Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Government of Bangladesh Vs. A. S. M. Firoj Uddin Bhuiyan, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d. ......being dead his heirs Mrs Rosey Firoz and others……... ........Respondents Judgement February 10, 2004. Case Referred to- Central London Property Trust Ltd Vs. High Trees House Ltd, 1974 QB 130. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additio...... 16. In view of the above we do not find any substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ouse Ltd, 1974 QB 130. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney General instructed by B. Hossain, Advocate -on-Record- For the Appellants Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by A.K.M. Shahidul Huq, Advocate- on- Record- For Respondents. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Moksed Ali Mondal Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....greement. The plaintiff surrendered his possession of 'Ka' schedule properties situated in India infavour of Ghose brothers who also gave possession of 'Kha' schedule properties to the plaintiff in Bangladesh in pursuance of the contract. But when the plaintiff came to this country on query he le......Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Moksed Ali Mondal being dead his heirs Md. Abdul Mannan and others...Appellants. Vs. Abdus Samad Mondal and others…………..........Respondents. ......gment and decree passed by the Court of appeal decreeing the plaintiff's suit and this requires interference by us. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......gement May 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved: A J Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on–Record- For the Appellants Shahid Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on- Record- For Respondent No.1 E..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 12 BLD (AD) 247; Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 20 BLD (AD) 278; Sreemati Pushpa Rani Das and another Vs. A.K.M. Habibur Rahman a......ip;…….....Appellant Vs M.M. Nurussafa and others .........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 12 BLD (AD) 247; Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 20......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer Bangladesh Railway Vs. A.P.M. Basher, Advocate & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ere is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
A.N.M. Gaziul Azim Vs. M.A. Kader and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......….....Petitioner Vs M.A. Kader and others..........................Respondents. Judgement January 1, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Khandhker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Mustafa Niaz Muhammad, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Mohammad Naw..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others Vs. Kad Banu and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others…………Appellants Vs. Kad Banu and others........Respondents Judgement February 17, 2004. ...... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......the plaintiff. The appellate court further observed that in the plaint there is mention of only one settlement alleged to have been taken on 2nd of Poush, 1340 B.S. from the Estate of Khan Bahadur Ahmed Hossain Chowdhury and his group and of no other settlement and there is also nothing no recor..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ellip;………………………………………..Appellant Versus Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondent......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ...... Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondents Judgement: July 31, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Saiah Uddin Ahmed, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellant. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Sonali Bank Vs. Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
......Appellant Vs Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others…………….........Respondents Judgement June 27, 2004. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Railway Vs. M/s. Sinaf Racht Chartering and Ship Broking Corporation, 5 BLD (AD) 115. ......Vs Md. Sirajul Hoque Chowdhury and others…………….........Respondents Judgement June 27, 2004. Case Referred to- Bangladesh Railway Vs. M/s. Sinaf Racht Chartering and Ship Broking Corporation, 5 BLD (AD) 115. Lawyers Involv......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ......has quite legally filed the suit impleading the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 as the defendants along with others. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... This Case is also Reported in: ......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh………....Appellant Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others............Respondents Judgement June 21, 2005. Case Referr......gh Court Division are set aside. The judgment and decree passed by (he Additional District Judge, Rangpur is restored. Consequently the suit stands dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... given pattan to one Rahim Uddin at a Jama of Taka 9.78 annas. The plaintiffs predecessor Abdur Rahman being in possession settled 4.00 acres of land to one Abid Ali and 3.22 acres to one Emad Uddin Ahmed and put them in possession thereof; that thereafter the said Abdur Rahman, died leaving behin..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 156
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ns made in the judgment. As against that order dated 26.1.2003 accused petitioner filed Criminal Revision No. 546 of 2003 before a Division Bench of the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh and their lordships by judgment and order dated 17.6.2003 rejected the said criminal rev......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
University of Rajshahi Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......have no respect for the ethics and values of the profession. In the background of the aforesaid discussions the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 15,000/-. Ed. ......45. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdul Jabbar, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Ajmalul Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by M. Khaled Ahmed, Advocate-on-Record- For the Respondent No. 1. Not represented- For the Respondent Nos..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Robert Pinaru Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....out of that 14 decimals were acquired by C & B Department and thereupon he remained owner and possessor of 27 decimals of land. It was further averred that during the war of liberation he left Bangladesh and in his absence structures including dwelling house in the land in suit were destroye...... (2004) 421. ......he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ......he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
State Vs. Khandker Zillul Bari and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.- Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 1998 has been preferred by the State represented by the Solicitor to the Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh against the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division on 9th April, 1996in Cr......, 77. ......gainst them. In default, the District Magistrate concerned shall take step for effecting their arrest to undergo the sentences. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 26 BLD (AD) 2006, 77. ......ahbub Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Azra Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent. [In Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 1998]. Abdul Malek, Senior Advocate, (Khandker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate, with him) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Res..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 129
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-op......m J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, and others.....Petitioners. Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder...................................Respondent Judgment ......ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ......ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Md. Faruque Reza and another Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Hossain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Faruque Reza and another..............Petitioners. Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others.................Respondents. Judgment M......is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others.................Respondents. Judgment March7, 2004 Cases Referred to- Shawkat vs. Bhimeshwari, AIR 1978 SC 528. Aftab Ahmed vs. Moinuddin Zaigirdar and another, 46 DLR 173. Lawyers Involved: Mrs. Sufia Kh..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
State Vs. Omar Ahmed, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in transferring the case from Druta Bichar Tribunal, Barisal to Khulna. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. ...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.M. Ruhul Amin J The State……………………..Appellant Vs. Omar Ahmed……………..Respondent. Judgment D...... are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in transferring the case from Druta Bichar Tribunal, Barisal to Khulna. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.M. Ruhul Amin J The State……………………..Appellant Vs. Omar Ahmed……………..Respondent. Judgment December 6, 2007..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation And Others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....zlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq……………………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation and Others………..Respondent Judgment ...... Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq……………………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation and Others………..Respondent Ju...... The appeal is allowed with the aforesaid direction to the Respondents. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 21. ...... The appeal is allowed with the aforesaid direction to the Respondents. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 21. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Alauddin Bhuiyan (Md) Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nd the allegations leveled against him. 7. In view of above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nd the allegations leveled against him. 7. In view of above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nd the allegations leveled against him. 7. In view of above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......maining Government money amounting to Taka 1, 25, 113.87 by abusing his official position as Nazir and thereby committed criminal breach of trust. On the basis of the aforesaid allegation, Foyezuddin Ahmed, Assistant Inspector of Anticorruption Bureau, Kishoreganj, lodged FIR with Tarail Police St..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 90
Sahera Khatun & others Vs. Abdur Rahim SK and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....try. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 21. ......1) 21. ......try. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 21. ......ur Lal Rudra Partab Narain Singh AIR 1926 PC 100; Malik Fateh Khan vs Nazibullah Khan 9 DLR WP 40; SM Lutfullah vs Bibi Badrunnessa 20 DLR 1019; Ajit Kumar Sarkar vs Radhakanta Sarkar 44 DLR 533; Nur Ahmed vs Kalimuddin Ahmed 1987 BCR (AD) 152; Chitta Ranjan Das alias Chitta Ranjan Sinha vs Shashi M..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48