Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 461-480 of 614 results.
Mrs. Bakul Akter Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
.... that case she will be liable. With these observations, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 18 BLT (AD) (2010) 282, 7 LG (AD) (2010) 101, 31 BLD (AD) (2011) 33. ......ion summarily filed under Article 102 of the Constitution. 2. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are that the Agrani Bank Limited filed a suit under the provisions of the Artho Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, against M/S. Oyester Fashion Limited and others, praying for a decree for Tk. ......summarily filed under Article 102 of the Constitution. 2. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are that the Agrani Bank Limited filed a suit under the provisions of the Artho Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, against M/S. Oyester Fashion Limited and others, praying for a decree for Tk. 1,90...... (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim CJ Md. Abdul Matin J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Mrs. Bakul Akter………………………Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others……………………….Respondents Judgment March 10, 2010. Lawyers Involved..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Md. Nurul Abedin Vs. Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....ay without having decree from court. Even the hire purchase deed itself does not empower respondents to sell those valuable assets of the petitioner in a managed auction under Sections 12 and 33 of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. 5. The Managing partner of the petitioner Md. Liaquat Ali subsequ......hout having decree from court. Even the hire purchase deed itself does not empower respondents to sell those valuable assets of the petitioner in a managed auction under Sections 12 and 33 of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. 5. The Managing partner of the petitioner Md. Liaquat Ali subsequently ...... having decree from court. Even the hire purchase deed itself does not empower respondents to sell those valuable assets of the petitioner in a managed auction under Sections 12 and 33 of Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003. 5. The Managing partner of the petitioner Md. Liaquat Ali subsequently surr......nha J Md. Nurul Abedin……………….Petitioner (In both the cases) Vs Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Industry, Police Station-Motijheel 1, Dhaka-1000 and others….......Respondents (In Civil Petition No.832 of 2009) Judgment January 6,..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 29
S. Co. Power Plant Ltd. Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others , 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....hat the petitioners filed the aforesaid writ petition and obtained rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause why the order dated 6.7.2008 attaching the property of the petitioners by the Artha Rin Adalat and the proceeding of the execution proceeding in Artha Rin Execution Case No.471 o......e petitioners filed the aforesaid writ petition and obtained rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause why the order dated 6.7.2008 attaching the property of the petitioners by the Artha Rin Adalat and the proceeding of the execution proceeding in Artha Rin Execution Case No.471 of 2008......titioners filed the aforesaid writ petition and obtained rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause why the order dated 6.7.2008 attaching the property of the petitioners by the Artha Rin Adalat and the proceeding of the execution proceeding in Artha Rin Execution Case No.471 of 2008 sho......Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J S. Co. Power Plant Ltd., represented by its Managing Director Md. Sirajul Haque and another ...Petitioners Vs Government of Bangladesh and others ..........Responde..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Jalaluddin Ahmed and others Vs. Md. Selim Hossain and others, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....king the rule absolute reversing those dated 24th May, 2006 of the District Judge, Narayangonj in Civil Revision No.37 of 2006, who by judgment and order dated 23rd January, 2006 reversed that of the Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj in Miscellaneous Case No. 23 of 2005. 2. The Rupali bank Limite......he rule absolute reversing those dated 24th May, 2006 of the District Judge, Narayangonj in Civil Revision No.37 of 2006, who by judgment and order dated 23rd January, 2006 reversed that of the Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj in Miscellaneous Case No. 23 of 2005. 2. The Rupali bank Limited inst......ule absolute reversing those dated 24th May, 2006 of the District Judge, Narayangonj in Civil Revision No.37 of 2006, who by judgment and order dated 23rd January, 2006 reversed that of the Artha Rin Adalat, Narayangonj in Miscellaneous Case No. 23 of 2005. 2. The Rupali bank Limited institut...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Jalaluddin Ahmed and others...................Petitioners Vs. Md. Selim Hossain and others...............Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Tanvir Ul Islam Vs. General Manger, Credit Information Bureau, Bangladesh Bank, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ly misconceived. The petitioner being director of the companies comes within the mischief of Section 5(Ga Ga) and 27 Ka Ka of the Act, 1991. The definition of loan as provided in Section 2 of the Artha Rin Ain, 2003 (shortly, the Ain) also includes a guarantor. Thus, it is clear that the legisla......conceived. The petitioner being director of the companies comes within the mischief of Section 5(Ga Ga) and 27 Ka Ka of the Act, 1991. The definition of loan as provided in Section 2 of the Artha Rin Ain, 2003 (shortly, the Ain) also includes a guarantor. Thus, it is clear that the legislature i...... report has been prepared accordingly. We find substance in this submission. Accordingly these leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: VII (ADC) (2010) 197....... Md. Abdul Aziz J Tanvir Ul Islam……………Petitioner (In all cases) Vs. General Manger, Credit Information Bureau, Bangladesh Bank, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka-1000 and others…………..Respondents (In Civil Petition No. 540 of 2009) Judgment Apri..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 216
....d. Abdul Matin J
Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J
ABM Khairul Haque J
Dr. S. M. Eunus Ali, Free Friday Clinic …………..Petitioner
Vs.
Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Second Court of Bagerhat and another……………….Respondents
Judgment......ul Matin J
Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J
ABM Khairul Haque J
Dr. S. M. Eunus Ali, Free Friday Clinic …………..Petitioner
Vs.
Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Second Court of Bagerhat and another……………….Respondents
Judgment
......atin J
Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J
ABM Khairul Haque J
Dr. S. M. Eunus Ali, Free Friday Clinic …………..Petitioner
Vs.
Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Second Court of Bagerhat and another……………….Respondents
Judgment
N......
Md. Abdul Matin J
Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J
ABM Khairul Haque J
Dr. S. M. Eunus Ali, Free Friday Clinic …………..Petitioner
Vs.
Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Second Court of Bagerhat and another……………….Respondents
Judg..
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 84
....und from Narayanganj Silo while a Tanker of BIWTC dashed it near Gazaria and the accident occurred. Food Department held the carrier responsible and filed Suit No.48 of 1994 in the 3rd Commercial and Artha Rin Sub-Judge Chittagong demanding Tk. 66,39,572.70. The suit was decreed and the carrier was ......om Narayanganj Silo while a Tanker of BIWTC dashed it near Gazaria and the accident occurred. Food Department held the carrier responsible and filed Suit No.48 of 1994 in the 3rd Commercial and Artha Rin Sub-Judge Chittagong demanding Tk. 66,39,572.70. The suit was decreed and the carrier was direct...... of 1994 is a self contained order. It appears that this Court ordered that the plaintiff decree-holder will satisfy the decree of Money Suit No.48 of 1994 of the 3rd Commercial Court and Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong to the extend of Tk. 66,39,572.70 upon realization of the decretal amount from th......zul Islam J
Md. Abdul Matin J
Md. Abdul Aziz J
Director General of Food, 16 Abdul Goni Road, Dhaka-1000………….Petitioner
Vs.
Al-Falah Shipping Lines Limited and others…………….Respondents
Judgment
May 10, 2009.
Lawyers Involved:..
Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 356
Abdus Samad Sheikh and another Vs. Khaleda Begum and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....nction of further Taka 3 crore as loan facility by the Bank as assured the plaintiff sustained loss and the defendant Bank in order to realise its outstanding loan from the plaintiff industry filed Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 10 of 2006 now pending in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and the c......on of further Taka 3 crore as loan facility by the Bank as assured the plaintiff sustained loss and the defendant Bank in order to realise its outstanding loan from the plaintiff industry filed Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 10 of 2006 now pending in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and the claimed......f further Taka 3 crore as loan facility by the Bank as assured the plaintiff sustained loss and the defendant Bank in order to realise its outstanding loan from the plaintiff industry filed Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 10 of 2006 now pending in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and the claimed amo......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: MM Ruhul Amin CJ Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Abdul Aziz J Abdus Samad Sheikh and another………………….Petitioners Vs. Khaleda Begum and others...............Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 94
M/S. R.M. Salt Crushing Industries Vs. Sonali Bank, Cox's Bazar Branch & others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ment and order dated 20.11.2007 passed in Writ Petition No.4219 of 2005 by the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The writ petitioner has challenged the filing and continuation of Artha Rin Suit No.73 of 2004 now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Cox's Bazar. The Artha Rin Suit h......nd order dated 20.11.2007 passed in Writ Petition No.4219 of 2005 by the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The writ petitioner has challenged the filing and continuation of Artha Rin Suit No.73 of 2004 now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Cox's Bazar. The Artha Rin Suit has bee.......4219 of 2005 by the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The writ petitioner has challenged the filing and continuation of Artha Rin Suit No.73 of 2004 now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Cox's Bazar. The Artha Rin Suit has been filed by the respondent No.1, Sonali Bank, for rea......Advocate, instructed by Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondents Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 515 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 20.11.2007 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.4219 of 2005.) ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 136
M/s International Trade Promotors Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... CJ Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J M/s International Trade Promotors…………………......Petitioners Vs. The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka and others………..Respondents Judgment ...... Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J M/s International Trade Promotors…………………......Petitioners Vs. The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka and others………..Respondents Judgment July ...... Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J M/s International Trade Promotors…………………......Petitioners Vs. The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka and others………..Respondents Judgment July 2, 2......J Md. Abdul Matin J M/s International Trade Promotors…………………......Petitioners Vs. The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1 Dhaka and others………..Respondents Judgment July 2, 2008. Lawyers ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 191
