Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4781-4800 of 5060 results.
Yusuf A Hassan Vs. KM Rezaul Firdous, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....o reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 53 ......of the learned Sessions Judge are set aside and the order of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate dated 10.5.94 is affirmed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 53 ......s Salam Master vs. State, 35 DLR 140; Abdus Salam Master vs. State, 36 DLR (AD) 58; Abdur Razzaque vs. State, 35 DLR 103. Lawyers Involved: Serajul Huq, Senior Advocate, (AKM Nazrul Islam, Advocate with him), instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate-on-Record—For the Ap...... Present: ATM Afzal CJ Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Md. Ismailuddin Sarker J Yusuf A Hassan.......................................... Appellant Vs. KM Rezaul Firdous………………………..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 60
Khalequzzaman (Md) Vs. Md. Illias and others , 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
.... J Latifur Rahman J Khalequzzaman (Md)…………………………………...Informant-Appellate vs. Md. Illias and others ………………………&helli......le of adjudication ‘hear the order side’. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order, transfer is set aside. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 52 ......s Judgment November 21st, 1994. Lawyers Involved: Mahbubey Alam, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. A K M Nazrul Islam, Advocate, instructed by Sharifuddin Chaklader, Advocate- on- Record— For Respondent No......le of adjudication ‘hear the order side’. The appeal is allowed and the impugned order, transfer is set aside. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 52 ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Moudud Ahmed Vs. State, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
.... is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 42 ......ch stands settled by various previous decisions of ours. 17. We therefore find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 42 ......ch stands settled by various previous decisions of ours. 17. We therefore find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 42 ......ppellate Division (Criminal) Present: ATM Afzal CJ Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Md. Abdur Rouf J Md. Ismailuddin Sarker J Moudud Ahmed…………………..Petitioner Vs. State……………………………………Respondent. Judgment November 2nd, 1995 ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 105
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasan Movies Ltd. and others, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....e extent as mentioned above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 40. ......allowed without any order as to costs. The judgment of the High Court Division stands modified only to the extent as mentioned above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 40. ......allowed without any order as to costs. The judgment of the High Court Division stands modified only to the extent as mentioned above. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 40. ...... Md. Ismailuddin Sarker J Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of Labour and Manpower. Bangladesh Secretariat Dhaka……………… Appellant Vs. Hasan Movies Ltd. and others……………………Respondents Result: The appeal is..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 130
Principal, Chittagong Medical College and others Vs. Shahrayar Murshed and others, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....o costs. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 33. ......pugned judgment and order passed by the High Court Division. Accordingly all the appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 33. ......vs. Baldwin (1964) AC 40 (Law Reports 1964) & 16 DLR (SC) 722. Lawyers Involved: Aminul Huq, Attorney-General instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. Amirul Islam, Senior Advocate, (Zakir Ahmed Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advo......J Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Md. Abdur Rouf J Md. Ismailuddin Sarker J Principal, Chittagong Medical College and others ………………Appellants (In all the Appeals) Vs. Shahrayar Murshed ………………………………………………Respondent (In Civil..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 169
Hutchison Telecom Bangladesh Ltd. Vs. BD Telegraph & Telephone Board & ors, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....enior Advocates with him) instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on- Record— For the Petitioner. TH Khan, Senior Advocate (AM Nooruddin Ahmed, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record — For the Respondents. Civil Petition for Leave......mit any illegality in discharging the Rule Nisi. 12. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 30 ......0) All ER Rep. 530 and Koduri Krishnarao vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1962 (Andhra Pradesh) 249. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Rafiq-ul Huq and Mahmudul Islam, Senior Advocates with him) instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on- Record— ......mit any illegality in discharging the Rule Nisi. 12. We find no ground for interference. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 30 ..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 251
Bangladesh Telecom (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh T & T Board & others, 1993, 21 CLC (AD)
