Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Capital Tower Ltd. Vs. Mirpur Mazar Co operative Market Society Ltd. & ors, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....previously numbered as Title Suit No. 92 of 1993 of the 1st Court of Assistant Judge, Dhaka) is set aside and the suit is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... of the defendant No. 6 filed on April 26, 1992 seeking allotment of the land but the Directors of the Company signed the Memorandum and the Articles of the Company on June 7, 1992(f) that from the proceedings of the Allotment Committee it is seen that resolution Nos. 1‑13 relates to allotm..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 216
Category: Civil Law | Date: 11 Aug, 2003 | Hits: 21
Abdul Kader Rabbani and others Vs. Ebaruddin and others, 2003,32 CLC (HCD)
....ance with law and in the light of the observation made in the body of the judgment. Send down the LC record at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 307. ...... Pakistan and the second Appeal No.625 of 1966 was dismissed by judgment and decree dated 1‑2‑1980. During pendency of the second Appeal No.625 of 1966 there was no order of stay of the execution proceeding and the decree holder put the decree into execution being Title Execution No.36 of 1969 a..Category: Civil Law | Date: 1 Jul, 2003 | Hits: 4
Mrs. Razia Satter Vs. Mr. Azizul Huq and two others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....in this rule and accordingly this rule is discharged and the contemners are acquitted of the charges-eveled against them. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (HCD) (2007) 515. ......, Advocates- Amicus Curieas. Contempt Petition No.116 of 2001. Judgment Syed Amirul Islam J.- This rule was issued calling upon the respondent-contemners to show cause as to why a proceeding for contempt of Court should not be drawn up against them and punished accordingly f..Category: Constitutional Law, Contempt of Court Law | Date: 30 Jun, 2003 | Hits: 13
Begum Lutfunnessa Vs. Md. Shafiullah and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....of Subordinate Judge, Commercial Court No. 2, Dhaka. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 102. ...... sufficient for the disposal of the suit in that case the superior court should dispose of the same. But there may be cases, as the instant one, even though there is no prayer from the parties in the proceedings for sending the suit back to the trial court or to the lower appellate court for disposa..Category: Civil Law | Date: 18 May, 2003 | Hits: 202
Jahanara Begum and others Vs. Hazera Khatun, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... not sustainable in law and the same is accordingly set aside. In the result the appeals are allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... of 2001 moved the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 1967 of 1999 against the said impugned order dated 27.5.1999 whereupon the rule was issued with an ad-interim order of stay of all further proceeding of the said Title Suit. The said appellant, however, in order to get the suit disposed of..Category: Contract Law | Date: 12 May, 2003 | Hits: 251
Chan Miah (Md) Vs. Md. Dabirul Islam Khan & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....it any consideration and we also do not find any illegality or infirmity to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... the amount of consideration money together with the compensation thereon. 2. Upon receipt of the notice of the pre-emption proceeding the petitioner, a co‑sharer tenant, filed an application under section 96(4) ..Category: Property Law | Date: 5 May, 2003 | Hits: 141
Nurul Huq (Md.) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
...., 2000 against the appellant, being informant of the case, is hereby set aside. Communicate this order to the Court concerned Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 588.......n a case under section 17(1) only when a complaint to that effect is filed by any person, but, in the instant case, no petition by anybody was filed before the Tribunal for initiation of the criminal proceeding against the informant and, in that view of the matter, the order of the learned Tribunal ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 28 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 126
United Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Jahangir Alam Khan & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....comment on it. 11. However, in any view of the matter, the impugned order does not suffer from any infirmity for our interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......bsp; 5. Respondent No. 3 has filed the Caveat. Mr. Rafique‑ul‑Huq, the learned Counsel appearing for the Caveator, however, submitted that even the Bangladesh Bank earlier drew a proceeding against the present Chairman under section 46 of the Bank Companies Act, 1991 on various..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 22 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 201
Amir Hossain Vs. MA Malek & others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....Instead, a lawyer appearing on their behalf filed an application for time to enable them to file an application before the High Court Division under section 561A of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of the complainant case. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate refused to take notice of the ......ques by him and those cheques being dishonoured. The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898) Section 561A There is no bar for the complaint case to proceed side by side with winding up proceeding about the same subject matter. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek, Senior Advo..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 15 Apr, 2003 | Hits: 88