M/S. United Leather International Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....sp; Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S. United Leather International….........Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others.......Respondents Judgment &n......sp; Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S. United Leather International….........Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others.......Respondents Judgment &n......nbsp; Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S. United Leather International….........Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others.......Respondents Judgment ......bsp; Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S. United Leather International….........Petitioner Vs. Artha Rin Adalat and others.......Respondents Judgment ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 152
Sonali Bank, Sadarghat Corporate Branch, Dhaka Vs. Mrs. Hazera Islam and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
.... the Writ Petition was filed challenging the order dated 24.9.2007 (Annexure-“D" to the Writ Petition) and order dated 22.11.2004 (Annexure "B" to the Writ Petition) passed in Artha Jari Case No. 94 of 2004 of Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka rejecting the application of the Wri......g the order dated 24.9.2007 (Annexure-“D" to the Writ Petition) and order dated 22.11.2004 (Annexure "B" to the Writ Petition) passed in Artha Jari Case No. 94 of 2004 of Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka rejecting the application of the Writ Petitioners under section 57 of the A......e order dated 24.9.2007 (Annexure-“D" to the Writ Petition) and order dated 22.11.2004 (Annexure "B" to the Writ Petition) passed in Artha Jari Case No. 94 of 2004 of Artha Rin Adalat No.4, Dhaka rejecting the application of the Writ Petitioners under section 57 of the Artha...... Present: MM Ruhul Amin CJ Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Abdul Aziz J Sonali Bank, Sadarghat Corporate Branch, Dhaka.............Appellant Vs. Mrs. Hazera Islam and others........Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Most. Rokeya Begum Vs. Dr. Md. Golam Kibria, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....e present petitioner) and Other Class Suit No. 55 of 1991 (filed by the present respondent). The appeals were ultimately heard by the learned subordinate Judge (at present Joint District Judge) and Artha Rin Adalat. Jamalpur. 7. Against the judgment and decree dated 21.04.1992 passed in o......ent petitioner) and Other Class Suit No. 55 of 1991 (filed by the present respondent). The appeals were ultimately heard by the learned subordinate Judge (at present Joint District Judge) and Artha Rin Adalat. Jamalpur. 7. Against the judgment and decree dated 21.04.1992 passed in other C......petitioner) and Other Class Suit No. 55 of 1991 (filed by the present respondent). The appeals were ultimately heard by the learned subordinate Judge (at present Joint District Judge) and Artha Rin Adalat. Jamalpur. 7. Against the judgment and decree dated 21.04.1992 passed in other Class......cate-on-Record-For the Respondent (In Civil Petition No. 354 of 2007). Not represented-The Respondent (In Civil Petition No. 514 of 2007). Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 354 and 514 of 2007. (From the judgment and order dated 08.01.2002 passed by the High Court Divi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 87
Sree Jagannath Bairagy Vs. Sree Sree Kanailal Jew Bigraha and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5583 of 2000 discharging the Rule affirming the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2000 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 221 of 1995. 2. The facts, in short, are th......passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5583 of 2000 discharging the Rule affirming the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2000 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 221 of 1995. 2. The facts, in short, are that the......ed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.5583 of 2000 discharging the Rule affirming the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2000 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Additional Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka in Title Appeal No. 221 of 1995. 2. The facts, in short, are that the re......CJ Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Abdul Aziz J Sree Jagannath Bairagy…............Petitioner Vs. Sree Sree Kanailal Jew Bigraha and others..........Respondents Judgment Ap..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 110
M/S M.M. Steel Mills Ltd & anr Vs. Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat, Ctg & anr, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....d Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S M.M. Steel Mills Limited and another….............Petitioners Vs. The Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong and another….........Respondents Judgment April ......ul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S M.M. Steel Mills Limited and another….............Petitioners Vs. The Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong and another….........Respondents Judgment April 27, 20......arim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S M.M. Steel Mills Limited and another….............Petitioners Vs. The Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat, Chittagong and another….........Respondents Judgment April 27, 2009. ...... Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Shah Abu Nayeem Mominur Rahman J M/S M.M. Steel Mills Limited and another….............Petitioners Vs. The Judge, First Artha Rin Adalat, Ch..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 99
