Search Options

Judgment Advanced Search

Displaying 4681-4700 of 5060 results.

Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd. Vs. The Govt. of Bangla­desh and others, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)

....shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ......shy;nufacture by the appellant Company is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and was of no legal effect. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: M. Habibur Rahman, Advocate, instructed by A. Bakkar, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Addl. Attorney-Gene­ral, with Mahmudul Islam, Asstt. Attorney-General, instructed by S.S. Hoda, Advocate-on-Record—For the Responden......d Hussain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Karnaphuli Rayon and Chemical Ltd…………....Appellant. Vs. The Govt. of Bangla­desh and others…………….....Resp..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 109

Azizur Rahman and another Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others, 1975, 4 CLC (AD)

....the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......the basis of what is just and convenient in each case. The result therefore is that this appeal fails and is dismissed with costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported In: 28 DLR (AD) (1976) 65. ......¦â€¦â€¦â€¦.Appellants Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others………..Respondents Judgment August 26, 1975. Result: The Appeal fails. Cases Referred to- Hajee Nurul Islam Chowdhury and others Vs. The Patya Tea Company Limited (1968) 20 DLR (Dac.) 54, PLD 1969 Dacca......ion (Civil) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debash Chandra Bhattacharya J Azizur Rahman and another………….Appellants Vs. Sree Kailash Chand Burmecha and others………..Respondents Judgment August 26, 197..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 93

Bangladesh Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)

.... Pakistan in Civil Re-vision Case No. 101 of 1968). Judgment: Kemaluddin Hossain, J.—Facts leading to the grant of Special leave to appeal are as follows: Respondent 1, Md. Abdur Razzak obtained a money decree against Respondent 2, Md. Belayet Ali Khan, a Government C......l subsist subject to the prior lien or charge of the Go­vernment and in accordance with the obser­vation made herein. The appeal is allowed but without any order as to costs. Ed. ......evanand Gir, I.L.R. 52 All. 619 same case A.I.R. 1930, All. 225; C.V. Raghavayya Vs. Chamria Talkie Distributors and another, A.I.R. 1958 Andhra Pradesh 31. Lawyers Involved: Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A. W. Mallick, Advocate-on- Record—For the ......J. Syed A. B. Mahmud Hussain, J. Ahsanuddin Choudhury, J. Kemaluddin Hossain, J. Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya. J. Bangladesh……Appellant. Vs. Mohd. Abdur Razzak and another………. Respondents Judgment ..

Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103

Abdur Razzaque & anr Vs. The State, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)

....that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal   is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal   is dismissed. Ed. ......that the High Court Division rightly held that the accused, namely, the appellants had not been prejudiced in any manner. In the result, the appeal   is dismissed. Ed. ...... F.K.M.A. Munim J Abdur Razzaque & anr………………..Appellants.              Vs. The State............................Respondent Judgment Jan. 14, 1976. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64

Government of Bang­ladesh & ors Vs. M/s. Samir & Co, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)

....d, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A.W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellants. Ahmadur Rahman Khan, Advocate, ins­tructed by Md. Nurul, Huq, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Respondent. Civil Appeal No. 10 of 1972. (From......ct, and therefore no ques­tion of irregular exercise of jurisdiction does arise in this case. The result therefore is that this appeal is dismissed but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......or General of India in Council Vs. Bilas Singh, and Nalini Ranjan Guha Vs. Union of India, A.I.R. 1954 Cal. 462. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attorney-General, with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant Attorney-General, instructed by A.W. Mallik, Advocate-on-Record.—For the Appellan......ppellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Government of Bang­ladesh & ors........Appellant Vs. M/s. Samir & Co…………..Respondent Judgment November 20, 1975. Cases ref..

Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 258

Amir Sultan Ali Hyder Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....ellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Amir Sultan Ali Hyder................................ Appellant. Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others............. Respondents Judgment July 1, 1977. R...... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295....... not be binding on the Courts below. For the reasons stated above, the appeal is dismissed. We, however, make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1977) 29 DLR (SC) 295....... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed ABM Husain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Amir Sultan Ali Hyder................................ Appellant. Vs. Md. K. Alam alias S. Alam & others............. Respondents Judgment July 1, 197..

