Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Displaying 4921-4940 of 5287 results.
Sheikh Farid (Md) & others Vs. Abdul Wadud Sikder and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......is lack of evidence to show that he possessed the land denying title of Karuna Moyee Dasi or her sons to their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......is lack of evidence to show that he possessed the land denying title of Karuna Moyee Dasi or her sons to their knowledge. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......ion (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Sheikh Farid (Md) & others. ............. Appellants Vs. Abdul Wadud Sikder and others...................Respondents Judgment March 16, 2006. Adverse Po..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 59
Selim (Md) and others Vs. Syedul Haque Chowdhury and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....on calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......nt case. 8. We do not find any illegality or infirmity in the judgment of the High Court Division calling for our interference. The leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......it of section 14 of the Limitation Act……….( 5 & 7) Cases Referred To: Syed Amir Hossain vs. Nadera Rahman, 37 DLR (AD) 184; Sakina Khatoon vs. Ibrahim Ahmed Khan, 2 MLR (AD) 330. Lawyers Involved: Akram Hossain Amin, Advocate-on-Record&mdas...... ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 68
Serajul Islam & others Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....late Division (Civil) Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J SJR Mudassir Husain J Serajul Islam & others ...................Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another.................Respondents Judgment Apri......tly affirmed the decision of the lower appellate Court as the final court of fact. In such view of the matter, this petition merits no consideration Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......tly affirmed the decision of the lower appellate Court as the final court of fact. In such view of the matter, this petition merits no consideration Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Present: Mainur Reza Chowdhury J SJR Mudassir Husain J Serajul Islam & others ...................Petitioners Vs. Md. Abdur Razzaque Chowdhury and another.................Respondents Judgment April 15, 2002. The State..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 43
Kader Textiles (Pvt) Ltd. and another Vs. Md. Lehajuddin Miah, and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Present: M Reza Chowdhury CJ Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Kader Textiles (Pvt) Ltd. and another................Petitioners Vs. Md. Lehajuddin Miah, and others.......................Respondents Judgment February......ection 233 of the Company law and thus in passing the impugned judgment and order. Therefore, we do not find merits in this leave petition. Accordingly, this leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Syed Al Nesar Ahmed MD, United Food Complex Ltd. vs. Nafisa Choudhury and others 53 DLR (AD) 83. Lawyers Involved: Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate instructed by Md. Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petitioners. Zafarullah Chowdhury, Advocate, instru......eme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: M Reza Chowdhury CJ Syed JR Mudassir Husain J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Kader Textiles (Pvt) Ltd. and another................Petitioners Vs. Md. Lehajuddin Miah, and others..........Category: Business or Commercial Law | Date: | Hits: 86
Anwar Hossain Vs. Mainul Hosein & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....of Bihar vs. Rai Bahadur Hurdut Roy Moti Lal Jute Mills and another AIR 1960 SC 378; Madhu Limaye vs. The Superintendent. Tihar Jail, Delhi and others AIR 1975 SC 1505; M Saleem Ullah Advocate vs. Md. Abdur Rouf, Chief Election Commissioner and others 1 BLC 229; Md. Abdur Rashid Khan vs. Governm...... question. All the appeals are therefore, allowed. There is no order as to costs. The connected civil petition is disposed of in the light of the Judgment in the appeals. Ed. ......; Madhu Limaye vs. The Superintendent. Tihar Jail, Delhi and others AIR 1975 SC 1505; M Saleem Ullah Advocate vs. Md. Abdur Rouf, Chief Election Commissioner and others 1 BLC 229; Md. Abdur Rashid Khan vs. Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh 6 MLR (AD) 8; Manjurul Huq vs. Banglades......ection with the affairs of the Republic or of any local authority but in connection with the business of the Ittefaq Group of Publications Ltd. In his capacity as Executive Director of the Company and as the Printer, Publisher and Editor of the Daily Ittefaq while he was a Minister. Since..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 103
Harendra Nath Mahali Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....o merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ...... reconveyance at all stages. 18. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with cost of. Ed. ......he Transfer of Property Act, 1882. …………………….(16) Cases Referred to- Biswaswar Roy vs. Joytennessa and others,13 DLR 287; Shafi Khan vs. Mannujan Hussain and others, 35 DLR (AD) 225; Muzaffar Ali Bepari vs. Omar All and other......hul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Harendra Nath Mahali…………………………… Appellant Vs. Ramesh Chandra Haider and others...............Respondents Judgment March 16, 2006. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 67
