Search Options
Judgment Advanced Search
Rasheda Begum Vs. M.M. Nurussafa and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ......e Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000 and shall also not be a subject matter for adjudication in the Other Class Suit No. 41 of 2000. 15. In the result the appeal is allowed with costs. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzal Islam J Rasheda Begum………………….....Appellant Vs M.M. Nurussafa and others .........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- ......ip;…….....Appellant Vs M.M. Nurussafa and others .........Respondents Judgement May 2, 2004. Cases Referred to- Guiness Peat (Trading) Limited Vs. Md. Fazlur Rahman, 12 BLD (AD) 247; Abdul Jalil and others Vs. Islamic Bank Bangladesh Ltd., 20..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 122
Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer Bangladesh Railway Vs. A.P.M. Basher, Advocate & ors, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... some other land belonged to his father and the same was requisitioned in L.A. Case No. 4 of 1950-51, that the land in suit measuring .13 acre has been leased out on October 14, 1984 to him by the Ministry-of Works for 99 years and thereupon he got the land recorded in his name and paying rent,......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ...... Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Saleh Ahmed, Estate Officer, Bangladesh Railway……………......Appellant Vs A.P.M. Basher, Advocate and others .........Respondents Judgement February 25, 2004. Lawyers Involved:......wed. The suit is sent back to the trial Court for disposal in the light of the direction made hereinabove. The record of the trial Court be sent down. There is no order as to costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 32
A.N.M. Gaziul Azim Vs. M.A. Kader and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......mirul Kabir Chowdhury J A.N.M. Gaziul Azim………………………………….....Petitioner Vs M.A. Kader and others..........................Respondents. Judgement January 1, 2005. La......ny error and as such no interference is called for. 7. In this view of the matter we do not find any substance in this petition and accordingly the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others Vs. Kad Banu and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ...... judgment and decree dated 26.01.1994 passed by the High Court Division in 2nd Appeal No. 1204 of 1965 is hereby set aside and those of the court of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......ourt of appeal below are restored. Ed. ......Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Md. Abu Hanif Mia and others…………Appellants Vs. Kad Banu and others........Respondents Judgement February 17, 2004. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. Bangladesh, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....ip;…………………………..Appellant Versus Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondents Judgement: July 31, 2005. ......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ......llip;…………………..Appellant Versus Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, and others ..............Respondents Judgement: July 31, 2005. Lawyers Involve......ourt as not abandoned property. 21. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed with costs. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 38
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... pleader has argued that to obtain opinion of various authorities concern before filing an appeal sometimes may reasonably be expected to elapse. Specifically the learned G. P. has mentioned that the Ministry of Land wanted the file for taking decision to prefer appeal, which remained in the Ministr...... argued that to obtain opinion of various authorities concern before filing an appeal sometimes may reasonably be expected to elapse. Specifically the learned G. P. has mentioned that the Ministry of Land wanted the file for taking decision to prefer appeal, which remained in the Ministry for ling t......ate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh………....Appellant Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others............Respondents Judgement June 21, 2005. Case Referred to- Abdul Kader......preme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Government of Bangladesh………....Appellant Vs. Hasrat Mohani and others............Respondents Judgement June 21, 2005. Case Referr..Category: Limitation Law | Date: | Hits: 156
A. Motaleb Howlader Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
.... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ...... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ......p; Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J.-The petitioner A. Motaleb Howlader seeks leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 27.01.2004 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court Division in Criminal Miscel...... while passing the impugned judgment and order. We do not therefore find any reason to sustain the attack. 7. The petition, under the aforesaid circumstance, stands dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 47
Md. Saidur Rahman Shahid Vs. State, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ......r Rahman Shahid………………………………...Petitioner Vs The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and another…………… …...Respondents. Judgement ......he accused petitioner could not show any illegality or irregularity in the judgment and order of the High Court Division and as such the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 102
Robert Pinaru Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others, 2006, 35 CLC (AD)
....he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ......he appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of the trial Court is restored. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: I ADC (2004) 421. ......rt Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J K. M. Hassan J Robert Pinaru....................Appellant Vs. Moulana Habibur Rahman and others…….....Respondents Judgment April 7, 2003. Cases Referr...... (2004) 421. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Abdus Salam Vs. Samala Bibi and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. 10. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ......nations offered for condonation of delay are far from satisfactory. 10. In the aforesaid premises, this petition merits no consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Ed. ...... Present Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K.M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abdus Salam alias Md. Abdus Salam................Petitioner Vs. Samala Bibi and others.........Respondents Judgment May 22, 2002. Lawyers Involved: ......n (Criminal) Present Mainur Reza Chowdhury J K.M. Hasan J Syed J. R. Mudassir Husain J Abdus Salam alias Md. Abdus Salam................Petitioner Vs. Samala Bibi and others.........Respondents Judgment May 22, 2002. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 37
Hotel Agrabad Ltd. CTG Vs. Chairman, First Labour Court, Khatungonj, CTG & ors, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....ce the impugned Judgment passed in the aforesaid two writ petitions deserves no interference by this court. Both the appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......ce the impugned Judgment passed in the aforesaid two writ petitions deserves no interference by this court. Both the appeals are accordingly dismissed without any order as to costs. Ed. ......l Abedin J Hotel Agrabad Ltd. Chittagong, represented by its Managing Director........Appellant (In both the cases) Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Khatungonj, Chittagong and others .......Respondents Judgment January10, 2007 Case Referred to- ......ad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Joynul Abedin J Hotel Agrabad Ltd. Chittagong, represented by its Managing Director........Appellant (In both the cases) Vs. The Chairman, First Labour Court, Khatungonj, Chittagong and others .......Respondents ..Category: Labour and Industrial Law | Date: | Hits: 95
