Assistant Att..Category: Criminal Law, Evidence Law | Date: 20 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 5
Selim Saial Vs. A. Majid Molla and others, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....he rule is discharged. Right of Pre-emption Right of Pre-emption is a statutory right conferred upon a co-sharer either by way of a. inheritance or b. purchase or contiguity of the land transferred, and that right can be defeated only under the provisions of law embodied in secti......2004. Result: The rule is discharged. Right of Pre-emption Right of Pre-emption is a statutory right conferred upon a co-sharer either by way of a. inheritance or b. purchase or contiguity of the land transferred, and that right can be defeated only under the provisions...... Right of Pre-emption Right of Pre-emption is a statutory right conferred upon a co-sharer either by way of a. inheritance or b. purchase or contiguity of the land transferred, and that right can be defeated only under the provisions of law embodied in section 96(10)(a) of the Ac......……………………………Opposite parties Judgment January 20, 2004. Result: The rule is discharged. Right of Pre-emption Right of Pre-emption is a statutory right conferred upon a co-sharer either by way of a. inheritance or b. purchase or contiguity o..Category: Property Law | Date: 20 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 6
State Vs. Moslemuddin (Md), 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....tence is illegal". In view of above position we fined no reason to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......structed by AM., Md Wahidullah Advocate‑on Record‑For the Appellant. Not represented‑The Respondent. Criminal Appeal Nos. 27 of 1997. (From the Judgment and order dated 28 June 1995 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 2013 of 1992). Judgment Md. Tafaz......a fine of Taka 1000/on both counts, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month and both the sentences were to be run concurrently. 2. The prosecution case, in brief, is that informant, Abdur Rouf, Assistant Commissioner (Land) Mirzapur, Tangail on surprise visits on dif......Islam J State ........... Appellant Vs. Moslemuddin (Md) ............ Respondent Judgment January 19th, 2004 Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by AM., Md Wahidullah Advocate‑on Record‑For the Appellant. Not ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: 19 Jan, 2004 | Hits: 96
639430981511011612261147320902413713189048910129889314988948590146