Afia Begum and others Vs. Abdul Baset Mia & others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ....... In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ....... In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 70
Nur Amin and others Vs. Abdul Quddus and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....n the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......lower appellate Court. 13. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with cost of Taka 5,000. Ed. ......st of Taka 5,000. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Abdur Rashid Sarker (Md) and others Vs. Dines Chandra Das and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....sp; Ed. ......im earlier. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......im earlier. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ...... Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ssed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......the unqualified apology and to censure the appellants in modifying of the sentence imposed on them. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ....... 9. Upon hearing of the Rule the High Court Division passed the aforesaid order of conviction and sentence finding the appellant guilty of contempt of Court. 10. Mr. Khandakar Mahbubuddin Ahmed, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No....... Division (Criminal) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MA Aziz J Amirul K Chowdhury J Shahudul Haque, IG Police and others..................Appellants Vs. State............................Responde..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 64
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha Vs. Abdul Jakir and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....gladesh 50 DLR (AD) 11. Lawyers Involved: AKM Nazrul Islam, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellant. Md. Fazlul Karim, Senior Advocate, instructed by Nurul Islam Bhuiyan, Advocate-on-Record— Fo......, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ......, therefore, allowed. The impugned judgment and order of the High Court Division is set aside. Resultantly the suit stands dismissed. Parties do bear their respective costs. Ed. ......in CJ MM Ruhul Amin J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakha......................Appellant Vs. Abdul Jakir and others........................Respondents Judgment April 6, 2006. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 51
Abdul Mannan Vs. Tayeb Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......rit. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......rit. 16. In the background of the discussions made hereinbefore we find merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is allowed. There is no order as to cost. Ed. ......esent: Md. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J Abdul Mannan……………………….Appellant Vs. Tayeb Ali and others........................Respondents Judgment March 1, 2006. The Co..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Fatema Khatun and others Vs. Abdul Quddus, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....33 Indian Cases, 901; AIR 1932 Allahabad, 596; 13 CWN, 160; Md Zaki Khan and others vs. Munnu Sahu and another AIR 1925 Oudh 407; Ghulam Abbas vs .Razia Begum and others AIR 1951 Allahabad 86 (FB); Md. Meher Ali Mondal vs. Md Karam Ali Sarkar 17 DLR 365; Abdur Rahman vs. Baser Ali and others 21 ...... appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to cost. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 721. ......ration of the deed under section 60 of the Registration Act subsequent to filing of the case seeking preemption……(28) Cases Referred To: Saiful Bibi vs. Abdul Aziz Khan 133 Indian Cases, 901; AIR 1932 Allahabad, 596; 13 CWN, 160; Md Zaki Khan and others vs. Munnu......7) 721. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 55
Government of Bangladesh and another Vs. Md. Afsar Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Present: Md Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh and another.......................Appellants Vs. Md. Afsar Ali and others.......................Respondents Judgement October 21, 2......ition No. 43 of 1996 making the Rule absolute is hereby set aside and the judgment and order dated 1-5-1995 passed by the Court of Settlement in case No. 869 of 1987 is restored. Ed. ......ition No. 43 of 1996 making the Rule absolute is hereby set aside and the judgment and order dated 1-5-1995 passed by the Court of Settlement in case No. 869 of 1987 is restored. Ed. ...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md Ruhul Amin J Syed JR Mudassir Husain J MM Ruhul Amin J Government of Bangladesh and another.......................Appellants Vs. Md. Afsar Ali and others...........Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 77
Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission Vs. Ekushey Television Ltd., 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....im), instructed by Sufia Khatun, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (Civil Appeal Nos. 386-87 of 2003). Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, (A Hasib, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by Mvi. Md. Wahidullah, Advocate-on-Record—For the Appellant (Civil Appeal No. 383-84 of 2003). Dr Kama......ns aforesaid, with the above observations the appeals are, accordingly, allowed without any order as to costs. The impugned judgment and orders of the High Court Division are hereby set aside. Ed. ......ammad Ali, the learned Attorney-General appearing in Civil Appeal No. 386-387 of 2003 and Mr. Fida M Kamal, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellants in Civil Appeal No. 385 of 2003 and Mr. TH Khan, the learned Counsel appearing for BTRC, referring to the revisions of section 3 of the Banglad...... Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, (Rokanuddin Mahmud, Senior Advocate with him), instructed by ASM Khalequzzaman, Advocate-on-Record—For the Respondent No. 1 (Civil Appeal Nos. 383, 385-387 of 2003) and Respondent No. 10. (Civil Appeal Nos. 384 of 2003). Not represented—Respondent Nos. 2-5 (Ci..Category: Information Technology Law | Date: | Hits: 266
Yaor Mia (Md) and another Vs. Haji Shah Dhanai Ali and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nd others 13 DLR 287; Sital Chandra Kole and others vs Mohilal Kole and others 58 CWN 1000; Mozaffar Ahmed Bepari vs Duar Ali and others 1 BLC (AD) 25. Lawyers Involved: Chowdhury Md. Jahangir, Advocate-on-Record— For the Appellants. Ex parte— The Respondent N......which were not alive when PO No. 88 of 1972 was promulgated being transaction past and closed. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ons of Transfer of Property Act shall not apply to resist redemption……(16) Cases Referred To: Government of Bangladesh vs Sheikh Md All Asgar 1994 BLD (AD) 219; Shafi Khan vs Mannujan Hossain 35 DLR (AD) 225; Abdus Sattar Mallick vs Younus Mallick and others 12 DLR...... Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md Fazlul Karim J AK Chowdhury J Yaor Mia (Md) and another .......................Appellants Vs. Haji Shah Dhanai Ali and others...Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 71
Yogeshwar Gope Vs. State, 2005, 34 CLC (AD)
.... In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 982; 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 226. ...... In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 982; 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 226. ...... In view of the discussion made above we do not find any substance in the petition. The petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: IV ADC (2007) 982; 11 MLR (AD) 2006, 226. ......f occurrence. There may be various reasons for not finding blood on the place of occurrence. Similarly failure of the prosecution to prove the motive as imputed by it will have no impact in the facts and circumstances of the case. The petition is dismissed. ………….(17 & 19) Lawyers Inv..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Abdul Kader Vs. Secretary, Election Commission and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ioner. The petition is dismissed Ed. ......f their duties." 8. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed Ed. ......f their duties." 8. In view of the above, we do not find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. The petition is dismissed Ed. ...... Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J AK Chowdhury J Abdul Kader.....................Petitioner Vs. Secretary, Election Commission and others...............Respondents Judgment October 23, 2005. The Local G..Category: Election Law | Date: | Hits: 106
Sec., Min. of Food, Government of BD & ors Vs. Md. Sirajuddin Ahmed & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....nt: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Secretary, Ministry of Food, Government of Bangladesh and others..................Appellants Vs. Md. Sirajuddin Ahmed and others......................Respondents Judgment June 20......aka 3,000 in favour of the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 within two months from the date of receipt of this order by the trial Court, in default, this appeal shall stand dismissed. Ed. ......k on remand to the trial Court for giving reasonable opportunity to the appellant to contest the suit……..……(13 & 14) Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record— For th......t Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed JR Mudassir Husain CJ Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Secretary, Ministry of Food, Government of Bangladesh and others..................Appellants Vs. Md. Sirajuddin Ahmed and others.........Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 66
Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abu Dakar and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Housing and Settlement and ors....... ... ......Petitioners vs Md. Abu Dakar and others... ..................Respondents Judgment February 16th, 2......lotment of a plot to the writ petitioner. 5. So, there is no cogent reason to interfere with the decision of the High Court Division. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ors....... ... ......Petitioners vs Md. Abu Dakar and others... ..................Respondents Judgment February 16th, 2005 Lawyers Involved: Abdur Razaque Khan, Additional Attorney-General, instructed by B Hossain, Advocate-on-Record—For the Petit......on (Civil) Present : Md Ruhul Amin J Md Tafazzul Islam J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Housing and Settlement and ors....... ... ......Petitioners vs Md. Abu Dakar and others... ....Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 72
11161114111311121110110411021101109310921089108510831082108010791077107610751074