Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 461-480 of 1025 results.
Pubali Bank Ltd. Vs. Farzana Begum and another, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
.... Subordinate Judge (Joint District Judge), Artha Rin Adalat No. 3, Dhaka, in Title Suit No. 209 of 1990 dismissing the suit. 2. The Pubali Bank as the plaintiff, filed the above mentioned suit for realisation of loan money sanctioned under a usufructury mortgage against the defendants contending ......dge (Joint District Judge), Artha Rin Adalat No. 3, Dhaka, in Title Suit No. 209 of 1990 dismissing the suit. 2. The Pubali Bank as the plaintiff, filed the above mentioned suit for realisation of loan money sanctioned under a usufructury mortgage against the defendants contending that the defend..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 116
Sultana Jute Mills Ltd. and another Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others, 2007, 36 CLC (HCD)
....osition that the names of the petitioners have been included in the CIB Report as defaulting borrower for loan liabilities of respondent No. 3. That the instant writ petition is intended to delay the realisation of rightful claim of the bank. The petitioners liabilities were classified by the respon...... the case as stated in the petition are that the petitioner No. 1 is a company engaged in jute mills business and petitioner No. 2 is its Managing Director. Petitioner No. 1 has been enjoying various loan, overdraft and banking facilities from its banker, respondent No. 3, for the purpose of its bus..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 121
Mampower Ltd. Vs. Artha Rin Adalat No.2, Dhaka and another, 2011, 40 CLC (AD)
....tions made by the High Court Division could not be sustained and accordingly they are expunged. The petition is disposed of with the above observations. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: ...... are that the respondent No.2, Premier Bank Ltd., Elephant Road Branch, Dhaka, filed Artha Rin Suit No.439 of 2008 against Mampower Ltd. (present petitioner) and others for realization of outstanding loan of Tk.1556.30 lac only stating that it owes the plaintiff bank Tk.1492.03 lac, and the defendan..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Khodeja Begum & others Vs. Md. Sadeq Sarkar, 1994, 23 CLC (HCD)
....stitution of conjugal rights at present and in future filing of such suits. Let the records of this case be sent down immediately. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 181. ......osite party, in short, is that he married defendant No.1 by a registered kabinnama dated 5-2-1980 and they lived together as husband and wife and the marriage was consummated: the defendant No.2 took loan of Taka 3,000.00 from the plaintiff for purchase of land but the money was not repaid on demand..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 185
Abdul Jalil Munshi (Md.) Vs. Returning Officer & others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....ion is disposed of. Let a copy of this judgment/order be sent to the Returning Officer (respondent No.1) forthwith for compliance. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 179. ......97 as evidenced from Annexure-C to the petition that Sonali Bank, Goalanda Branch by their Office memo dated 5-11-97 informed the Returning Officer that Year Ali Munshi, father of the petitioner took loan (Grain loan) on 10-1-91. In the aforesaid information slip issued by the bank on which date the..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 153
....the petitioner No.1 Trust. The respondent No. 2 Janata Bank, Local Office as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 165 of 2001 in the Court of the Subordinate Judge and Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Dhaka for realisation of Taka 8,64,87,775 as on 30‑6‑01 by selling the mortgaged property impleading the p......75 as on 30‑6‑01 by selling the mortgaged property impleading the petitioners as defendant in the suit asserting, inter alia, that Messrs Delwar Pictures Ltd, an unit of defendant No. 1, obtained loan from the plaintiff bank by mortgaging the properties and also hypothecating of all machineries ..
Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 173
....f 1998.
2. The facts leading to this writ petition are that respondent No.3, Bangladesh Krishi Bank, Pirojpur branch as plaintiff instituted Artha Rin Suit No. 3 of 1998 against the petitioner for realisation of loan. The said suit was decreed ex parte and the decree-holder bank initiated Artha R......he facts leading to this writ petition are that respondent No.3, Bangladesh Krishi Bank, Pirojpur branch as plaintiff instituted Artha Rin Suit No. 3 of 1998 against the petitioner for realisation of loan. The said suit was decreed ex parte and the decree-holder bank initiated Artha Rin Decree Execu..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 107
.... case), if it is required.
The office is directed to communicate the judgment to the concerned executing Court at once.
