Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4841-4860 of 6090 results.
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Salahuddin Talukder, 2004, 33 CLC (AD)
....le absolute in Writ Petition No. 5981 of 2000 are hereby set aside and the Rule nisi accordingly stands recalled. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2006 (XIV) BLT (AD) 60. ......esent: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul K Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh and others..................Appellants Vs. Md. Salahuddin Talukder ..........................Respondent Judgment No......le absolute in Writ Petition No. 5981 of 2000 are hereby set aside and the Rule nisi accordingly stands recalled. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 2006 (XIV) BLT (AD) 60. ......ujibur Rahman vs Bangladesh 44 DLR (AD) 111; JB Sampath Kumar vs Union of India, AIR 1937 SC 387 and Chopra vs Union of India AIR 1987 SC 357. Lawyers Involved: AJ Mohammad Ali, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by Md. Ahsanullah Patwary, Advocate-on-Record—Fo..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 133
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Sheikh Hasina and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ment Commissioner 21 DLR 456; Firm Sriniwas vs Mahabir Prasad AIR 1951 (SC) 177; Om Prakash vs Ram Kumar AIR 1991 (SC) 409; Secretary to Government vs Abdul Kafil PLD 1978 (SC) 242; Muskrat vs United States 219 US 346; Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh vs State of Vindhya Pradesh AIR 1953 SC 394; Nayyar appell......ich the question is raised can be properly disposed of in some other way and Court should not give decision on any law which is not strictly necessary for the disposal of the case before it. ......ich the question is raised can be properly disposed of in some other way and Court should not give decision on any law which is not strictly necessary for the disposal of the case before it. ......gest political parties of Bangladesh of which she is the President, out of a political design and vengeance. 6. It was further stated that on 13-6-2007 one Azam J Chowdhury son of late Mohtasin Ali Chowdhury, Managing Director, East Coast Trading (Pvt) Ltd SW (G) 4, Gulshan Avenue, Gulshan 1, ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 254
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Shamsul Huda and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ed To- SP Gupta vs. President of India AIR 1982 (SC) 149; K Jain vs. Union of India AIR 1993 (SC) 1769; SR Bommai vs. Union of India AIR 1994 (SC) 1918; New York Times Company vs. United States 403 US 713 (1971); Nixon vs. United States 418 US 683 (1974); State of Punjab vs. SS Singh A...... Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs................................Appellant Vs. Md. Shamsul Huda and others..................Respondents Judgment M......ections and guidelines, the appeal is allowed and the order of the High Court Division appealed against is set aside. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 108. ......ating to summary in connection with the appointment of Mr. Md. Abdul Hye, Mr. Faruque Ahmed, Mr. Md. Marzi-ul-Haque, Mr. Md. Shamsul Huda, Mr. Abdur Razzaque, Mr. Syed Mahmud Hossain, Mr. Md. Iman Ali and Mr. Hasan Foez Siddique under Article 95 of the Constitution. The application wa..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 124
A. B. M. Shamsuddin Vs. Mahmuda Selina and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ngs and decisions as arrived at by the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... R. Mudassir Husain, CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim, J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury, J Md. Joynul Abedin, J A. B. M. Shamsuddin................................. Petitioner. Vs. Anowara Begum being dead her heirs 1. (a) Mahmuda Selina and others. .........................ngs and decisions as arrived at by the High Court Division. In the aforesaid premises, we find no merit in this petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Mahmuda Selina and others. ........................ Respondents. Judgement: November 16, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Fariduddin Md. Reza, Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record- For the Petitioner. Not represented- the Respondents. Civi..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Loyal Shipping Ltd. Vs. Castrol UK Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... of Money Suit No. 21 of 1993 by the plaintiff. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 48. ......late Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Loyal Shipping Ltd. ........................Appellant Vs. Castrol UK Ltd. and others ...............Respondents Judgment Decembe...... of Money Suit No. 21 of 1993 by the plaintiff. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 48. ...... of Money Suit No. 21 of 1993 by the plaintiff. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 48. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 111
Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. Barrister Nazmul Huda and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....zmul Huda and another…..Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 6 of 2008) Judgment March 6, 2008. Cases Referred to- ADM, Jabalper vs. Sukla, AIR 1976 (SC) 1207, Harabayashi vs. United States (1943), Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh vs. Syed Sanwar Ali 27 DLR (AD) 16; 1991 BLD (AD)...... MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Md. Abdul Matin J Anti-Corruption Commission ........................Appellant (In both the cases) Vs. Barrister Mir Md. Helaluddin and another…..Respondents (In Criminal Appeal No. 5 of 2008) ......fe to be certified by duly constituted Medical Board, may consider the matter of granting bail in an appropriate case in an appeal. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 16 BLT (AD) (2008) 256. ......2008) Judgment March 6, 2008. Cases Referred to- ADM, Jabalper vs. Sukla, AIR 1976 (SC) 1207, Harabayashi vs. United States (1943), Solicitor, Government of Bangladesh vs. Syed Sanwar Ali 27 DLR (AD) 16; 1991 BLD (AD) 96 = 43 DLR (AD) 119, 1994 BLD (AD) 184 = 46 DLR (AD) 143; 1999 BL..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 219
Sarder M. Hashim Zaman & ors Vs. Thana Nirbahi Officer, Mithapukur, Rangpur & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....y;ed teachers of the said school. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 55. ......ision (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Md. Joynul Abedin J Md. Hassan Ameen J Sarder Md. Hashim Zaman and others.........Appellants Vs. Thana Nirbahi Officer, Mithapukur, Rangpur and others..........Respondents Ju......y;ed teachers of the said school. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in part without any order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 55. ......ision was competent to exercise power under section 73 of the Evidence Act. Lawyers Involved: Fawzia Karim, Advocate (appeared with the leave of the Court), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellants. ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record&mda..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 110
Abdul Mannan Bhuiyan and another Vs. State, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....llip;…………….Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1999) Amanullah Kabir..............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1999) Vs. The State and others ………………………&hell......iya ………………….Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1999) Amanullah Kabir..............Appellant (In Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 1999) Vs. The State and others …………………&hell......gment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD)(2008) 49; V ADC (2008) 150. ......ates, 272 U.S. 52,71,L.Ed.160. Lawyers Involved: Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants (In both cases). Fida M. Kamal, Attorney General (Syed Haider Ali, Deputy Attorney General and Zahurul Islam, Mukul, Deputy Attorney General with him) instructed..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 79
State Vs. Md. Kamaluddin @ Pichi Kamal and ors., 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
....Ed. ......or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......or calling for our interference. In the aforesaid premises we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Md. Abu Alam Vs. Zarina Begum and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......pellate Court. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Md. Muinuddin Zulfiquer Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......e fact of the judgment for review. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the review petition. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......f Shipping, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others.... Respondents Judgment November 29, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razzaq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-record-For the Petitioner. Not represented- Respondents. Civil Revi..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Mahfuzul Hoque and ors Vs. Collector of Customs, Customs House, Chittagong & ors, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... Private Ltd, 1994 PLD (SC) 363; Govt. of Province of Bombay Vs. Pestonji Ardeshir Wadia and others, AIR 1949 PC 143; Gupto Imp. Vs. Board of Revenue, AIR 1953 SC 25; Texco Stores Vs. Secretary of State for Environment and others, (1995)2 All England Reports 636; Ghulam Zarina, 16 DLR 486 Vs. A.......Collector of Customs, Customs House, Chittagong & others................. Respondents (In all the cases). Judgment August 8, 2005. Cases Referred To- Mustafa Kamal Vs. The Commissioner of Customs, 52 DLR (AD) 1; Phassco Hardware Company Vs. The Government of Paki...... 61. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Counsel for the appellants. The appeals are dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......, Constitution of India and Delhi Laws Act (1912), A.I.R. 1951 (SC) 332. Lawyers Involved: Dr. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (Salahuddin, Advocate with him), instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellants (In Civil Appeal Nos. 76-77 of 1994). Dr. Kamal H..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 107
