Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4721-4740 of 5664 results.
Md. Mohirruddin Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Mohirruddin............................................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment May 8, 200......ion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Mohirruddin............................................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment&nb..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Matiur Rahman Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....J Matiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- For Respondents ...... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......atiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayum, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- For Respondents Judg......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Matiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Jashimuddin & other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e State.........................................................Respondent Judgment January 31, 2006. Lawyers Involved: A.M. Mahbuddin Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner Not represented- Respondent&nb...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judg..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Alimuzzaman Khan Vs. Mohammad Golam Kibria, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ M.M. Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Alimuzzaman Khan...............................Petitioner Vs Mohammad Golam K......aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... that has been rightly done…………………..(7 & 8) Cases Referred to- Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury 29 DLR (SC) 41; M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. vs. M/S. A.R.A.G. Ltd. 28 DLR (AD) 76. ......laim damages for the breach of contract committed by the employer. In this connection, the High Court Division relied on the decisions in the case of Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury reported in 29 DLR (SC) 41 and the case of M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. V..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....l. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......ta Kumar Bepari vs. Jamini Mohan Das and others 4 DLR, 487. Chapala Sundari Devi vs. Wahed Ali and others 11 DLR, 376. Lawyers Involved: Jainal Abedin, Deputy Attorney General, instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. Ex parte- the Respondent. ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. Judgment June 20, 2005. Cas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ules, 1988, is not maintainable. Lawyers Involved: S. M. Zillul Haque, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For respondent No.1. Not represen......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ...... is not maintainable. Lawyers Involved: S. M. Zillul Haque, Senior Advocate, instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For respondent No.1. Not represented- For re......ainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
M Sahabuddin Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered in the application for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. For all the above reasons, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Firoz Shah, Advocate-on- Record— For the Appellant. TH Khan, Senior Advocate, (Mr. Ajmalul Hossain, QC Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Mr. Mvi Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—Fo......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Mustafizur Rahman....................Appellant vs Md. Amjad Hossain................Respondent Judgment October 24, 2005. Cases R......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......llate Division (Civil) Present: Md Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Mustafizur Rahman....................Appellant vs Md. Amjad Hossain................Respondent Judgment October 24, 2005. Cases Referred to......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; March 21st, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional A......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......ate and another... .........Respondents Judgment March 21st, 2006 Lawyers Involved: Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zah......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ......adesh vs Md Azizur Rahman 46 DLR (AD) 19; Sharfat Ali vs Union of India AIR 1974 SC 1631; CB Boarding and Lodging vs Mysore AIR 1970 SC 2042; Kashabananda Bharati vs State of Kerala AIR 1973 SC 1461; Anwar Hossain Chowdhury vs Government of Bangladesh and ors 41 DLR (AD) 165; Madras vs Chamapakan Do......gladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents Judgment July 19, 2005. Result: The petitions are dismissed. Cases Referred to- Dr Ahmed Hossain vs Bangladesh and others 44 DLR (AD) 109; Smt. Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narayan AIR 1975 SC 2275......Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Farida Akhter and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: Ozair Farooq, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 2002. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
State Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....guilty of the offence……………………………(13) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General (Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney-General with him) instructed by Md. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Abdul Baset Majumder, Senior Advo......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ...... (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Re..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 184
Capt. (Retd.) B. Akram Ahmed Khan Vs. BD Oil, Gas & Mineral Resources Corpn. & or, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n No. 400 of 2003 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 126. ......is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs, the connected Civil Petition No. 400 of 2003 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 126. ...... Mineral Resources Corporation & other...........Respondents Judgment August 17, 2003. Cases Referred To- Mosharraf Hossain Chowdhury vs General Manager, Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution Co Ltd and another 1......n (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J MM Ruhul Amin J Capt. (Retd) B Akram Ahmed Khan Chowdhury ...........Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Resources Corporation & other...........Respondents ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Election Commission Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... ......In both the Appeals] Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others.........Respondents [In CA No. 54 of 2006] Judgment May 23, 2006. Cases Referred To- Anwar Hossain vs Bangladesh, 1989 BLD (Spl) 1 paragraph 324; ATM Ali Reza Khan vs Election Commissi......h the Appeals] Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others.........Respondents [In CA No. 54 of 2006] Judgment May 23, 2006. Cases Referred To- Anwar Hossain vs Bangladesh, 1989 BLD (Spl) 1 paragraph 324; ATM Ali Reza Khan vs Election Commission 50 ......hul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Election Commission......................Appellant [In both the Appeals] Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others.........Respondents [In CA No. 54 of 2006]..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Aynul Sheikh and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ach, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
AKM Shamsuddin alias Kalam Doctor and other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ......ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ......ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ......ave perused the impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division and on the reasons stated above we do not find any error therein. The criminal petition is therefore dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 46
Anwar Hossain Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....1 Federation of Pak vs. Tamijuddin Khan; 7 DLR (FC); 9 DLR (SC) 177, 178; 18 DLR (SC) 69; 32 DLR (AD) 233 Bangladesh vs. Hazi Abdul Gani; 17 DLR (SC) 384 Shamsuddin vs. Capt.Gauhar 1 Ayub; 35 DLR 362 Md. Mustafa Mandal Vs. State; 41 DLR 395 Nurul Huda vs. Baharuddin; 26 DLR (SC) 17; 34 DLR (AD) 110 ......D (Special Issue) 1, 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 165. ......cial Issue) 1, 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 165. ...... (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Anwar Hossain Chowdhury.................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1988) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry o..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 1934
Mizazul Islam @ Dablu Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....venge. The informant found one pair of plastic sandal in the room of his parents which belonged to accused Dablu. The informant raised alarm whereupon neighbour Professor Waned Anwarul Kader (P.W.1), Md. Hashem Air (P.W. 14), Md. Khizir Ahmed (P.W.5) and Professor Harun-or-Rashid (P.W. 13) and many ......out a threat to take revenge. The informant found one pair of plastic sandal in the room of his parents which belonged to accused Dablu. The informant raised alarm whereupon neighbour Professor Waned Anwarul Kader (P.W.1), Md. Hashem Air (P.W. 14), Md. Khizir Ahmed (P.W.5) and Professor Harun-or-Ras......1898), sections 164 & 342 It is in the confessional statement that Dablu stated that he along with Fiktoo and Sukkur went to commit the crime. In the confessional statement of Fiktoo @ Zahurul Hossain he stated that Dablu and Sukkur inflicted dagger blows on Nurul Islam and his wife. In the c......here Supreme Court Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M H Rahman J ATM Afzal J Mizazul Islam @ Dablu.......Appellant Vs. The State......................... Respondents Judgment January 22, 1989. Result: ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Abul Kashem and others Vs. State, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
....nce is set aside. They are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 152......nce is set aside. They are acquitted and it is directed that they be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in connection with any other case. Ed.This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 152......facts and circumstances of the case………………(9 & 12) Lawyers Involved: S.S. Haider, Senior Advocate instructed by Ranesh Chandra Maitra, Advocate-on-Record — For the Appellants. B. Hossain, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by M.R. Khan, Advocate-on-Record — For the Responde......urt Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Abul Kashem and others............. Appellants Vs. The State……………………………………Respondent Judgment January 30, 198..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 57
19311930192219191915191419121911191019081907190519031901190018981897189518941892