Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Sonali Bank and others Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....not allowed but we allow interest on the decretal sum of Tk. 15,39,300.00 @ 7.1/2% per annum from the date of the institution of the suit upto the date of decree of this Court. Ed. ......not allowed but we allow interest on the decretal sum of Tk. 15,39,300.00 @ 7.1/2% per annum from the date of the institution of the suit upto the date of decree of this Court. Ed. ......and others................................... Respondents [In CA No. 68/90] Judgment February 4th, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Asrarul Hossain, Senior Advocate instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the appellants in CA No....... Present: MH Rahman J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Sonali Bank and others ......................................Appellants Vs. Gazi Abdur Rashid and others ............................Respondents ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Subash Chandra Halder & another Vs. Abdul Bari & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....party is necessary within the meaning of Order 1 rule 10(2) CPC or for the ends of justice............(8) Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (SK Sinha, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record -For the Appellants. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate in......hus cannot be sustained. The order is, accordingly, set aside. The appeal is allowed without any order as to Cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1992) 12 BLD (AD) 174; 44 DLR (AD) 253. ......ecessary within the meaning of Order 1 rule 10(2) CPC or for the ends of justice............(8) Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (SK Sinha, Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record -For the Appellants. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate instructed b......ion (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Subash Chandra Halder & another.................Plaintiff-Appellants Vs. Abdul Bari & others ..................Defendant-Respondents Judgment April 12, 1992..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Manik Chand Bibi @ Rezian Nahar & anr Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chy @ Sufi Mia Chy, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Appellant Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment December 3rd, 1991 Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellants. M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - For...... person entitled to execute the decree and that stage did not reach fill then. Hence, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment December 3rd, 1991 Lawyers Involved: TH Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Appellants. M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record - For the Respo......ivil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Manik Chand Bibi alias Rezian Nahar and another.........................Appellant Vs. Abdul Mutakabbir Chowdhury alias Sufi Mia Chowdhury……………….Respondents Judgment..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Mozahar Ali Howlader Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....itioner. Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another…………………Respondent. Judgment July 9th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Moksudor Rahman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on- Record -For the Petitioner. Not Represented -Respondents. Cri......rt Division is modified accordingly and it is directed that the accused‑petitioner be tried by the Sessions Judge and Ex‑officio Senior Special Judge, Jhalakati. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another…………………Respondent. Judgment July 9th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Moksudor Rahman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on- Record -For the Petitioner. Not Represented -Respondents. Criminal peti......e Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Mozahar Ali Howlader………………….Accused-Petitioner. Vs. Lal Miah Talukder and another…………………Respondent. Judgment July 9th, 1992. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 100
AKM Mosharaf Hossain Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ed‑Appellant Vs. The State.................Respondent Judgment March 8th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Rokunuddin Mahmud, Advocate (Mr. Tamizul Haque, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hussain, Advocate-On-Record-For the Appellant. M Shamsul Alam, Deputy Attorney‑Genera......are of the view that the appellant is entitled to bail. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed. The appellant will remain on same bail granted by this Court earlier till commencement of the trial. Ed. ...... earlier till commencement of the trial. Ed. ......d. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 92
Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J and Latifur Rahman J Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited ………………..Appellant Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman. ................ Respondents Judgment January 29th, 1992. C......thin the jurisdiction of the court where the plaint was filed. We find no good ground to interfere with the concurrent order of the courts below. The appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......Co. Vs. Benoy Bhusan AIR 1943 Cal. 199 (202); Read Vs. Brown 22 QBD 128 (132); Cooke Vs. Gill LR 8 CP 107; G. Venkatesha Vs. Kamlapath 1957 AIR 201 (Mad). Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Mr. Kazi Shahabuddin Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appe......MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J and Latifur Rahman J Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited ………………..Appellant Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman. ................ Respondents Judgment January 29th, 199..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Shamser Ali (Md) and others Vs. Mosammat Kafizan Bibi, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....an Bibi………..…………….Respondent Judgment August 18th, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Appellant. M Nawab Ali, A......tion of the document. Consequently the judgment is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without cost and the judgment of the lower appellate Court is restored. Ed. ......llip;……..…………….Respondent Judgment August 18th, 1991. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑ For the Appellant. M Nawab Ali, Advocate......hman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shamser Ali (Md) and others ……………………Appellants. Vs. Mosammat Kafizan Bibi………..…………….R..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
Narayan Chandra Rajak Das Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment November......appellate Court's judgment was not a proper judgment of reversal. For all the above reasons, we do not find any merit in this appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment November 21 st, 1991. Lawyers Involved: SS Halder, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on-Record-For the Appellant. Khandaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Ad......Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Narayan Chandra Rajak Das......... Appellant Vs. Md. Amjad Ali Miah and others………...Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Abul Khair Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Ahmed Ali Advocate (appeared with leave of the Court) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on -Record- For the Petitioner. B Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For th......elay will merit such commutation. We find no compelling extenuating circumstance in this case and therefore find no ground whatsoever to interfere. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......dgment April 29th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Ahmed Ali Advocate (appeared with leave of the Court) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on -Record- For the Petitioner. B Hossain Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent. Criminal petition for leave to appeal No. 38 ......ellate Division (Criminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abul Khair...............Petitioner. Vs. The State .................Respondent Judgment April 29th, 1992. La..