Syeda Mazeda Khatun Vs. Bangladesh Shilpa Rin Sangstha, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... In that view of the matter, this petition is dismissed. Ed. Same Case Cited in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 82. ......ransferred her to a lower post of LDA‑cum‑Typist while her appeal was awaiting hearing by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal. Changing her designation during the pendency of a judicial proceeding in a subjudice matter to the prejudice of the petitioner actually constituted an obstruct..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 17 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 84
Moinul Haque (Md) & anr. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
.... substance in the petitions. The two petitions are accordingly dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Referred in: 56 DLR (AD) 81; 9 MLR (2004) (AD) 321. ......her dead body was found on the following morning beside the road. The accused do not deny this aspect also. Their case is that she jumped from the running pick‑up while the pick‑up was proceeding towards Dinajpur. But there is no evidence whatsoever in support of the said story made ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 13 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 316
Nahar Shipping Lines Ltd. & anr. Vs. Homera Ahmed & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ourt Division in the company matter, we do not find any reason to grant leave against the said judgment. The petition is therefore, dismissed and the delay is condoned. Ed. ......agement of the company, no dividends or profits were paid to them. In that situation filed an application to wind up the company on 14 June 1988 being Matter No. 24 of 1988. In the context of those proceedings, the company court granted an injunction restraining the company from creating any furt..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: 12 Mar, 2003 | Hits: 273
Category: Others | Date: 8 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 112
Abul Hossain (Md) Vs. State, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....urt Division 'Further enquiry" is directed to be held. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 125. ......ake it a court and hence bar under section 195 is not attracted. Therefore, in the instant case, a complaint in writing of a relevant court is not necessary and there is no bar in initiating legal proceeding against the accused by a complaint lodged by a police officer………&he..Category: Property Law | Date: 4 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 80
Md. Ashequr Rahman Vs. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....uded within 180 days as per Regulation 43(8) of the Regulations. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 14 BLT (AD) (2006) 1. ...... passed in the appeal but he did not have the desired result. The appellant challenged his order of compulsory retirement in the writ jurisdiction of the High Court Division primarily contending that proceeding against him was not concluded within the prescribed time in the light of the provision of..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: 2 Feb, 2003 | Hits: 92
Abdur Rashid (Md) Vs. LGRD and Cooperatives, Local Government Division and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
.... Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. Same Case Cited in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 72. ......the said decision "The Prescribed Authority is obliged to consider the correlation between the interest of administration or the interest of the Union Parishad vis‑a‑vis the criminal proceeding. The criminal proceeding against the Chairman must of necessity be such that the power ve..Category: Others | Date: 27 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 89
Alfazuddin Ahmed Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....emption case is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 108. ......and by opening a separate khatian and that no appeal having been filed as against the order of the Revenue Officer allowing splitting of the jama the validity thereof cannot be opened in a collateral proceeding i.e. in a pre‑emption proceeding, before the Civil Court and that Civil Court is no..Category: Property Law | Date: 21 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 81
Govt. of BD, rep. by the Sec., Min. of Defence & ors. Vs. Md. Afzal Hossain Ansari, 2003, 32 CLC (AD
....peal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 65. ......nts (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1985 Rule 4 Section 4 of the Administrative Tribunal Act vested the Tribunal with the power to consider the regularity and legality of the proceeding initiated against the delinquent officer as well as to consider the proportionality of t..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 8 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 122
Pannu Mollah & anr. Vs. State, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
..... The Special Tribunal upon hearing the parties convicted the appellants and two others as aforesaid. 5. Being aggrieved the appellants took a revision before the High Court Division for quashing the judgment and order of the Special (8) Tribunal, the Rule issued was discharged. ......ssed in Special Tribunal Case No. 100 of 1996 is quashed insofar as the same relates to the appellants. The appellants are set at liberty if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 3 Jan, 2003 | Hits: 84