Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
MA Gafur and anr. Vs. Govt. of BD rep. by Sec., Min. of Defence and anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....les. We therefore, find no legal infirmity in the impugned judgments of the High Court Division calling for interference. Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed. Ed. ......on, Class‑1, Military Lands of the Cantonment, by notification dated 30th November, 1995 and thereafter, he was promoted to the post of the SDO in the same Administrative Department. But some interested quarters, as it is submitted by the petitioner, raised the question as to promotion of ..Category: Administrative Law | Date: 24 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 133
Amir Hossain Vs. Homeland Footwear Ltd. and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... on the prayer of Mr. Imtiaz Mahmud, Advocate, let the operation of this judgment be stayed for a period of three months from date. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 478. ......stead of the petitioner because those machineries were set up in its premises. However, the operational control of the plant and the machineries as well as the beneficial ownership of the leaseholder interest remained with the petitioner. In respect of the MOU dated 2‑6‑2000, it was stated that ..Category: Company Law | Date: 21 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 226
Goutam Chandra Das alias Goutam Kumar Das Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....at No.2 Jhalakati, in Nari-o-Shishu Case No.40 of 1999 is hereby set aside. Send down the lower Court record expeditiously. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (HCD) (2003) 527. ......there having been no consistent evidence and independent witness to Substantiate or prove the prosecution case and that all the prosecution witnesses being closely related to the informant-victim are interested witnesses and that no reliance should be placed on their testimony to find out the guilt ..Category: Women and Children | Date: 20 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 173
BD rep. by the Sec. Min. of Works & ors. Vs. Kazi Ashrafuddin Ahmed, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....e in the submission of the learned Additional Attorney-General for our interference with the impugned judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ated 24-12‑1987 and 17‑1‑1988 directing him to hand over possession of the house as an abandoned property, that the respondent submitted papers before the Ministry in support of his interest but the Minister did not consider them and directed him to vacate the house; that Mrs. Ovai..Category: Property Law | Date: 13 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 89
Upazila Education Officer & anr. Vs. Tara Miah Akhand & ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....pugned judgment of the High Court Division does not suffer from any legal infirmity for our interference. Accordingly, this petition merits no consideration and it is dismissed. Ed. ......under police station Zazira, District Shariatpur, that Government allotted taka 7,50,000 (seven lac fifty thousand) for consideration of the school building, that on getting the said information some interested persons made attempts to shift the school from plot No. 331, which is far away from the e..Category: Civil Law | Date: 3 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 206
Ekushey Television Ltd. and others Vs. Dr. Chowdhury Mahmood Hasan & others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
.... judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. All the leave petitions are dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (AD) (2002) 130. ......written by the convener of the committee Annexure-A. 9. The writ petitioners alleged that after submission of the evaluation report, the technical committee came under heavy pressure from an interested group. As a result of which, the technical committee changed the evaluation report and ..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: 2 Jul, 2002 | Hits: 50
Abdul Majid Sarker (Md) Vs. State and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....ntendent of Naogaon Jail is directed to release the detenu Masuda Khanam (Hasi), daughter of the appellant forthwith and handover her to the custody of her father the appellant. Ed. ......l to go with her father is not at all a consideration regarding her custody and it was observed that father being the best well wisher of a minor daughter is entitled to the custody and in her own interest she should be given to her father's custody. 7. Here in the present case the main ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: 9 Jun, 2002 | Hits: 74
State Vs. Chief Editor, Manabjamin and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)_Part One
....imprisonment for a period of one month with a fine of Taka 2000 (two thousand) payable within two months, in default, to undergo further simple imprisonment for a period of one month. Part Two ......not given in the memo. By publishing the aforementioned report the Chief Editor, Printer and the owner of the daily newspaper 'Manabjamin' have committed the gravest contempt of Court. In the interest of rule of law and independence of judiciary and administration of justice it is necessary ..Category: Contempt of Court Law, Criminal Law | Date: 20 May, 2002 | Hits: 201
Abul Kashem & anr. Vs. Govt. of BD and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....herefore discharged the Rule. 5. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division. The petition is therefore, dismissed. Ed. ......litigant with a petition under section 5 of the Limitation Act and it is found that the government has given satisfactory explanation for delay in filing the case where there is substantial public interest involved, there is no wrong in passing the order in condoning the delay. ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: 13 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 133
Gouri Das and ors. Vs. ABM Hasan Kabir and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