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Hamid Mollah Vs. Ali Mollah and another, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....Court with him) instructed by M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Maksumul Hakim, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court (Abdul Hamid, Advocate Supreme, Court with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain, Deputy Att......order of acquittal and the alleged misreading of evidence has not affected the decision on merit. There has been no failure of justice. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. ......him) instructed by M Nowab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Maksumul Hakim, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court (Abdul Hamid, Advocate Supreme, Court with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No. 1. B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney‑......esent: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Abdul Hamid Mollah................... Complainant-Appellant Vs. Ali Mollah and another…………………... Accuse..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Chairman, Kushtia Cooperative Industrial Union Ltd Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ondent Nos. 1-3. SS Haider, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ranesh Chandra Maitra, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For Respondent No. 4. Moazzem Hossain, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Respondent Nos. 5-6. Contempt Petition No. ...... the superior Court. Normally, therefore, an advocate's information will be honoured by the Court, unless a strong case for refusal is made out by the Court in its order of refusal. Ed. ......dvocate-on-Record - For the Respondent Nos. 1-3. SS Haider, Senior Advocate, instructed by Ranesh Chandra Maitra, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For Respondent No. 4. Moazzem Hossain, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record - For the Respondent Nos. 5-......Division (Civil) Present: MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Chairman, Kushtia Co‑operative Industrial Union Ltd .............Petitioner Vs. Mujibur Rahman & others...............Respondents Judgment June 10th, 199..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 98
State Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ...... aside and it is held that the Senior Special Judges got power to transfer the cases which they had earlier transferred to the Divisional Special Judge. The appeal is allowed. Ed. ......l Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement May 3rd, 1992. Lawyers Involved: A. Wadud Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate‑on- Record-For the Appellant Ex - parte - For the Respondents....... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J The State, represented by the Solicitor, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh ......... ......Appellant Vs. Divisional Special Judge, Khulna Division and anr...........Respondents Judgement..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 118
BD Chemical Industries Corporation & another Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works & ors, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....s Corporation and others…………. Respondents (In CA 36/1991) Judgment March 4th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (In CA 100/1990) Khandker Mahbubudd......a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. Civil Appeal No. 36 of 1991 is dismissed. There will be no order as to cost in either of the appeals. Ed. ......tion and others…………. Respondents (In CA 36/1991) Judgment March 4th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: M Zahir, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (In CA 100/1990) Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, ...... Rahman J Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and another………………………………. Appellants Vs. M/s Sattar Match Works and others ..........Respondents (In CA 100/1990) ..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 227
Fazlur Rahman Molla Vs. Bangladesh, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......ult, we accept the appellant's contention and hold that his conviction is without any evidence. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. ......nt May 14th, 1992. Lawyers Involved: Abu Taher Chowdhury, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Ataul Huq, Advocate‑on‑ Record ‑For the Appellant. B Hossain, Advocate‑on ‑Record, Supreme Court‑For the Respondent No. 1. Ex pa...... CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Latifur Rahman J Fazlur Rahman Molla ...................Appellant Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice Division and anoth..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Shaikh Shahidul Islam Vs. State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
....will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ......will continue to remain on the same bail already granted by this Court until commencement of the trial, if any. The trial Court will pass necessary orders as deemed fit at that time. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: Abdul Malek Senior Advocate, (Rafiqul Huq, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Shamsul Huq Siddique, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Appellant. B Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑For the Respondent in both the appeals Criminal...... Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Shaikh Shahidul Islam……………....……Accused‑Appellant (in both the Appeals) Vs. State .......................Respondent Judgment February 24th, 1992. ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Rafiqul Islam (Md) Vs. Mir Abdul Ali, 1991, 20 CLC (AD)
....nd up to the challenge thrown up by the defendant on other grounds. So, the impugned judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is dismissed……….(12,17,18) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate ‑ For the Appellant. Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by ...... record, the result of the judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 44 DLR (AD) 176. ......rounds. So, the impugned judgment under review need not be disturbed. The appeal is dismissed……….(12,17,18) Lawyers Involved: Md. Nurul Huq, Advocate ‑ For the Appellant. Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Kazi Shahabuddin Ahmed, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Re......upreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Rafiqul Islam (Md)………………………..Appellant Vs. Mir Abdul Ali................Respondent Judgment December 12, 1991. Result: The a..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 73
State Vs. Abdul Mannan @ A Mannan and others, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ......n and others..................................................Respondents Judgment November 3, 1991 Lawyers Involved: AW Bhuiyan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record‑ For the Petitioner. Not represented ‑R...... should not normally differ from sobriety, moderation and reserve. A Judge is not expected to import his own notions and ideas into law, as we are not making legislative enactments. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 92
Siddique Munshi Vs. The State, 1992, 21 CLC (AD)
.... Duga Mia vs. Crown 7 DLR 395; Shahed Ali Vs. State 13 DLR 414 and Sadik Vs. State (1971) PLD (SC) 713. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellant. M Shamsul ......e same Judge. However, departure from this practice has caused no prejudice to the appellant. 13. In the result, we do not find anything to interfere. The appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......a vs. Crown 7 DLR 395; Shahed Ali Vs. State 13 DLR 414 and Sadik Vs. State (1971) PLD (SC) 713. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate‑on‑Record ‑For the Appellant. M Shamsul Alam, Depu......iminal) Present: Shahabuddin Ahmed CJ MH Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mustafa Kamal Latifur Rahman J Siddique Munshi ...................Appellant Vs. The State .........................Respondent Judgment October 24th, 1991. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 69