Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4681-4700 of 6409 results.
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Abdur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 30.11.1998 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 3961 of 1996 discharging the Rule. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff respondent filed Title Suit No. 196 of 1977 in the ......erence by this court. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 129; II ADC (2005) 476; 14 MLR (AD) (2009) 147...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Mohsen Jute Mills Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Labour Court, Khulna and another, 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....respondent-appellant Mohsen Jute Mills Ltd. against the judgment and order dated 6.8.96 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 3684 of 1992 discharging the Rule. 2. Respondent No. 2 was a permanent senior clerk of the appellant's mill. Due to ......ithout however, any order as to costs. Both the judgments of the Labour Court as well as of the High Court Division are set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 473. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 100
M/s. Shahjhan Enterprise Ltd. Vs. Meghna Petroleum Ltd. and others, 2001, 30 CLC (AD)
....n allowing the appeal and dismissing the suit. There is therefore no merit in this appeal and the same is accordingly dismissed with cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 455....... Products under defendant No. 2. It is also the case of the plaintiff that 25 years lease of Nawab Khawja Habubullah Bahadur ended on 1.3.1977 whereupon defendant No. 3 Dhaka Nawab Waqf Estate became absolute owner of the suit land and was legally entitled to rent payable by defendant Nos. 1 and 2 w..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 149
Md. Shamsul Huda Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1999, 28 CLC (AD)
....gment and decree dated 16,7.91 of the High Court Division without any order as to costs and restore those of the trial court. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 440. ......gistered through the Court. The learned subordinate Judge also found that Lala Ram Sankar and Gour Sankar had no right, title, interest and possession in the suit property and Sarna Kumari had absolute right, title interest and possession in the suit property and she entered into an agreeme..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shajahan, 1999, 28 CLC (AD)
....of Settlement by its judgment and order dated 4.11.92 dismissed the case on the finding that the property was rightly enlisted as abandoned property. 5. Both the writ petitioners obtained a Rule Nisi in their respective writ petition. The learned Judges of the High Court Division made the......y was rightly enlisted as abandoned property. 5. Both the writ petitioners obtained a Rule Nisi in their respective writ petition. The learned Judges of the High Court Division made the Rule absolute by a common Judgment and order dated 9.7.1993 holding in so far as writ petition No. 648 o..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23
Most. Hamida Vs. Md. Majibur Rahman , 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....ected against the judgment and order dated 17.04.1995 passed by a Single Judge of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 842 of 1990, under section 25 of the Small Cause Courts Act, making the Rule absolute and consequent thereupon setting aside the judgment and decree dated 14.04.90 passed b...... against the judgment and order dated 17.04.1995 passed by a Single Judge of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 842 of 1990, under section 25 of the Small Cause Courts Act, making the Rule absolute and consequent thereupon setting aside the judgment and decree dated 14.04.90 passed by the..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Export Promotion Bureau and another Vs. Md. Nazmul Hossain and others, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....ation to refund all his entitlements, back wages with other allowances to which the writ petitioner is legally entitled. 3. Respondent No. 1 as the writ petitioner prayed for issuance of the Rule before the High Court Division upon writ respondents to show cause as to why the order passed......owances. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 5.8.1999 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 112 of 1999 making the rule absolute and declaring the dismissal order of the writ respondent No. 1 dated 7.11.1990 (Annexure-G..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 105
Chairman, B.R.T.C. Vs. Nooruddin & Ors., 1998, 27 CLC (AD)
....oration, from three separate judgment and order, all dated 12.5.96, passed by a Division bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 1585, 1586 and 1587 of 1994 respectively making Rules Nisi absolute. The main judgment was passed in Writ Petition No. 1587 of 1984 out of which ar......om three separate judgment and order, all dated 12.5.96, passed by a Division bench of the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 1585, 1586 and 1587 of 1994 respectively making Rules Nisi absolute. The main judgment was passed in Writ Petition No. 1587 of 1984 out of which arises Civil ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Bangladesh Vs. Chowdhury Tanbir Ahmed Siddiky, 1997, 26 CLC (AD)
....e suit. 11. Against the said order the plaintiff preferred Civil Revision No. 896 of 1973. By the impugned judgment and order a learned Single Judge of the High Court Division made the Rule absolute in part and set aside the order of abatement in so far as recording abatement of the ......t. 11. Against the said order the plaintiff preferred Civil Revision No. 896 of 1973. By the impugned judgment and order a learned Single Judge of the High Court Division made the Rule absolute in part and set aside the order of abatement in so far as recording abatement of the whole..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Hussain Muhammad Ershad Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2000, 29 CLC (AD)
....ng to China at the invitation of the Chairman of the Communist Party and he filed Writ Petition No. 4259 of 1999 challenging that order of impounding his passport and the High Court Division issued a Rule Nisi which was made absolute on contest on 1.3.2000 declaring the order of seizure of the passp......tion of the Chairman of the Communist Party and he filed Writ Petition No. 4259 of 1999 challenging that order of impounding his passport and the High Court Division issued a Rule Nisi which was made absolute on contest on 1.3.2000 declaring the order of seizure of the passport as illegal, mala fide..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 208
