Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Haji Ebad Ali Akanda and others Vs. Haji Basiruddin Akanda and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....lso point out any error apparent on the face of the above judgment. The review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 790. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Haji Ebad Ali Akanda and others…………….Petitioners Vs. ......lso point out any error apparent on the face of the above judgment. The review petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 790. ......eme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Haji Ebad Ali Akanda and others…………….Petitioners Vs. H..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Abul Hossain and Brothers Vs. Rupali Bank Limited, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e leave-petition. In the aforesaid premises, we find no legal infirmity for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 785. ......e leave-petition. In the aforesaid premises, we find no legal infirmity for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 785. ......e leave-petition. In the aforesaid premises, we find no legal infirmity for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 785. ...... Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Ruhul Amin J Mohammad Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Abul Hossain and Brothers, 16/E, Chota Katara (Near Chawk Bazar) Dhaka…...Petitioners Vs. Rupali Ba..Category: Banking Law | Date: | Hits: 85
Abdul Jabbar Mondal Vs. Babar Ali Malita, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....cord arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment The Leave petition is dismissed Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 782. ......V ADC (2007) 782. ......cord arrived at a correct decision. There is no cogent reason to interfere with the impugned judgment The Leave petition is dismissed Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 782. ......K. Saha, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented- the Respondent. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 938 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 19.03.2005 passed by the High Court Division in S.A. No. 302 of 1979). Judgment ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 97
Abul Kashem Vs. Md. Abu Bakar Siddique Khan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 779. ......p;…………Petitioner Vs. Md. Abu Bakar Siddique Khan and others......Respondents Judgment July 11, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Enayetur Rahim, Advocate, instructed by A.K.M Sh......gh Court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no substance in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 779. ......hellip;……………………………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Abu Bakar Siddique Khan and others......Respondents Judgment July 11, 2006. Lawyers Involved: M..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 33
Mst. Mariam Bibi Vs. Shiraj Madbar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of the view that there is no error in the said judgment. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 774. ......titioner Vs. Shiraj Madbar and others.........Respondents Judgment August 1, 2006. Lawyers Involved: M. A. Mannan, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondents. Civil Petit......of the view that there is no error in the said judgment. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 774. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Mst. Mariam Bibi.............. Petitioner Vs. Shiraj Madbar and others.........Respondents Judgment August 1, 2006. Lawyers Involved: ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 25
Abdur Rahim Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....espondent No. 11 for addition of party and added her as party in the writ petition. 9. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 772. ...... Building, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 & others .................Respondent Judgment July 3, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Khondker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Dr. A. K. M. Ali, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. ......espondent No. 11 for addition of party and added her as party in the writ petition. 9. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 772. ......abir Chowdhury J Abdur Rahim………………Petitioner Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources, Bangladesh Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 & others ..............Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 52
M/s. Sikder Brothers Vs. Chairman, Power Development Board, WAPDA Bhaban & ors, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....or Leave to Appeal No. 1500 of 2006) and the other are barred by limitation (Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 188 of 2007). Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 767. ......or Leave to Appeal No. 1500 of 2006) and the other are barred by limitation (Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 188 of 2007). Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 767. ......or Leave to Appeal No. 1500 of 2006) and the other are barred by limitation (Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 188 of 2007). Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 767. ......l Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J M/s. Sikder Brothers……………Petitioner (In both the cases) Vs. Chairman, Power Development Board, WAPDA Bhaban and others…………Respondents (In both the cases) Judgment Fe..Category: Alternative Dispute Resolution | Date: | Hits: 193
Janata Bank and others Vs. National Electric Company Ltd., 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....of the High Court Division can not be sustained. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 764. ......of the High Court Division can not be sustained. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 764. ......of the High Court Division can not be sustained. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 764. ...... ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Chalna Carriers & Fibres Ltd. & another Vs. M/s. Shainpukur Navigation Ltd. & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....e hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 735. ......e hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 735. ......e hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 735. ...... Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 735. ..Category: Admiralty Law or Maritime Law | Date: | Hits: 210
Md. Foridur Rahman @ Forid @ Reza Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....shy;ty in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The Jail petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ......shy;ty in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The Jail petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ......shy;ty in the decision of the High Court Division so as to call for any interference. The Jail petitioner is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 715. ...... Lawyers involved: Sarwar Ahmed, Advocate-For the Jail Petitioner. Golam Kibria, Deputy Attorney General-for the State. Jail Petition No. 4 of 2005 (From the judgment and order dated 16.5.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No. 34 of 2001, Jai..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 51