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, and others.....Petitioners. ......ground to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 61 DLR (AD) (2009) 111. ...... Amin J MM Ruhul Amin J Md. Tafazzul Islam J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, and others.....Petitioners. Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder.................m J The Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, and others.....Petitioners. Vs. Md. Fariduddin Talukder...................................Respondent Judgment ..Category: Civil Law | Date: | Hits: 104
Md. Faruque Reza and another Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......is hereby approved. 9. In view of the above, there is no substance in the submission of the learned Advocate-on- Record for the petitioners. The petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Supreme Court Appellate Division (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Hossain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Faruque Reza and another..............Petitioners. Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others................ (Civil) Present: Syed J.R. Mudassir Hossain CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J Amirul Kabir Chowdhury J Md. Faruque Reza and another..............Petitioners. Vs. Most.Hossena Ara Begum and others.................Respondents. Judgment M..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 34
Guru Charan Mondal and others Vs. Sree Bhaba Sindhu Sarkar and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....not prevail over the title of the plaintiffs, we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......not prevail over the title of the plaintiffs, we do not find any reason to interfere with the judgment of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the leave petition is dismissed. Ed. ......ed. Ed. ......vision (Civil) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin J Abu Sayeed Ahammed J Md. Hamidul Haque J Guru Charan Mondal and others..........................Petitioners Vs. Sree Bhaba Sindhu Sarkar and others..................Respondents Judgment ..Category: Procedural Law | Date: | Hits: 113
State Vs. Omar Ahmed, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
.... are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in transferring the case from Druta Bichar Tribunal, Barisal to Khulna. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. ...... are of the view that the High Court Division was not justified in transferring the case from Druta Bichar Tribunal, Barisal to Khulna. The appeal is accordingly allowed. Ed. ...... 2004. Judgment: M. M. Ruhul Amin J. - This appeal by leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 07.03.2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 188...... Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M.M. Ruhul Amin J The State……………………..Appellant Vs. Omar Ahmed……………..Respondent. Judgment D..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 41
Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation And Others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....section 9(2) of the Act". 13. It may be mentioned that in the aforementioned reported case the orders of retirement in respect of the Respondents were passed by the government in the Ministry of Civil Aviation and Tourism and because of that order of retirement was found valid. ...... The appeal is allowed with the aforesaid direction to the Respondents. There is no order as to costs. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 60 DLR (AD) (2008) 21. ......hul Amin J Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq……………………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation and Others………..Respondent Judgment September 3, 2007. ...... Mohammad Fazlul Karim J M. M. Ruhul Amin J Capt. Mir Mazharul Huq……………………………….Appellant Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation and Others………..Respondent Ju..Category: Employment/Service Law | Date: | Hits: 79
Alauddin Bhuiyan (Md) Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....nd the allegations leveled against him. 7. In view of above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ......o defalcation of money, therefore, the impugned judgment and order is liable to be set aside and the appellant set a liberty. 6. Admittedly, the accused-petitioner, a Nazir in the office of Tarail Land Revenue office was officially entrusted with the responsibility of collecting lease money of ......ocate, instructed by Md Sajjadul Huq, Advocate-on- Record—For the Respondent. Not represented—Respondent (State). Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 13 of 2005. (From the judgment and order dated 25th July 2004 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No. 1296 of 1994......nd the allegations leveled against him. 7. In view of above, we find no substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Anti-Corruption Laws | Date: | Hits: 90
Sahera Khatun & others Vs. Abdur Rahim SK and another, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....try. In the background of the discussions made hereinabove, we find no merit in the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 19 BLT (AD) (2011) 21. ...... the petition of the aforementioned miscellaneous case, being Miscellaneous Case No 337 of 1973 and the order said to have been passed in the miscellaneous case before the Assistant Commissioner (Land), Mirzapur for correction of the record of rights in their favour and thereupon notice was serv...... Appellate Division (Criminal) Present: Md. Ruhul Amin CJ Md. Fazlul Karim J MM Ruhul Amin J Sahera Khatun & others…………………..Appellants Vs. Abdur Rahim SK and another............Respondent Judgment August 22, 2007. Cases Referred to- Idrish ......1) 21. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 48
Abdus Salam Mollah Vs. State, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....trial Court and affirmed by the High Court Division. The appellant be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 14. ......trial Court and affirmed by the High Court Division. The appellant be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 14. ......m vs State 27 DLR (AD) 29; Babor All Molla vs State 44 DLR (AD) 10; Ustar Ali vs State 1998 BLD (AD) 43 = 3 BLC (AD) 53; Joygun Bibi vs State 12 DLR (SC) 156; Maqbool Hossain vs State 12 DLR (SC) 217 and Kashmira Singh vs State of Madhya Pradesh 1952 SCR (India) 526. Lawyers Involved: ABM Nuru......trial Court and affirmed by the High Court Division. The appellant be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in any other connection. Ed. This Case is also Reported in: 20 BLT (AD) (2012) 14. ..Category: Criminal Law | Date: | Hits: 63
Shahanaz Begum Vs. Md. Kutubuddin and others, 2008, 37 CLC (AD)
....rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ......Division (Civil) Present: Md Ruhul Amin J Md Fazlul Karim J M.M. Ruhul Amin J Shahanaz Begum.....................Petitioner Vs Md. Kutubuddin and others.......Respondents Judgment August 29, 2007. Lawyers Involved: ......rused the materials on record. 8. We d0 not find any reason to interfere with the judgment and order of the High Court Division. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Ed. ..Category: Property Law | Date: | Hits: 31