....urt Division is not correct inference. In view of the above, the appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: II ADC (2005) 449, 635. ......ing Title Suit No. 171 of 1985 and Title Suit No. 133 of 1981. 3. The Title Suit No. 171 of 1985 was filed by the respondent, ABM Hasan Kabir as plaintiff impleading predecessor‑ in‑ interest of the defendant appellants and others for a declaration of title and recovery of khas poss..Category: Tenancy Law | Date: 9 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 148
Aroti Rani Paul Vs. Sudarshan Kumar Paul and others, 2002, 31 CLC (AD)
....indings and decisions of the High Court Division and consequently the appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (AD) 73. ......ad gifted tile Suit property in her favour by genuine registered deed of gift vide Exhibit 5 and Exhibit 6 respectively dated 24‑3‑1975 and, as such, tile (plaintiff) acquired valid right, title, interest and possession in the Suit property, and the defendant No. 2 illegally treated the suit pro..Category: Family Law | Date: 1 Apr, 2002 | Hits: 181
Chowdhury Mahmood Hasan and others Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....the order for two weeks. Mr. Razzaq opposed the prayer. However, the operation of the order is stayed for ten days. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (HCD) (2002) 537. ......luation report is marked Annexure-A-1. The petitioners alleged that after the evaluation report was submitted to the Ministry of Information, the Technical Committee came under serious pressure by an interested group as a result of which the Technical Committee changed the evaluation report and in t..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 7
Mahmood Alam (Md.) and another Vs. Moklesur Rahman Bhuiya, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ed judgment and decree affirming those of the trial Court are hereby confirmed. Send down the records at once. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (HCD) (2002) 523. ......of 1996 affirming those dated 8-7-96 passed by Subordinate Judge, Court No. 1 in Title Suit No. 33 of 1995 in decreeing the suit. 2. Opposite party Nos. 1 to 3 and Mojibar Rahman, predecessor-in-interest of opposite party Nos. 4 to 13 as plaintiff instituted the suit for confirmation of their p..Category: Property Law | Date: 27 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 4
Abul Hussain and others Vs. Afezuddin Mondal and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... The appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 93. ......herein. This has cast a cloud over the title the plaintiffs. Defendant Nos. 1 and 5‑9 contested the suit. Their case, in short, was that Jabbar and others who are the predecessor‑in‑interest surrendered the suit land in favour of the original tenants in 1333 BS. The defendants subs..Category: Property Law | Date: 18 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 80
Alfazuddin Mollah and ors. Vs. Md. Almas Chokder and anr., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....t Division. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the learned Assistant Judge is directed to proceed with the pre‑emption proceeding in accordance with law. Ed. ......but actually the transaction was a sale we are of the view that when the nature of transaction become doubtful on the specific allegation being made out by the appellant pre‑emptor then for the interest of justice matter is required to be tested by adducing evidence in the trial Court in order..Category: Property Law | Date: 16 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 95
Raj Unnayan Kartripakshya (RAJUK), Dhk. & ors. Vs. Water Front Apt. Ltd. and ors., 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....nsel for the petitioners. We find no illegality is committed in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. Therefore, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......espondents could not show any paper to the High Court Division in the writ petition that tile case land was derequisitioned or the possession thereof was restored to their predecessors‑in‑interest of the respondents upon refund of compensation money. Therefore, any mistaken approval of p..Category: Property Law | Date: 9 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 1202
Abu Taher Bhuiyan Vs. Lal Mohon Mondal and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....he result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The stay order granted earlier by this Court is hereby vacated. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 604. ...... raised by the learned Advocate is that as the opposite parties claimed to have purchased the suit land during the pendency of the suit, the said transfer is hit by lis pendens, they have acquired no interest in the suit land, for which, they are not entitled to b impleaded in the suit. 6. Mr. ..Category: Property Law | Date: 6 Mar, 2002 | Hits: 56
Category: Property Law | Date: 12 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 28
Jaban Ali (Md) Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
.... any other case. The trial Court is at liberty to cancel the bail in case of any misuse of the privilege of bail by the accused appellant. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 56 DLR (2004) 89.......here is no reason why such a long time is required for framing charge for completion of the trial of the said case. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that in the interest of justice the accused appellant should be enlarged on bail, since he has been waiting in t..Category: Women and Children | Date: 10 Feb, 2002 | Hits: 79
Abdul Rashid Vs. Santi Bhusan Deb and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD).
.... This petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 55 DLR (AD) (2003) 86. ......,000 solatium within four months in the trial Court and the plaintiff will be at liberty to withdraw the same and in default the petitioners will get more three months to deposit the said amount with interest as per rate of Sonali Bank at the relevant time and in default the decree passed by the Cou..Category: Property Law | Date: 26 Jan, 2002 | Hits: 100