Badal Chandra Das and others Vs. Amena Khatun, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... No infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division could be pointed out for our interference. In that view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. A. Aziz J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Badal Chandra Das and others .........Appellants Vs. Amena Khatun .............................Respondent Judgment April 5, 20...... No infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division could be pointed out for our interference. In that view of this, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......andra Das and others .........Appellants Vs. Amena Khatun .............................Respondent Judgment April 5, 2005. Lawyers Involved: A. J. Mohammad Ali, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Aftab Hossain, Advocate-on-Record- For the Appellants. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Kazi Muhammad Khokon Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... for review has been filed upon discovery of new fact. In that state of the matter we do not find any merit in this petition. Accordingly review petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Sree Girish Chandra Barman Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....aneous Case No. 53 of 1996 refusing pre-emption. 2. The petitioner, the pre-emptor, filed the above Miscellaneous Case No.53 of 1996 for pre-emption of the case land under Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act 1950 stating, inter alia, that he is a co-sharer in the case hold...... (Civil) Present Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Girish Chandra Barman………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other ……………………R......ion of materials on record arrived at a correct decision and there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. 9. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nt Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sree Girish Chandra Barman………………………Petitioner Vs. Md. Yasin Ali and other ……………………Respondent Judg..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Humayun Kabir Khan Vs. Md. Nurul Haque & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......of the view that the High Court Division erred in law in not assessing the evidence properly and thereby discharging the Rule. The appeal is accordingly allowed without costs. Ed. ......llant Vs Md. Nurul Haque & others ...........Respondents Judgment November 28, 2006. Lawyers Involved: Hurunur Rashid, Advocate instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record-For the Appellant. Hasan Faiz Siddiqui, Advocate instructed by Aftab..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Commissioner of Customs and others Vs. Mohammad Ali, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Commissioner of Customs and others......Appellants Vs. Mohammad Ali................Respondent Judgment April 19, 2007. C......s illegal and without any legal basis. 7. Accordingly, we do not find any substance in the appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......n (Civil) Present: Md. Fazlul Karim J Amirul K Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Commissioner of Customs and others......Appellants Vs. Mohammad Ali................Respondent Judgment April 19, 2007. Cases Referred To- ..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 99
Mir Kalimuddin and others Vs. Md. Dukhi Mondal and others, 2003, 32 CLC (AD)
....gh Court Division. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ...... Ed. ......gh Court Division. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. .....................Petitioners Vs. Md. Dukhi Mondal and others…………... Respondents Judgment April 5, 2003. Lawyers Involved: Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record — For the Petitioners. Nurul Amin, Advocate instructed by AKM ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 35
Khan Md. Firoj Kabir Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. ......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Khan Md. Firoj Kabir...................................Appellant Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others... ...................Respondents Judgment Mar......nbsp; Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. .................Appellant Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others... ...................Respondents Judgment March 12, 2006. Cases Referred to- Fazlul Huq vs. Md. Tahed Ali, 47 DLR 326; Messrs Adamjee Jute Mills Ltd vs. Chairman 3rd Labour Court 39 DLR 11; Lal Mamud V..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 120
Arif A. Shekha and others Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another, 2007, 36 CLC (AD)
....do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ......urt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Arif A. Shekha and others............................Appellants Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Industries and another..................................Respondents ......do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence the three appeals are dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 91. ......esh vs. Messrs ATJ Industries Limited and others, 28 DLR (AD) 120. Lawyers Involved: Khondaker Mahbubuddin Ahmed, Senior Advocate (Dr. M Zahir, Senior Advocate with him) instructed by Md. Nawab Ali, Advocate-on-Record and Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record as per Power of Attorney— For..Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 114
23632360235923562355235123502349234523442343234223412340233923382336233423332332