Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4761-4780 of 5793 results.
Enamul Huq and another Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... 16. In view of the discussion above, we are of view that the High Court Division was well justified in dismissing the appeal. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......(Criminal) Present : Md. Ruhul Amin J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Enamul Huq and another..........................................Petitioner Vs. The State...........................Respondent Judgment February 1, 2005 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Mohirruddin Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ......e find that the view taken by the High Court Division is a correct one. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 420. ......ion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Mohirruddin............................................... Petitioner Vs. Md. Nazir Hossain Patwary & others ...................Respondents Judgment&nb..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Matiur Rahman Vs. Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... holder in the suit land. 7. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 8. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Matiur Rahman....................... Petitioner Vs. Habibur Rahman and others .......Respondents Lawyers Involved: Abdul Quayu..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 24
Md. Abdur Razzaque Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ter, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ...... 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ......ter, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Counsel for petitioner. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 416. ...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Abdur Razzaque............................................... Petitioner Vs. The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission Secretariat, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, ..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Jashimuddin & other Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......f the accused Liakat under the surveillance of the accused Absar at village Betchari under P.S. Rangunia. He further stated that under the command of the Superintendent of Police of Chittagong, Mr. Abdur Rouf, they along with the accused Jashim and Abu Taher went to the house of the khala of the......sion upon correct assessment of the materials on record arrived at a correct decision and we find no cogent reason to interfere with the same. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Jashimuddin & other.....................................Petitioners Vs. The State.........................................................Respondent Judg..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
Md. Alimuzzaman Khan Vs. Mohammad Golam Kibria, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......aterials on record arrived at a correct decision. We find no cogent reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......laim damages for the breach of contract committed by the employer. In this connection, the High Court Division relied on the decisions in the case of Bangladesh Small Industries Corporation, Dhaka Vs. Mahbub Hossain Chowdhury reported in 29 DLR (SC) 41 and the case of M/S. Amin Jute Mills Ltd. V..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 82
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Osimuddin, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ...... the discussion made hereinabove we find no merit in this appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011)119. ......ivil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Forest, Secretariat Building, Dhaka and others ..........Appellants. Vs. Md. Osimuddin................................Respondent. Judgment June 20, 2005. Cas..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......e Supreme Court of Bangladesh (Appellate Division) Rules 1988 and therefore is not maintainable. Consequently, the Review Petition merits no consideration and accordingly it is dismissed. Ed. ......ainur Reza Chowdhury CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J Azizullah @ Azizur Rahman.......................Petitioned Vs. Abu Taher Chowdhury and others…….........Respondents Judgment ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Badsha Miah (Md) Vs. Sonali Bank and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... June 15th, 2004. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate, instructed by Firoz Shall, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant. Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by M Khaled Ahmed, Advocate- on-Record......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......cisions arrived at by the Administrative Appellate Tribunal and, as such, we find no substance in this appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Bangladesh Vs. AKM Enayetullah, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ......t aside and we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed with observation made hereinabove. No order is made as to cost. Ed. ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Mustafizur Rahman Vs. Md. Amjad Hossain, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the suit. 20. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Abdul Mazid Khan (Md) Advocate Vs. State and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ...... Lawyers Involved: Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (Mahbubey Alam, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Chowdhury Md. Zahangir, Advocate-on-Record— For the Petitioner. Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Recor......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ......g the needful in accordance with law, who is directed to inform this Court through the Registrar of the Supreme Court as to the action taken in the matter within 3 months from date. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Farida Akhter and others Vs. Bangladesh, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....d others 44 DLR (AD) 109; Smt. Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narayan AIR 1975 SC 2275; Jibendra Kishora vs Province of East Pakistan, 9 DLR (SC) 21; Jalan Trading Company vs Mill Mazdoar Sabha AIR 1967 SC 69; Sheikh Abdus Sattar vs Returning Officer and others 41 DLR (AD) 30; Bangladesh vs Md Azizur Rahman 4......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ......ng the cause of democracy through a process which could not be termed as undemocratic. In the result, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 11 MLR (AD) (2006) 237. ......Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Farida Akhter and others.........................Petitioners Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Cabinet Division & others .........Respondents..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 221
Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sent: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J Majid Sheikh alias Majid and others... ............Appellants vs State……&hell......unishment. 8. He further submits that in the aforesaid confessional statement he involved other co-accused appellants and also there is corroborative evidence of the witnesses including PW 9 Abdur Rahim, PW 12 Amir Mridha and PW 13 Abdul Barek and, as such, according to the learned Deputy......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ......if not wanted in any other connection. The appeal so far as of remaining three appellants: namely, (1) Majid Sheikh alias Majid, (2) Manik Sarder and (3) Zinnah Sarder is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 36
State Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ...... bail after being satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused respondent is not guilty of the offence……………………………(13) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General (Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney-General with him) ins......e set aside. In view of the discussion made above, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court Division is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in:11 MLR (AD) 2006, 203. ...... (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul K Chowdhury J State………………………………………………………...Appellant Vs. Muhibur Rahman Manik and another………… Respondents Judgment March 28, 2006. Re..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 184
Ali Akbar (Md) Vs. Shajirannessa Bewa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......r Class Suit No. 53 of 1995 decreeing the same. The suit was filed seeking a decree for specific performance of contract for sale of land. 2. The suit was filed stating, inter alia, that Md Abdur Rashid, maternal grandfather of the plaintiff, proposed to sell the land in respect whereof d......s Suit No. 53 of 1995 decreeing the same. The suit was filed seeking a decree for specific performance of contract for sale of land. 2. The suit was filed stating, inter alia, that Md Abdur Rashid, maternal grandfather of the plaintiff, proposed to sell the land in respect whereof decree ......nsidered unsustainable. 14. In the background of our discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 26
Capt. (Retd.) B. Akram Ahmed Khan Vs. BD Oil, Gas & Mineral Resources Corpn. & or, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs, the connected Civil Petition No. 400 of 2003 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 126. ......is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs, the connected Civil Petition No. 400 of 2003 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 126. ......is accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs, the connected Civil Petition No. 400 of 2003 is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 28 BLD (AD) 2008, 126. ......n (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Abu Sayeed Ahmed J MM Ruhul Amin J Capt. (Retd) B Akram Ahmed Khan Chowdhury ...........Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Oil, Gas and Mineral Resources Corporation & other...........Respondents ..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Election Commission Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on, as above, in the findings and observations/ directives given by the High Court Division in the impugned judgment and order. The parties will bear their respective costs. Ed. ......on, as above, in the findings and observations/ directives given by the High Court Division in the impugned judgment and order. The parties will bear their respective costs. Ed. ......on, as above, in the findings and observations/ directives given by the High Court Division in the impugned judgment and order. The parties will bear their respective costs. Ed. ......hul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul K Chowdhury J Election Commission......................Appellant [In both the Appeals] Vs. Alhaj Advocate Md. Rahmat Ali, MP and others.........Respondents [In CA No. 54 of 2006]..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 159
Aynul Sheikh and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ch. Ed. ......vs State.................................Respondents Judgement July 19, 2005. Lawyers Involved: Md Nawab All, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. Abdur Rouf, Deputy Attorney-General, instructed by Mvi Md Wahidullah, Advocate-on- Record—Fo......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ......Code and they are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 (ten) years each and to pay a fine of Taka 5,000 each, in default, to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 (one) year each. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Anwar Hossain Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh, 1989, 18 CLC (AD)
.... the Ministry of Law and Justice, Bangladesh Secretariat, P.S. Ramna, Dhaka & other ………………………………………........ Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 43 of 1988) Ibrahim Sheikh.......................Petitioner (In Civil Petition No. 3 of 1989) Vs. Bangladesh, re......Petition No. 3 of 1989 is disposed of in terms of this Order. 6. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1989) BLD (Special Issue) 1, 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 165. ......Petition No. 3 of 1989 is disposed of in terms of this Order. 6. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1989) BLD (Special Issue) 1, 41 DLR (AD) (1989) 165. ...... (Civil) Present: Badrul Haider Chowdhury J Shahabuddin Ahmed J M.H. Rahman J A.T.M. Afzal J Anwar Hossain Chowdhury.................Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 42 of 1988) Vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry o..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 1934
19321931193019291922191919151914191319111910190819071905190319021901190018981895