Category: Trust/Waqf Law | Date: | Hits: 182

Nuruzzaman Chowdhury Vs. Asrarul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....Abdul Karim Chowdhury of the simple mortgage, brought a suit being No. 151 of 1926 in the second court of Munsif, Sadar, Chittagong, on that simple mortgage deed against the successors-in-interest of Md. Ashraf Chow­dhury, the present respondents. That suit was ultimately compromised on 28th Februa......e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......e appeal as per judgment dated 22-6-1966. The accounting will be made according to the directions given by the High Court in its judgment. In the result the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Fazle Munim J KM Subhan J Nuruzzaman Chowdhury…………………………………….Appellant Vs. Asrarul Hoque Chowdhury and others……………...Respondents. Judgement April 7, 19..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64

Md. Shaukat Ali Mia Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Shaukat Ali Mia…………………………......r of Wakfs, for its disposal in the manner indicated above, and in accordance with law. The costs of this appeal shall abide the result of proceeding be­fore the Administrator. Ed. ......r of Wakfs, for its disposal in the manner indicated above, and in accordance with law. The costs of this appeal shall abide the result of proceeding be­fore the Administrator. Ed. ...... D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Shaukat Ali Mia………………………………….. Appellant. Vs. Administrator of Wakfs and others ……….....Respondent. Judgme..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43

The State Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rah­man and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be suffi­cient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......boration thereof. It is not, however, necessary that independent evidence by itself should be suffi­cient to sustain a conviction. In the result the appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......hury, Assistant Attorney General instructed by S. S. Hoda,Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Aminul Huq, Advocate-on-Re cord—For the  Respondents. A. T. M. Kamrul Islam, Advocate, Supreme Court—U/o. XXIII, Rule 1, Supreme   Court Rules. Cri...... (Criminal) Present: Syed A.B.M. Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Fazle Munim J The State.....................Appellant. Vs. Fazu Kazi alias Kazi Fazlur Rah­man and others .................Respondents. ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 80

Afsar Ali Moral Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....bsp;                  January 20, 1977. Lawyers Involved: T.H. Khan, Senior Advocate with Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate, Supreme Court, instructed by Abu Bakkar, Advocate on-Record.—For P...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ...... to transportation for life under section 364 B.P.C. In our view the sentence passed should be read as one passed under section 303/109 B.PC instead of under Section 364 B.P. Code. Ed. ......tion 364. The law in respect of the charge for the offence of abduction followed by murder and the recovery of the dead body has been clearly laid down by this court in the case of Hafez Abul Khair Vs. The State in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 1975 of this court. Needless to say that the decision of..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62

Fakhruddin Mia and other Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....th  as second appellate court and  a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circum­stances.  With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......th  as second appellate court and  a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circum­stances.  With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......th  as second appellate court and  a revisional court, except in certain well-defined exceptional circum­stances.  With this observation the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Present: Syed A.B M. Husain CJ Kemaluddin Hussain J D. C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Fakhruddin Mia and other.........................Petitioners. Vs. Mohammad Khodabaksh Sheikh... ……………Respondent ..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 44

Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal Vs. State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....upreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal............Appellant Vs. The State................. Respondent Ju......n of the ap­pellant as well as of Pakistan Army in killing Saimuddin in the manner it were done. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 246. ......n of the ap­pellant as well as of Pakistan Army in killing Saimuddin in the manner it were done. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 246. ......l) Present: Syed AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Md. Abdur Rahim Mondal............Appellant Vs. The State................. Respondent Judgment April 21, 1977. Result: The ap..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63

Mansur Ali Vs. Bangladesh and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....t Judgment                     February 23, 1977. Lawyers Involved: Md. Ansar Ali, Advocate, instructed by Md. A. Aziz, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. ...... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court   Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ...... For the reasons we allow the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court   Division, accept the reference of the Sessions Judge Dacca, and quash the proceedings. Ed. ......ud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Mansur Ali............................. Appellant Vs. Bangladesh and another............... Respondent Judgment    ..

Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 81

Abdur Rahim Afroze Vs. B. C. Aga and Co. Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....therefore, jurisdiction to enter upon arbitration on his appointment and the award made by him was not void. In the result the appeal is dismissed with­out, however, any order as to costs. Ed. ......therefore, jurisdiction to enter upon arbitration on his appointment and the award made by him was not void. In the result the appeal is dismissed with­out, however, any order as to costs. Ed. ......therefore, jurisdiction to enter upon arbitration on his appointment and the award made by him was not void. In the result the appeal is dismissed with­out, however, any order as to costs. Ed. ......ourt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: A.M. Sayem CJ Mu­hammad Abdullah Jabir J Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Abdur Rahim Afroze.......................................Appellant Vs. B. C. Aga and Co. Ltd. and others…………………… Respondents Judgment Februar..

Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 86

Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf Vs. Appellate Tribu­nal and another, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....14 DLR (SC) 81 (86) = PLR 1962 (SC) 102 (106); Hari Vishnu vs. Ahmed Ishaque AIR 1955 (SC) 233, Syed Yakoob vs. Radha Krishnan AIR 1964 (SC) 477. Lawyers Involved: Mainul Hossain, Advocate with Md. Joynal Abedin, Advocate, Mozammel Huq Khan, Advocate—For the Appellant. Sultan Hossain Khan......nths more. The sentences are accordingly modified. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with the modification of the sentence indicated. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 211. ......nths more. The sentences are accordingly modified. In the result, the appeal is dismissed with the modification of the sentence indicated. Ed. The Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) 211. ......Mahmud Hossain CJ Ahsanuddin Chowdhury J Kemaluddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Yusuf Sk. alias Sk Abu Yusuf.................................Appellant. Vs. Appellate Tribu­nal and another............................... Respondent. Judgment A..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 70

Punjab Ali Pramanik and others Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain, 1976, 5 CLC (AD)

.... cream He Bank Ltd. Vs. SardarKishan Singh, AIR 1963 Pun. 230; Income Tax, AIR 1955 S.C. 74 ; Shyamlal Vs Jagannath, AIR 1969 Cal 424; Fhtcrotts case (1883) 21 Ch. 519 (CA.); Abdur Rahim Vs. Syed Abu Md. Bark at AH LR55 IA 96—32 CWN 482-AIR 1928 ' P.C 16— ILR Cal. 519 ; Asmatunnessa Begum Vs. As......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ......er to set aside the sale. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 29 DLR (SC) (1977) 185. ......risdiction (Civil) Present: AB Mahmud Husain CJ Ahsanuddin Choudhury J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Punjab Ali Pramanik and others.................Appellants. Vs. Mohd. Mokarram Hossain... ……………….Respondents Judgment March 4, 1976. Re..

Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 118

Abul Hayat Choudhury Vs. Nurul Amin and ors., 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

.... Judgment                 December 8, 1976.  Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Md. Abdur Rouf, Advocate Khademul Islam Chowdhury, instructed by A. Rab-II Advocate-on-Record- For ......pondent Nos. 13, 14 and 15 is set aside, but the order relating to the election of Respondent No. 2 is not interfered with Respondent No. 1 shall bear the costs of this appeal.  Ed. ......nbsp;            December 8, 1976.  Lawyers Involved: Khondkar Mahbubuddin Ahmad, Md. Abdur Rouf, Advocate Khademul Islam Chowdhury, instructed by A. Rab-II Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. T.H. Khan, S......ddin Hossain J Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J           Abul Hayat Choudhury ......................................Appellant Vs. Nurul Amin and ors...........................................Respondents Judgment..

Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 141

Mohiuddin Khan and others Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......eral provision and as such valid and lawful. The result, therefore, is that this appeal is dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Syed A.B. Mahmud Hussain CJ Debesh Chandra Bhattacharya J Fazle Munim J Mohiuddin Khan and others......................Appellants. Vs. Pakistan River Steamer Ltd. and others. ...Respondents Judgment January ..

Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 138

Akhtar Hossain Khan & others Vs. The State, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....4 affirmed—Qudrutullah VS. Bareilly Municipality, AIR 1974 SC 396; referred A. Malek vs. Abdur Rahman, (1976) 19 DLR3I8; Sona vs. State, (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 55. Lawyers Involved: Md.   Fazlul Karim, Advocate with Abul n, Advocate, instructed by B. C. Panday, ate-on-Re......which charge-sheet has been, submitted and cognizance has been taken under P.O. 50 after its repeal is' be tried by the Special Magistrate or the Special Tribunal as the case may be. Ed. ......which charge-sheet has been, submitted and cognizance has been taken under P.O. 50 after its repeal is' be tried by the Special Magistrate or the Special Tribunal as the case may be. Ed. ......C J Ahsanuddin   Choudhury J Kemaluddin Hosain J D.C. Bhattacharya J Fazle Mumin J Akhtar Hossain Khan & others .................Appellants. Vs. The State..............................................Respondent Judgment ..

Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 113

M/s Amin Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1977, 6 CLC (AD)

....e 157; Attorney General vs. Prince Ernest Augustus of Hanover, 1957 A.C. 436 same case 1957 (1) All. E.R. 49; M/s Speed Bird Navigation Company and another vs. Bangladesh in (1975) 27 D.L.R. 170; Md. Rejaul Haque vs. Bangladesh m (1976) 28 D.L.R. 38. Lawyers Involved: M.H. Khand......e of the enactment of the Basic Democracies Order. We, therefore, do not find any substance in all these appeals which are dismissed, but there shall be no order as to costs. Ed. ......ocate, with Syed Mozaffar Hossain, Advocate, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant (In all the appeals). Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Additional Attorney-General with Mahmudul Islam, Assistant  Attorney-General, instructed by A.M.A. Khan Chowdhury, Advocate-on-Record&md......………Appellant (In Appeal No. 6 of 1972).  M/s Carpet Allied Products Ltd………………. Appellant (In Appeal No. 7 of 1972). Vs. Bangladesh and another.................... Respondents in all the appeals Judgmen..

Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 244