K. M. Muzahid Islam Vs. Bangladesh, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....a Division Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The petitioner hereof filed the Writ Petition No.1426 of 2006 challenging the Order No.11 dated 05.02.2006 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court, Dhaka, in Artha Rin Execution Case No.490 of 2005 rejecting the petiti......sion Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The petitioner hereof filed the Writ Petition No.1426 of 2006 challenging the Order No.11 dated 05.02.2006 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court, Dhaka, in Artha Rin Execution Case No.490 of 2005 rejecting the petitioner's...... Bench of the High Court Division discharging the Rule. 2. The petitioner hereof filed the Writ Petition No.1426 of 2006 challenging the Order No.11 dated 05.02.2006 passed by the Artha Rin Adalat, 2nd Court, Dhaka, in Artha Rin Execution Case No.490 of 2005 rejecting the petitioner's app...... M. Muzahid Islam ………………………….Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affair of Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 and others .......Respondents..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 140
Abdul Mannan and others Vs. Borhan Uddin Chowdhury and others, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....st the aforesaid judgment and decree the plaintiff preferred Title Appeal No.120 of 1997 before the learned District Judge, Sylhet, which was heard on transfer by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Sylhet, who by the judgment and decree dated 22.7.2002 dismissed the appeal and r......e aforesaid judgment and decree the plaintiff preferred Title Appeal No.120 of 1997 before the learned District Judge, Sylhet, which was heard on transfer by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Sylhet, who by the judgment and decree dated 22.7.2002 dismissed the appeal and remande......oresaid judgment and decree the plaintiff preferred Title Appeal No.120 of 1997 before the learned District Judge, Sylhet, which was heard on transfer by the Joint District Judge and Artha Rin Adalat, Sylhet, who by the judgment and decree dated 22.7.2002 dismissed the appeal and remanded th......62. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Saiful Hoque Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....হয় ।" It is further contended that the said case was allowed on 1.4.1987 and execution case being Decree Jari Case No.9 of 1988 was started which is now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna, hence the suit is liable to be dismissed. 4. The plaintiff petition......;য় ।" It is further contended that the said case was allowed on 1.4.1987 and execution case being Decree Jari Case No.9 of 1988 was started which is now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna, hence the suit is liable to be dismissed. 4. The plaintiff petitioner th......527; ।" It is further contended that the said case was allowed on 1.4.1987 and execution case being Decree Jari Case No.9 of 1988 was started which is now pending in the Artha Rin Adalat, Pabna, hence the suit is liable to be dismissed. 4. The plaintiff petitioner therea......structed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for leave to Appeal No. 646 of 2008. (From the judgment and order dated 2.3.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Order No.1010 of 2008) ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 53
M/S M. A Salam and Co. Vs. Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....itioner filed writ petition No.4070 of 2008 stating, inter alia, that the execution case was once disposed of finally on compromise and thereafter it was again restored by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat concerned illegally and as such all the orders passed in this execution case......shy;er filed writ petition No.4070 of 2008 stating, inter alia, that the execution case was once disposed of finally on compromise and thereafter it was again restored by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat concerned illegally and as such all the orders passed in this execution case after......r filed writ petition No.4070 of 2008 stating, inter alia, that the execution case was once disposed of finally on compromise and thereafter it was again restored by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat concerned illegally and as such all the orders passed in this execution case after its ......ivision (Civil) Present: Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Abdul Aziz J M/S M A Salam and Co....................Petitioner Vs Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited represente..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Mrs. Zinnatul Ara & ors Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2009, 38 CLC (AD)
....ed in Writ Petition No. 7492 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. Facts, in brief, are that the petitioners filed the above writ petition calling in question the provisions section 12(3) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, the notice for auction sale of the properties of the petitioners publis......Writ Petition No. 7492 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. Facts, in brief, are that the petitioners filed the above writ petition calling in question the provisions section 12(3) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, the notice for auction sale of the properties of the petitioners published in...... Petition No. 7492 of 2005 discharging the Rule. 2. Facts, in brief, are that the petitioners filed the above writ petition calling in question the provisions section 12(3) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003, the notice for auction sale of the properties of the petitioners published in the...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: MM Ruhul Amin CJ Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Abdul Matin J Md. Abdul Aziz J Mrs. Zinnatul Ara and others……….............Petitioners. Vs. Government of the Peo..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 88
36163603360236003579357835763559354335323514351335103506349534943493348434763457