....Appeal No.73 of 1992). T H Khan, Senior Advocate instructed by NH Khandker, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No.1 (In Civil Appeal No.73 of 1992). Rokanuddin Mahmud, Advocate instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Respondent No.3 (In Civil Appeal No.73 of 1992). No......etition in respect of this system is allowed. No order as to costs. Civil Appeal No. 3 of 1993 is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 20...... Mohinder Singh vs. Chief Election Commissioner, AIR 1978 (SC) 851; Joseph Vilangandan vs. Executive Engineer, AIR 1978 (SC) 930. Lawyers Involved: Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate Mahmudul Islam, Advocate with him), instructed by Shamsul Haque Siddique, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appell......……………………. Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 73 of 1992) Bangladesh Telegraph and Telephone Board and anr. ……………………………Appellant (In Civil Appeal No. 3 of 1993) Vs. Bangladesh T & T Board & ors........... Respondents (In Civil Appeal No. 73 of 1992..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 242
Attar Mia and another Vs. Mahmuda Khatun Chowdhury, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....6) 16 ......to cannot be accepted. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 16 ......to cannot be accepted. In the result, therefore, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 16 ...... Attar Mia and another………………………………………………Plaintiff-Appellants Vs. Mahmuda Khatun Chowdhury being dead her heirs Abdul Malik Chowdhury…&hellip..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 84
Kamiruddin and others Vs. Md. Mokshed Ali Biswas and others, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....e is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 14 ...... be set aside. In the result the appeal is allowed and the impugned order set aside without any orders as to costs. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 14 ...... be set aside. In the result the appeal is allowed and the impugned order set aside without any orders as to costs. Ed. This case is also reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 14 ...... ATM Afzal CJ Mustafa Kamal J Latifur Rahman J Md. Abdur Rouf J Md. Ismailuddin Sarker J Kamiruddin and others............................... Appellants Vs. Md. Mokshed Ali Biswas and others........... Respondents Judgment July 3, 199..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Jalil and others, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....r Rouf J Md Ismailuddin Sarker J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works ……….Appellant Vs. Md. Jalil and others…….Respondents Judgment ...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 415, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 10, 49 DLR (AD) (1997) 26 ...... the result, therefore, this appeal is allowed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 415, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 10, 49 DLR (AD) (1997) 26 ...... Md Abdur Rouf J Md Ismailuddin Sarker J Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works ……….Appellant Vs. Md. Jalil and others…….Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 57
Abdul Wadud Vs. State, 1995, 24 CLC (AD)
....e appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 236, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 6.......ded by Act No. XLII of 1992 will be applicable to the pending cases. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 236, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 6.......ded by Act No. XLII of 1992 will be applicable to the pending cases. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: (1995) 3 BLT (AD) 236, 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 6....... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Mustafa Kamal J Md. Abdur Rouf J Md. Ismailuddin Sarker J Abdul Wadud………………………………………….Appellant Vs. State ………………………………………………………..Respondent Judgme..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 75
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Suruzzamal and others, 1996, 25 CLC (AD)
....p;……………………………………………….. Appellant [In both the Appeals] Vs. Md. Suruzzamal and others ………………………&h......ut any order as to costs. Title Suit No. 339 of 1981 is dismissed and Title suit No. 69 of 1981 is decreed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 1. ......ut any order as to costs. Title Suit No. 339 of 1981 is dismissed and Title suit No. 69 of 1981 is decreed without costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 48 DLR (AD) (1996) 1. ......llip;………………………………………………….. Appellant [In both the Appeals] Vs. Md. Suruzzamal and others …………………&hellip..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 61
Abdul Gani and others Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... AC 1; Safdar Ali vs. Crown 5 DLR (FC 107; Major Robert Stuart Wauchope vs. Emperor 38 CWN 187; Osimuddin Sarkar vs. The State 13 DLR 197 PLD 1961 (Dacca) 98; Abdul Bari Sikdar The Crown 7 DLR 457; Md. Hekmatullah vs. The Crown 7 DLR 13; Emperor vs. Anwar Ali AIR 1948 Lah. 27; Lt. Hector Thomas ......nt of sentence has become infructuous and it is accordingly discharged. Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Special Judge wherever he may be in present stationed. Ed. ...... to the learned Special Judge wherever he may be in present stationed. Ed. ......m J Abdul Gani……………………...Appellant (in Appeal No. 290 of 1967) Taru Mian...............................Appellant Vs. State..................................Respondent (in Appeal No. 362 of 1967) ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 68