State Vs. Md. Humayun Hafiz , 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 705. ......: Abdur Razzaque Khan, Additional Attorney General, instructed by Md. Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Khan Saifur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-for the Respondent. &n...... In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 705. ......he State..........................Appellant Vs. Md. Humayun Hafiz ..........Respondent Judgment February 14, 2006. Cases Referred To- A. K. M. Azizul Islam and another Vs. State, 49 DLR (AD) 115; Government of Bangladesh vs. Shah Alam (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 1..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Paritosh Rudra Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....s no substance in this petition for leave to appeal and accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 702. ......s no substance in this petition for leave to appeal and accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 702. ......s no substance in this petition for leave to appeal and accordingly, the petition for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 702. ......rd-For the Petitioner. Not represented-Respondent. Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 307 of 2004. with Jail Petition No. 02 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 18-07-2004 passed by the High Court Division in Jail Appeal No. 615 of 2002 with De..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Md. Siddiqullah and others Vs. Sufura Khatun and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....Counsel for the petitioners in the facts and circumstances of the case. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 691. ......Counsel for the petitioners in the facts and circumstances of the case. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 691. ......Counsel for the petitioners in the facts and circumstances of the case. Accordingly, the application is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 691. ......ed in: IV ADC (2007) 691. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Mst. Rousan Ara Vs. Alhaj Mst. Hazera, Begum alias, Hazera Khatun & another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....(Civil) Present: MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Hashan Ameen J Mst. Rousan Ara ................................................................Petitioner Vs. Alhaj Mst. Hazera, Begum alias, Hazera Khatun & another........Respondents Judgement June 5, 20.......................Petitioner Vs. Alhaj Mst. Hazera, Begum alias, Hazera Khatun & another........Respondents Judgement June 5, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. N. H. Khandaker, Advocate-on-Record-For Responde......n-Record found difficult to assail the Judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 689. ......era, Begum alias, Hazera Khatun & another........Respondents Judgement June 5, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioner. N. H. Khandaker, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent No. 1. Not represented-Respondent No. 2. Civ..Category: Family Law | Date: | Hits: 150
Birendra Nath Mondal Vs. Dhirendra Nath Mandal and others, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....he above, we find no substance in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 680. ......he above, we find no substance in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 680. ......irendra Nath Mondal……………………………………………..Appellant Vs. Dhirendra Nath Mandal and others………………………..Responde......rendra Nath Mondal……………………………………………..Appellant Vs. Dhirendra Nath Mandal and others………………………..Responden..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 30
Md. Siraj Mondal @ Md. Sirajuddin Mondal & anr Vs. Mosammat Miraton Nessa & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....render his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2,000/- Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 672. ......……………………..Respondents Judgment March 23, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Appellants. Dr. Rafiqur Rahman, Senior Advocate, instructed......render his tenancy, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with cost of Tk. 2,000/- Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 672. ......) 672. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Abdus Samad Talukder and another Vs. Sarkar Mahmud and others , 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....e decision of the High Court Division so as to call for interference. The appeal is dismissed with cost at all stages. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 669. ....... Sarkar Mahmud and others .......................Respondents Judgment February 14, 2007. Lawyers Involved: Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants. Ex-parte- The Respondent(s). Civil Appeal ......e decision of the High Court Division so as to call for interference. The appeal is dismissed with cost at all stages. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 669. ......rted in: IV ADC (2007) 669. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Md. Syed Badruddoza Vs. Tawfiq Hasan and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... committed any error in rejecting the prayer for re-hearing of the civil revision. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 667. ......and Others………… Petitioners Vs. Tawfiq Hasan and another .........Respondens Judgment May 23, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-Respondents. Civil Petitio...... committed any error in rejecting the prayer for re-hearing of the civil revision. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 667. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Syed Badruddoza being dead his legal heirs: Mrs. Arjuman Banu and Others………… Petitioners Vs. Tawfiq Hasan and another ...Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Khariat Hossain and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....d at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the said decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 664. ......d at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the said decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 664. ......d at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the said decision. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 664. ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, Represented by the Deputy Commissioner and others, Rangpur……………Petitioners Vs. Khariat Hos..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 27
Md. Shamsul Haque and another Vs. Md. Abdul Jalil Khan and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....to differ with the above findings of the High Court Division. This petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 658. ......ers Vs. Md. Abdul Jalil Khan and others……………….Respondents Judgment August 28, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners. Not represented-the Respondents. Civil Pe......to differ with the above findings of the High Court Division. This petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 658. ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Shamsul Haque and another………………Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdul J..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 23