Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Kajemuddin Miah (Md) Vs. Bangladesh and others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....ed their residence and settled in Mouza Charbhadrason, Kallyanpur, etc. within the district of Faridpur in 1948. When the lands appeared the petitioner and other co-villagers took settlement from the Government and the usufruct thereof. Due to subsequent erosion the petitioner and co-villagers shift......rney-General-For the Respondent. Writ Petition No. 2702 of 1996. Judgment Mainur Reza Chowdhury J. - By this Rule Nisi the respondents were called upon to show cause as to why the impugned order as contained in case No. 9-24 dated 29-11-84 (Annexure) issued by respondent No.1 should not b..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 167
Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 482
Shan Hosiery Vs. Bangladesh Jatiya Shamabaya Shilpa Samity Ltd and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ed Subordinate Judge rejected the application for temporary injunction, and also rejected the plaint being of the view that the suit is barred by limitation, and that the suit premises belongs to the Government and no such suit is maintainable against the Government. 6. Mr. Nazrul Islam, learned ......tioner. Probir Halder, Advocate—For Opposite Party Nos.1, 2 & 5. Civil Revision No. 3748 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J. - This Rule was obtained by the plaintiff against the order of Subordinate Judge, Second Court at Dhaka dated 13-8-2000 passed in Title Suit No. 57 of 200..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Selim (Haji Md) Vs. Collector of Customs and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....nnot be changed or increased. 7. Before we proceed further, we want to quote section 19 of the Customs Act which is as follows: “19. General power to exempt from customs duties: (1) if the Government is satisfied, after consultation with the Board, that it is necessary in the public inter......able to this conflict, the section 21 of the General Clauses Act also may be looked into which reads as follows: “21. Where by any Act of Parliament or Regulation, a power to issue notification, order, rules or bye-laws is conferred, then that power includes a power, exercisable in the like man..Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 62
Sazeda Khatun Vs. Asad Ali and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
.... this Rule is discharged. No order as to costs. Order of stay granted at the time of issue of the Rule is re-called and vacated. Communicate. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 285....... Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- This Rule was obtained by the pre-emptee (purchaser) by making a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in brief, the Code, against order No. 33 dated 4-5-2000 passed by Senior Assistant Judge at Sadar in Sunamganj in Miscellaneous ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 28
Shaikh (Md) Obaidullah Raihan Vs. Sayed Shahidul Haque Jamal and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....tion of disqualification and for the reason mentioned earlier, the Rule is liable to be struck out. In the result, the Rule is struck out. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 280.......tion of disqualification and for the reason mentioned earlier, the Rule is liable to be struck out. In the result, the Rule is struck out. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 280...Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 88
Category: Fiscal/Taxation Law | Date: | Hits: 69
Ramesh Chandra Chowdhury @ Das Vs. Naresh Chandra Das @ Chowdhury, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....o have been properly executed if such power-of-attorney is executed before and authenticated by a Notary Public, a Judge, any Court, Magistrate, Bangladesh consul or vice consul representative of the Government. The power-of-attorney does not carry any presumption under section 85 of the Evidence Ac......ry, Advocate—For the Opposite Party. Civil Revision No. 636 of 1996. Judgment Bijan Kumar Das J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 16-9-95 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Narshingdi in Title Appeal No.20 of 199..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Tofazzal Hossain (Md) and others Vs. Momtaz Begum & others, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....plication contending, inter alia, that after purchase they duly mutated their names in respect of the case land and the jama has been duly separated, following which they have been paying rent to the Government Acquired Estate and, consequently, the pre-emptor is no longer a co sharer to the case jo......ul Yaque Khan Fakir Rahen Hossain with Mostafa Zaman Islam, Advocates—For the Opposite Parties. Civil Revision No.1546 of 1999. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J.- In this Rule, the judgment and order dated 15-4-99 passed by the Second Court of Subordinate Judge, Manikganj in Miscellaneous Appe..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31
Abul Hossain Vs. State, 2000, 29 CLC (HCD)