State Vs. Lutfor Fakir, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... and PW, 1 Sk. Elahi Baksh to be the dead body of Dulal Fakir. On such identification, the investigating Officer PW 13 held inquest and sent it to the morgue for post mortem examination. PW 12 Dr. Md. Mohsin held post mortem on the dead body of Dulal Fakir on 27.7.69 and found four incised wound...... allowed to the extent of sentence only and the conviction under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code is maintained. The appellant is sentenced to undergo transportation for life. Ed. ......ained. The appellant is sentenced to undergo transportation for life. Ed. ......d. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Rakman Ali alias Md. Rakman Ali and others Vs. Hasib Ali Chowdhury and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....e case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......servations made above after discussing and considering all the material evidence on record. 18. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ......e facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Supreme Court High Court Division Civil Appellate jurisdiction Present: Nurul Islam J Rakman Ali alias Md. Rakman Ali and others ...............Appellants Vs. Hasib Ali Chowdhury and others..............................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Syed Modaris Ali Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....ris Ali ............Appellant Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May 6th, 1971. ......he observations made in the judgment. The cost of this appeal will abide by the result. In view of the above order, the cross-objection has lost its importance and is, therefore, rejected. Ed. ......sons namely, Syed Idris Ali and Syed Ismail Ali but the latter had gone elsewhere and had kept no touch with Idris Ali and with the property in suit. The defendant further alleged that Syed Sirajul Islam Khan who was a mere Benamdar of the defendant was a necessary party to the suit. He also all...... Syed Modaris Ali ............Appellant Vs. Syed Md. Illias Ali and others.......... ......Respondents Judgment May ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Kasiruddin Sarkar @ Kasiruddin Fakir Vs. The State, 1972, 1 CLC (AD)
....R (FC) 56. st Sairan vs. State (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 35; Sultan Ahmad vs. Crown (1954) 6 DLR (FC) 28: Fazal Elahi vs. Crown (1953) 5 DLR (FC) 207. Lawyers Involved: M. Golam Rabbani and Md. Nurul Islam, Advocates—For the Appellant. T Talukdar, Advocate—For the State......ppellant is set aside and he is acquitted from the charge under section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code. He may be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ...... may be set at liberty at once if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. ......nbsp; Kasiruddin Sarkar @ Kasiruddin Fakir.................Appellant Vs. The State....................................................Respondent Judgment..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 124
Pronab Kumar Majumder Vs. Hatem Mondal and others, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
.... 11 DLR 470; Jamman Mia vs Assistant Custodian of Enemy Property (1969) 21 DLR 562; Shahzada Muhd. Omar Beg vs Sultan Mohammad Khan and others (1970) 22 DLR (SC) 41. Lawyers Involved: Md. Abdur Rahim, Advocate—For the Petitioner. AM Mahmudur Rahman, Advocate— For......I make no order as to costs. However, I direct the learned Munsif to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible. Let the records of this case be sent down expeditiously. Ed. ......ossible. Let the records of this case be sent down expeditiously. Ed. ......risdiction Present: Nurul Islam J Pronab Kumar Majumder ...................Petitioner Vs. Hatem Mondal and others ............Opposite Parties Judgment November 5t..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 100
Aminul Islam Vs. State, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....R 549 PLD 1964 Dac 330; Fakku Mia alias Motahar All vs. The State 10 DLR 26; Srinivas Mall vs King Emperor 51 C.W.N 900. Lawyers Involved: Abdul Aziz with Latifur Rahman—For the Appellant. Md. Modabber Hosain —For the State. Criminal Appeal No. 204 of 1958. Judgment: Abdulla......s not at all been proved and he is entitled to be acquitted. The appeal is allowed. The conviction and sentence passed against the appellant are set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed. ......passed against the appellant are set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed. ......s not at all been proved and he is entitled to be acquitted. The appeal is allowed. The conviction and sentence passed against the appellant are set aside and he is acquitted of the charge. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 83
Abdul Hamid Howlader and others Vs. Province of East Pakistan, 1972, 1 CLC (HCD)
....n has no merit which is therefore, discharged with costs which we assess at Rs. 500/ (Rupees five hundred) only. The costs so ordered will be taken equally by the respondents. Ed. ......n has no merit which is therefore, discharged with costs which we assess at Rs. 500/ (Rupees five hundred) only. The costs so ordered will be taken equally by the respondents. Ed. ......ufail Mahammad Vs. Raja Mohammad Ziaullah 17 DLR (1965) (SC) 325 PLD 1965 (SC); Lawyers Involved: DC Bhattacharjee and SS Haider. Advocates — For the Petitioners. Ruhul Islam, Attorney-General, AM Khan Chowdhury and Mr. Khan Advocates — For the Respondents 3-12....... Presents: Maksum-ul-Hakim J Fazle Munim J Abdul Hamid Howlader and others.....Petitioners Vs. Province of East Pakistan ..............Respondents Judgment &n..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 81
764763759758757756755754753751750749745744743739735733732731