Monzur Rahman Khan Vs. Mst. Tahera Parvin and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....d decision of the court of appeal below the respondent No. 1 as petitioner filed Civil Revision No. 492 of 1986 before the High Court Division, who by its judgment and order dated 29.7.93 made the Rule absolute. 3. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order dated 29.7.93 the......ision of the court of appeal below the respondent No. 1 as petitioner filed Civil Revision No. 492 of 1986 before the High Court Division, who by its judgment and order dated 29.7.93 made the Rule absolute. 3. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order dated 29.7.93 the pres..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Mossammat Khursheda Jahan Vs. Jahan Syada Shafinaz and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....xecuted in favour of the pre-emptee appellants. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is Also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 365. ...... Court concurrently dismissed the miscellaneous case. In revision by the pre-emptor respondents a Single Judge of the High Court Division reversed the concurrent judgment and the rule was made absolute. 7. Leave was granted to consider whether the pre-emptor respondents being parties ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Sufia Khatun Vs. Amin Hossin Mondal and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....gainst the judgment and order dated February 5, 1997 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 59 of 1986 (Jessore)/Civil Revision No. 6061 of 1991 (Dhaka) making the Rule absolute and thereupon dismissing the suit upon reversing the judgment and decree dated Septem......t the judgment and order dated February 5, 1997 of a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 59 of 1986 (Jessore)/Civil Revision No. 6061 of 1991 (Dhaka) making the Rule absolute and thereupon dismissing the suit upon reversing the judgment and decree dated September 3..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Dr. Md. Rashidul Islam Vs. Morsheda Parveen, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... M. Ruhul Amin J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.11.2001 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2519 of 2000 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff filed Family Court Suit No. 100 of 199......uhul Amin J.- This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 14.11.2001 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 2519 of 2000 making the Rule absolute. 2. Short facts are that the plaintiff filed Family Court Suit No. 100 of 1998 und..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 161
Md. Akkas Ali Biswas and others Vs. Ashit Kumar Mojumder and others, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....charging the rule obtained against Order No. 15 dated 09.07.1998 passed in Title Suit No. 152 of 1997 of the Court of Senior Assistant Judge, Rajbari, rejecting the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 2. The facts, in brief, are that the respondent Nos.......rtgage. Against the aforesaid judgment and order of the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) the appellants moved the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 1465 of 1991 and the rule was made absolute declaring the order of the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) to be without lawful ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Begum Khodeza Akhter Vs. Hajera Khatun & ors., 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
....limitation and other as to partial pre-emption, have been finally decided in favour of the Pre-emptors. No order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 212. ......limitation and other as to partial pre-emption, have been finally decided in favour of the Pre-emptors. No order as to costs. Ed This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 212. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Reazuddin & ors. Vs. Jatindra Kishore Malaker and others, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... High Court Division is set aside and that of the lower Appellate Court is restored. There will no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 202. ......t the aforesaid decision of the learned Subordinate Judge, the respondents filed a revisional application before the High Court Division, Dhaka Bench, and obtained a rule which was ultimately made absolute. A Single Judge of the Dhaka Bench set aside the judgments and orders of the Courts below ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Syed Amir Hossain Vs. Mrs. Nadera Rahman, 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
....e set aside and that of the District Judge is restored. In the circumstances of the case we however do not make any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 184.......e set aside and that of the District Judge is restored. In the circumstances of the case we however do not make any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 184...Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Md. Ebadullah Bepari Vs. Nikhil Chandra Das, 1985, 14 CLC (AD)
....rt rejecting the application under Order IX, rule 13 C.P.C. The appeal is therefore dismissed. We however make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 174. ......rt rejecting the application under Order IX, rule 13 C.P.C. The appeal is therefore dismissed. We however make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 174. ..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Ali Jan Khan & others Vs. Bangladesh, 1984, 13 CLC (AD)
.... that no contempt had been committed and the petition is therefore dismissed. The order of this court dated 31.10.84 is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 37 DLR (AD) (1985) 161.......onformity with law" and concluded that in the plaint no such case have been made out for coming to a decision that the purpose was not a public purpose. In this view of the matter the rule was made absolute and the judgment of the appellate Court below was set aside and those of the learned Munsif..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
32433242324032373236323532343233323232303228322732263225322432213218321532133210