....nce with law regarding that petition. Communicate the order to the Magistrate concerned. The application is accordingly disposed of. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 222.......he Opposite Party. Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.1293 of 2000. Judgment Md. Hamidul Haque J. - This is an application under section 561A of Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside the order dated 1-2-2000 passed in Criminal Revision No.83/99 by the learned Sessions Judge, Cox’s Baz..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Shah Alam (Md.) Vs. Abul Kalam and others, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....e plaint. In appeal, permission was sought to sign by the left out person, which was allowed and the case was sent back on remand to cure the irregularity. In the case of NWFP Vs. Faiz Muhammad, some Government officials were all through taking steps on behalf of the Government for setting aside an ......21 of 2000. Judgment Md. Abdur Rashid J.- The above Rule was obtained by the preemptors upon making a revision application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure against judgment and order dated 28-11-99 passed by the Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court at Noakhali in Miscellaneous Case No..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 175
Anil Kumar Ghosh Vs. Shamir Kumar Ghosh, 2001, 30 CLC (HCD)
....29 and No. 55568 in class 29 are expunged from the register of the Trade Marks and the Registrar is directed to rectify the same accordingly. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 54 DLR (2002) 273....... a colour scheme, design and get up similar to that of the petitioner’s trade mark under application No. 38902 in class 29 in the Trade Marks Registry, Dhaka and managed to get the said application ordered to be advertised in the Trade Marks Journal. 5. The petitioner not being aware of legal p..Category: Intellectual Property Law | Date: | Hits: 200
Protima Sen and others Vs. Chitra Rani Dey and another, 1999, 28 CLC (HCD)
....of the order of the Court. Communicate the order to the learned Court below immediately for his information and necessary action. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 218. ......……………...Petitioners Vs. Chitra Rani Dey and another…………………...Opposite Parties Judgment August 24, 1999. Result: The Rule is made absolute without any order as to cost. Section 4 of the Partition Act was enacted to afford a special opportunity to ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Tanveerul Haque Vs. Unistar Shipping Limited and ors., 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
....int of Money Suit No. 31 of 1995 of the Subordinate Judge 2nd Court, Chittagong is hereby rejected. There will be no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 52 DLR (HCD) (2000) 215.......pondent Nos. 1 and 2. Civil Revision No. 3616 of 1996. Judgment Md. Tafazzul Islam J.- This Rule was issued calling upon the Opposite Party Nos. 1 and 2 to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 8-9-1996 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, 2nd Court Chittagong in Money Suit No...Category: Company Law | Date: | Hits: 197
Dr. Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2010, 39 CLC (AD)
....d. Abdul Matin J SAN Mominur Rahman J ABM Khairul Haque J Md. Muzammel Hossain J Surendra Kumar Sinha J Dr. Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir................................Petitioner Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh....................Respondents Judgment Ju......nstructed by Syed Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate-on-Record—For Respondent Nos. 2-3. Not Represented—Respondent No.1. Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 311 of 2009. (From the judgment and order dated 15-12-2008 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No. 9865 of 2008). Judg..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 127
Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 39
Kalandiar Kabir Vs. Bangladesh and others, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....rs………………. Respondents Judgment January 12, 2002. Cases Referred To- Mostafizur Rahman vs. Bangladesh 51 DLR (AD) 1; Salim Hasan vs. Bangladesh 45 DLR 318; Shahidul Haque vs. Government of East Pakistan 20 DLR 1005; Mrs. Tahera Islam vs. Secretary, Ministry of Home. Banglade......ay satisfy itself that he is not being held in custody illegally and without any lawful authority. 2. Mr. M Amirul Islam appeared on behalf of the petitioner, he has challenged the validity of the order of detention on several grounds which we like to discuss one by one. First argument of Mr. M A..Category: Constitutional Law | Date: | Hits: 195
Nure Alam and others Vs. State, 2002, 31 CLC (HCD)
....ether given in writing or reduced to writing as aforesaid, shall be signed by the person giving it, and the substance thereof shall be entered in a book to be kept by such officer in such form as the Government may prescribe in this behalf.” 43. Reference may be made to a case of Jhantu Mannan ......Md. Shamsul Huda J.- This appeal is directed the instance of the convict appellants Nur-e-Alam, Md Abdur Razzaque, Md Joynal Haque alias Joynal, Nurul Islam and Md Lebu Miah against (the judgment and order dated 12-10-1993 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Tangail in Sessio..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 42
Parimal Chandra & others Vs. Shaheda Begum and others, 1999, 18 CLC (HCD)
....hers……………Respondents Judgment December 2, 1999. Cases Referred To- Abu Bashar Vs. Mehar Khatun, 35 DLR 6; Khairuzzaman and others Vs. Noor Hossain, 9 BLD 453; Nurul Hossain Vs. Government of Bangladesh, 47 DLR (AD) 108(17). Lawyers Involved: Muzibur Rahman, Advocate—Fo......hman, Advocate—For the Appellants. PC Guha, Advocate—For the Respondents. Original Order No.10 of 1992. Judgment Gour Gopal Saha J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28-11-91 passed by the District Judge, Barguna in Review Case No.3 of 1991 under Order 4..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 81