Nazmun Ara Sultana J. - I agree.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in:
......oners case in short is that respondent No.2, Sonali Bank Ltd. as plaintiff instituted Artha Rin Suit No.182 of 1992 in the Artha Rin Adalat, Comilla against the petitioners and others for recovery of loan amounting to Tk.6, 39,608.55 (taka six lac thirty-nine thousand six hundred eight taka and pais..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Zaminur Rahman & others Vs. Bangladesh & others, 1978, 7 CLC (AD)
....h the provisions of these rules, as it may deem fit.” 12. Mr. Ishtiaq Ahmed argues that the bid money leasing out the Octroi posts is not equivalent to tax collected and this according to him is realisation of Octroi in advance and such advance realisation must be made under the authority of a ......uraged. In the above premises the appeal is dismissed but in the facts and circumstances of the case, we make no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 31 DLR (AD) (1979) 171...Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 112
Sonali Bank Vs. Mozaffor Hossain, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....h is set out below: The petitioner, Sonali Bank, as plaintiff on 2.2.1978 instituted a suit being Money Suit No.3 of 1978 in the First Court of Subordinate Judge, Barisal against the defendant for realisation of Taka 41,487.20 with cost and interest till realisation of the entire amount due under......uit was called on for hearing within the meaning of Order 9 rule 13 of the Code. The defendant Md. Mozaffar Hossain as P.W.1 gave evidence that the prayer for remission of interest and the payment of loan money on installment, having been under consideration of the plaintiff-Bank, he took adjournmen..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 80
Harunar Rashid (Md.) Vs. Subordinate Judge, (Artha Rin Adalat) Bogra and others, 1997, 26 CLC (HCD)
....strate, 1st Class, Bogra stating that he would pay off the said amount with interest and the respondent No.2 prayed for a decree of Taka 11,87,085.00 with interest at the rate of 20% till the date of realisation from the petitioner. In fact that said amount has been decreed by the Artha Rin Adalat. ......3 showing him as the proprietor of the same and deposited Taka 25,000.00. On 13-8-88 the petitioner was under suspension on various charges stating that he has caused loss to the Bank by distributing loans to different persons without any authority. Thereafter a criminal case was also started on 11-..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Jamil Akhter Elahi (Md.) Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others, 2009, 38 CLC (HCD)
....ion is misconceived and the Rule is liable to be discharged. In the result, the Rule is discharged but without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 62 DLR (HCD) (2010) 64.......cle 102 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, challenging the legality of the Head Office circular No.43 dated 24-5-2009, issued by the respondent Nos.4 and 5, approving the car loan facilities to the executives of the respondent Sonali Bank Limited. 2. It is stated in the p..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 134
Al Baraka Bank Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. Rina Alam and another, 2004, 33 CLC (HCD)
....alat had no jurisdiction to decide the suit of the plaintiff. 47. In the suit of the bank before the Artha Rin Adalat relief was sought for a money decree of Taka 1,33,70,592 with interest and for realisation of the money by sale of mortgaged vessels and property described in the schedule to the ......o.1 as plaintiff on 14‑7‑97 instituted Title Suit No. 208 of 97 against the appellant bank and another for a decree of declaration that the plaintiff owed no amount to said bank on account of any loan and that the plaintiff had no liability with the bank; and that so-called memorandum or deposit..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 109
Abdur Rashid Chowdhury Vs. Additional District Judge and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....by directed to proceed with the suit by issue of the summons/notice however, in accordance with law, expeditiously. Communicate at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 573. ......ও অপরিশোধিত ঋণ বা দেনা” 23. Definition is simple, straight and unambiguous. In case of bank or any other financial institution the matured debt means matured loan or debt as defined time to time by the Bangladesh Bank. And in other cases, matured debt means ..Category: Others | Date: | Hits: 185
Sonali Bank Vs. Mahbubul Amin & others, 1989, 18 CLC (HCD)
.... the money was withdrawn by the plaintiff. Thereafter the decree-holder filed the Execution case for recovery of Tk. 76,361.25 as interest @ 15% for the period from the institution of the suit till realisation. 4. Main contention of the petitioner is that reading of the decree shows that the in......Execution Case No.791 of 1986 is vacated. The Execution Case will proceed in accordance with law. The records be sent down at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 41 DLR (HCD) (1989) 298. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 74
Naogaon Rice Mills Ltd. Vs. Pubali Batik Ltd., 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....out Taka 21,00,000. 2. Short facts relevant for the purpose of the case are that, Pubali Bank as plaintiff instituted Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 132 of 1994 before the Artha Rin Adalat, Naogaon for realisation of its outstanding dues from the defaulting loanee the petitioner. Ultimately, the suit ......urpose of the case are that, Pubali Bank as plaintiff instituted Artha Rin Adalat Suit No. 132 of 1994 before the Artha Rin Adalat, Naogaon for realisation of its outstanding dues from the defaulting loanee the petitioner. Ultimately, the suit was decreed on contest on 1‑12-1998. In the said jud..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 82
AKM Shahidul Hoque Vs. Deputy Commissioner and others, 2003, 32 CLC (HCD)
....spital authority was not bound to pay for such works. Accordingly, by the impugned decree the learned Subordinate Judge decreed the suit in part for Taka 2,43,505 only with interest at Bank rate till realisation. 10. Mr. Md Abdus Samad, the learned Advocate for the appellant, submits that it is n......l get a decree for 2,43,505 + 3,66,225.81 = Taka 6,09,730.81 with interest at the rate of 10% from the date of the decree till realisation. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 538. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Mollah Shabidul Islam Vs. Md. Monsur Rahman and others, 2005, 34 CLC (HCD)
....ssed by the Judge of the Artha Rin Adalat Khulna in Miscellaneous Case No.47 of 2003. 2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the respondent No.2 Islami Bank instituted Title Suit No.33 of 1993 for realisation of Taka 2,78,646 in the Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Khulna. The suit was decreed in preli......he application under Order XXI, rules 90 and 91 of the petitioner in accordance with law and with utmost expedition. No order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 57 DLR (2005) 164. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 61
....t they supplied 3500 MT scraps out of 7880 MT only.
10. When defendant Nos. 3 and 4 on 20‑7‑87 issued a notice upon the plaintiff for sale of all attached property hypothecated to the bank for realisation of Taka 97,59,001 the interest of the bank was seriously threatened. Then, the bank was ......d Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd. (which was then substituted by the Eastern Bank Ltd) for a credit facility of Taka 1,98,03,000 for import of an old ship for scrapping. Said Bank sanctioned a loan of Taka 1,93,19,000 by its letter dated 16‑2‑85. One of the conditions was hypothecation of..
Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 92
..... Therefore, the petitioner is liable to pay VAT on the impugned telephone bill.
In view of the above, the Rule is discharged without any order as to cost. Stay order granted earlier in respect of realisation of the disputed portion of VAT is hereby vacated.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported i...... without any order as to cost. Stay order granted earlier in respect of realisation of the disputed portion of VAT is hereby vacated.
Ed.
This Case is also Reported in: 50 DLR (HCD) (1998) 115.
..
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 138
68696865685568406838663566216620656563456344633563216318630562926291628660136002